Abstract
Two bacterial strains, KH365_2T and KH569_7, were isolated from the cecum contents of wild-derived house mice. The strains were characterized as Gram-negative, rod-shaped, strictly anaerobic, and non-motile. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that both strains were most closely related to Bacteroides uniformis ATCC 8492T. Whole genome sequences of KH365_2T and KH569_7 strains have a DNA G + C content of 46.02% and 46.03% mol, respectively. Most morphological and biochemical characteristics did not differ between the newly isolated strains and classified Bacteroides strains. However, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) and dDNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values clearly distinguished the two strains from described members of the genus Bacteroides. Here, we present the phylogeny, morphology, and physiology of a novel species of the genus Bacteroides and propose the name Bacteroides muris sp. nov., with KH365_2T (DSM 114231T = CCUG 76277T) as type strain.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The mammalian intestinal tract is densely populated by microorganisms that share an ancient evolutionary history with the host (Bäckhed et al. 2005). Two dominant phyla of the intestinal microbiomes of humans and mice are the Gram-negative Bacteroidetes and Gram-positive Firmicutes (Ley et al. 2005, 2008; Reyes et al. 2010). One of the prominent genera of Bacteroidetes, Bacteroides, is linked to health-related traits of the host (Wang et al. 2020), provides protection against pathogens (Hecht et al. 2016; Li et al. 2017), and modulates host immunity (Round and Mazmanian 2009; Round et al. 2011). Moreover, Bacteroides are metabolically versatile and offer key benefits to the host, including the breakdown of dietary carbohydrates (Comstock 2009). Because of their high abundance and medical relevance, Bacteroides species have become important models for understanding gut microbial ecology and the role of the microbiota in health and disease (Bencivenga-Barry et al. 2020; Donaldson et al. 2020).
The first Bacteroides sp. was described at the end of the nineteenth century (Bacteroides fragilis) (Veillon and Zuber 1898). Since then, 35 different Bacteroides species have been isolated, characterized, and validated (www.bacterio.net/bacteroides.html (last checked on June 16, 2022); García-López et al., 2019). A considerable number of species that were formerly classified as part of the genus Bacteroides were recently assigned to new genera (García-López et al. 2019). Recent microbiome studies include the genome sequence of a yet unclassified Bacteroides sp. (assembly accession GCA_004793475.1) that is referred to as Bacteroides sp. NM69_E16B (NCBI taxonomy) or Bacteroides sp002491635 (GTDB taxonomy) (Afrizal et al. 2022; Beresford-Jones et al. 2022; Wong et al. 2022). This genome sequence indicates the existence of an additional Bacteroides species, which is not yet phenotypically characterized and could be important for understanding the diversity and evolution of the Bacteroides genus.
Here, we describe strains KH365_2T and KH569_7, which were isolated from the cecum of wild-derived house mice (Mus musculus musculus) at the animal facility of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Plön, Germany. The two strains exhibit phenotypic characteristics of Bacteroides and are close relatives to the independently isolated NM69_E16B strain. All three strains are similar enough to belong to the same species and sufficiently distinct from classified Bacteroides species to propose Bacteroides muris as their species name, which was recently independently suggested on a preprint server for one of the three strains (Afrizal et al. 2022).
Materials and methods
Isolation and preservation
Strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 were isolated from the cecal contents of two Mus musculus musculus house mice. The mice were wild-derived and maintained as outbred colonies in the animal facility at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Plön, Germany.
Isolation and cultivation of bacteria from the mouse gut were performed in July 2018. Cecum content was collected from freshly sacrificed mice and stored at – 70 °C in anaerobic Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Merck) containing 20% (v/v) glycerol. To isolate individual strains, 100 µl of the homogenized cecum content sample was serially diluted in 900 µl of anaerobic BHI medium and shortly mixed by vortexing. Next, 50 µl of the dilution was spread onto Schaedler anaerobe kanamycin vancomycin selective agar with lysed horse blood (SKV) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). After incubation for 72 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions, single colonies were picked and transferred onto new SKV plates. Single isolates were preserved at – 70 °C in anaerobic BHI medium containing 20% glycerol. All the isolation and cultivation steps were performed under strictly anaerobic conditions in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products Inc.) with an atmosphere containing 5% H2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2. Anaerobic media were supplemented with 0.5 g/l l-cysteine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) added after autoclaving, to remove oxygen from the solution. All the materials and media were placed into the anaerobic chamber on the day prior to an experiment. The strains were submitted to the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) and to the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (CCUG). The type strain B. uniformis ATCC 8492 T was obtained from the DSMZ.
