Skip to main content
Log in

Process monitoring of the AISI D6 steel turning using artificial neural networks

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work implements artificial neural networks (ANNs) to monitor tool wear during turning of AISI D6 steel. The goal is to detect wear, prevent tool breakage, and enhance productivity. Experimental tests involve using polycrystalline cubic boron nitride tools to turn AISI D6 steel, measuring wear and surface roughness. ANNs are trained with machining forces, electric current, and acoustic emission data. Findings showed that cutting and machining forces, along with motor current, increased as the wear progresses. The dominant frequencies of the acoustic emission signal range from 30 to 40 kHz, with decreasing RMS as wear increases. The ANN achieved satisfactory results, with wear estimation deviations below 0.09 mm. However, its predictive capability beyond the training range is limited. Workpiece surface roughness estimation showed around 8% error compared to the experimental Ra values. Overall, the ANN-based approach enables real-time tool wear monitoring, reducing the risk of damage and optimizing productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All the authors declare that this paper has no available data or material.

Code availability

All the authors declare that this paper has no available code.

References

  1. Oliveira ARF, da Silva LRR, Baldin V et al (2021) Effect of tool wear on the surface integrity of Inconel 718 in face milling with cemented carbide tools. Wear 476. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WEAR.2021.203752

  2. de S RR, de Paiva RL, LRR d S et al (2021) Comprehensive study on Inconel 718 surface topography after grinding. Tribol Int 158:106919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.106919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sales WF, Schoop J, da Silva LRR et al (2020) A review of surface integrity in machining of hardened steels. J Manuf Process 58:136–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Suresh R, Basavarajappa S, Gaitonde VN et al (2013) State-of-the-art research in machinability of hardened steels. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 227:191–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405412464589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva LRR, Favero Filho A, Costa ES et al (2018) Cutting temperatures in end milling of compacted graphite irons. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman S (2018) Energy conscious cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 232(10):1690–1706

  7. Duc TM, Long TT, Chien TQ (2019) Performance evaluation of MQL parameters using Al2O3 and MoS2 nanofluids in hard turning 90CrSi steel. Lubricants 7:40. https://doi.org/10.3390/LUBRICANTS7050040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutnichenko O, Nilsson M, Lindvall R et al (2021) Improvement of tool utilization when hard turning with cBN tools at varying process parameters. Wear 477:203900. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WEAR.2021.203900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonfá MM, Costa ÉS, Sales WF et al (2019) Evaluation of tool life and workpiece surface roughness in turning of AISI D6 hardened steel using PCBN tools and minimum quantity of lubricant (MQL) applied at different directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:971–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-019-03619-Z/METRICS

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suarez MP, Marques A, Boing D et al (2019) MoS2 solid lubricant application in turning of AISI D6 hardened steel with PCBN tools. J Manuf Process 47:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2019.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2013) Effect of work material hardness and cutting parameters on performance of coated carbide tool when turning hardened steel: An optimization approach. Measurement 46:1572–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2012.11.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Machado AR, da Silva LRR, de Souza FCR et al (2021) State of the art of tool texturing in machining. J Mater Process Technol 293:117096. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2021.117096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurniawan R, Thirumalai Kumaran S, Arumuga Prabu V et al (2017) Measurement of burr removal rate and analysis of machining parameters in ultrasonic assisted dry EDM (US-EDM) for deburring drilled holes in CFRP composite. Measurement 110:98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2017.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding H, Shin YC (2010) Laser-assisted machining of hardened steel parts with surface integrity analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMACHTOOLS.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. da Silva LRR, Del Claro VTS, Andrade CLF et al (2021) Tool wear monitoring in drilling of high-strength compacted graphite cast irons. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 235:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420937857/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0954405420937857-FIG11.JPEG

