Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental and theoretical approach for stiffness of machine tool spindle with fluid bearings

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spindle nose stiffness is a leading technical indicator of machine tool spindle. However, the stiffness of machine tool spindle supported by fluid bearings has not been studied thoroughly, by far; there is not an ideal approach to obtain the spindle nose stiffness due to the nonlinear fluid bearings. This paper proposes a new methodology for the spindle nose stiffness including definition of the spindle nose stiffness with the fluid bearings, experimental and theoretical approach to obtain the spindle nose stiffness. A motorized spindle with hydrodynamic water-lubricated spiral groove bearings developed in our laboratory is selected as an object; a theoretical and experimental investigation on the spindle nose stiffness is conducted. The result shows that the proposed methodology is applicable for obtaining the spindle nose stiffness with the fluid bearings; the experimental device has the advantages of simple structure, low cost, and convenient operation. Meanwhile, the spindle nose stiffness can be calculated by simultaneously solving the dynamic model of rotor-bearing system. We expect an improvement for the experimental device by introducing another load device to apply a perturbed load with an any angle to the external load on the spindle nose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

\({b}_{g},{b}_{r}\) :

Groove width, ridge width of bearing

d :

Diameter of journal bearing

\({D}_{i},{D}_{o}\) :

Inner diameter, outer diameter of loading head

\({\mathbf{G}}_{\mathbf{d}},{\mathbf{G}}_{\mathbf{s}}\) :

Gyroscopic matrix

\({G}_{r},{G}_{\theta },{G}_{{x}^{^{\prime}}},{G}_{z}\) :

Parameters of depending on the Reynolds number

h :

Film thickness

H :

Height of iron core

\({K}_{n},{K}_{z}\) :

Spindle nose stiffness

\({\mathbf{K}}_{\mathbf{s}},{\mathbf{K}}_{\mathbf{p}}\) :

Stiffness matrix

\(l,{l}_{g}\) :

Journal length, groove length of journal bearing

L :

Length of loading head

\({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathbf{d}},{\mathbf{M}}_{\mathbf{s}},{\mathbf{M}}_{\mathbf{c}}\) :

Mass matrix

\({F}_{z}^{T},{F}_{x}^{T},{M}_{y}^{T}\) :

Force and moment of thrust bearing

\({F}_{x}^{J},{F}_{y}^{J},{M}_{x}^{J},{M}_{y}^{J}\) :

Force and moment of journal bearing

p :

Water film pressure

\({\mathbf{Q}}_{\mathbf{b}}\) :

Transient film forces

\({\mathbf{Q}}_{\mathbf{e}}\) :

Transient external loads

\({Q}_{\zeta },{Q}_{\eta },{Q}_{v}\) :

Flow rate

r :

Radius of journal bearing

\({r}_{o},{r}_{i},{r}_{s}\) :

Outer radius, inner radius, seal radius of thrust bearing

U :

Linear velocity

X:

Displacement vector

Re:

Reynolds number

\(\alpha\) :

Pole angle of journal electromagnet

\(\beta ,{\beta }_{1},{\beta }_{2}\) :

Groove angles of bearing

\({\xi }_{o},{\xi }_{i},{\xi }_{s}\) :

Outer radius, inner radius, seal radius of thrust bearing after coordinate transformation

\({\xi }_{r}\) :

Radius of journal bearing after coordinate transformation

\({\eta }_{l}\) :

Length of journal bearing after coordinate transformation

μ :

Fluid viscosity

ρ :

Fluid density

δ :

Air gap

\(\Delta {F}_{n},\Delta {F}_{z}\) :

Perturbed load

\(\Delta {S}_{n},\Delta {S}_{z}\) :

Perturbed displacement

Θ:

Circumferential coordinate after coordinate transformation

Ω:

Angular velocity

References

  1. Abele E, Altintas Y, Brecher C (2010) Machine tool spindle units. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):781–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin SY, Jiang SY (2022) Rotordynamics of an improved face-grinding spindle: rotational stiffness of thrust bearing increases radial stiffness of spindle. ASME J Manuf Sci E-T 144(8):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo MX, Jiang XH, Ding ZS, Wu ZP (2018) A frequency domain dynamic response approach to optimize the dynamic performance of grinding machine spindles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(9–12):2737–2745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li JS, Huang M, Liu PK (2019) Analysis and experimental verification of dynamic characteristics of air spindle considering varying stiffness and damping of radial bearings. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(5–8):2939–2950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu CD, Jiang SY (2015) Dynamic analysis of a motorized spindle with externally pressurized air bearings. ASME J Vib Acoust 137(4):041001

  6. Shi JH, Cao HR, Maroju NK, Jin XL (2020) Dynamic modeling of aerostatic spindle with shaft tilt deformation. ASME J Manuf Sci E-T 142(2):021006

