Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An in-depth study of robust MPPT for extend optimal power extraction using wind speed compensation technique of wind generators

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To achieve effective power production and control, it is essential to establish an effective maximum power point tracking (MPPT) approach. This makes designing a wind turbine easier. A brand new method called robust changeable step-perturb & observe (RVS-P&O) is created to address the issues of wind speed variable situations, significant oscillations around the maximum power point (MPP), and step size estimate all at once. Where two main points are involved, it is first suggested to choose step sizes systematically based on the normalization of power and speed data. Second, a novel adjustment to compute the power variation is made in order to provide adequate resilience for large and prolonged wind speed fluctuations. According to the simulation findings, the suggested RVS-P&O-based MPPT approach is better to the competing P&O techniques, variable step-P&O, small fixed step-P&O, and large fixed step-P&O. An improvement of 1.34% over the variable step-P&O algorithm is provided by the suggested RVS-P&O approach, which delivers a WECS efficiency of 99.05%, when compared to the 0.032 s, 0.071 s, 0.018 s, 0.012 s, and 0.007 s provided by LS-P&O, SS-P&O, VS-P&O, ME-PO, and AD-P&O, respectively. The settling time for V = 6 m/s is really noticeably improved; it is now 0.004 s. As a result, the RVS-P&O algorithm could be a good choice for MPP online operation monitoring in terms of energy efficiency, transient- and steady-state regime performances under diverse operating situations, and multiple data for wind speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [MEGHNI BILLEL], upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

\({C}_{\mathrm{P}}\) :

Coefficient power

F :

Simplex

\({f}_{\mathrm{g}}\) :

Grid frequency

\({I}_{\mathrm{d}}\) :

d-axis current

\({I}_{\mathrm{dg}}\) :

Grid d-axis current

\({I}_{\mathrm{q}}\) :

q-axis current

\({I}_{\mathrm{qg}}\) :

Grid q-axis current

\(K\) :

First unknown gain

l :

Sector index

\({L}_{\mathrm{d}}\) :

d-axis inductance

\({L}_{\mathrm{q}}\) :

q-axis inductance

\(M\) :

Second unknown gain

m :

Complex size

N :

Normalization index

P :

Number of independent complexes

\({P}_{\mathrm{g}}\) :

Grid active power

\({P}_{t}\) :

Power of the air mass

\({P}_{k}\) :

Turbine power

\({Q}_{\mathrm{g}}\) :

Grid reactive power

\({R}_{\mathrm{s}}\) :

Stator resistance

\(S\) :

Surface

\({S}_{\mathrm{P}}\) :

Sliding surface of the active power

\({s}_{Q}\) :

Sliding surface of the reactive power

\({T}_{\mathrm{e}}\) :

Electromagnetic torque

\({\alpha }_{L}\) :

Weighting factor

V :

Wind speed

\({V}_{\mathrm{d}}\) :

d-axis voltage

\({V}_{\mathrm{dg}}\) :

Grid d-axis voltage

\({V}_{\mathrm{di}}\) :

Inverter d-axis voltage

\({V}_{\mathrm{q}}\) :

q-axis voltage

\({V}_{\mathrm{qg}}\) :

Grid q-axis voltage

\({V}_{\mathrm{qi}}\) :

Inverter q-axis voltage

\(W\) :

Selection factor

d :

Stator axis

e :

Electromagnetic

f :

Flux

g :

Grid

i :

Element (solution)

j :

Point index

k :

Complex index

max:

Maximum

mes:

Measure

\(\mathrm{opti}\) :

Optimum

p :

Power

q :

Stator axis

ref:

Reference

s :

Stator

α :

Number of iteration for each simplex

β :

Blade pitch angle

λ :

Tip speed ratio

\(\rho \) :

Air density

τ :

Number of offspring

\(\omega \) :

Electric pulsation

\({\uppsi }_{\mathrm{f}}\) :

Magnetic flux

AC:

Alternate current

AI:

Artificial intelligent

ANFIS:

Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system

ANN:

Artificial neural network

DC:

Direct current

DFIG:

Doubly fed induction generator

DPC:

Direct power control

FLC:

Fuzzy logic control

FOSMC:

First-order sliding mode control

FOC:

Field-oriented control

FS:

Fixed

GSC:

Grid side converter

INC:

Incremental conductance

IPC:

Indirect power controller

LS:

Large step

MPPT:

Maximum power point tracking

MSC:

Machine side converter

ORB:

Optimum relation-based

ORC:

Optimal rotational cycle

OTC:

Optimal torque control

P&O:

Perturb & observe

PMSG:

Permanent magnet synchronous generator

PSO:

Particle swarm optimizer

PSF:

Power signal feedback

RVS:

Robust variable step

SCIG:

Squirrel cage induction generator

SS:

Small step

SOSMC:

Second-order sliding mode control

STA:

Super-twisting algorithm

SVM:

Support vector machine

SVPWM:

Space vector pulse width modulation

THD:

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization

VS:

Variable step

VSWT:

Variable speed wind turbine

WECS:

Wind energy control system

WSE:

Wind speed estimated

WT:

Wind turbine

VDC ref:

Reference of DC link voltage

Pg ref:

Reference of grid active power

Qg ref:

Reference of grid reactive power

References

  1. Ali MN, Mahmoud K, Lehtonen M, Darwish MM (2021) An efficient fuzzy-logic based variable-step incremental conductance MPPT method for grid-connected PV systems. IEEE Access 9:26420–26430

    Google Scholar 

  2. Youssef AR, Mousa HH, Mohamed EE (2020) Development of self-adaptive P&O MPPT algorithm for wind generation systems with concentrated search area. Renew Energy 154:875–893

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng M, Zhu Y (2014) The state of the art of wind energy conversion systems and technologies: a review. Energy Convers Manag 88:332–347

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ali MM, Youssef AR, Ali AS, Abdel-Jaber GT (2020) Variable step size PO MPPT algorithm using model reference adaptive control for optimal power extraction. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 30(1):e12151

    Google Scholar 

  5. Apata O, Oyedokun DTO (2020) An overview of control techniques for wind turbine systems. Sci Afr 10:e00566

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mousa HH, Youssef AR, Mohamed EE (2019) Study of robust adaptive step-sizes P&O MPPT algorithm for high-inertia WT with direct-driven multiphase PMSG. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 29(10):e12090

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tripathi SM, Tiwari AN, Singh D (2015) Grid-integrated permanent magnet synchronous generator based wind energy conversion systems: a technology review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:1288–1305

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dursun EH, Koyuncu H, Kulaksiz AA (2021) A novel unified maximum power extraction framework for PMSG based WECS using chaotic particle swarm optimization derivatives. Eng Sci Technol Int J 24(1):158–170

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castelló J, Espí JM, García-Gil R (2016) Development details and performance assessment of a wind turbine emulator. Renew Energy 86:848–857

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghaffari A, Krstić M, Seshagiri S (2014) Power optimization and control in wind energy conversion systems using extremum seeking. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 22(5):1684–1695

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taveiros FEV, Barros LS, Costa FB (2015) Back-to-back converter state-feedback control of DFIG (doubly-fed induction generator)-based wind turbines. Energy 89:896–906

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jena D, Rajendran S (2015) A review of estimation of effective wind speed based control of wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:1046–1062

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alanis AY (2022) Adaptive neural sensor and actuator fault-tolerant control for discrete-time unknown nonlinear systems. Frankl Open 1:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramadan H, Youssef AR, Mousa HH, Mohamed EE (2019) An efficient variable-step P&O maximum power point tracking technique for grid-connected wind energy conversion system. SN Appl Sci 1(12):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lahfaoui B, Zouggar S, Mohammed B, Elhafyani ML (2017) Real time study of P&O MPPT control for small wind PMSG turbine systems using Arduino microcontroller. Energy Procedia 111:1000–1009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mei Q, Shan M, Liu L, Guerrero JM (2010) A novel improved variable step-size incremental-resistance MPPT method for PV systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(6):2427–2434

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abdullah MA, Yatim AHM, Tan CW, Saidur R (2012) A review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for wind energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):3220–3227

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu KN, Liao CK (2015) Applying novel fractional order incremental conductance algorithm to design and study the maximum power tracking of small wind power systems. J Appl Res Technol 13(2):238–244

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abdullah MA, Al-Hadhrami T, Tan CW, Yatim AH (2018) Towards green energy for smart cities: Particle swarm optimization based MPPT approach. IEEE Access 6:58427–58438

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meghni B, Saadoun A, Dib D, Amirat Y (2015) Effective MPPT technique and robust power control of the PMSG wind turbine. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng 10(6):619–627

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mousa HH, Youssef AR, Hamdan I, Ahamed M, Mohamed EE (2021) Performance assessment of robust P&O algorithm using optimal hypothetical position of generator speed. IEEE Access 9:30469–30485

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meghni B, Dib D, Azar AT, Saadoun A (2018) Effective supervisory controller to extend optimal energy management in hybrid wind turbine under energy and reliability constraints. Int J Dyn Control 6(1):369–383

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Hachana O, Meghni B, Benamor A, Toumi I (2022) Efficient PMSG wind turbine with energy storage system control based shuffled complex evolution optimizer. ISA Trans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.05.014

  24. Agarwal V, Aggarwal RK, Patidar P, Patki C (2009) A novel scheme for rapid tracking of maximum power point in wind energy generation systems. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 25(1):228–236

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kazmi SMR, Goto H, Guo HJ, Ichinokura O (2010) A novel algorithm for fast and efficient speed-sensorless maximum power point tracking in wind energy conversion systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xia Y, Ahmed KH, Williams BW (2011) A new maximum power point tracking technique for permanent magnet synchronous generator based wind energy conversion system. IEEE Trans Power Electron 26(12):3609–3620

    Google Scholar 

  27. Linus RM, Damodharan P (2015) Maximum power point tracking method using a modified perturb and observe algorithm for grid connected wind energy conversion systems. IET Renew Power Gener 9(6):682–689

    Google Scholar 

  28. Putri RI, Pujiantara M, Priyadi A, Ise T, Purnomo MH (2018) Maximum power extraction improvement using sensorless controller based on adaptive perturb and observe algorithm for PMSG wind turbine application. IET Electr Power Appl 12(4):455–462

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang P, Liu F, Song Y (2013) A novel maximum power point tracking control method in wind turbine application. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese control conference. IEEE, pp 7569–7574

  30. Youssef AR, Ali AI, Saeed MS, Mohamed EE (2019) Advanced multi-sector P&O maximum power point tracking technique for wind energy conversion system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 107:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mousa HH, Youssef AR, Mohamed EE (2019) Variable step size P&O MPPT algorithm for optimal power extraction of multi-phase PMSG based wind generation system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 108:218–231

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mousa HH, Youssef AR, Mohamed EE (2019) Adaptive P&O MPPT algorithm based wind generation system using realistic wind fluctuations. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 112:294–308

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pathak D, Gaur P (2019) A fractional order fuzzy-proportional-integral-derivative based pitch angle controller for a direct-drive wind energy system. Comput Electr Eng 78:420–436

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou F, Liu J (2018) Pitch controller design of wind turbine based on nonlinear PI/PD control. Shock Vib 2018:7859510

  35. Belmokhtar K, Ibrahim H, Doumbi ML (2016) A maximum power point tracking control algorithms for a PMSG‐based WECS for isolated applications: critical review. In: Wind turbines: design, control and applications. https://doi.org/10.5772/63803

  36. Matraji I, Al-Durra A, Errouissi R (2018) Design and experimental validation of enhanced adaptive second-order SMC for PMSG-based wind energy conversion system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 103:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hong YY, Lu SD, Chiou CS (2009) MPPT for PM wind generator using gradient approximation. Energy Convers Manag 50(1):82–89

    Google Scholar 

  38. Meghni B, Dib D, Azar AT (2017) A second-order sliding mode and fuzzy logic control to optimal energy management in wind turbine with battery storage. Neural Comput Appl 28(6):1417–1434

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meghni B, Ouada M, Saad S (2020) A novel improved variable-step-size P&O MPPT method and effective supervisory controller to extend optimal energy management in hybrid wind turbine. Electr Eng 102(2):763–778

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meghni B, Dib D, Azar AT, Ghoudelbourk S, Saadoun A (2017) Robust adaptive supervisory fractional order controller for optimal energy management in wind turbine with battery storage. In: Azar A, Vaidyanathan S, Ouannas A (eds) Fractional order control and synchronization of chaotic systems. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 688. Springer, Cham, pp 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50249-6_6

  41. Jain B, Jain S, Nema RK (2015) Control strategies of grid interfaced wind energy conversion system: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:983–996

    Google Scholar 

  42. Abdeddaim S, Betka A (2013) Optimal tracking and robust power control of the DFIG wind turbine. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 49:234–242

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pan L, Shao C (2020) Wind energy conversion systems analysis of PMSG on offshore wind turbine using improved SMC and extended state observer. Renew Energy 161:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lin H, Yan W, Wang J, Yao Y, Gao B (2009) Robust nonlinear speed control for a brushless DC motor using model reference adaptive backstepping approach. In: 2009 international conference on mechatronics and automation. IEEE, pp 335–340

  45. Benelghali S, Benbouzid MEH, Charpentier JF, Ahmed-Ali T, Munteanu I (2011) Experimental validation of a marine current turbine simulator: application to a PMSG-based system second-order sliding mode control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(1):118–126

    Google Scholar 

  46. Guo B, Su M, Wang H, Tang Z, Liao Y, Zhang L, Shi S (2020) Observer-based second-order sliding mode control for grid-connected VSI with LCL-type filter under weak grid. Electric Power Syst Res 183:106270

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fazli E, Rakhtala SM, Mirrashid N, Karimi HR (2022) Real-time implementation of a super twisting control algorithm for an upper limb wearable robot. Mechatronics 84:102808

    Google Scholar 

  48. Belkaid A, Colak I, Kayisli K (2017) Implementation of a modified P&O-MPPT algorithm adapted for varying solar radiation conditions. Electr Eng 99(3):839–846

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In their acknowledgements, the writers mention the “LSEM Laboratory, University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria).”

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghni Billel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors affirm that they have no known financial or interpersonal conflicts that would have seemed to have an impact on the research presented in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7, 8.

Table 6 PMSG setting parameters
Table 7 WT setting parameters
Table 8 DC bus and Grid setting parameters

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Billel, M., Ilham, T., Amira, B. et al. An in-depth study of robust MPPT for extend optimal power extraction using wind speed compensation technique of wind generators. Electr Eng 105, 681–704 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01691-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01691-5

Keywords

Navigation