Abstract
A polyphasic study was designed to resolve the taxonomic position of isolate MGRD01-02T which was recovered from an acidic hot spring in Indonesia and assigned to the genus Actinospica. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences show that the isolate is most closely related to the type strains of Actinospica acidiphila (98.5%), Actinospica robiniae (97.8%) and Actinospica durhamensis (96.8%). Morphological and chemotaxonomic data underpin the assignment of the isolate to the genus Actinospica as it forms an extensively branched substrate mycelium which carries tufts of white aerial hyphae that differentiate into straight to flexuous chains of cylindrical spores with faint rugose surfaces, contains 2,6-diamino-3-hydroxydiaminopimelic acid in the peptidoglycan, mixtures of hydrogenated menaquinones with nine isoprene units, iso-C 15:O and iso-C 16:O as major fatty acids and phosphatidylethanolamine as the diagnostic phospholipid. Whole-genome sequence analyses show that the isolate, A. durhamensis CSCA 57T and Actinocrinis puniceicyclus DSM 45168T have genome sizes of 7.9, 9.6 and 6.7 Mbp, respectively. A phylogenomic tree shows that they form distinct branches in a well-supported clade, a result supported by associated phenotypic data. Average nucleotide identity and digital DNA:DNA hybridization similarities are below the recommended thresholds for assigning strains to the same species; they also indicate that isolate MGRD01-02T is most closely related to the A. durhamensis and A. robiniae strains. Corresponding amino acid identity and conserved protein data not only support these relationships but also confirm the taxonomic integrity of the genus Actinocrinis. Based on these results, it is proposed that isolate MGRD01-02T (= CCMM B1308T = ICEBB-09T = NCIMB 15218T) be classified in the genus Actinospica as Actinospica acidithermotolerans sp. nov. The draft genome of the isolate and its closest phylogenomic neighbours contain biosynthetic gene clusters with the potential to produce new natural products, notably antibiotics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Novel filamentous neutrophilic actinomycetes isolated from extreme biomes are a rich source of novel antibiotics (Bull and Goodfellow 2019), as exemplified by the discovery of novel polyketide antibiotics from the type strains of Micromonospora maris (Nouioui et al. 2018) and Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii (Busarakam et al. 2014) which were isolated from deep-sea sediment and hyper-arid Atacama Desert soil, respectively. Compared with their neutrophilic counterparts, acidophilic filamentous actinomycetes have rarely featured in bioprospecting campaigns even though they are common in acidic habitats and produce diverse specialized metabolites, notably novel antibiotics (Wang and Donk 2012). In general, acid-loving filamentous actinomycetes encompass acidotolerant (pH range 4.5–7.5., optimal growth around pH 5.5) and obligate acidophiles (pH range 3.5–6.5, optimal growth around pH 4.5 (Williams et al. 1971), as represented by Streptomyces (Xu et al. 2006) and Actinospica species (Cavaletti et al. 2006; Golinska et al. 2015), respectively. Members of these taxa and related genera that contain acidotolerant and acidophilic species are of particular interest as a prospective source of new specialized metabolites as they have large genomes with many biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) associated with the production of novel antibiotics (Nouioui et al. 2018; Świecimska et al. 2020) and hence can be considered as gifted sensu Baltz (2017).
The family Actinospicaceae (Cavaletti et al. 2006) of the order Catenulisporales (Donadio et al. 2015) contains the genera Actinospica (Cavaletti et al. 2006) and Actinocrinis (Kim et al. 2017); the former encompasses three validly published species, including Actinospica robiniae, the nomenclatural type species, and the latter Actinocrinis puniceicyclus. The present study, a continuation of our earlier work on the diversity of filamentous actinomycetes from Indonesian extreme habitats, was designed to establish the taxonomic status of an Actinospica strain isolated from acidic hot spring sediment. Strain MGRD01-02T was compared with the type strains of Actinospica, Actinocrinis and Catenulispora species using genomic and phenotypic data. In addition, the draft genomes of the isolate and its closest relatives were checked for natural product-biosynthetic gene clusters (NP-BGCs) predicted to express for novel specialized metabolites, especially antibiotics. The isolate was shown to belong to a new Actinospica species: the name proposed for this taxon is Actinospica acidithermotolerans with isolate MGRD01-02T as the type strain.