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuntoğlu M, Salur E, Gupta MK et al (2021) A state-of-the-art review on sensors and signal processing systems in mechanical machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116(9):2711–2735. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-021-07425-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu X, Wang J, Zhong B et al (2021) Deep learning-based tool wear prediction and its application for machining process using multi-scale feature fusion and channel attention mechanism. Measurement 177:109254. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2021.109254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li X, Yang Y, Ye Y et al (2021) An online visual measurement method for workpiece dimension based on deep learning. Measurement 185:110032. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2021.110032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramesh S, Viswanathan R, Ambika S (2016) Measurement and optimization of surface roughness and tool wear via grey relational analysis, TOPSIS and RSA techniques. Measurement 78:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2015.09.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manivel D, Gandhinathan R (2016) Optimization of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning of austempered ductile iron (grade 3) using Taguchi method. Measurement 93:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2016.06.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ambhore N, Kamble D, Chinchanikar S (2018) Behaviour of cutting tool vibrations with the progress of tool wear in turning hardened AISI 52100 steel: an approach to tool condition monitoring system. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 455:012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Upase R, Ambhore N (2020) Experimental investigation of tool wear using vibration signals: An ANN approach. Mater Today Proc 24:1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.04.454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chabbi A, Yallese MA, Nouioua M et al (2017) Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2267–2290. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-016-9858-8/METRICS

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sick B (2002) On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: a review of more than a decade of research. Mech Syst Signal Process 16:487–546. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2001.1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aslan A (2020) Optimization and analysis of process parameters for flank wear, cutting forces and vibration in turning of AISI 5140: a comprehensive study. Measurement 163:107959. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2020.107959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han J, Cao K, Xiao L et al (2020) In situ measurement of cutting edge temperature in turning using a near-infrared fiber-optic two-color pyrometer. Measurement 156:107595. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2020.107595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Han J, Liu Z, Cao K et al (2022) Cutting temperature measurement in turning using fiber-optic multi-spectral radiation thermometry and its application in tool wear status recognition. Measurement 198:111413. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2022.111413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marani M, Zeinali M, Songmene V, Mechefske CK (2021) Tool wear prediction in high-speed turning of a steel alloy using long short-term memory modelling. Measurement 177:109329. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2021.109329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marani M, Zeinali M, Kouam J et al (2020) Prediction of cutting tool wear during a turning process using artificial intelligence techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:505–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-020-06144-6/FIGURES/10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Twardowski P, Wiciak-Pikula M (2019) Prediction of tool wear using artificial neural networks during turning of hardened steel. Materials 12:3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA12193091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Akbari A, Danesh M, Khalili K (2017) A method based on spindle motor current harmonic distortion measurements for tool wear monitoring. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39:5049–5055. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40430-017-0762-4/FIGURES/13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frigieri EP, Ynoguti CA, Paiva AP (2019) Correlation analysis among audible sound emissions and machining parameters in hardened steel turning. J Intell Manuf 30:1753–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10845-017-1356-9/TABLES/6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Santos MS, Ludermir TB (1999) Using factorial design to optimize neural networks. Proc Int Jt Conf Neural Netw 2:857–861. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.1999.831064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kannaiyan M, Karthikeyan G, Thankachi Raghuvaran JG (2020) Prediction of specific wear rate for LM25/ZrO2 composites using Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation algorithm. J Mater Res Technol 9:530–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2019.10.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramezan CA, Warner TA, Maxwell AE (2019) Evaluation of sampling and cross-validation tuning strategies for regional-scale machine learning classification. Remote Sens 11:185. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS11020185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Haykin S (2008) Neural networks and learning machines. Pearson Prentice, Hall New Jersey USA, p 936 pLinks 3:906. 978-0131471399

    Google Scholar 

  37. Machado ÁR, Diniz AE (2017) Tool wear analysis in the machining of hardened steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:4095–4109. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-017-0455-2/METRICS

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors declare that all co-authors participated in all the development stages of this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable to this paper.

Consent to participate

Not applicable to this paper.

Consent for publication

Not applicable to this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubin, V.H.S., da Silva, L.R.R., Okada, K.F.Á. et al. Process monitoring of the AISI D6 steel turning using artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127, 3569–3584 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11745-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11745-y

Keywords

Navigation