16S rRNA gene phylogeny
Near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences for both strains (1527 bp) were extracted from the respective whole genome sequences using the ContEst16S tool (Lee et al. 2017). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the two novel strains were aligned against 35 Bacteroides type strains with validly published names (www.bacterio.net/genus/bacteroides.html) using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004). Neighbour-joining (Saitou and Nei 1987), maximum-likelihood (Felsenstein 1981) and maximum-parsimony (Kolaczkowski and Thomton 2004) trees were constructed using PAUP4 (Swofford 2002) with bootstrap analysis of 1000 random replicates and Prevotella bryantii as the outgroup.
16S rRNA gene comparison
The 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 were compared to the other closely related Bacteroides type strains, and the sequence similarity was determined using progressive pairwise aligner in Geneious Prime 2022.1.1 (https://www.geneious.com).
Genome sequencing
The genomic DNA from pure cultures of strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 was extracted using the DNeasy UltraClean Microbial Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples were prepared according to the Illumina Nextera XT protocol and the final DNA library was sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 system using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 with 300 cycles. Genome assemblies were generated using SPAdes 3.14 genome assembler (Bankevich et al. 2012) and annotated using Prokka (Seemann 2014).
Genome analysis and comparison
The genomes of KH365_2T and KH569_7 strains were analyzed using the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) (Meier-Kolthoff and Göker 2019). The pairwise digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between the two strains and their 19 most closely related Bacteroides type strains (automatically determined by TYGS) were calculated. The degree of genomic similarity between KH365_2T and KH569_7 strains and closely related species was estimated using the average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculator (Yoon et al. 2017) with the species delineation threshold of < 95% for orthoANIu values. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were predicted using antiSMASH 6.0 (Blin et al. 2021) with the detection relaxed option.
Microscopy
To analyze the colony morphology of the strains, they were grown on CM plates for 72 h at 37 °C, and the bright field images were captured using an Axio Zoom V16 microscope (Zeiss) at 56 × magnification. The size ranges of bacterial colonies were determined based on the measurement of five different colonies for each strain.
The cell morphology and ultrastructure were determined by conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM). For negative staining, drops of bacterial cultures, grown for 24 h, were incubated on copper, 400 mesh, formvar- and poly-L-lysine-coated grids to allow bacteria to attach. After a short wash on several drops of dH2O, grids were incubated with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate < 10 s and then the excess uranyl acetate was blotted and grids air-dried. For epoxy resin embedding and ultrastructural analysis on thin sections, bacterial cultures grown for 24 h were fixed by adding 2% glutaraldehyde (GA) in 200 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), pH 7.4 at a 1:1 ratio. After 2 h of initial fixation, bacteria were pelleted, resuspended in 1% GA in 200 mM HEPES, and stored in the fixative until further processing. Cells were embedded in low-melting point agarose, post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide prepared in 1.5% potassium ferricyanide/dH2O for 1 h on ice, and contrasted en-bloc with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate for 2 h at room temperature. Dehydration was performed with an ethanol series 50–70–80–90–96–100–100%, each for minimum 15 min, followed by acetone, 2 × 30 min. Tissue was progressively infiltrated with epoxy resin and polymerized at 70 °C for 2 days. Ultra-thin, 80-nm-thin sections were cut using a Leica UC7 ultramicrotome, deposited on copper, slot, formvar-coated grids, and contrasted with saturated aqueous uranyl acetate for 10 min, followed by 0.03% lead nitrate for 3 min. All grids were imaged in a Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN transmission electron microscope (FEI, now Thermo Fisher Scientific), operated at 80 kV, and equipped with a LaB6 filament, an Eagle 4 k × 4 k CCD camera, and a TIA software (both FEI, now Thermo Fisher Scientific). Bacterial cell size ranges were determined based on the measurement of six different negatively stained cells of each strain, selected to represent overall size variation (from the smallest to the biggest cell).
