Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research status and development trend of cutting surface integrity of aerospace alloy materials

  • Critical Review
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The manufacturing of critical structural components for aerospace applications needs to meet high-reliability requirements, and surface integrity is one of the key factors to evaluate the quality of machined surfaces. In the aerospace field, difficult-to-machine metal materials such as nickel-based superalloys, titanium alloys, and tungsten alloys have a wide range of applications due to their excellent properties such as high hardness and high strength. Firstly, the latest results of the research on the geometrical characteristics of the integrity of machined surfaces and the physical and mechanical properties of surface layers by domestic and foreign scholars have been systematically reviewed; the influence of cutting parameters, tool wear values, and tool geometry parameters on the formation mechanism of surface integrity have been comprehensively described. Secondly, the influences of compound machining technology on the surface integrity of aerospace materials are sorted out, and the achievements in predicting and controlling the surface integrity of cutting aerospace materials are introduced. Finally, the research results on the influence of cutting surface integrity on the operating properties of parts have been summarized, and the future development trend of the research on cutting surface integrity of aerospace materials has been prospected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chu MQ, Ding RG, Zhang SY, Zheng JP, Zhang N (2021) Surface integrity for machining aerospace parts. Materials Reports 35(7):7183–7189

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ulutan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):250–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Esmaeili H, Adibi H, Rezaei SM (2021) Study on surface integrity and material removal mechanism in eco-friendly grinding of Inconel 718 using numerical and experimental investigations. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 112:1797–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Żyra A, Bogucki R, Podolak-Lejtas A, Skoczypiec S (2021) Research on influence of heat treatment scheme of Ti10V2Fe3Al alloy on technological surface integrity after electrodischarge machining. J Manuf Process 62:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Field M, Kahles JF (1964) The surface integrity of machined and ground high-strength steels. DMIC Report 210:54–77

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin X, Wu D, Yang B, Wu G, Shan XF, Xiao QB, Hu LY, Yu J (2017) Research on the mechanism of milling surface waviness formation in thin-walled blades. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 93:2459–2470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang L, Yahya E, Ding GF, Hu MH, Qin SF (2013) The research of surface waviness control method for 5-axis flank milling. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 69:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yue CX, Liu ZB, Nan YC, Yan FG, Gao HN (2020) Research progress in the surface integrity of metal milling. J Harbin Univ Sci Technol 25:38–49

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shen XH, Zhang DH, Yao CF, Tan L (2021) Research progress on formation mechanism of surface integrity in titanium alloy machining. J Aeronautical Materials 41(4):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liang X, Liu Z (2017) Experimental investigations on effects of tool flank wear on surface integrity during orthogonal dry cutting of Ti-6Al-4V. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 93:1617–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang SJ, To S, Wang SJ, Zhu ZW (2015) A review of surface roughness generation in ultra-precision machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 91:76–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadi MA, Ghani JA, Haron CHC, Kasim MS (2016) Effect of cutting speed on the carbide cutting tool in milling Inconel 718 alloy. J Mater Res 31(13):1885–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang D, Liu Z (2015) Surface topography analysis and cutting parameters optimization for peripheral milling titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Refract Metal Hard Mater 51:192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan L, Wu ZR, Fang L, Song YD (2020) Investigation of surface damage and roughness for nickel-based superalloy GH4169 under hard turning processing. Proceedings Institut Mechanical Engineers, Part B: J Engineering Manufact 234(4):679–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang X, Liu Z (2018) Tool wear behaviors and corresponding machined surface topography during high-speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V with fine grain tools. Tribol Int 121:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Limin S (2018) Investigation of tool wear and surface roughness when turning titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) under different cooling and lubrication conditions. Ferroelectrics 526(1):199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta A, Hemakumar S, Patil A, Khandke SP, Kuppan P, Oyyaravelu R, Balan ASS (2018) Influence of sustainable cutting environments on cutting forces, surface roughness and tool wear in turning of Inconel 718. Materials Today: Proceedings 5(2):6746–6754