  7. Fedorynenko D, Kirigaya R, Nakao Y (2020) Dynamic characteristics of spindle with water-lubricated hydrostatic bearings for ultra-precision machine tools. Precis Eng 63:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen DJ, Fan JW, Zhang FH (2012) Dynamic and static characteristics of a hydrostatic spindle for machine tools. J Manuf Syst 31(1):26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li JD, Zhu YS, Yan K, Yan XY, Liu YW, Hong J (2018) Research on the axial stiffness softening and hardening characteristics of machine tool spindle system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(1–4):951–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang LP, Zhang BB, Wu J, Zhao QZ, Wang JJ (2020) Stiffness modeling, identification, and measuring of a rotating spindle. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mec 234(6):1239–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsubara A, Yamazaki T, Ikenaga S (2013) Non-contact measurement of spindle stiffness by using magnetic loading device. Int J Mach Tools Manu 71:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang XP, Guo YZ, Chen TN (2015) Measurement research of motorized spindle dynamic stiffness under high speed rotating. Shock Vib 2015:284126

  13. Tian SL, Zhao XX, Dong SJ (2021) Dynamic support stiffness of motorized spindle bearings under high-speed rotation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117(7–8):2359–2367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wan SK, Hong J, Su WJ, Li XH, Sun YH, Chen W (2018) Measurement of dynamic performances of high-speed rotating spindle by non-contact electromagnetic loading device. Proc ASME Int Mech Eng Congr Exposition 2017(2):70301

  15. Feng M, Zhao YL, Yang W (2013) The development of noncontact gas-loading system for stiffness measurement of high speed spindles. Mach Des Manuf 6:102–105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rantatalo M, Aidanpaa JO, Goransson B, Norman P (2007) Milling machine spindle analysis using FEM and non-contact spindle excitation and response measurement. Int J Mach Tools Manu 47(7–8):1034–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li HQ, Shin YC (2004) Integrated dynamic thermo-mechanical modeling of high speed spindles, part 1: Model development. ASME J Manuf Sci E-T 126(1):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao YZ, Altintas Y (2004) A general method for the modeling of spindle-bearing systems. J Mech Des 126(6):1089–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin SY, Jiang SY (2019) Dynamic characteristics of motorized spindle with tandem duplex angular contact ball bearings. ASME J Vib Acoust 141(6):061004

  20. He CL, Zhang J, Geng K, Wang SQ, Luo MJ, Zhang XN, Ren CZ (2022) Advances in ultra-precision machining of bearing rolling elements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122(9–10):3493–3524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jang GH, Chang DI (2000) Analysis of a hydrodynamic herringbone grooved journal bearing considering cavitation. ASME J Tribol 122(1):103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao GY, Yin ZW, Jiang D, Zhang XL (2014) Numerical analysis of plain journal bearing under hydrodynamic lubrication by water. Tribol Int 75:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang SW, Jiang SY, Lin XH (2020) Static and dynamic characteristics of high-speed water-lubricated spiral-groove thrust bearing considering cavitating and centrifugal effects. Tribol Int 145:106159

Download references

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51635004, 12172088).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ge Xu: software, validation, writing — original draft; Xun Huang: validation; Shuyun Jiang: conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, writing — review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuyun Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The derivation of equivalent Reynolds equation for thrust bearing:

The transformational relations of pressure gradient of water film between physical coordinate and calculational coordinate for thrust bearing are

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}\frac{\partial p}{\partial r}=\frac{\partial p}{\partial \xi }-\frac{\partial p}{\partial \eta }\mathrm{sign}\left(\xi -{\xi }_{s}\right)\frac{\mathrm{cot}\beta }{\xi }\\ \frac{\partial p}{\partial \theta }=\frac{\partial p}{\partial \eta }\end{array}\right.$$
(14)

In physical coordinate, the unit volume flow rates along with r and \(\theta\) directions of thrust bearing can be written as

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}{q}_{r}=-\frac{{G}_{r}{h}^{3}}{\mu }\frac{\partial p}{\partial r}\\ {q}_{\theta }=-\frac{{G}_{\theta }{h}^{3}}{\mu r}\frac{\partial p}{\partial \theta }+\frac{\Omega rh}{2}\end{array}\right.$$
(15)

In Eq. (15),

$$\left\{\begin{array}{cc}{G}_{r}=\frac{1}{12},{G}_{\theta }=\frac{1}{12}& \mathrm{Laminar}\left(\mathrm{Re}<{10}^{3}\right)\\ {G}_{r}=\frac{1}{12+0.0043{\mathrm{Re}}^{0.96}},{G}_{\theta }\frac{1}{12+0.0136{\mathrm{Re}}^{0.9}}& \mathrm{Turbulence}\left(\mathrm{Re}\ge {10}^{3}\right)\end{array}\right.$$
(16)

