Skip to main content
Log in

Are there detectable common aperiodic displacements at ITRF co-location sites?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The time evolution of station positions has historically been described by piece-wise linear models in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF). Although those models were extended with exponential and logarithmic functions in the ITRF2014 and with annual and semiannual sine waves in the ITRF2020, part of the Earth’s surface deformation is still not captured by such deterministic functions. Taking into account additional aperiodic ground deformation in the reference frame could in principle provide a better description of the shape of the Earth. This would, however, require the aperiodic displacements of the different space geodetic techniques to be tied into a common frame by means of co-motion constraints. The relevance of applying co-motion constraints to the measured aperiodic displacements raises questions because of the presence of technique-specific errors in the station position time series. In this article, we investigate whether common aperiodic displacements, other than post-seismic deformation, can be detected at ITRF co-location sites. We use for that purpose station position time series extracted from the solutions provided by the four technique services for ITRF2014 and carefully aligned to a common reference frame in order to minimize differential network effect. The time series are then cleaned from linear, post-seismic and periodic signals (including seasonal deformation and technique systematic errors). The residual time series are finally compared within ITRF co-location sites. Modest correlations are observed between Global Navigation Satellite Systems residual time series and the other space geodetic techniques, mostly in the vertical component, pointing to a domination of technique errors over common aperiodic displacements. The pertinence of applying co-motion constraints to measured aperiodic displacements is finally discussed in light of these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The input data used in the ITRF2014 computation are available at the NASA Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS), https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/slr/products/itrf2014/ for SLR, https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/gnss/products/repro2/ for GNSS, https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/vlbi/ITRF2014/ for VLBI and https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/doris/products/sinex_series/idswd/ for DORIS. The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. https://lists.igs.org/pipermail/igsmail/2012/000497.html.

  2. https://climserv.ipsl.polytechnique.fr/ixion/.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study contributes to the IdEx Université de Paris ANR-18-IDEX-0001. We are grateful to the IAG technique services for providing the space geodesy products that we used and to the IERS Global Geophysical Fluids Center for the non-tidal loading deformation time series. We thank the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) for their financial support through the TOSCA committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZA, PR, XC and MS designed the research; MS and PR performed the data processing; MS wrote the initial draft of the paper. All authors analyzed and discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maylis de La Serve.

Appendices

Detected periods

Table 1 summarizes, for each technique, the periods for which a sine wave has been added in the kinematic models of the technique stations. A period followed by * corresponds to a variable sine wave as described in Sect. 3.1, with a degree equal to the number of *.

Concordance correlation coefficients

The figures in this appendix detail, for each pair of techniques, the highest concordance correlation coefficient obtained at each co-location site and its 95% confidence interval (Figs. 9, 10, 11, 12).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Highest concordance correlation coefficient obtained at each co-location site and its 95% confidence interval for GNSS-DORIS station pairs, with (in pink) or without (in green) non-tidal loading corrections from Boy (2021) applied

Fig. 10
figure 10

Highest concordance correlation coefficient obtained at each co-location site and its 95% confidence interval for GNSS-SLR station pairs, with (in pink) or without (in green) non-tidal loading corrections from Boy (2021) applied

Fig. 11
figure 11

Highest concordance correlation coefficient obtained at each co-location site and its 95% confidence interval for GNSS-VLBI station pairs, with (in pink) or without (in green) non-tidal loading corrections from Boy (2021) applied

Fig. 12
figure 12

Highest concordance correlation coefficient obtained at each co-location site and its 95% confidence interval for a SLR-DORIS, b VLBI-DORIS and c VLBI-SLR station pairs, with (in pink) or without (in green) non-tidal loading corrections from Boy (2021) applied

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de La Serve, M., Rebischung, P., Collilieux, X. et al. Are there detectable common aperiodic displacements at ITRF co-location sites?. J Geod 97, 79 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01769-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01769-3

Keywords

Navigation