Abstract
Although total least squares (TLS) is more rigorous than the weighted least squares (LS) method to estimate the parameters in an errors-in-variables (EIV) model, it is computationally much more complicated than the weighted LS method. For some EIV problems, the TLS and weighted LS methods have been shown to produce practically negligible differences in the estimated parameters. To understand under what conditions we can safely use the usual weighted LS method, we systematically investigate the effects of the random errors of the design matrix on weighted LS adjustment. We derive the effects of EIV on the estimated quantities of geodetic interest, in particular, the model parameters, the variance–covariance matrix of the estimated parameters and the variance of unit weight. By simplifying our bias formulae, we can readily show that the corresponding statistical results obtained by Hodges and Moore (Appl Stat 21:185–195, 1972) and Davies and Hutton (Biometrika 62:383–391, 1975) are actually the special cases of our study. The theoretical analysis of bias has shown that the effect of random matrix on adjustment depends on the design matrix itself, the variance–covariance matrix of its elements and the model parameters. Using the derived formulae of bias, we can remove the effect of the random matrix from the weighted LS estimate and accordingly obtain the bias-corrected weighted LS estimate for the EIV model. We derive the bias of the weighted LS estimate of the variance of unit weight. The random errors of the design matrix can significantly affect the weighted LS estimate of the variance of unit weight. The theoretical analysis successfully explains all the anomalously large estimates of the variance of unit weight reported in the geodetic literature. We propose bias-corrected estimates for the variance of unit weight. Finally, we analyze two examples of coordinate transformation and climate change, which have shown that the bias-corrected weighted LS method can perform numerically as well as the weighted TLS method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Branham RL (2001) Astronomical data reduction with total least squares. New Astron Rev 45:649–661
Cai JQ, Grafarend E (2009) Systematical analysis of the transformation between Gauss–Krueger-coordinate/DHDN and UTM-coordinate/ETRS89 in Baden–Württemberg with different estimation methods. In: Drewes H (ed) Geodetic reference frames, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 134. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–211
Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM (2006) Measurement error in nonlinear models—a modern perspective, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London
Davies RB, Hutton B (1975) The effect of errors in the independent variables in linear regression. Biometrika 62:383–391
Deming WE (1931) The application of least squares. Phil Mag 11:146–158
Deming WE (1934) On the application of least squares—II. Phil Mag 17:804–829
Deming WE (1964) Statistical adjustment of data. Dover Publications, New York
Denton FT, Kuiper J (1965) The effect of measurement errors on parameter estimates and forecasts: a case study based on the Canadian preliminary national accounts. Rev Econ Stat 47:198–206
Felus YA, Burtch RC (2009) On symmetrical three-dimensional datum conversion. GPS Solut 13:65–74
Fuller WA (1987) Measurement error models. Wiley Interscience, New York
Gerhold GA (1969) Least-squares adjustment of weighted data to a general linear equation. Am J Phys 37:156–161
Golub GH, van Loan CF (1980) An analysis of the total least squares problem. SIAM J Numer Anal 17:883–893
Hodges SD, Moore PG (1972) Data uncertainties and least squares regression. Appl Stat 21:185–195
Krakiwsky ED, Thomson DB (1974) Mathematical models for the combination of terrestrial and satellite networks. Can Surv 28:606–615
Liu JN (1983) The equivalence of coordinate transformation models for the combination of satellite and terrestrial networks. J Wuhan Techn Univ Surv Mapp 8:37–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu JN, Liu DJ, Cui XZ (1987) Theory and applications of combined adjustment of satellite and terrestrial networks. J Wuhan Tech Univ Surv Mapp 12(4):1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Magnus JR, Neudecker H (1988) Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. Wiley, New York
Mann ME, Emanuel KA (2006) Atlantic hurricane trends linked to climate change. EOS 87(24):233–241
Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Phil Mag 2:559–572
Rao CR, Kleffe J (1988) Estimation of variance components and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Richardson DH, Wu D (1970) Least squares and grouping method estimators in the errors in variables model. J Am Stat Assoc 65:724–748
Schaffrin B, Wieser A (2008) On weighted total least-squares adjustment for linear regression. J Geod 82:415–421
Schaffrin B, Felus YA (2008) On the multivariate total least-squares approach to empirical coordinate transformations. Three algorithms. J Geod 82:373–383
Schaffrin B, Lee I, Choi Y, Felus YA (2006) Total least-squares for geodetic straight-line and plane adjustment. Boll Geod Sci Aff LXV:141–168
Searle SR (1971) Linear models. Wiley, New York
Shen YZ, Li BF, Chen Y (2011) An iterative solution of weighted total least squares adjustment. J Geod 85:229–238
Ursin B (1997) Methods for estimating the seismic reflection response. Geophysics 62:1990–1995
van Huffel S, Vandewalle J (1991) The total least squares problem: computational aspects and analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia
Wolf H (1980) Scale and orientation in combined doppler and triangulation nets. Bull Géod 54:45–53
Xu PL (1987) An extension of methods for prediction of displacements on large dams. Acta Geodetica Cartogr Sinica 16:280–288 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xu PL (2004) Determination of regional stress tensors from fault-slip data. Geophys J Int 157:1316–1330
Xu PL (2009) Iterative generalized cross-validation for fusing heteroscedastic data of inverse ill-posed problems. Geophys J Int 179:182–200
Xu PL (2013) The effect of incorrect weights on estimating the variance of unit weight. Stud Geophys Geod 57:339–352. doi:10.1007/s11200-012-0665-x
Xu PL, Shimada S, Fujii Y, Tanaka T (2000) Invariant geodynamical information in geometric geodetic measurements. Geophys J Int 142:586–602
Xu PL, Shen YZ, Fukuda Y, Liu YM (2006) Variance component estimation in inverse ill-posed linear models. J Geod 80:69–81
Xu PL, Liu JN, Shi C (2012) Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: algorithm and statistical analysis. J Geod 86:661–675
Acknowledgments
This work is partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C25400449) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41231174). The authors also thank the associate editor, Prof. W. Keller, and two of the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which help to clarify some of the points.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, P., Liu, J., Zeng, W. et al. Effects of errors-in-variables on weighted least squares estimation. J Geod 88, 705–716 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0716-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0716-x