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramana MV (2017) Optimization and influence of process parameters on surface roughness in turning of titanium alloy under different lubricant conditions. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(8):8328–8335

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar S, Singh D, Kalsi NS (2017) Experimental investigations of surface roughness of Inconel 718 under different machining conditions. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(2):1179–1185

    Google Scholar 

  20. Varela PI, Rakurty CS, Balaji AK (2014) Surface integrity in hard machining of 300 M steel: effect of cutting-edge geometry on machining induced residual stresses. Procedia Cirp 13:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Madariaga A, Esnaola JA, Fernandez E, Arrazola PJ, Garay A, Morel F (2014) Analysis of residual stress and work-hardened profiles on Inconel 718 when face turning with large-nose radius tools. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 71:1587–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou J (2010) The main causes and treatment measures of physical properties change of the surface layer of mechanical part. Knowledge Economy 19:103–104

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li BZ, Jiang XH, Yang JG, Liang SY (2015) Effects of depth of cut on the redistribution of residual stress and distortion during the milling of thin-walled part. J Mater Process Technol 216:223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jafarian F, Amirabadi H, Sadri J (2015) Experimental measurement and optimization of tensile residual stress in turning process of Inconel718 superalloy. Measurement 63:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thakur A, Gangopadhyay S (2016) State-of-the-art in surface integrity in machining of nickel-based super alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 100:25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2015) The effect of tool nose radius on surface integrity and residual stresses when turning Inconel 718™. J Mater Process Technol 216:123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Niaki FA, Mears L (2017) A comprehensive study on the effects of tool wear on surface roughness, dimensional integrity and residual stress in turning IN718 hard-to-machine alloy. J Manuf Process 30:268–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang WH, Wu YJ, Wang C, Gao J, Li L, Chen DD (2022) Research on influence of tool wear on residual stress in machining Inconel 718. Tool Engineering 56(07):79–83

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang P, Yao CF, Xie SH, Zhang DH, Tang DX (2016) Effect of tool orientation on surface integrity during ball end milling of titanium alloy TC17. Procedia CIRP 56:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Masmiati N, Sarhan AAD (2015) Optimizing cutting parameters in inclined end milling for minimum surface residual stress–Taguchi approach. Measurement 60:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Daymi A, Boujelbene M, Ben Amara A, Bayraktar E, Katundi D (2011) Surface integrity in high speed end milling of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Technol 27(1):387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao CF, Wu DX, Tan L, Ren JX, Shi KN, Yang ZC (2013) Effects of cutting parameters on surface residual stress and its mechanism in high-speed milling of TB6. Proceed Instit Mechanical Engineers, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 227(4):483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu EL, Han JD, Zhao LG, Liu X (2017) Experimental research on machined surface quality of turning titanium alloy TC11. Tool Engineering 51(09):22–26

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yao CF, Shen XH, Zhang DH (2017) Formation mechanism of surface metamorphic layer on turning end face of GH4169 superalloy. J Aeronautical Materials 37(06):50–58

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wojtowicz N, Danis I, Monies F, Lamesle P, Chieragati R (2013) The influence of cutting conditions on surface integrity of a wrought magnesium alloy. Procedia Engineering 63:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rao KSS, Allamraju KV (2017) Effect on micro-hardness and residual stress in CNC turning of aluminium 7075 alloy. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(2):975–981

