Abstract
Predicting a component’s fatigue life requires information on not only the number of stress cycles the component will undergo but also the kind and frequency of those stress cycles, as well as information about the surrounding environment and the intended purpose of the component. Models that can forecast lifespan by utilizing available experimental data are preferred since fatigue investigations are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, this work focuses on fatigue testing of S355 mild steel specimens under multiaxial loading conditions involving bending and torsion. The impact of phase-shifted loading conditions on material behavior, considering in-phase and with angles 0°, 45°, and 90°, has been studied. Then, the data of fatigue tests involve variations in loading amplitudes, and configurations used in different ML algorithms such as lazy k-nearest neighbors (Lazy-KNN), linear regression (LR), and random forest (RF) were employed for predictive modeling. These models are evaluated based on their ability to predict nominal stresses, torsion, and bending moments under varying loading configurations. The predictive modeling results are visually presented, showcasing the effectiveness of Lazy-KNN in accurately predicting material responses. Quantitative analyses further confirm the robustness of Lazy-KNN in predicting bending, nominal stress, and torsion under different loading conditions. The study provides valuable insights into the fatigue behavior of S355 mild steel and highlights the significance of considering multiaxial loading configurations in material testing and design.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is available on request from the authors.
References
Derda S, Karolczuk A, Robak G, Prażmowski M, Paul H, Łagoda T, Gupta MK (2023) Impact of the interface on the fatigue life of steel-based explosively welded heterostructured plates. Arch Civ Mech Eng 23:191
Yucesan YA, Viana FAC (2022) A hybrid physics-informed neural network for main bearing fatigue prognosis under grease quality variation. Mech Syst Signal Process 171:108875. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2022.108875
Moghadam FK, Nejad AR (2022) Online condition monitoring of floating wind turbines drivetrain by means of digital twin. Mech Syst Signal Process 162:108087. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2021.108087
Morishita T, Itoh T, Bao ZL (2015) Fatigue Life of Type 316 Stainless steel under wide ranged multiaxial loading. Proc Eng 130:1730–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.198
Gao J, Heng F, Yuan Y, Liu Y (2024) A novel machine learning method for multiaxial fatigue life prediction: improved adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Int J Fatigue 178:142–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.108007
Kluger K (2015) Fatigue life estimation for 2017A–T4 and 6082–T6 aluminium alloys subjected to bending-torsion with mean stress. Int J Fatigue 80:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.05.005
Macek W, Marciniak Z, Branco R, Rozumek D, Królczyk GM (2021) A fractographic study exploring the fracture surface topography of S355J2 steel after pseudo-random bending-torsion fatigue tests. Measurement 178:109443. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2021.109443
Macek W, Branco R, Podulka P, Masoudi Nejad R, Costa JD, Ferreira JAM, Capela C (2023) The correlation of fractal dimension to fracture surface slope for fatigue crack initiation analysis under bending-torsion loading in high-strength steels. Measurement 218:113169. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2023.113169
Karolczuk A (2016) Analysis of revised fatigue life calculation algorithm under proportional and non-proportional loading with constant amplitude. Int J Fatigue 88:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.027
Pejkowski Ł, Skibicki D, Sempruch J (2014) High-cycle fatigue behavior of austenitic steel and pure copper under uniaxial, proportional and non-proportional loading, Stroj. Vestnik/Journal. Mech Eng 60:549–560. https://doi.org/10.5545/SV-JME.2013.1600
Yu ZY, Zhu SP, Liu Q, Liu Y (2017) A new energy-critical plane damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction of turbine blades. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050513
Karolczuk A, Słoński M (2022) Application of the Gaussian process for fatigue life prediction under multiaxial loading. Mech Syst Signal Process 167:108599. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2021.108599
Mei J, Dong P (2017) Modeling of path-dependent multi-axial fatigue damage in aluminum alloys. Int J Fatigue 95:252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.031