Physiological analyses
Gram-staining was performed using a Gram-stain kit (Carl Roth) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cell motility was tested in semi-solid agar (0.5%) as previously described (Tittsler and Sandholzer 1936). Catalase activity was determined by adding 3% (v/v) H2O2 to fresh cells, and oxidase activity was determined using oxidase strips (Merck). Bacterial growth was evaluated on CM agar plates with different NaCl concentrations (0.5–5% (w/v) intervals of 0.5%), at different temperatures (18, 20, 25, 32, 37, 42, 45 and 47 °C), and in liquid CM medium at various pH (4.0–10, at intervals of 1.0 pH unit). The pH range of the basal medium was adjusted using the following buffers: 100 mM acetate buffer (for pH 4.0–5.0), 100 mM phosphate buffer (for pH 6.0–8.0) and 100 mM NaHCO3/Na2CO3 buffer (for pH 9.0–10.0) (Sorokin 2005). The pH values after autoclaving showed only minor changes.
Metabolic analyses
The metabolic repertoire of KH365_2T, KH569_7, and B. uniformis ATCC 8492 T was studied by performing a series of assays using Biolog AN MicroPlates™ (Biolog, Hayward, CA), following the protocol provided by the manufacturer with minor modifications. The strains were grown on CM agar under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 5 days to obtain colonies of sufficient size. Individual colonies were picked and inoculated in AN Inoculating Fluid (Biolog, Hayward, CA) such that the turbidity (600 nm) of 0.05–0.1 was achieved. The Inoculating Fluid was then pipetted into Biolog AN MicroPlates™ (100 μl per well), and the initial turbidity (590 nm) was measured using a Spark® microplate reader (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland). The plates were then incubated in anaerobic jars at 37 °C for 5 days, after which the final turbidity (590 nm) was measured. The difference between the final and initial turbidity, ΔT (590 nm), was used to determine the extent to which each of the metabolites were utilized by the strains. The metabolites differentially utilized by the strains were identified by testing whether the difference in ΔT for each metabolite was significantly different between each pair of strains (KH365_2T vs. B. uniformis ATCC 8492 T, KH569_7 vs. B. uniformis ATCC 8492 T, and KH365_2T vs. KH569_7) using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Repositories
The GenBank/ENA/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 are ON325392 and ON361133, respectively. The GenBank/ENA/DDBJ accessions numbers for the genome sequences of strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 are JAMZED000000000 and JAMZEE000000000, respectively.
Graphic illustrations
Some figures were created using BioRender.com.
Results and discussion
Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences
The taxonomy of the isolated strains was determined based on their 16S rRNA gene sequences after an initial taxonomic analysis of their whole genome sequences.
First, the genomes of KH365_2T and KH569_7 were uploaded to the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) (Meier-Kolthoff and Göker 2019) to check whether the strains are classified as members of an already known bacterial species. The genome sequences of KH365_2T and KH569_7 did not match any sequence in the database and were identified as members of a potentially novel species of the genus Bacteroides. These results were further supported by pairwise digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between the two strains and their 19 most closely related Bacteroides type strains (automatically determined by TYGS), which ranged from 21.7 to 49.2% and were all below the threshold of microbial species delineation (70%). The pairwise dDDH value between the strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 was 87% (Table S1), indicating that they belonged to the same species (Meier-Kolthoff et al. 2014).