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang HC, Chen ZT, Zhou ZT (2015) Influence of cutting speed and tool wear on the surface integrity of the titanium alloy Ti-1023 during milling. The Int J Adv Manufacturing Technol 78:1113–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hassanpour H, Sadeghi MH, Rezaei H, Rasti A (2016) Experimental study of cutting force, microhardness, surface roughness, and burr size on micromilling of Ti6Al4V in minimum quantity lubrication. Mater Manuf Processes 31(13):1654–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hassanpour H, Sadeghi MH, Rasti A, Shajari S (2016) Investigation of surface roughness, microhardness and white layer thickness in hard milling of AISI 4340 using minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 120:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tampu C, Chirita B, Cristea I, Zichil V, Schnakovszky C, Herghelegiu E, Carausu C (2020) Influence of cutting parameters on surface hardness in milling of AL6061T6. Conference Series: Materials Sci Engineering 916(1):012118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zeng Q, Liu G, Liu L, Qin Y (2015) Investigation into grindability of a superalloy and effects of grinding parameters on its surface integrity. Proceed Institution Mechanical Engineers, Part B: J Engineering Manufact 229(2):238–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Agmell M, Ahadi A, Zhou JM, Peng RL, Bushlya V, Stahl J-E (2017) Modeling subsurface deformation induced by machining of Inconel 718. Mach Sci Technol 21(1):103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Imran M, Mativenga PT, Gholinia A, Withers PJ (2014) Comparison of tool wear mechanisms and surface integrity for dry and wet micro-drilling of nickel-base superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 76:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li XF, Ji BY, Zhou Q, Chen J, Gao P (2016) Influence of grain size on electrically assisted tensile behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 25:4514–4520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liang X, Liu Z, Wang B (2019) State-of-the-art of surface integrity induced by tool wear effects in machining process of titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Measurement 132:150–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang HW, Wang CY, Ren ZW, Yi YL, He L, Zhao XF (2021) Influence of cutting velocity on gradient microstructure of machined surface during turning of high-strength alloy steel. Mater Sci Eng, A 819:141354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang P, Wang YQ, Li WH, Wang Q, Li YY (2018) A study on microstructure evolution and corrosion resistance of cutting layer metal of 7055 aluminum alloy based on extreme environment. Mater Corros 69(10):1389–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xu WX, Zhang LC (2015) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining: principle, design and application. Advances in Manufacturing 3(3):173–192

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. He Y, Zhou Z, Zou P, Gao X, Ehmann KF (2019) Study of ultrasonic vibration–assisted thread turning of Inconel 718 superalloy. Adv Mech Eng 11(10):1687814019883772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ning F, Cong W (2020) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted (UV-A) manufacturing processes: state of the art and future perspectives. J Manuf Process 51:174–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bin F, Zhonghang Y, Depeng L, Liying G (2021) Effect of ultrasonic vibration on finished quality in ultrasonic vibration assisted micromilling of Inconel 718. Chin J Aeronaut 34(6):209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Suárez A, Veiga F, Polvorosa R, Artaza T, Holmberg J, Lopez de Lacalle LN, Wretland A (2019) Surface integrity and fatigue of non-conventional machined Alloy 718. J Manuf Process 48:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Peng Z, Zhang X, Zhang D (2021) Integration of finishing and surface treatment of Inconel 718 alloy using high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting. Surf Coat Technol 413:127088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tan R, Zhao X, Guo S, Zou X, He Y, Geng Y, Hu Z, Sun T (2020) Sustainable production of dry-ultra-precision machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy using PCD tool under ultrasonic elliptical vibration-assisted cutting. J Clean Prod 248:119254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Peng Z, Zhang X, Zhang D (2021) Improvement of Ti–6Al–4V surface integrity through the use of high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting. Tribol Int 160:107025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Song X (2021) Study on surface integrity of tungsten alloy processed by ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting. Dissertation, Dalian University of Technology

  57. Kang RK, Song X, Dong ZG, Pan YA, Zhang Y, Bao Y (2021) Study on surface integrity of tungsten alloy processed by ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting. Surface Technol Surf Technol 50:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ruszkiewicz BJ, Grimm T, Ragai I, Mears L, Roth JT (2017) A review of electrically-assisted manufacturing with emphasis on modeling and understanding of the electroplastic effect. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(11):110801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li X, Zhou Q, Zhao S, Chen J (2014) Effect of pulse current on bending behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy. Procedia Engineering 81:1799–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Li D, Li Y, Enlin Yu, Yi H, Liu F (2018) Theoretical and experimental study of the drawing force under a current pulse. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 97(1):1047–1051

