Skip to main content
Log in

On the equivalence of Kalman filtering and least-squares estimation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 February 2017

Abstract

The Kalman filter is derived directly from the least-squares estimator, and generalized to accommodate stochastic processes with time variable memory. To complete the link between least-squares estimation and Kalman filtering of first-order Markov processes, a recursive algorithm is presented for the computation of the off-diagonal elements of the a posteriori least-squares error covariance. As a result of the algebraic equivalence of the two estimators, both approaches can fully benefit from the advantages implied by their individual perspectives. In particular, it is shown how Kalman filter solutions can be integrated into the normal equation formalism that is used for intra- and inter-technique combination of space geodetic data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertella A, Betti B, Sansó F, Tornatore V (2005) Real time and batch navigation solutions: alternative approaches. Bollettino SIFET 4:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso AM, García-Martos C (2012) Time series analysis. Autoregressive, MA and ARMA processes. http://www.etsii.upm.es/ingor/estadistica/Carol/TSAtema4petten.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2016

  • Bierman GJ (1977) Factorization methods for discrete sequential estimation. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann E (1997) Combination of solutions for geodetic and geodynamic applications of the Global Positioning System (GPS), Geodätisch-geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, vol 55. Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission

  • Didova O, Gunter B, Riva R, Klees R, Roese-Koerner L (2016) An approach for estimating time-variable rates from geodetic time series. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0918-5

  • Durbin J, Koopman SJ (2012) Time series analysis by state space methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Gelb A (ed) (1974) Applied optimal estimation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser S, Fritsche M, Sósnica K, Rodríguez-Solano CJ, Wang K, Dach R, Hugentobler U, Rothacher M, Dietrich R (2015) A consistent combination of GNSS and SLR with minimum constraints. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-015-0849-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng IEEE Comput Soc 9(3):90–95

  • Kailath T, Sayed AH, Hassibi B (2000) Linear estimation. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 82D:35–45

  • Koch KR (1982) Kalman filter and optimal smoothing derived by the regression model. Manuscr Geod 7:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Koch KR (2010) Introduction to Bayesian statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR (2014) Modified Bryson–Frazier smoother cross-covariance. IEEE Trans Autom Control 59(1):233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson T, Soja B, Karbon M, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2015) Application of Kalman filtering in VLBI data analysis. Earth Planet Space 67:136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittelkau ME (2013) Attitude determination Kalman filter with 1/f flicker noise gyro model. In: Proceedings of the 26th international technical meeting of the ION satellite division, Nashville, Tennessee, pp 2143–2159

  • Rauch HE, Tung F, Striebel CT (1965) Maximum likelihood estimates of linear dynamic systems. AIAA 3(8):1445–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutman J (1991) Characterization of frequency stability in precision frequency sources. Proc IEEE 79(6):952–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh H, Behrend D (2012) VLBI: a fascinating technique for geodesy and astrometry. J Geodyn 61:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillard P, Boucher C (2001) A review of algebraic constraints in terrestrial reference fram datum definition. J Geod 75:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja B, Nilsson T, Karbon M, Zus F, Dick G, Deng Z, Wickert J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2015) Tropospheric delay determination by Kalman filtering VLBI data. Earth Planet Space 67:144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson HW (1970a) Comparison of Kalman, Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation techniques. AGARDograph 139:119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson HW (1970b) Least-squares estimation: from Gauss to Kalman. Spectr IEEE 7(7):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovers OJ, Fanselow JL (1987) Observation model and parameter partials for the JPL VLBI parameter estimation software “MASTERFIT”-1987. JPL Publ, Rev. 3, NASA, pp 83–39

  • Thaller D (2008) Inter-technique combination based on homogeneous normal equation systems including station coordinates. Earth orientation and troposphere parameters, GFZ Potsdam, Scientific Technical Report STR08/15

  • Thaller D, Dach R, Seitz M, Beutler G, Mareyen M, Richter B (2011) Combination of GNSS and SLR observations using satellite co-locations. J Geod 85:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SDP (2003) The effect of coloured noise on the uncertainties of rates from geodetic time series. J Geod 76:483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks colleague Halfdan P. Kierulf for clarifying and stimulating discussions, and project member and colleague Michael Dähnn for feedback which made the work more readable. The author also thanks colleagues and project members Geir Arne Hjelle, Ingrid Fausk and Ann-Silje Kirkvik for their support. The presented work was facilitated by the management at the Geodetic Institute, Norwegian Mapping Authority, as part of its reference frame contribution project. The management is represented by Head of Section Oddgeir Kristiansen, Project Leader Laila Løvhøiden, Director of Geodetic Institute Per Erik Opseth and Assistant Director/Head of Section Reidun Kittelsrud. The computations were performed with Python 3 (www.python.org), using packages NumPy (www.numpy.org) and Matplotlib (Hunter 2007) (www.matplotlib.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Mysen.

Ethics declarations

Note added in proof

From Didova et al. (2016), it has become clear to the author that a general expression for the error cross-covariances, see Eq. (96), has previously been derived (Durbin and Koopman 2012, p.104).

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1007-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mysen, E. On the equivalence of Kalman filtering and least-squares estimation. J Geod 91, 41–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0936-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0936-3

Keywords

Navigation