To build a phylogeny of Bacteroides species including the two strains KH365_2T and KH569_7, 16S rRNA gene sequences were extracted and compared against those of 35 Bacteroides type strains with validly published names (www.bacterio.net/genus/bacteroides.html). KH365_2T and KH569_7 clustered in a neighbor-joining tree within the genus Bacteroides (cluster represented by KH365_2T) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, they formed a clade with Bacteroides uniformis ATCC 8492 T and Bacteroides rodentium JCM 16496 T. These results were consistent with the topologies of maximum-likelihood and maximum-parsimony trees (Figs. S1 and S2). Pairwise sequence analysis of the full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences between the novel strains and other Bacteroides type strains revealed that KH365_2T and KH569_7 had the highest sequence similarity to B. uniformis ATCC 8492 T (accession no. AB050110, 96.83%), followed by B. rodentium JCM 16496T (AB547646, 96.75%) and Bacteroides fluxus YIT 12057T (AB490802, 94.33%). These values were below the species delineation threshold of 98.7% (Goebel and Stackebrandt 1994). Moreover, 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 was 99.86%, supporting the results of the whole genome analysis by TYGS that these two strains might represent the same novel Bacteroides taxon. A comparison between the herein described strains KH365_2T and KH569_7, and the strain Bacteroides sp. NM69_E16B revealed a sequence identity above the species delineation threshold (99.8%), indicating that all three strains belong to the same novel taxon.
Genome characteristics
To study genomic features of KH365_2T and KH569_7, whole genomes were sequenced and analyzed. The genomic differences between the two strains to other Bacteroides species, which had already been observed in 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. 1), were additionally determined at the level of the whole genome. The dDDH values between KH365_2T and KH569_7 and their 19 most closely related Bacteroides type strains ranged from 21.7 to 49.2%, which is below the threshold of microbial species delineation (70%) (Meier-Kolthoff et al. 2014). The pairwise dDDH value between the two novel strains was 87% (Table S1) and thereby above the threshold. Similarly, OrthoANIu values between the novel strains and type strains of closely related species were below the species delineation thresholds, ranging from 80.07 to 80.22% similarity with B. fluxus YIT 12057T and 92.01% to 91.85% similarity with B. uniformis ATCC 8492T (Table S1). These results further support the assignment of KH365_2T and KH569_7 to the same novel species. Moreover, the comparison of dDDH and orthoANIu confirm the classification of Bacteroides sp. NM69_E16B in the same species as the herein described strains (Table S2).
The draft genomes of KH365_2T and KH569_7 were 4 164 660 bp and 4 177 920 bp long, with 46.02% and 46.03% mol G + C content, respectively (Table S1). Coding DNA sequences (CDSs), rRNAs, and tRNAs were annotated in the draft genomes (Table S3). A total of 3886 and 3903 CDSs were predicted for KH365_2T and KH569_7, respectively. Further genome mining revealed 101 proteins involved in polysaccharide transport and degradation encoded in the genome of KH365_2T, while only 75 were identified in the genome of KH569_7. Moreover, several beta-lactamases were detected in the draft genomes of both strains, potentially indicating resistance to some antibiotics. The numbers of identified rRNAs and tRNAs in KH365_2T were 6 and 66, respectively. Strain KH569_7 had 5 rRNAs and 48 tRNAs in its genome. These results are within the range of the number of rRNAs and tRNAs identified in closely related Bacteroides species (Table S3). Both strains, KH365_2T and KH569_7, harbored two predicted gene clusters each for the synthesis of secondary metabolites: ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptide classes (RiPPs) and respective recognition elements.
Taken together, whole genome sequences confirm the classification of the two strains distinct from known Bacteroides species, predict a function in polysaccharide metabolism among others, and reveal genomic differences between the two strains.
Morphological characterization
To characterize the morphology of KH365_2T and KH569_7, we imaged bacterial colonies and cells microscopically. The colonies of KH365_2T were smooth, creamy, circular, convex, and approximately 0.8–1.0 mm in diameter (Fig. 2a). Their appearance was similar to colonies of B. uniformis ATCC 8492T (Fig. 2a). The colony morphology of KH569_7 was analogous to the strain KH365_2T and B. uniformis type strain, except for a smaller colony size (0.6–0.8 mm in diameter) and slightly brighter color when grown under the same conditions (Fig. 2a). The difference in colony size might be explained by differences in growth, which are also observed when growing the strains in liquid media (Fig. 2b).