    Google Scholar 

  61. Troitsky OA, Stashenko VI (2020) Advantages of drawing and rolling metals with pulse current. Conference Series: Materials Sci Engineering 848(1):012084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Potapova AA, Stolyarov VV (2013) Deformability and structural features of shape memory TiNi alloys processed by rolling with current. Mater Sci Eng, A 579:114–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Stolyarov VV (2013) Influence of pulse current on deformation behavior during rolling and tension of Ti–Ni alloys. J Alloy Compd 577:S274–S276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Jiang Y, Guan L, Tang G, Zhang Z (2015) Improved mechanical properties of Mg–9Al–1Zn alloy by the combination of aging, cold-rolling and electropulsing treatment. J Alloy Compd 626:297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Xu X, Zhao Y, Ma B, Zhang M (2014) Rapid precipitation of T-phase in the 2024 aluminum alloy via cyclic electropulsing treatment. J Alloy Compd 610:506–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Jiang Y, Guan L, Tang G (2016) Recrystallization and texture evolution of cold-rolled AZ31 Mg alloy treated by rapid thermal annealing. J Alloy Compd 656:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Jin W, Fan J, Zhang H, Liu Y, Dong H, Xu B (2015) Microstructure, mechanical properties and static recrystallization behavior of the rolled ZK60 magnesium alloy sheets processed by electropulsing treatment. J Alloy Compd 646:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Egea AJS, Rojas HAG, Montaña CAM, Echeverri VK (2015) Effect of electroplastic cutting on the manufacturing process and surface properties. J Mater Process Technol 222:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Nie X (2016) Experiment study of titanium alloy in electroplastic turning. Dissertation, Nanchang Hangkong University

  70. Sun Z, Wang H, Ye Y, Xu Z, Tang G (2018) Effects of electropulsing on the machinability and microstructure of GH4169 superalloy during turning process. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 95(5):2835–2842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhao L, Chen G, Liu J, Wei H, Huang J (2023) Effect of pulse current parameters on electroplastically assisted dry cutting performance of W93NiFe alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10762-7

  72. Chaabani S, Arrazola PJ, Ayed Y, Madariaga A, Tidu A, Germain G (2020) Surface integrity when machining Inconel 718 using conventional lubrication and carbon dioxide coolant. Procedia Manufacturing 47:530–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Duan PF, Qiao Y, Wang XY, Fu XL, Guo PQ (2019) Overview of cryogenic cutting machining technology. Tool Engineering 53(09):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  74. Dhokia V, Newman ST, Imani-Asrai R (2012) An initial study of the effect of using liquid nitrogen coolant on the surface roughness of Inconel 718 nickel-based alloy in CNC milling. Procedia Cirp 3:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2016) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 21:172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhao W, Ren F, Iqbal A, Gong L, He N, Xu Q (2020) Effect of liquid nitrogen cooling on surface integrity in cryogenic milling of Ti-6Al-4 V titanium alloy. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 106(3):1497–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sartori S, Pezzato L, Dabalà M, Maurizi Enrici T, Mertens A, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2018) Surface integrity analysis of Ti6Al4V after semi-finishing turning under different low-temperature cooling strategies. J Mater Eng Perform 27(9):4810–4818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kim TW, Lee CM (2015) Determination of the machining parameters of nickel-based alloys by high-power diode laser. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Venkatesan K, Ramanujam R, Kuppan P (2014) Laser assisted machining of difficult to cut materials: research opportunities and future directions—a comprehensive review. Procedia Engineering 97:1626–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Xu D, Liao Z, Axinte D, Sarasua JA, M’Saoubi R, Wretland A (2020) Investigation of surface integrity in laser-assisted machining of nickel based superalloy. Mater Des 194:108851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wojciechowski S, Przestacki D, Chwalczuk T (2017) The evaluation of surface integrity during machining of Inconel 718 with various laser assistance strategies. MATEC Web of Conferences 136:01006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Venkatesan K (2017) The study on force, surface integrity, tool life and chip on laser assisted machining of Inconel 718 using Nd: YAG laser source. J Adv Res 8(4):407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lalwani DI, Mehta NK, Jain PK (2008) Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel. J Mater Process Technol 206(1–3):167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhou Y, Gong Y, Zhu Z, Gao Q, Wen X (2016) Modelling and optimisation of surface roughness from microgrinding of nickel-based single crystal superalloy using the response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 85:2607–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Yang A, Han Y, Pan Y, Xing H, Li J (2017) Optimum surface roughness prediction for titanium alloy by adopting response surface methodology. Results in Physics 7:1046–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Sahu NK, Andhare AB, Andhale S, Abraham RR (2018) Prediction of surface roughness in turning of Ti-6Al-4V using cutting parameters, forces and tool vibration. Conference Series: Materials Sci Engineering 346(1):012037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Ali MH, Khidhir BA, Ansari MNM, Mohamed B (2013) FEM to predict the effect of feed rate on surface roughness with cutting force during face milling of titanium alloy. Hbrc Journal 9(3):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Daniyan I, Tlhabadira I, Mpofu K, Adeodu A (2021) Investigating the geometrical effects of cutting tool on the surface roughness of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) during milling operation. Procedia CIRP 99:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Xiao G, Xing J, Zhang Y (2021) Surface roughness prediction model of GH4169 superalloy abrasive belt grinding based on multilayer perceptron (MLP). Procedia Manufacturing 54:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Kortabarria A, Armentia I, Arrazola P (2016) Sensitivity analysis of material input data influence on machining induced residual stress prediction in Inconel 718. Simul Model Pract Theory 63:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Rahul Y, Vipindas K, Mathew J (2021) Methodology for prediction of sub-surface residual stress in micro end milling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Process 62:600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Hao XL (2020) Prediction modeling of residual stress in titanium alloy milling. Dissertation, Harbin University of Science and Technology

