Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of incorrect weights on estimating the variance of unit weight

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of incorrect weights on the weighted least squares (WLS) estimate, its accuracy, relative goodness and reliability have been thoroughly investigated in statistical and geodetic literature. Although the variance of unit weight has been one of the most important quantities in statistics and geodesy, little has been done to understand the effect of incorrect weights of observations and incorrect prior information on this quantity, except for an earlier study of Koch who showed that incorrect weights of observations would create a bias in the estimation of the variance of unit weight, though they do not affect the unbiasedness of the WLS estimates of parameters and the corrections to the observations. Since Koch did not directly give the formula to compute the bias, we will derive the bias of the estimated variance of unit weight due to incorrect weights of observations in this paper. In the case of incorrect prior information, both incorrect prior mean and incorrect prior weights can independently contribute a bias to the estimate of the variance of unit weight. Two simulated examples clearly show that the bias of the estimated variance of unit weight due to incorrect weights can be much larger than the variance of unit weight itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen X.R. and Wang S.G., 1984. Modern Applied Regression. Guangxi People Press, Guangxi (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub G.H., 1963. Comparison of the variance of minimum variance and weighted least squares regression coefficints. Ann. Math. Stat., 34, 984–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotthardt E., 1962. Die Auswirkung unrichtiger Annahmen über Gewichte und Korrelationen auf die Genauigkeit von Ausgleichungen. Z. Vermess., 87, 65–68 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn M. and van Mierlo J., 1987. Die Abhängigkeit der Ausgleichungsergebnisse von der Genauigkeitsänderung einer Beobachtung. Z. Vermess,, 112, 105–115 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslett S.J. and Puntanen S., 2011. On the equality of the BLUPs under two linear mixed models. Metrika, 74, 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howind J., Kutterer H. and Heck B., 1999. Impact of temporal correlations on GPS-derived relative point positions. J. Geodesy, 73, 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isotalo J., Puntanen S. and Styan G.P.H., 2008. The BLUE’s covariance matrix revisited: A review. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 138, 2722–2737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K.R., 1999. Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koreisha S.G. and Fang Y., 2001. Generalized least squares with misspecified serial correlation structures. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., B63, 515–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal W., 1968. When are Gauss-Markov and least squares estimators identical? A coordinatefree approach. Ann. Math. Stat., 39, 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutterer H., 1999. On the sensitivity of the results of least-squares adjustments concerning the stochastic model. J. Geodesy, 73, 350–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkwitz K., 1961. Über den Einfluss verschiedener Gewichtsannahmen auf das Ausgleichungsergebnis bei bedingten Beobachtungen. Z. Vermess., 86, 179–186, 239–245 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magness T.A. and McGuire J.B., 1962. Comparison of least squares and minimum variance estimates of regression parameters. Ann. Math. Stat., 33, 462–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy F.W., 1967. A necessary and sufficient condition that ordinary least-squares estimators be best linear unbiased. J. Am. Stat. Soc., 62, 1302–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S.K. and Rao C.R., 1969. Conditions for optimality and validity of simple least squares theory. Ann. Math. Stat., 40, 1617–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puntanen S. and Styan G.P.H., 1989. The equality of the ordinary least squares estimator and the best linear unbiased estimator. Am. Stat., 43, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao C.R., 1967. Least squares theory using an estimated dispersion matrix and its application to measurement of signals. In: Le Cam L.M. and Neyman J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, 355–372 (http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.bsmsp/1200512997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y., 2006. Influence of stochastic model on adjustment results of GPS network. J. Xi’an Univ. Sci. Tech., 26, 344–348 (in Chinese with English Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutenburg H., 1982. Prior Information in Linear Models. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson G.S., 1967. Linear least squares regression. Ann. Math. Stat., 38, 1679–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf H., 1961. Der Einfluss von Gewichtsänderungen auf die Ausgleichungsergebnisse. Z. Vermess., 86, 361–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P.L., 1991. Least squares collocation with incorrect prior information. Z. Vermess., 116, 266–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P.L., Liu J.N. and Shi C., 2012. Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: algorithm and statistical analysis. J. Geodesy, 86, 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young D.M., Odell P.L. and Hahn W., 2000. Nonnegative-definite covariance structures for which the blu, wls, and ls estimators are equal. Stat. Prob. Lett., 49, 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyskind G., 1967. On canonical forms, nonnegative covariance matrices and best and simple least squares linear estimators in linear models. Ann. Math. Stat., 38, 1092–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peiliang Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, P. The effect of incorrect weights on estimating the variance of unit weight. Stud Geophys Geod 57, 339–352 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-012-0665-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-012-0665-x

Keywords

Navigation