Next, TEM was performed to analyze the cell morphology and ultrastructure (Figs. 2c, d; S3, S4). Negative staining of live bacteria that had been cultured for 24 h revealed rod-shaped cells in all three strains in the size range of 1.62–3.38 × 0.80–0.85 µm for the strain KH365_2T, 1.00–2.60 × 0.80–0.87 µm for the strain KH569_7, and 1.13–2.08 × 0.85–0.92 µm for B. uniformis ATCC 8492 T. Notably, some B. muris KH365_2 cells could grow unusually long, up to 9 µm in length, which was not detected in the other two strains (Fig. S3). We observed dividing cells showing the typical constriction characteristic for the division of Gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 2c). All three strains produced outer membrane vesicles (Fig. 2c). Thin sections of resin embedded bacteria were used to characterize the ultrastructure of the cell envelope (Figs. 2d; S4). In all three strains (KH365_2T, KH569_7 and B. uniformis ATCC 8492T), the cell envelope consists of multiple layers: the cytoplasmic membrane, the periplasm, the outer membrane, and the microcapsule external to the outer membrane. Between independent samples of the same strain, and even within single populations, we observed bacteria with different structures of the microcapsule (Fig. 2d). This suggests that the phase variation in the capsule production observed earlier in intestinal Bacteroides species (Coyne and Comstock 2008) is also present in the newly described strains. The capsule could appear as i) one fringed layer (Fig. 2d i), ii) an electron dense layer with an additional, peripheral compact layer (AL, based on a description by Kornman and Holt (1981)) (Fig. 2d ii), or iii) like in (ii), but with an extra fringed layer beyond the AL (Fig. 2d iii). In KH365_2T and B. uniformis ATCC 8492T, all three variations of the capsule were observed, whereas in KH569_7, only (ii) and (iii) were detected (Fig. S4).
In brief, these images show rod-shaped cells, illustrate the ultrastructure of the multi-layered cell envelope, reveal the production of outer membrane vesicles, and demonstrate variable production of the microcapsule in a single bacterial population. The two B. muris strains share most morphological features in common and yet differ slightly.
Bacterial physiology
Next, we studied the physiological and biochemical characteristics of the two strains. First, their Gram-stain was assessed as a basic parameter to differentiate between bacteria. KH365_2T and KH569_7 were Gram-negative (Table 1), which was to be expected based on the ultrastructure of the cell envelope (Fig. 2d) and is consistent with Gram-negative staining of B. uniformis ATCC 8492T and other members of the genus Bacteroides.
Second, multiple measurements were performed to study the conditions under which the strains grow. When grown as stab cultures in aerobic conditions, KH365_2T, KH569_7, and B. uniformis ATCC 8492T strains grew only at the bottom of the tube, suggesting that these bacteria are strictly anaerobic. The two strains KH365_2T and KH569_7 were calatase- and oxidase-negative, as was the closely related B. uniformis ATCC 8492T strain (Table 1). The KH365_2T strain was able to grow in the presence of 0.5–2.0% (w/v) NaCl, similar to B. uniformis ATCC 8492T (optimal growth at 0.5–1% (w/v)), whereas the KH569_7 strain could tolerate as little as 0.5% (w/v) NaCl (Table 1). Similar to B. uniformis ATCC 8492T, optimal growth of KH365_2T and KH569_7 was observed at 32–37 °C; while KH365_2T was able to grow at 20–42 °C and KH569_7 at 20–37 °C (Table 1). All three strains grew at pH 5–10 with slight differences in the optimum pH (Table 1).
Third, the metabolic repertoire of KH365_2T and KH569_7 was systematically studied by performing a series of Biolog assays. We measured the extent to which 95 carbon sources were utilized by the novel strains and B. uniformis ATCC 8492T (Fig. S5). Two metabolites, L-alanyl-l-histidine and i-erythritol, were differently utilized by KH365_2T and KH569_7, compared to their closest relative B. uniformis ATCC 8492T, i.e., these are metabolites that are better utilized by B. uniformis ATCC 8492T than by either of the novel strains (Fig. 2e). We further observed differences in the metabolism between the two strains of the novel species. Nineteen different metabolites, including lactic acid and some sugars, among others, were differentially utilized by KH365_2T and KH569_7 (Fig. 2f), indicating a high degree of intra-specific diversity. Notably, all 19 of these metabolites were significantly better utilized by KH365_2T than by KH569_7, and 12 of them were utilized similarly by KH365_2T and B. uniformis ATCC 8492T.