  93. Da Silva FAV, Denguir LA, Outeiro JC (2020) Residual stresses prediction in machining of Inconel 718 superalloy using a constitutive model considering the state of stress. Procedia CIRP 87:527–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Liu Y, Xu D, Agmell M, Ahadi A, Stahl J, Zhou J (2021) Investigation on residual stress evolution in nickel-based alloy affected by multiple cutting operations. J Manuf Process 68:818–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Arrazola PJ, Kortabarria A, Madariaga A, Esnaola JA, Fernandez E, Cappellini C, Ulutan D, Özel T (2014) On the machining induced residual stresses in IN718 nickel-based alloy: experiments and predictions with finite element simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory 41:87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Fan YH, Wang T, Hao ZP, Liu XY, Gao S, Li RL (2018) Surface residual stress in high speed cutting of superalloy Inconel718 based on multiscale simulation. J Manuf Process 31:480–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Jafarian F (2019) 3D modeling of recrystallized layer depth and residual stress in dry machining of nickel-based alloy. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41(4):198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Dong P, Peng H, Cheng X, Xing Y, Zhou X, Huang D (2019) A random forest regression model for predicting residual stresses and cutting forces introduced by turning in718 alloy. In：2019 IEEE International Conference on Computation, Communication and Engineering (ICCCE). pp 5–8

