Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping ground displacement by a multiple phase difference-based InSAR approach: with stochastic model estimation and turbulent troposphere mitigation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tropospheric delay is one of the dominant error sources of interferometric synthetic aperture radar when measuring ground displacement. Although many methods have been presented for the correction of tropospheric effects, a large portion of them (such as the numerical weather models and the topography-correlated analysis methods) can only be used to correct the stratified delays (i.e., topography-related delays), and it is still intractable for mitigating the turbulent effects. Considering that the approximate displacement extent over an interested region often can be known based on some prior geophysical or geological information, we present here a new method to mitigate the effects of atmospheric turbulence by fusing multiple phase differences (MPDs) between the pixel of interest and those pixels whose displacement can be ignored or can be known based on external displacement datasets (e.g., from other geodetic observations). Our method involves estimating the stochastic model, i.e., variance–covariance matrix, of the MPDs for each pixel and then reconstructing the ground displacement pixel by pixel using a proposed minimum variance-based linear estimator. Two advantages of the proposed method are that: (1) no external atmospheric data are required; (2) uncertainties of the reconstructed displacements can be provided as well. In addition, our method is implemented interferogram by interferogram, so we do not need time series of InSAR datasets. The performance of the proposed approach is tested by using both simulated datasets and the real data over Mexico City regions, and the experimental results show that our method can mitigate the turbulent atmosphere efficiently and robustly, which is of great interest to a wide community of geodesists and geophysicists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bamler R, Hartl P (1998) Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Inverse Prob 14:R1–R54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert DPS, Hooper A, Wright TJ (2015) A spatially variable power law tropospheric correction technique for InSAR data. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:1345–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardino P, Fornaro G, Lanari R, Sansosti E (2002) A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40:2375–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y-M, Li Z-W, Wei J-C, Zhan W-J, Zhu J-J, Wang C-C (2014) A novel method for determining the anisotropy of geophysical parameters: unit range variation increment (URVI). Appl Geophys 11:340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Li Z, Wei J, Hu J, Duan M, Feng G (2017) Stochastic modeling for time series InSAR: with emphasis on atmospheric effects. J Geodesy 92:185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CW, Zebker HA (2000) Network approaches to two-dimensional phase unwrapping: intractability and two new algorithms. JOSA A 17:401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Guo H, Ma P, Lin H, Wang C, Ishwaran N, Hang P (2017) Radar interferometry offers new insights into threats to the Angkor site. Science 3:e1601284

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1990) The origins of kriging. Math Geol 22:239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding XL, Li ZW, Zhu JJ, Feng GC, Long JP (2008) Atmospheric effects on InSAR measurements and their mitigation. Sensors 8:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JR, Biggs J, Parsons B, Wright TJ (2008) InSAR slip rate determination on the Altyn Tagh Fault, northern Tibet, in the presence of topographically correlated atmospheric delays. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emardson TR, Simons M, Webb FH (2003) Neutral atmospheric delay in interferometric synthetic aperture radar applications: statistical description and mitigation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 108:2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F (2001) Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J, Brooks B, Cherubini T, Shacat C, Businger S, Werner CL (2006) Mitigating atmospheric noise for InSAR using a high resolution weather model. Geophys Res Lett 33:L16304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong W, Meyer FJ, Liu S, Hanssen RF (2015) Temporal filtering of InSAR data using statistical parameters from NWP models. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53:4033–4044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González PJ, Fernández J (2011) Error estimation in multitemporal InSAR deformation time series, with application to Lanzarote, Canary Islands. J Geophys Res 116:10404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen RF (2001) Radar interferometry. Data interpretation and error analysis, vol 2. Springer, Netherlands