Finally, we checked for motility of the strains. All were non-motile (Table 1), consistent with reports on other Bacteroides species (Lakhdari et al. 2011).
In summary, the physiology of the two strains is largely consistent with what might be expected from a Bacteroides species. Both strains lack some metabolic features of the closely related B. uniformis and show considerable intraspecific variation.
Conclusions
The results of the genomic and phenotypic analysis suggest that the two herein described strains, KH365_2T and KH569_7, in addition to the independently isolated strain NM69_E16B (Afrizal et al. 2022), represent a novel species of the genus Bacteroides, for which the name Bacteroides muris sp. nov. is proposed. The impact of this species on the intestinal ecology will need to be resolved more detailed in future studies. Based on our data, we speculate that B. muris contributes to the carbohydrate metabolism and potentially uses peptides with antimicrobial activity to interact with other members of the gut microbiota or to mediate colonization resistance towards pathogens. Differences in growth, morphology, and metabolism between the strains are an indication of intraspecific diversity. This novel bacterial taxon might be present in mammals beyond mice, including humans, and holds promise to better understand the evolution of the Bacteroides genus as an important member of a healthy mammalian microbiota.
Description of Bacteroides muris sp. nov.
Bacteroides muris sp. nov. (mu’ris. L. gen. n. muris of a mouse).
Cells are Gram-negative, rod-shaped (1.62–3.38 × 0.80–0.85 µm), obligately anaerobic, non-spore-forming, and non-motile. Bacteria of this species are negative for catalase and oxidase. Colonies have a creamy, circular, and convex morphology after cultivation on CM plates at 37 °C for 72 h. Growth is observed at temperatures of 20–42 °C (optimum, 32–37 °C), at a pH of 5–10 (optimum, pH 7) and in presence of 0.5–2.0% (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 0.5%). This strain metabolizes d-glucosaminic acid, d-trehalose, d-cellobiose and beta-methyl-D-galactoside. It is not able to utilize carbon sources, such as l-methionine, thymidine-5-mono-phoshate, glycerol, and d-malic acid.
The type strain, KH365_2T (DSM 114231T = CCUG 76277T), was isolated from the cecal content of a wild-derived M. m. musculus house mouse.
The 16S rRNA gene and genome sequences have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases under the accession numbers ON325392 and JAMZED000000000, respectively.
The Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JAMZED000000000. The version described in this paper is version JAMZED010000000.
Abbreviations
- dDDH:
-
Digital DNA DNA hybridization
- ANI:
-
Average nucleotide identity
- TEM:
-
Transmission electron microscopy
References
Afrizal A, Jennings SA V, Hitch TCA, et al (2022) Enhanced cultured diversity of the mouse gut microbiota enables custom-made synthetic communities. bioRxiv 2022.03.07.483007. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.07.483007
Bäckhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL et al (2005) Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 307:1915–1920. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104816
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D et al (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
Bencivenga-Barry NA, Lim B, Herrera CM, et al (2020) Genetic manipulation of wild human gut Bacteroides. J Bacteriol 202:. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00544-19
Beresford-Jones BS, Forster SC, Stares MD et al (2022) The mouse gastrointestinal bacteria catalogue enables translation between the mouse and human gut microbiotas via functional mapping. Cell Host Microbe 30:124-138.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.12.003
Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM et al (2021) antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W29–W35. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab335
Comstock LE (2009) Importance of glycans to the host-Bacteroides mutualism in the mammalian intestine. Cell Host Microbe 5:522–526
Coyne MJ, Comstock LE (2008) Niche-specific features of the intestinal Bacteroidales. J Bacteriol 190:736–742. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01559-07
Donaldson GP, Chou WC, Manson AL et al (2020) Spatially distinct physiology of Bacteroides fragilis within the proximal colon of gnotobiotic mice. Nat Microbiol 5:746–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0683-3
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Felsenstein J (1981) (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 176(17):368–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01734359
García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ et al (2019) Analysis of 1000 type-strain genomes improves taxonomic classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 10:2083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02083/bibtex
Goebel BM, Stackebrandt E (1994) Cultural and phylogenetic analysis of mixed microbial populations found in natural and commercial bioleaching environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1614. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.5.1614-1621.1994
