Abstract
Fragility fractures in men represent a major health problem, and this prompts a necessity for reliable tools for the identification of men at risk of fracture. In order to assess the ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the prediction of fracture risk in men and whether their combination might be useful in a clinical setting, we studied 401 men (age range 45–82 years, mean 60.3±12.5), of whom 133 had osteoporotic fractures and 268 did not. In all subjects we measured bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (BMD-LS) and at the femur, calculating thereafter the standard femoral subregions: neck (BMD-FN), total hip (BMD-T), trochanter (BMD-TR), intertrochanter (BMD-ITR), and Ward’s triangle (BMD-W), by DXA. We also performed ultrasound parameters at the calcaneus: speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness, by Achilles plus, and at the phalanxes: amplitude dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS) and the parameters of the graphic trace: bone transmission time (BTT), fast wave amplitude (FWA), signal dynamic (SDy) and ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI), by Bone Profiler. All DXA and QUS parameters, apart from FWA, were significantly (P<0.001) lower in patients with a history of fracture. BMD at the proximal femur showed the best ability in discriminating men with or without fractures. QUS at the heel showed discriminatory ability significantly better than QUS at the fingers. By logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and BMI, BMD-T showed the best association with fragility fracture [odds ratio (OR)=3.43, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.47–4.77]. Among QUS parameters, the highest value of the OR was shown by stiffness (OR=3.18, CI=2.27–4.48). FWA and SDy were not associated with fragility fractures in men. If DXA and QUS were combined, the prediction of the OR of fragility fracture events in men increases; in fact Stiffness was able to increase the OR when added to BMD-LS (OR=5.44, CI=3.16–10.13) and BMD-T (OR=6.08, CI=2.63–14.27). SOS and BUA showed a similar pattern. AD-SoS improved the prediction of fracture only when combined with BMD-LS (OR=4.36, CI=1.99–9.57). If BMD-LS and BMD-FN or BMD-T were combined, the value of the OR increases (OR=4.59, CI=2.27–9.25 and OR=4.68, CI=2.24–9.76), respectively. Our study supports the effectiveness of QUS in the identification of osteoporotic fractures in men. QUS seems to play an independent and complementary role, with respect to DXA, in order to enhance the power for predicting osteoporotic fractures in men.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ III (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289
Melton LJ III, Lane AW, Cooper C, Eastell R, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3:113–119
O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:152–157
Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sarnbrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882
Orwoll E (2000) Perspective. Assessing bone density in men. J Bone Miner Res 15:1867–1870
Nguyen T, Sambrook P, Kelly P, Jones G, Lord S, Freund J (1993) Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by postural instability and bone density. BMJ 307:1111–1115
Mussolino ME, Looker AC, Madans JH, Langlois JA, Orwoll ES (1998) Risk factors for hip fracture in white men: The NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. J Bone Miner Res 13:918–924
De Laet CEDH, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AEAM, Hofman A, Pols HAP (1998) Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation of the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1587–1593
De Laet C.D.H, Van Der Klift M, Hofman A, Pols HAP (2002) Osteoporosis in men and women: a story about bone mineral density threshold and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 17:2231–2236
Fujiwara S, Kasagi F, Masunari N, Naito K, Suzuki G, Fukunaga M (2003) Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women. J Bone Miner Res 18:1547–1553
The European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS Group) (2002) The relationship between bone density and incident fractures in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 17:2214–2221
Melton LJ, Orwoll ES, Wasnich RD (2001) Does bone density predict fracture comparable in men and women? Osteoporos Int 12:707–709
Faulkner GK, Orwoll E (2002) Implications in the use of T-scores for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men. J Clin Densitom 5:87–93
Binkley NC, Schmeer P, Wasnich RD, Lenchik L (2002) What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-caucasians? J Clin Densitom 5:19–27
Legrand E, Chappard D, Pascaretti C, Duquenne M, Rondeau C, Simon Y, Rohmer V, Basle MF, Audran M (1999). Bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in men. Osteoporos Int 10:265–270
Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Diessel E, Genant HK (2001) Is quantitative ultrasound dependent on bone structure? A reflection. Osteoporos Int 12:1–15
Pluskiewicz W, Drozdowska B (1999) Ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus in men: differences between healthy and fractured persons and the influence of age and anthropometric features on ultrasound parameters. Osteoporos Int 10:47–51
Montagnani A, Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Mangeri M, Monaco R, Gennari L, Gennari C (2001) Usefulness of bone quantitative ultrasound in management of osteoporosis in men. J Clin Densitom 4:231–237
Mulleman D, Legroux-Gerot I, Duquesnoy B, Marchandise X, Delcambre B, Cortet B (2002) Quantitative ultrasound of bone in male osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:388–393
Goemaere S, Zmierczak H, Van Pottelbergh I, Kaufman JM (2002) Ability of peripheral bone assessments to predict areal bone mineral density at hip in community-dwelling elderly men. J Clin Densitom 3:219–228
Ekman A, Michaelsson K, Petern-Mallmin M, Ljunghall S, Mallmin H (2002) Dual X-ray absorptiometry of hip, heel ultrasound, and densitometry of fingers can discriminate male patients with hip fracture from control subjects. J Clin Densitom 1:79–85
Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, Sebert JL, Cormier C, Kotzki PO, Delmas PD, Pouilles JM, Breart G, Meunier PJ, for the EPIDOS prospective study group (1996) Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348:511–514
Cepollaro C, Gonnelli S, Pondrelli C, Martini S, Montagnani A, Rossi S, Gennari L, Gennari C. (1997) The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture. Br J Radiol 70:691–696
Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2001) Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination? Osteoporos Int 12:471–477
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843
Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM, for the study of osteoporotic fractures research group (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 157:629–634
Wuster C, Albanese C, De Aloysio D, Duboef F, Gambacciani M, Gonnelli S, Gluer CC, Hans D, Joly J, Regynster JY, De Terlizzi F, Cadossi R (2000) Phalangeal Osteosonogrammetry Study: age-related changes, diagnostic sensitivity, and discrimination power. J Bone Miner Res 15:1603–1614
Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, Barkmann R, Njeh CF, Kantorovich E, Gluer CC, Genant HK (1999) Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res 14:644–651
Peretz A, De Maertelaer V, Moris M, Wouters M, Bergmann P (1999) Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in women with and without fractures. J Clin Densitom 2:127–133
The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women, and children. J Clin Densitom 7:17–26
Seeman E, Bianchi G, Adami S, Kanis J, Khosla S, Orwoll E (2004) Osteoporosis in men—consensus is premature. Calcif Tissue Int 75:120–122
Langton CM, Langton DK (2000) Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. Br J Radiol 73:31–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonnelli, S., Cepollaro, C., Gennari, L. et al. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men. Osteoporos Int 16, 963–968 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1771-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1771-6