In calculational coordinate, the unit volume flow rates along with \(\xi\) and \(\eta\) directions of thrust bearing can be described as

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}{q}_{\xi }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha }}\left(\frac{\partial \xi }{\partial r}{q}_{r}+\frac{\partial \xi }{r\partial \theta }{q}_{\theta }\right)\\ {q}_{\eta }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\beta }}\left(r\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial r}{q}_{r}+\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial \theta }{q}_{\theta }\right)\end{array}\right.$$
(17)

In Eq. (17),

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}\alpha ={\left(\frac{\partial \xi }{\partial r}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\frac{\partial \xi }{r\partial \theta }\right)}^{2}\\ \beta ={\left(r\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial r}\right)}^{2}+{\left(r\frac{\partial \eta }{r\partial \theta }\right)}^{2}\end{array}\right.$$
(18)

The volume flow rates in Eq. (5) can be expressed as

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}{Q}_{\xi }={\int }_{\eta }\sqrt{\alpha }{q}_{\xi }\xi d\eta \\ {Q}_{\eta }={\int }_{\xi }\sqrt{\beta }{q}_{\eta }d\xi \\ {Q}_{v}={\iint }_{\xi ,\eta }\frac{\partial h}{\partial t}\left|J\right|d\xi d\eta \end{array}\right.$$
(19)

The derivation of equivalent Reynolds equation for journal bearing:

The transformational relations of pressure gradient of water film between physical coordinate and calculational coordinate for journal bearing are

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}\frac{\partial p}{\partial {x}^{^{\prime}}}=\frac{\partial p}{\partial \xi }\\ \frac{\partial p}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial p}{\partial \eta }-\frac{\partial p}{\partial \xi }\mathrm{cot}{\beta }_{\kappa }\end{array}\right.$$
(20)

In physical coordinate, the unit volume flow rates along with \({x}^{^{\prime}}\) and z directions of journal bearing are

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}{q}_{{x}^{^{\prime}}}=-\frac{{G}_{{x}^{^{\prime}}}{h}^{3}}{\mu }\frac{\partial p}{\partial {x}^{^{\prime}}}+\frac{Uh}{2}\\ {q}_{z}=-\frac{{G}_{z}{h}^{3}}{\mu }\frac{\partial p}{\partial z}\end{array}\right.$$
(21)

In Eq. (21),

$$\left\{\begin{array}{cc}{G}_{{x}^{^{\prime}}}=\frac{1}{12},{G}_{z}=\frac{1}{12}& \mathrm{Laminar}\left(\mathrm{Re}<{10}^{3}\right)\\ {G}_{{x}^{^{\prime}}}=\frac{1}{12+0.0136{\mathrm{Re}}^{0.9}},{G}_{z}=\frac{1}{12+0.0043{\mathrm{Re}}^{0.96}}& \mathrm{Turbulence}\left(\mathrm{Re}\ge {10}^{3}\right)\end{array}\right.$$
(22)

In calculational coordinate, the unit volume flow rates along with \(\xi\) and \(\eta\) directions of journal bearing can be expressed as

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}{q}_{\xi }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha }}\left(\frac{\partial \xi }{\partial {x}^{^{\prime}}}{q}_{x}^{^{\prime}}+\frac{\partial \xi }{\partial z}{q}_{z}\right)\\ {q}_{\eta }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\beta }}\left(\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial {x}^{^{\prime}}}{q}_{x}^{^{\prime}}+\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial z}{q}_{z}\right)\end{array}\right.$$
(23)

In Eq. (23),

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}\alpha ={\left(\frac{\partial \xi }{\partial {x}^{^{\prime}}}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\frac{\partial \xi }{\partial z}\right)}^{2}\\ \beta ={\left(\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial {x}^{^{\prime}}}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial z}\right)}^{2}\end{array}\right.$$
(24)

The volume flow rates in Eq. (10) can be described as

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}{Q}_{\xi }={\int }_{\eta }\sqrt{\alpha }{q}_{\xi }d\eta \\ {Q}_{\eta }={\int }_{\xi }\sqrt{\beta }{q}_{\eta }d\xi \\ {Q}_{v}=\underset{\xi ,\eta }{\overset{}{\iint }}\frac{\partial h}{\partial t}\left|J\right|d\xi d\eta \end{array}\right.$$
(25)

Appendix 2

Table 4 Structure and operation parameters of rotor

4

Table 5 Structure parameters of bearings

5

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, G., Huang, X. & Jiang, S. An experimental and theoretical approach for stiffness of machine tool spindle with fluid bearings. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128, 167–180 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11710-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11710-9

Keywords

Navigation