Hecht AL, Casterline BW, Earley ZM, et al (2016) Strain competition restricts colonization of an enteric pathogen and prevents colitis. EMBO Rep 17:1281–1291. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642282
Kolaczkowski B (2004) Thomton JW (2004) Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nat 4317011(431):980–984. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02917
Kornman KS, Holt SC (1981) Physiological and ultrastructural characterization of a new Bacteroides species (Bacteroides capillus) isolated from severe localized periodontitis. J Periodontal Res 16:542–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0765.1981.tb02016.x
Lakhdari O, Tap J, Béguet-Crespel F et al (2011) Identification of NF-κB modulation capabilities within human intestinal commensal bacteria. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:282356. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/282356
Lee I, Chalita M, Ha SM et al (2017) ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:2053–2057. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001872
Ley RE, Bäckhed F, Turnbaugh P et al (2005) Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:11070. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504978102
Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C et al (2008) Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320:1647–1651. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155725
Li Z, Deng H, Zhou Y et al (2017) Bioluminescence imaging to track Bacteroides fragilis inhibition of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection in mice. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00170
LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature. https://www.bacterio.net/genus/bacteroides
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M (2019) TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J et al (2014) Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci 9:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1944-3277-9-2
Reyes A, Haynes M, Hanson N et al (2010) Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature 466:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09199
Round JL, Lee SM, Li J, et al (2011) The toll-like receptor 2 pathway establishes colonization by a commensal of the human microbiota. Science 332:974–977. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2515
Round JL, Mazmanian SK (2009) The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9:313–323
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
Seemann T (2014) Genome analysis Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. 30:2068–2069. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153
Sorokin DY (2005) Is there a limit for high-pH life? Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1405–1406. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63737-0
Swofford DL (2002) PAUP4 phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. In: Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts
Tittsler RP, Sandholzer LA (1936) The use of semi-solid agar for the detection of bacterial motility. J Bacteriol 31:575. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.31.6.575-580.1936
Veillon A, Zuber A (1898) Recherches sur quelques microbes strictement anaérobies et leur rôle en pathologie. Arch Med Exp 10:517–545
Wang C, Zhao J, Zhang H et al (2020) Roles of intestinal Bacteroides in human health and diseases. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 61:3518–3536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1802695
Wong EO-Y, Brownlie EJE, Ng KM et al (2022) The CIAMIB: a large and metabolically diverse collection of inflammation-associated bacteria from the murine gut. Mbio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02949-21
Yoon SH, Ha S min, Lim J, et al (2017) A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Sven Künzel for support with whole genome sequencing, Dr. Alibek Galeev for support with Gram-staining assays, Olga Vogler for help with the strain and genome submissions, the animal caretakers of the MPI for Evolutionary Biology, and Prof. Dr. Thomas Clavel for helpful comments on the manuscript. Furthermore, we acknowledge the Central Microscopy Facility at the Department of Biology, Kiel University. We thank Dr. Thomas Riedel from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) and Prof. Dr. Edward Moore from the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (CCUG) for the strain deposition.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—SFB 1182—project-ID 261376515 to HF (Subproject B4), RAS (Subproject Z2), JFB (Subproject A2), DU (Subproject B4). RU is funded by the International Max–Planck Research School for Evolutionary Biology (IMPRS EvolBio). Work in the Unterweger Lab is supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (grant 01KI2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HF, RU, and UR performed experiments, analyzed the data, and visualized the data; RAS provided resources; MB, JB and DU designed, coordinated and supervised the study. HF drafted the manuscript. All authors read, edited and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fokt, H., Unni, R., Repnik, U. et al. Bacteroides muris sp. nov. isolated from the cecum of wild-derived house mice. Arch Microbiol 204, 546 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03148-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03148-6