Karolczuk A, Kluger K (2014) Analysis of the coefficient of normal stress effect in chosen multiaxial fatigue criteria. Theor Appl Fract Mech 73:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.07.015
Hamada N, Sakane M, Itoh T, Kanayama H (2014) High temperature nonproportional low cycle fatigue using fifteen loading paths. Theor Appl Fract Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.07.006
Han Q, Wang Y, Yin Y, Zhang S (2020) Fatigue tests on notched specimens of G20Mn5QT cast steel and life prediction by a new strain-based method. Arch Civ Mech Eng 20:1–16
Karolczuk A, Carpinteri A, Robak G, Derda S, Prażmowski M (2020) Fatigue failure analysis of three-layer Zr–Ti/Zr–steel composite plates: an insight into the evolution of cracks initiated at the interfaces. Arch Civ Mech Eng 20:138
Hasni H, Alavi AH, Jiao P, Lajnef N (2017) Detection of fatigue cracking in steel bridge girders: a support vector machine approach. Arch Civ Mech Eng 17:609–622
Shenggang C, Quanquan G, Yingying Z, Hexiang H, Bei S (2022) Machine learning models for cracking torque and pre-cracking stiffness of RC beams. Arch Civ Mech Eng 23:6
Huang M, He W, Incecik A, Gupta MK, Królczyk G, Li Z (2022) Phase change material heat storage performance in the solar thermal storage structure employing experimental evaluation. J Energy Storage 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103638
Korkmaz ME, Gupta MK, Kuntoğlu M, Patange AD, Ross NS, Yılmaz H, Chauhan S, Vashishtha G (2023) Prediction and classification of tool wear and its state in sustainable machining of Bohler steel with different machine learning models. Measurement 223:113825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113825
Feng S, Sun X, Chen G, Wu H, Chen X (2023) LBE corrosion fatigue life prediction of T91 steel and 316 SS using machine learning method assisted by symbol regression. Int J Fatigue 177:107962. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2023.107962
Zhang J, Zhu J, Guo W, Guo W (2022) A machine learning-based approach to predict the fatigue life of three-dimensional cracked specimens. Int J Fatigue 159:106808. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2022.106808
Alkunte S, Fidan I (2023) Machine learning-based fatigue life prediction of functionally graded materials using material extrusion technology. J Compos Sci 7:420. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCS7100420
Owsiński RO, Lachowicz DS, Lachowicz CT, Gil R, Niesłony A (2021) Characterisation of joint properties through spatial mapping of cracks in fatigue specimens, extracted from the linearly friction welded steel coupon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.02.008
Korkmaz ME, Gupta MK, Çelik E, Ross NS, Günay M (2024) Tool wear and its mechanism in turning aluminum alloys with image processing and machine learning methods. Tribol Int 191:109207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.109207
Ross NS, Sheeba PT, Shibi CS, Gupta MK, Korkmaz ME, Sharma VS (2023) A novel approach of tool condition monitoring in sustainable machining of Ni alloy with transfer learning models. J Intell Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02074-8
Peng Z, Yang P, Song Y, Hu K (2023) Three-dimensional fracture analysis of large opening box girder with crack damage under bending and torsion loads. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 145. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056736
Lachowicz CT, Owsiński R (2020) Comparative analysis of fatigue energy characteristics of S355J2 steel subjected to multi-axis loads. Materials (Basel) 13:2470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112470
Małecka J, Żak K, Łagoda T (2023) Fatigue fracture surface of bronze RG7 under proportional cyclic torsion and bending. Measurement 218:113126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2023.113126
Marciniak Z, Rozumek D, Lesiuk G, Correia JAFO (2020) Fatigue failure assessment of S355J2G1W structural steel under biaxial in- and out of phase loading regarding geometrical constraints of samples. Eng Fail Anal 117:104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2020.104785
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Owsiński, R., Gupta, M.K., Lachowicz, C.T. et al. Exploring the impact of phase-shifted loading conditions on fatigue life of S355J2 mild steel with different machine learning approaches. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 132, 475–494 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13389-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13389-y