Abstract
Streptomyces is currently the main producer of microbial pharmaceuticals from its secondary metabolites as natural products. It will be more beneficial if the promoters, which are particularly strong during the secondary metabolism of Streptomyces, are used to drive the efficient production of desired natural products with the coordination of bacterial growth. Here, in an industrial natamycin producer Streptomyces chattanoogensis L10, a strong promoter groESp was identified for this purpose based on the comparative proteomic analysis of the primary and secondary metabolism. With a constitutive promoter ermEp* as a control, the activity of groESp was weak in the primary metabolism, but about sixfold higher than ermEp* in the secondary metabolism, when the representative antibiotic natamycin was highly produced. Furthermore, when ScnRII, a pathway-specific positive regulator in natamycin biosynthesis, was expressed under groESp, the productivity of natamycin was about 20% higher in the secondary metabolism than that from ermEp*, but had no discrimination in the early 2 days. Thus, we showed that proteomics is an effective alternative way to identify promoters for the high yield of natamycin in S. chattanoogensis, and this strategy can be widely adaptable to other Streptomyces species for the full development of secondary metabolites with promising bioactivities.
References
Baltz RH (2014) Combinatorial biosynthesis of cyclic lipopeptide antibiotics: a model for synthetic biology to accelerate the evolution of secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways. ACS Synth Biol 3:748–758. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb3000673
Berdy J (2005) Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 58:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2005.1
Cordero F, Botta M, Calogero RA (2007) Microarray data analysis and mining approaches. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 6:265–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elm034
Cui H, Ni X, Shao W, Su J, Ren J, Xia H (2015) Functional manipulations of the tetramycin positive regulatory gene ttmRIV to enhance the production of tetramycin A and nystatin A1 in Streptomyces ahygroscopicus. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42:1273–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-015-1660-3
Du YL, Chen SF, Cheng LY, Shen XL, Tian Y, Li YQ (2009) Identification of a novel Streptomyces chattanoogensis L10 and enhancing its natamycin production by overexpressing positive regulator ScnRII. J Microbiol 47:506–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-009-0014-0
Fu J, Wu M, Liu X (2018) Proteomic approaches beyond expression profiling and PTM analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 410:4051–4060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1021-y
Hertweck C (2009) The biosynthetic logic of polyketide diversity. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:4688–4716. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200806121
Hrdlickova R, Toloue M, Tian B (2017) RNA-Seq methods for transcriptome analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1364
Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Butter MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA (2000) Practical Streptomyces genetics. The John Innes Foundation, Norwich, United Kingdom
Kuzuyama T (2017) Biosynthetic studies on terpenoids produced by Streptomyces. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 70:811–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2017.12
Li S, Wang J, Li X, Yin S, Wang W, Yang K (2015) Genome-wide identification and evaluation of constitutive promoters in streptomycetes. Microb Cell Fact 14:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0351-0
Li X et al (2017) A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. PLoS ONE 12:e0176185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176185
Liu SP et al (2015) Sigma factor WhiGch positively regulates natamycin production in Streptomyces chattanoogensis L10. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2715–2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6307-1
Luo Y, Zhang L, Barton KW, Zhao H (2015) Systematic identification of a panel of strong constitutive promoters from Streptomyces albus. ACS Synth Biol 4:1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00016
Mandric I, Temate-Tiagueu Y, Shcheglova T, Al Seesi S, Zelikovsky A, Mandoiu II (2017) Fast bootstrapping-based estimation of confidence intervals of expression levels and differential expression from RNA-Seq data. Bioinformatics 33:3302–3304. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx365
Mantione KJ et al (2014) Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: microarray and RNA-Seq. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 20:138–142. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSMBR.892101
Mao XM, Zhou Z, Hou XP, Guan WJ, Li YQ (2009) Reciprocal regulation between SigK and differentiation programs in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol 191:6473–6481. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00875-09
Myronovskyi M, Luzhetskyy A (2016) Native and engineered promoters in natural product discovery. Nat Prod Rep 33:1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6np00002a
Niu G, Chater KF, Tian Y, Zhang J, Tan H (2016) Specialised metabolites regulating antibiotic biosynthesis in Streptomyces spp. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:554–573. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuw012
Ozcengiz G, Okay S, Unsaldi E, Taskin B, Liras P, Piret J (2010) Homologous expression of aspartokinase (ask) gene in Streptomyces clavuligerus and its hom-deleted mutant: effects on cephamycin C production. Bioeng Bugs 1:191–197. https://doi.org/10.4161/bbug.1.3.11244
Shao L et al (2014) Improvement of 7alpha-methoxycephalosporins production by overexpression of cmcJ and cmcI controlled by promoter ermEp* in Streptomyces clavuligerus. J Appl Microbiol 117:1645–1654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12640
Sun J, Kelemen GH, Fernandez-Abalos JM, Bibb MJ (1999) Green fluorescent protein as a reporter for spatial and temporal gene expression in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Microbiology 145(Pt 9):2221–2227. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-145-9-2221
Wang K et al (2019) Transcriptome-based identification of a strong promoter for hyper-production of natamycin in Streptomyces. Curr Microbiol 76:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-018-1589-7
Wang W, Li X, Wang J, Xiang S, Feng X, Yang K (2013) An engineered strong promoter for streptomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:4484–4492. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00985-13
Werner T (2007) Regulatory networks: linking microarray data to systems biology. Mech Ageing Dev 128:168–172
Yates JR (2019) Recent technical advances in proteomics. F1000Res 8:351. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16987.1
Yin S et al (2015) Identification of a cluster-situated activator of oxytetracycline biosynthesis and manipulation of its expression for improved oxytetracycline production in Streptomyces rimosus. Microb Cell Fact 14:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0231-7
Zheng JT, Wang SL, Yang KQ (2007) Engineering a regulatory region of jadomycin gene cluster to improve jadomycin B production in Streptomyces venezuelae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:883–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1064-z
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0400805), and Natural Science Foundation of China (31571284, 31470212, 31520103901).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, K., Chen, XA., Li, YQ. et al. Identification of a secondary metabolism-responsive promoter by proteomics for over-production of natamycin in Streptomyces. Arch Microbiol 201, 1459–1464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01710-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01710-3