  • Hooper A (2008) A multi-temporal InSAR method incorporating both persistent scatterer and small baseline approaches. Geophys Res Lett 35:L16302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolivet R, Grandin R, Lasserre C, Doin MP, Peltzer G (2011) Systematic InSAR tropospheric phase delay corrections from global meteorological reanalysis data. Geophys Res Lett 38:L17311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolivet R, Agram PS, Lin NY, Simons M, Doin M-P, Peltzer G, Li Z (2014) Improving InSAR geodesy using global atmospheric models. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaymaz I (2005) Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 27:133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita Y, Furuya M, Hobiger T, Ichikawa R (2012) Are numerical weather model outputs helpful to reduce tropospheric delay signals in InSAR data? J Geodesy 87:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein M (1967) A primal method for minimal cost flows with applications to the assignment and transportation problems. Manag Sci 14:205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knospe SH-G, Jónsson S (2010) Covariance estimation for dInSAR surface deformation measurements in the presence of anisotropic atmospheric noise. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A, Couckuyt I, Dhaene T (2014) Efficient multi-objective simulation-driven antenna design using co-kriging. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 62:5900–5905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (2005) Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) atmospheric correction: GPS, moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), and InSAR integration. J Geophys Res 110:B03410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZW, Ding XL, Liu GX (2004) Modeling atmospheric effects on InSAR with meteorological and continuous GPS observations: algorithms and some test results. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 66:907–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZW, Ding XL, Huang C, Zhu JJ, Chen YL (2008) Improved filtering parameter determination for the Goldstein radar interferogram filter. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 63:621–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y-NN, Simons M, Hetland EA, Muse P, DiCaprio C (2010) A multiscale approach to estimating topographically correlated propagation delays in radar interferograms. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 11:73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Quiroz P, Doin M-P, Tupin F, Briole P, Nicolas J-M (2009) Time series analysis of Mexico City subsidence constrained by radar interferometry. J Appl Geophys 69:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Kwoun O, Rykhus R (2007) Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR): its past, present and future. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 73:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Massonnet D, Feigl KL (1998) Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth’s surface. Rev Geophys 36:441–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onn F (2006) Modeling water vapor using GPS with application to mitigating InSAR Atmospheric distortions. Ph.D dissertation, Stanford University

  • Onn F, Zebker HA (2006) Correction for interferometric synthetic aperture radar atmospheric phase artifacts using time series of zenith wet delay observations from a GPS network. J Geophys Res 111:91020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmanoğlu B, Dixon TH, Wdowinski S, Cabral-Cano E, Jiang Y (2011) Mexico City subsidence observed with persistent scatterer InSAR. Int J Appl Earth Obs and Geoinf 13:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT (1993) Lagrange multipliers and optimality. SIAM Rev 35:183–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez E, Martin JM (1992) Theory and design of interferometric synthetic aperture radars. IEE Proc F (Radar Signal Process) 139:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen PA, Gurrola E, Sacco GF, Zebker H (2012) The InSAR scientific computing environment EUSAR. In: 9th European conference, pp 730–733

  • Sudhaus H, Jónsson S (2009) Improved source modelling through combined use of InSAR and GPS under consideration of correlated data errors: application to the June 2000 Kleifarvatn earthquake, Iceland. Geophys J Int 176:389–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Shi W, Atkinson PM, Zhao Y (2015) Downscaling MODIS images with area-to-point regression kriging. Remote Sens Environ 166:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu WB, Li ZW, Ding XL, Zhu JJ (2011) Interpolating atmospheric water vapor delay by incorporating terrain elevation information. J Geodesy 85:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Y, Doin M-P, Lopez-Quiroz P, Tupin F, Fruneau B, Pinel V et al (2012) Mexico City subsidence measured by InSAR time series: joint analysis using PS and SBAS approaches. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 5:1312–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebker H, Villasenor J (1992) Decorrelation in interferometric radar echoes. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 30:950–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebker HA, Rosen PA, Hensley S (1997) Atmospheric effects in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation and topographic maps. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102:7547–7563

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC1503603) and a joint doctoral program of China Scholarship Council (201606370114). We would like to thank ESA (European Space Agency) for supplying the Sentinel-1A datasets through the WInSAR Projects. We also acknowledge JPL/Caltech for the use of ISCE software (Rosen et al. 2012) to generate our interferograms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiwei Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Y., Li, Z. & Amelung, F. Mapping ground displacement by a multiple phase difference-based InSAR approach: with stochastic model estimation and turbulent troposphere mitigation. J Geod 93, 1313–1333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01248-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01248-8

Keywords

Navigation