  99. Caruso S, Imbrogno S, Rotella G, Ciaran MI, Arrazola PJ, Filice L, Umbrello D (2015) Numerical simulation of surface modification during machining of nickel-based superalloy. Procedia CIRP 31:130–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Rotella G, Umbrello D (2014) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic cutting of Ti6Al4V alloy. CIRP Ann 63(1):69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Rotella G, Dillon OW Jr, Umbrello D, Settineri L, Jawahir IS (2013) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in turning of AA7075-T651 alloy. J Manuf Process 15(1):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Lu X, Jia Z, Lu Y, Feng Y, Liang SY (2017) Predicting the surface hardness of micro-milled nickel-base superalloy Inconel 718. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 93:1283–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Lu X, Jia Z, Yang K, Shao P, Ruan F, Feng Y, Liang SY (2018) Analytical model of work hardening and simulation of the distribution of hardening in micro-milled nickel-based superalloy. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 97:3915–3923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Zhuang K, Zhu D, Zhang X, Ding H (2014) Notch wear prediction model in turning of Inconel 718 with ceramic tools considering the influence of work hardened layer. Wear 313(1–2):63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Jafarian F, Ciaran MI, Umbrello D, Arrazola PJ, Filice L, Amirabadi H (2014) Finite element simulation of machining Inconel 718 alloy including microstructure changes. Int J Mech Sci 88:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Wang Q, Liu Z, Wang B, Song Q, Wan Y (2016) Evolutions of grain size and micro-hardness during chip formation and machined surface generation for Ti-6Al-4V in high-speed machining. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 82:1725–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Arısoy YM, Özel T (2015) Prediction of machining induced microstructure in Ti–6Al–4V alloy using 3-D FE-based simulations: effects of tool micro-geometry, coating and cutting conditions. J Mater Process Technol 220:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Rinaldi S, Imbrogno S, Rotella G, Umbrello D, Filice L (2019) Physics based modeling of machining Inconel 718 to predict surface integrity modification. Procedia Cirp 82:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Yao C, Wu D, Ma L, Tan L, Zhou Z, Zhang J (2016) Surface integrity evolution and fatigue evaluation after milling mode, shot-peening and polishing mode for TB6 titanium alloy. Appl Surf Sci 387:1257–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Quan F, Chen Z, Li Q, Gao S (2020) Effects of process combinations of milling, grinding, and polishing on the surface integrity and fatigue life of GH4169 components. Proceedings of the Instit Mechan Engineers, Part B: J Engineering Manufact 234(3):538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Liao Z, la Monaca A, Murray J, Speidel A, Ushmaev D, Clare A, Axinte D, M’Saoubi R (2021) Surface integrity in metal machining—part I: fundamentals of surface characteristics and formation mechanisms. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 162:103687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Rotella G (2019) Effect of surface integrity induced by machining on high cycle fatigue life of 7075–T6 aluminum alloy. J Manuf Process 41:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Herbert C, Axinte DA, Hardy M, Withers P (2014) Influence of surface anomalies following hole making operations on the fatigue performance for a nickel-based superalloy. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(5):051016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Kannan S, Kui L (2019) Experimental investigation of surface integrity during abrasive edge profiling of nickel-based alloy. J Manuf Process 39:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Javidi A, Rieger U, Eichlseder W (2008) The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life. Int J Fatigue 30(10–11):2050–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Yue C, Gao H, Liu X, Liang SY (2018) Part functionality alterations induced by changes of surface integrity in metal milling process: a review. Appl Sci 8(12):2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Wang B, Liu Z (2018) Influences of tool structure, tool material and tool wear on machined surface integrity during turning and milling of titanium and nickel alloys: a review. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 98:1925–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Yao CF, Tan L, Ren JX, Lin Q, Liang YS (2014) Surface integrity and fatigue behavior for high-speed milling Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al titanium alloy. J Fail Anal Prev 14:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Sun J, Wang T, Su A, Chen W (2018) Surface integrity and its influence on fatigue life when turning nickel alloy GH4169. Procedia Cirp 71:478–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Ren X, Liu Z, Liang X, Cui P (2021) Effects of machined surface integrity on high-temperature low-cycle fatigue life and process parameters optimization of turning superalloy Inconel 718. Materials 14(9):2428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52175431), the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin of China (No. 22JCZDJC00730), and the Scientific Research Project of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission (No. 2022ZD021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, 30022, China

    Jie Liu, Guangjun Chen, Lixiang Zhao, Zhiwei Yu & Xiongfei Jia

Authors
  1. Jie Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guangjun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lixiang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiwei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiongfei Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Jie Liu, Guangjun Chen, Lixiang Zhao, Zhiwei Yu, and Xiongfei Jia. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jie Liu and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangjun Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Chen, G., Zhao, L. et al. Research status and development trend of cutting surface integrity of aerospace alloy materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127, 45–63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11558-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11558-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation