Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influences of tool structure, tool material and tool wear on machined surface integrity during turning and milling of titanium and nickel alloys: a review

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titanium and nickel alloys have been used widely due to their admirable physical and mechanical properties, which also result in poor machinability for these alloys. Improvement of surface integrity of titanium and nickel alloys is always a challengeable subject in the area of manufacture. Besides the cutting parameters and cutting environments, the structure and material of cutting tools are also the most basic factors that govern the machined surface integrity. This review paper provides an overview of the machined surface integrity of titanium and nickel alloys with reference to the influences of tool structure, tool material, as well as tool wear. Surface integrity mainly covers geometrical characteristics, microstructure alterations and mechanical properties of the machined surface. Influences of cutting tool parameters on above characteristics of machined surface integrity are reviewed respectively, and there are many different types of surface integrity problems reported in the literatures. However, the current research on the effects of tool parameters on machined surface integrity mainly depends on practical experiments or empirical data, a comprehensive and systematic modeling approach considering the process physics and practical application is still lacking. It is concluded that further research for the influence of tool parameters on machined surface integrity should consider the requirements of service performance (e.g. fatigue life) for machined components. It is vital important to establish the mapping relationships among the cutting tool parameters, machined surface integrity, and the service performance of machined components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang XP, Liu CR (1999) Machining titanium and its alloys. Mach Sci Technol 3(1):107–139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arrazola PJ, Garay A, Iriarte LM, Armendia M, Marya S, Maître FL (2009) machinability of titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V and Ti555.3). J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2223–2230

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choudhury IA, El-Baradie MA (1998) Machinability of nickel-base super alloys: a general review. J Mater Process Technol 77(1–3):278–284

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dudzinski D, Devillez A, Moufki A, Larrouquère D, Zerrouki V, Vigneau J (2004) A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(4):439–456

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ulutan D, Özel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: A review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):250–280

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang B, Liu ZQ (2014) Investigations on the chip formation mechanism and shear localization sensitivity of high-speed machining Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5-8):1065–1076

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thakur A, Gangopadhyay S (2016) State-of-the-art in surface integrity in machining of nickel-based super alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 100:25–54

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang B, Liu ZQ (2017) Acoustic emission signal analysis during chip formation process in high speed machining of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy and Inconel 718 superalloy. J Manuf Process 27:114–125

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reed RC (2006) The Superalloys: Fundamentals and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Yamane Y (2003) An overview of the machinability of aero-engine alloys. J Mater Process Technol 134(2):233–253

    Google Scholar 

  11. M’Saoubi R, Axinte D, Soo SL, Nobel C, Attia H, Kappmeyer G, Engin S, Sim WM (2015) High performance cutting of advanced aerospace alloys and composite materials. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64(2):557–580

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pervaiz S, Rashid A, Deiab I, Nicolescu M (2014) Influence of tool materials on machinability of titanium- and nickel-based alloys: a review. Mater Manuf Process 29(3):219–252

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grzesik W (2008) Advanced machining processes of metallic materials: theory, modeling and applications, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu DH, Zhang XM, Ding H (2013) Tool wear characteristics in machining of nickel-based superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64(1):60–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Imran M, Mativenga PT, Gholinia A, Withers PJ (2014) Comparison of tool wear mechanisms and surface integrity for dry and wet micro-drilling of nickel-base superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 76(1):49–60

    Google Scholar 

  16. Da Silva RB, Sales WF, Costa ES, Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Da Silva MB, Machado ÁR (2017) Surface integrity and tool life when turning of Ti-6Al-4V with coolant applied by different methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5-8):1893–1902

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM (1997) Titanium alloys and their machinability a review. J Mater Process Technol 68:262–274

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guo YB, Li W, Jawahir IS (2009) Surface integrity characterization and prediction in machining of hardened and difficult-to-machine alloys: a state-of-the-art research review and analysis. Mach Sci Technol 13(4):437–470

    Google Scholar 

  19. Obikawa T, Kamio A, Takaoka H, Osada A (2011) Micro-texture at the coated tool face for high performance cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(12):966–972