Materials and methods
Isolation, maintenance and cultivation
Strain MGRD01-02T was isolated from a composite sediment sample (pH 3.0 ± 0.05, temperature 41.07 ± 0.2 °C, organic matter 0.06 ± 0.02%, salinity 0.03 ± 0.02) collected from the Mengeruda acidic hot spring (8°42′32.224″S/121°5′12.526″E) in East Nusa Tenggara Province, Flores Island, Indonesia. The strain was isolated on acidified actinomycete isolation agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), pH 4.5, after 2 weeks at 37 °C following inoculation of the plates with particles of the dried sediment. The pH of the isolation medium and other acidified media were adjusted using KH2PO4/HCI, KH2PO4 and KH2PO4/NaOH buffers. The isolate together with Actinospica acidiphila NRRL B-24432T. Actinospica durhamensis CSCA 57T (Golinska et al. 2015), Actinospica robiniae DSM 44927T (Cavaletti et al. 2006), Actinocrinis puniceicyclus DSM 45618T and Catenulispora acidiphila DSM 44928T, were maintained on modified Bennett’s agar at pH 4.5 (Jones 1949) and as a mixture of hyphal fragments and spores in 20% w/v glycerol at − 20 and − 80 °C. The C. acidiphila strain was obtained from the collection of the Northern Regional Research Laboratory, Peoria, USA, the A. durhamensis strain from the personal collection of Michael Goodfellow (Newcastle University) and the remaining strains from the Leibniz Institute, DSMZ German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
Chemotaxonomic and morphological properties
Biomass for the chemotaxonomic studies on isolate MGRDO1-02T was prepared in 250 ml of acidified yeast extract-malt extract broth (International Streptomyces Project [ISP 2]) (Shirling and Gottlieb 1966) pH 4.5, at 28 °C for 14 days and the resultant biomass harvested by centrifugation at 1968g for 10 min, washed twice in sterile distilled water and freeze-dried. The isolate was then examined for diaminopimelic acid isomers, whole cell sugar and polar lipid patterns and its fatty acid and menaquinone profiles determined, in all cases using standard chromatographic procedures and appropriate controls as described previously (Kusuma et al. 2021). The type of cell wall muramic acid was determined after Uchida et al. (1999). In addition, growth taken from an acidified oatmeal agar plate (Küster and Williams 1964), pH 4.5, incubated for 14 days at 28 °C was examined for spore chain arrangement and spore surface ornamentation using a scanning electron microscope (Tescan Vega 3, LMU instrument) in the Electron Microscopy Research Unit, Newcastle University, following the modified procedure described by O’Donnell et al. (1993).
Phenotypic traits
Smears prepared from growth of isolate MGRD01-02T taken from an acidified oatmeal agar plate after 10 days at 28 °C were examined by light microscopy following Gram staining (Society of American Bacteriologist 1957). The isolate and its phylogenomic neighbours were examined for a broad range of biochemical, degradation and phenotypic properties acquired using methods described by Williams et al. (1983), albeit using acidified media, and for diagnostic enzymes using API-ZYM strips (BioMerieux, Lyon, France). The ability of these strains to grow at different temperature (4, 10, 20, 28, 37, 45 and 55 °C) and pH (4.5–10.5 with increments of 0.5) regimes and in the presence of various sodium chloride concentrations (1, 3 and 5%) was recorded using acidified ISP 2 agar, pH 4.6, as the basal medium. All the tests were carried out in triplicate using a standard inoculum equivalent to 5.0 on the McFarland scale (Murray et al. 1999). Cultural properties of the isolate and its phylogenomic neighbours were recorded on acidified tryptone-yeast extract, yeast extract-malt extract, oatmeal, inorganic salts-starch, glycerol-asparagine, peptone-yeast extract-iron and tyrosine agar plates (ISP media 1–7) (Shirling and Gottlieb 1966) after 21 days at 28 °C. Aerial and substrate mycelial pigment colours and those of diffusible pigments were determined by comparison against colour charts (Kelly 1958).
Whole-genome sequencing and comparison of sequences
Genomic DNA was extracted from wet biomass of single colonies of isolate MGRD01-02T and A. durhamensis CSCA 57T which had been grown on acidified ISP 2 agar (pH 4.5), and on acidified R2A agar (Reasoner and Geldreich 1985), pH 4.5, for A puniceicyclus DSM 45618T for 7 days at 28 °C, using the protocol provided by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK) (http://www.microbesng.uk), and sequenced on an Miseq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The quality of DNA preparations and the sequencing of the genomic DNA libraries were carried out following the procedures described by Kusuma et al. (2021). The libraries were sequenced using the 2 × 250 bp paired-end protocol (MicrobesNG), reads under 200 bp discarded and contigs assembled using SPAdes software version 6.1.1 (Bankevich et al. 2012). The draft genomes of the strains were annotated using the RAST-SEED webserver (Aziz et al. 2008) and the default option. Draft genome sequences of isolate MGDR01-02T (GenBank accession number JAGSOH000000000), A. durhamensis CSCA 57T (GenBank accession number JAGSOG000000000) and A. puniceicyclus DSM 45168T (GenBank accession number JAGSXH000000000) were generated following an established procedure undertaken by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK) (http://www.microbesng.uk) and sequenced on an MiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The quality of the extracted DNA preparations and the sequencing of genomic DNA libraries were achieved as described by Kusuma et al. (2021).
The draft genome sequences generated for the isolate and the, A. durhamensis and A. puniceicyclus strains were compared with corresponding sequences of A. acidiphila NRRL B-24431T, A. robiniae DSM 44927T, and C. acidiphila DSM 44928T retrieved from the NCBI genome database using the codon tree option in the PATRIC website (Wattam et al. 2017; Davis et al. 2020), as described by Kusuma et al. (2021), and a ML phylogenomic tree constructed with the RAxML algorithm (Stamatakis 2014). Ortholog average nucleotide identity (orthoANI) (Lee et al. 2016) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) similarities (Meier-Kolthoff et al. 2013a) were determined between all of these organisms using the ANI calculator from the EZBioCloud (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) and the GGDC (http://ggdc.dsm.de/ggdc) webservers, respectively. Corresponding amino acid identity (AAI) (Konstantinidis and Tiedje 2005) and percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) (Qin et al. 2014) were also calculated.
Phylogeny
An almost full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence (1524 nucleotide [nt], GenBank accession number MK503593.1) was extracted directly from the draft genome of isolate MGRD01-02T using the ContEst16S tool available from the EZBioCloud webserver (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/contest16s). The resultant sequence was found to be identical to one generated using the Sanger method (Sanger and Coulson 1975). The 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared with corresponding sequences of the type strains of Actinospica, Actinocrinis and Catenulispora species taken from the EZBioCloud webserver following multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE software (Edgar 2010). Pairwise sequence similarities were determined using the single-gene tree option from the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) website (Meier-Kolthoff et al. 2013b). Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the maximum-likelihood (ML), maximum-parsimony (MP) and neighbour-joining (NJ) algorithms as previously cited (Golinska et al. 2015) and the trees validated in bootstrap analyses based on 1000 replicates using the MEGA X software package (Kumar et al. 2018), and the GTR + GAMMA model. The trees were rooted using the 16S rRNA gene sequence from Kineococcus aurantiacus IFO15268T (GenBank accession number NR_112022.1), the nomenclatural type species of the genus.
Detection of biosynthetic gene clusters
Natural product BGCs were detected in the draft genomes of isolate MGRD01-02T and its closest phylogenomic neighbours (Table 2) using AntiSMASH 5.0, with default options (Blin et al. 2019), available at http://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org). The genome of the isolate was also screened for the presence of antibiotic resistant target genes using the default settings in the Antibiotic Resistance Target Seeker 2.0 (ARTS 2.0) platform which is designed to detect potential novel antibiotic targets and to prioritize potential new NP-BGCs for further study (Mungan et al. 2020).
Results and discussion
The morphological and chemotaxonomic properties of the isolate were consistent with its classification in the genus Actinospica (Cavaletti et al. 2006; Golinska et al. 2015). The isolate formed an extensively branched substrate mycelium, tufts of white aerial hyphae which differentiated into straight to flexuous chains of cylindrical spores with slightly rugose ornamentation (Fig. S1). Colony characteristics were recorded following growth of the isolate on an oatmeal agar plate after 21 days, as shown in Fig. S2. The diamino acid of the peptidoglycan was 2,6-diamino-3-hydroxydiaminopimelic acid, the muramic acid moieties were N-acetylated, the predominant respiratory quinones consisted of mixtures of hydrogenated menaquinones with nine isoprene units, phosphatidylethanolamine was the diagnostic phospholipid, and the cellular fatty acids were found to be rich in iso- and anteiso-branched components. These properties distinguish the isolate from species classified in the genera Actinocrinis (Kim et al. 2017) and Catenulispora (Świecimska et al. 2020).
Actinospica species show qualitative differences in sugar and polar lipid patterns, and qualitative and quantitative variations in fatty acid and menaquinone profiles (Cavaletti et al. 2006; Golinska et al. 2015). The major sugars found in whole-organism hydrolysates of isolate MGRD01-02T were galactose, mannose, rhamnose and xylose; the polar lipid pattern contained diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylinositol (Fig. S3). These chemotaxonomic properties distinguish the isolate from the type strains of Actinospica species, as exemplified by the detection of xylose and phosphatidylglycerol in the sugar and polar lipid profiles, respectively. Like representatives of A. acidiphila, A. durhamensis and A. robiniae the fatty acid profile of the isolate was composed of major proportions of iso-C15:0 (25.8%) and iso-C16:0 (23.7%), but unlike them, it contained major amounts of anteiso-C18:0/C18:2 (33.2%) and only a minor proportion of anteiso-C15:0. Similarly, the presence of major proportions of di-, tri-, hexa- and octa-hydrogenated menaquinones with nine isoprene units (19, 21, 26 and 29%, respectively) in the isolate distinguishes it from profiles found in the Actinospica strains, as illustrated by the presence of a large proportion of MK9 (H2). However, quantitative differences in fatty acid and menaquinone profiles need to be interpreted with care as the former are sensitive to growth and experimental conditions (O’Donnell 1988) and the latter by the stage in the growth cycle from which biomass is harvested (Saddler et al. 1986; Yassin et al. 1991).
The accession numbers of the draft genomes are given in Table 1 which also shows that the isolate and A. durhamensis CSCA 57T have large genomes, albeit ones lower than those of the type strains of A. acidiphila (9.6 Mbp, GenBank accession number NJ-JNYX 0000000), A. robiniae (9.9 Mbp, GenBank accession number NZ-AZAN00000000) and C. acidiphila (10.5 Mbp, GCA—000024025). However, the digital (d) DNA G + C values of the Actinospica strains fall within the narrow range of 70.2 to 72.6%. In contrast, the draft genome size of A. puniceicyclus DSM 45618T was relatively low at 6.7 Mbp though its in silico G + C value of 70.5% was just short of that recorded for isolate MGRD01-02T.
The phylogenetic trees (Fig. 1) based on the 16 rRNA gene sequences showed that the isolate, the type strains of the Actinospica species and A. puniceicyclus DSM 45618T formed a well-supported clade that was most closely related to a similarly well-defined lineage that corresponded to the genus Catenulispora. The isolate formed a well-supported branch that was most closely related to A. acidiphila NRRL B-24481T sharing a sequence similarity with the latter of 98.4%, a value that corresponded to 22 nt differences at 1446 sites, though this relationship was not supported by a high bootstrap value. These strains shared lower similarity values with the A. durhamensis and A. robiniae strains and an even lower value of 95.40% with A. puniceicyclus DSM 45618T, this similarity value is equivalent to 84 nt differences at 1394 locations. The strains assigned to the Actinospica 16S rRNA gene clade shared sequence similarities with the Catenulispora strains within the range 92.0–92.8%, which is equivalent to 100 to 140 nt differences, respectively. The recovery of the Actinospica and Catenulispora strains in sister clades reinforces results recorded from earlier studies (Nouioui et al. 2018; Golinska et al. 2015; Świecimska et al. 2020) though in the latter two studies the type strain of A. puniceicyclus formed a distinct phyletic line towards the periphery of the Actinospica clade.
It is evident from the phylogenomic tree (Fig. 2) based on 441 single core genes that isolate MGRD01-02T and its phylogenomic neighbours were recovered as a well-supported clade which corresponded to the order Catenulisporales (Donadio et al. 2015). The isolate and the type strains of A. durhamensis and A. robiniae formed a distinct subclade while those of A. puniceicyclus, C. acidiphila and A. acidiphila were recovered as well-separated lineages within the tree that were increasingly distant from the subclade. Table 2 shows that all the strains, including the isolate, shared ANI and dDDH similarities much lower than the thresholds (95–96% and 70%, respectively) used to delineate closely related species (Chun et al. 2018). These data also show that the isolate is most closely related to A. durhamensis CSCA 57T and A. robiniae DSM 44926T and most distantly to A. acidiphila NRRL B-24431T and C. acidiphila DSM 44928T. The A. puniceicyclus strain showed ANI and dDDH values with the other strains well below the cut-offs cited above. The close relationship between the isolate, A. durhamensis and A. robiniae was supported by AAI and POCP values that were well above the 70 and 50% thresholds used to assign species to the same genus (Konstantinidis and Tiedje 2005; Qin et al. 2014), as shown in Table 2. In contrast, the A. puniceicyclus and C. acidiphila strains shared AAI and POCP similarities well below the recommended thresholds indicating that they belong to different genera. Similarly, the ANI and dDDH values found between the A. acidiphila and the other strains is consistent with its assignment to a separate genus though additional studies are needed to confirm this.
The triplicated cultures gave identical results for all of the phenotypic characteristics shown in Table 3. It is also encouraging that the results for many of the tests confirmed those recorded in earlier analyses on the Actinospica, Actinocrinis and Catenulispora type strains (Golinska et al. 2015; Świecimska et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2017). All the strains were aerobic, Gram-stain, and catalase positive though other phenotypic features were weighted to distinguish between them, as shown in Table 3. The isolate, for instance, can be separated from all of the other strains as it degraded hypoxanthine and grew at 45*C, and from A. durhamensis CSCA 57T and A. robiniae DSM 44927T, its nearest phylogenomic relatives, by its ability to use inulin as a sole carbon source and by an inability to produce α- and β-galactosidases, β-glucuronidase and cystine, leucine and valine arylamidases. Similarly, the isolate and the other Actinospica strains can be separated from the Actinocrinis and Catenulispora strains as they are positive for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8) and β-glucosidase. The A. acidiphila strain, unlike the isolate and the A. durhamensis and A. robiniae strains, degraded starch and used acetamide and L-alanine as sole nitrogen sources. In contrast, all the strains grew optimally at or around pH 5.5 indicating that they are acidotolerant (Williams et al. 1971; Xu et al. 2006).
As with the phenotypic characteristics shown in Table 3 good congruence was found between the growth and cultural features of the isolate and corresponding results from the previous studies cited previously thereby providing further evidence of the value of cultural properties in the systematics of filamentous actinomycetes (van der Aart et al. 2019). The isolate grew particularly well on oatmeal (Fig. S2) and yeast extract–malt extract agar plates as did the Actinospica and Catenulispora strains, but showed varying responses on the remaining ISP media (Table S1). In contrast, A. puniceicyclus DSM 45168T did not grow on any of the ISP media. Some of the substrate mycelial pigments were of diagnostic value though this was less so with other colonial features as most of the strains did not produce aerial hyphae or diffusible pigments. However, the isolate can be separated from the other Actinospica strains as it formed a greyish-yellow substrate mycelium on yeast extract-malt extract and oatmeal agar plates and a brown diffusible pigment on inorganic salts-starch agar.
Detection of biosynthetic gene clusters
Isolate MGRD01-02T and its closest phylogenomic relatives (Table 2) have large genomes (6.7–10.5 Mbp) which harbor between 13 and 31 BCCs, as shown in Fig. 3. The bioclusters include ones predicted to encode for drug-like molecules, notably non-ribosomal peptide synthases (NRPS), type 1 and 2 polyketide synthases (PKS) and hybrid clusters. The latter are composed of two or more gene clusters and are important as they tend to express for novel derivatives of known compounds (Gallagher and Jensen 2015). Only 5 out of the 66 BCGs predicted to encode for drug-like molecules (7.5%) showed high gene sequence similarities, that is, above 70% with known bioclusters held in the MIBiG database, namely ones associated with the production of antimycin (100% gene identity), cacibiocin B (92% gene identity), catenulipeptin (100% gene identity), curamycin (100% gene identity) and icosalides A/B (100% gene identity), the balance either showed low similarities with known compounds or were predicted to synthesize novel compounds.
The genomes of all of the strains contained a biocluster associated with the production of lobosamide, a polyene macrolactam which inhibits the growth of Trypanosoma brucei (Schulze et al. 2015). In contrast, most bioclusters were either strain specific or present in more than one of the genomes. Putative BGCs associated with the production of sporolide were found in the genomes of isolate MGRD01-02T, A. durhamensis CSCA57T and A. robiniae DSM 44926T whereas the biocluster predicted to encode for macrotetralide was only detected in the genomes of the isolate and the A. pumiceicyclus strain.
Strain-specific BCCs included ones associated with the production of tiacumicin B (6% gene identity), an anti-bacterial compound (Xiao et al. 2011), atratumycin (21% gene identity), an anti-tubercular antibiotic (Sun et al. 2019), auroramycin (11% gene identity), an antibiotic that actively inhibits Staphylococcus aureus (Duggar 2011), catenulipeptin (100% gene identity), a novel class III lantipeptide (Wang and Donk 2012), kirromycin (8% gene identity), an anti-bacterial compound active against Brevibacterium brevis (Wolf et al. 1972) and ristomycin A (10% gene identity), an antibiotic which inhibits mycobacteria (Fairbrother 1958) were characteristic of the genomes of isolate MGRD01-02T, A. puniceicyclus DSM 45618T, A. acidiphila DSM 44926T, C. acidiphila DSM 44928T, A. durhamensis CSCA 57T and A. robiniae DSM 44927T, respectively. The genome of the isolate also contained a biocluster predicted to encode for feglymycin (10% gene identity), a calcium-dependent antibiotic with anti-HIV properties (Férir et al. 2012). The genome analyses based on The Antibiotic Resistance Target Seeker (ARTS) software version 2.0 highlighted BCG 16.1 which is associated with the production of a feglymycin-like compound (47% gene identity) and hence is a good candidate for further gene expression studies.
The genome mining analyses show that strains classified in the order Catenulisporales are a potentially rich source of new specialized metabolites, notably antibiotics. However, molecular studies are needed to determine the functional impact of bioclusters found to predict for unknown products or ones that showed low levels of gene similarity with known compounds. Even so, these studies indicate that Actinospica and Catenulispora strains should be considered as candidates for bioprospecting campaigns designed to discover novel specialized metabolites of biotechnological value, not least antibiotics with new modes of action.
Conclusions
This polyphasic study shows that isolate MGRD01-02T is an authentic member of the genus Actinospica. Critically, it can be distinguished from the type strains of Actinospica species using a combination of genomic, genotypic and phenotypic features. Consequently, it should be classified as a novel species in the genus Actinospica for which the name Actinospica acidithermotolerans sp. nov. is proposed. The results of this study also confirm the taxonomic integrity of the genus Actinocrinis (Kim et al. 2017). It is becoming increasingly apparent that taxonomically diverse actinomycetes, including novel taxa, are a feature of geographically diverse hot springs (Song et al. 2009; Habib et al. 2020). Improved procedures are needed to selectively isolate and characterize novel actinomycetes, including Actinospica strains, from hot springs for biotechnological and ecophysiological purposes.
Description of Actinospica acidithermotolerans sp. nov.
Actinospica acidithermotolerans sp. nov. (a.ci.di.ther.mo.to.’le.rans L. masc. adj. acidus sour., Gr. masc. adj. thermos hot.,L. pres. part. tolerans, tolerating; N.L. part. adj, acidothermotolerans, tolerating acid and heat conditions).
Aerobic, Gram-stain positive, actinomycete which forms an extensively branched substrate mycelium, tufts of white aerial hyphae that differentiate into long straight to flexuous chains of cylindrical spores (0.8–0.9 × 0.4–0.5 µm) with slightly rugose ornamentation. Grows from 20 to 45 °C, optimally at ~ 37 °C, from pH 4.5 to 6.5, optimally at ~ pH 5.5 and in the presence of 1% w/v sodium chloride. Grows well on acidified Bennett’s, inorganic salts-starch and starch-casein agar and forms a grayish yellow substrate mycelium and white aerial hyphae on oatmeal agar. Reduces nitrate but not nitrite. Degrades hypoxanthine, Tweens 40 and 60, but not starch, Tween 20, xanthine or xylan. Positive for acid and alkaline phosphatases, esterase (C4), enterase lipase (C8), α- and β- glucosidases, but negative for α-chymotrypsin, cystine, leucine and valine arylamidases, β-glucuronidase, lipase (C14), α- mannosidase and trypsin. d-raffinose and d-trehalose are used as sole carbon sources for energy and growth, but not d-mannitol or sucrose. Does not use acetamide, l-alanine, l-isoleucine, l-phenylalanine or l-valine as sole nitrogen sources. The wall peptidoglycan contains 2,6-diamino-3-hydroxydiaminopimelic acid., N-acetylated muramic acid moieties and galactose, mannose, rhamnose and xylose. The major fatty acids are iso-C15:0, iso-C16:0, and summed feature anteiso- C18:0/C18:2, C18:0 is also present (7.2%), the balance of the fatty acids are found in trace amounts (< 0.7%). The polar lipid profile consists of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylinositol and the major menaquinones are MK-9 (H2, H4, H6 and H8). The genomic G + C content of the type strain is 70.5% and its approximate genome size 7.9 Mbp.
The type strain, MGRD01-02T (= CCMM B1308T = ICEBB-09T = NCIMB 15218T), was isolated from sediment collected from the Mengeruda acidic hotspring in East Nusa Tenggara Province, Flores Island, Indonesia.
References
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, Dejongh M, Disz T et al (2008) The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
Baltz RH (2017) Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery. J Ind Microbiol Biotech 44:573–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-016-1815-x
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comp Biol 19:455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al (2019) antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W81–W87. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz310
Bull AT, Goodfellow M (2019) Dark, rare and inspirational microbial matter in the extremobiosphere: 16000 m of bioprospecting campaigns. Microbiology (reading) 165:1252–1264. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000822
Busarakam K, Bull AT, Girard G, Labeda DP, van Wezel GP et al (2014) Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii sp. nov., the producer of chaxalactins and chaxamycins, forms a distinct branch in Streptomyces gene trees. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105:849–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0139-y
Cavaletti L, Monciardini P, Schumann P, Rohde M, Bamonte R et al (2006) Actinospica robiniae gen. nov., sp. nov. and Actinospica acidiphila sp. nov.: proposal for Actinospicaceae fam. nov. and Catenulisporinae subord. nov. in the order Actinomycetales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1747–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-015-0496-1
Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Chirstensen H, Arahal DR et al (2018) Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:461–466. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002516
Davis JJ, Wattam AR, Aziz RK, Brettin T, Butler R et al (2020) The PATRIC bioinformatics resource center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 48(DI):D606–D612. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz943
Donadio S, Cavaletti L, Monciardini P (2015) Order IV. Catenulisporales ord. nov. In: Goodfellow M, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Trujillo ME, Suzuki K, Ludwig W, Whitman WB (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology 2nd edn. vol 5, Part A, The Actinobacteria. Springer, New York, p 225
Duggar BM (2011) Aureomycin: a product of the continuing search for new antibiotics. Ann NY Acad Sci 1241(1):163–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06254.x
Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq4
Fairbrother R (1958) In-vitro activity of ristocetin and framycetin two new antibiotics. Lancet 72:1353–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(58)91440-5
Férir G, Hänchen A, François KO, Hoorelbeke G, Huskens D et al (2012) Feglymycin, a unique natural bacterial antibiotic peptide, inhibits HIV entry by targeting the viral envelope protein gp120. Virology 433:308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.08.007
Gallagher KA, Jensen PR (2015) Genomic insights into the evolution of hybrid isoprenoid biosynthetic gene clusters in the MAR4 marine streptomycete clade. BMC Genomics 16:960. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2110-3
Golinska P, Zucchi TD, Silva L, Dahm H, Goodfellow M (2015) Actinospica durhamensis sp. nov., isolated from a spruce forest soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 108:435–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-015-0496-1
Habib N, Khan IU, Xiao M, Li S, Saqib M, Xian WD (2020) Marmolicola caldifontis sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:2053–2058. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004016
Jones KL (1949) Fresh isolates of actinomycetes in which the presence of sporogenous aerial mycelia is a fluctuating characteristic. J Bacteriol 57:141–145. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.57.2.141-145.1949
Kelly KL (1958) Centroid notations for revised ISCC-NBS colour name blocks. J Res Nat Bureau Stand USA 61:472
Kim JJ, Marjerrison CE, Cornish Shartau SL, Brady AL, Sharp C (2017) Actinocrinis puniceicyclus gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from an acidic spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:602–609. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001667
Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM (2005) Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 187:6258–6264. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.18.6258-6264.2005
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Küster WST, Williams ST (1964) Selection of media for isolation of streptomycetes. Nature 202:928–929. https://doi.org/10.1038/202928a0
Kusuma AB, Nouioui I, Goodfellow M (2021) Genome-based classification of the Streptomyces violaceusniger clade and description of Streptomyces sabulosicollis sp. nov. from an Indonesian sand dune. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 114:859–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-021-01564-0
Lee I, Ouk KY, Park SC, Chun J (2016) OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1100–1103. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000760
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013a) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 14:1–14
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk HP (2013b) When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy? Arch Microbiol 195:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-013-0888-4
Mungan MD, Alanjary M, Blin K, Weber T, Medema MH et al (2020) ARTS 2.0: feature updates and expansion of the Antibiotic Resistant Target Seeker for comparative genome mining. Nucleic Acids Res 48:W546–W552. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa374
Murray PR, Boron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (1999) Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th edn. ASM Press, Washington, DC
Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al (2018) Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 9:2007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007
O’Donnell AG (1988) Numerical analysis of chemotaxonomic data. In: Goodfellow M, Jones D, Priest FG (eds) Computer-assisted bacterial systematics. Academic Press, London, pp 403–414
O’Donnell AG, Falconer C, Goodfellow M, Ward AC, Williams E (1993) Biosystematics and diversity amongst novel carboxydotrophic actinomycetes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 64:325–340
Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC et al (2014) A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 196:2210–2215. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01688-14
Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE (1985) A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.49.1.1-7.1985
Saddler GS, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DG, O’Donnell AG (1986) Influence of the growth cycle on the fatty acid and menaquinone composition of Streptomyces cyaneus NCIB 9616. J Appl Bacteriol 60:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1986.tb01064.x
Sanger F, Coulson AR (1975) A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 94(3):441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(75)90213-2
Schulze CJ, Donia MS, Siqueira-Neto JL, Ray D, Raskatov JA et al (2015) Genome-directed lead discovery: biosynthesis, structure elucidation, and biological evaluation of two families of polyene macrolactams against Trypanosoma brucei. ACS Chem Biol 10:2373–2381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.5b00308
Shirling EB, Gottlieb D (1966) Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 16:313–340. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-16-3-313
Society of American Bacteriologist (1957) Manual of microbiological methods. McGraw Hill, New York
Song ZQ, Zhu XY, Li WJ, Jiang HC, Zhang CL et al (2009) Actinobacteria1 diversity in hot springs in Tengchong (China), Kamchatka (Russia) and Nevada (USA). Geomicrobiol J 26:256–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450902892373
Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
Sun C, Yang Z, Zhang C, Liu Z, He J, Liu Q, Ma J et al (2019) Genome mining of Streptomyces atratus SCSIO ZH16: discovery of atratumycin and identification of its biosynthetic gene cluster. Org Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00208
Świecimska M, Golinska P, Wypij M, Goodfellow M (2020) Genome-based classification of Catenulispora pinisylvae sp. nov. novel actinobacteria isolated from a pine forest soil in Poland and emended description of Catenulispora rubra. Syst Appl Microbiol 44(1):126164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126164
Uchida K, Kudo T, Suzuki K, Nakase T (1999) A new rapid method of glycolate test by diethyl ether extraction, which is applicable to a small amount of bacterial cells of less than one milligram. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45:49–56. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.45.49
van der Aart LT, Nouioui I, Kloosterman A, Igual JM, Willemse J et al (2019) Polyphasic classification of the gifted natural product producer Streptomyces roseifaciens sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:899–908. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003215
Wang H, van der Donk WA (2012) Biosynthesis of the class III lantipeptide catenulipeptin. ACS Chem Biol 7:1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb3002446
Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T et al (2017) Improvements to PARTIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res 45(D1):D535–D542. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gwk1017
Williams ST, Davies FL, Mayfield CI, Khan MR (1971) Studies on the ecology of actinomycetes in soil. II. The pH requirements of streptomycetes in acid soils. Soil Biol Biochem 3:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(71)90014-9
Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EMH, Sneath PHA, Sackin MJ (1983) Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol 29:1743–1813. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-129-6-1743
Wolf H, Zähner H, Nierhaus K (1972) Kirromycin, an inhibitor of the 30 S ribosomal subunits function. FEBS Lett 21:347–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(72)80199-6
Xiao Y, Li S, Niu S, Ma L, Zhang G et al (2011) Characterization of tiacumicin B biosynthetic gene cluster affording diversified tiacumicin analogues and revealing a tailoring dihalogenase. J Am Chem Soc 133:1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja109445q
Xu C, Wang L, Cui Q, Huang Y, Liu Z et al (2006) Neutrotolerant acidophilic Streptomyces species isolated from acidic soils in China: Streptomyces guanduensis sp. nov., Streptomyces paucisporeus sp. nov., Streptomyces rubidus sp. nov. and Streptomyces yanglinensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63959-0
Yassin AF, Schaal KP, Brzezinka H, Goodfellow M, Pulverer G (1991) Menaquinone pattern in Amycolatopsis species. Zbl Bakt 274:465–470
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Mr. Ja’far Abdurrahman and Mr. Faiz Muhammad, for helping to collect the environmental sample, to Professor Hans-Peter Klenk (Newcastle University) for his contribution to the initial stages of the study, and to Professor Aharon Oren (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel) for help in preparing the species name.
Funding
ABK is grateful for financial support awarded through the Ph.D. Scholarship Scheme of the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Ministry of Finance, Indonesia [Grant no. S-2183/LPDP.3/2016]. IN is indebted to Newcastle University for a postdoctoral fellowship and MG for an Emeritus Fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MG, IN, ABK, KEP and LRV designed the study and prepared the manuscript. ABK, KEP, and JL helped to collect the sediment sample and characterized the isolate and associated strains under the supervision of MG and IN. ABK and LRV deposited the type strain of the new species in the culture collections. All of the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kusuma, A.B., Putra, K.E., Vanggy, L.R. et al. Actinospica acidithermotolerans sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from sediment from an Indonesian hot spring. Arch Microbiol 204, 518 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03058-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03058-7