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arunachalam RM, Mannan MA, Spowage AC (2004) Surface integrity when machining age hardened Inconel 718 with coated carbide cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(14):1481–1491

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cantero JL, Díaz-Álvarez J, Miguélez MH, Marín NC (2013) Analysis of tool wear patterns in finishing turning of Inconel 718. Wear 297(1-2):885–894

    Google Scholar 

  22. Groover MP (2010) Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: materials, processes, and systems, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leyens C, Peters M (2006) Titanium and titanium alloys. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang T, Wan Y, Kou ZJ, Cai YK, Wang B, Liu ZQ (2016) Construction of a bioactive surface with micro/nano-topography on titanium alloy by micro-milling and alkali-hydrothermal treatment. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 230(12):1086–1095

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu SY, Wang B, Zhang PR (2016) Effect of glucose concentration on electrochemical corrosion behavior of pure titanium TA2 in Hanks’ simulated body fluid. Materials 9(11):874 (11 pages)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saravanan I, Perumal AE, Balasubramanian V (2016) A study of frictional wear behavior of Ti6Al4V and UHMWPE hybrid composite on TiN surface for bio-medical applications. Trib Int 98:179–189

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang B, Liu ZQ (2015) Shear localization sensitivity analysis for Johnson-Cook constitutive parameters on serrated chips in high speed machining of Ti6Al4V. Simul Model Pract Theory 55:63–76

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sun S, Brandt M, Dargusch MS (2009) Characteristics of cutting forces and chip formation in machining of titanium alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(7):561–568

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas M, Turner S, Jackson M (2010) Microstructural damage during high-speed milling of titanium alloys. Scripta Mater 62(5):250–253

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cui WF, Jin Z, Guo AH, Zhou L (2009) High temperature deformation behavior of a+b-type biomedical titanium alloy Ti-6Al-7Nb. Mater Sci Eng A 499(1):252–256

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jemielniak K (2009) Finish turning of Inconel 718. Adv Manuf Sci Technol 33(1):59–69

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kadam GS, Pawade RS (2017) Surface integrity and sustainability assessment in high-speed machining of Inconel 718—an eco-friendly green approach. J Clean Prod 147:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  33. Navas VG, Arriola I, Gonzalo O, Leunda J (2013) Mechanisms involved in the improvement of Inconel 718 machinability by laser assisted machining (LAM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 74(4):19–28

    Google Scholar 

  34. Iturbe A, Giraud E, Hormaetxe E, Garay A, Germain G, Ostolaza K, Arrazola PJ (2017) Mechanical characterization and modelling of Inconel 718 material behavior for machining process assessment. Mater Sci Eng A 682:441–453

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sims CT, Stoloff NS, Hagel WC (eds) (1987) Superalloys II: high temperature materials for aerospace and industrial power. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Durand-Charre M (1997) The microstructure of superalloys. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  37. Astakhov VP, Xiao XR (2008) A methodology for practical cutting force evaluation based on the energy spent in the cutting system. Mach Sci Technol 12(3):325–347

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang B, Liu ZQ (2016) Cutting performance of solid ceramic end milling tools in machining hardened AISI H13 steel. Int J Refrac Met Hard Mater 55:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  39. Smith GT (2008) Cutting tool technology-industrial handbook. Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  40. Astakhov VP, Davim JP (2008) Machining: fundamentals and recent advances. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bayer AM, Becherer BA, Vasco T (1989) High speed steel. ASM handbook, vol 16: machining, pp 51–59

  42. Kupczyk MJ, Komolka J (2015) High durability of cutting insert edges made of nanocrystalline cemented carbides. Int J Refrac Met Hard Mater 49(1):225–231

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lorentzon J, Järvstråt N (2008) Modelling tool wear in cemented-carbide machining alloy 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(10):1072–1080

    Google Scholar 

  44. Noordin MY, Venkatesh VC, Chan CL, Abdullah A (2001) Performance evaluation of cemented carbide tools in turning AISI 1010 steel. J Mater Process Technol 116(1):16–21

    Google Scholar 

  45. Davim JP (2008) Machining; fundamentals and recent advances. Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. Koseki S, Inoue K, Sekiya K, Morito S, Ohba T, Usuki H (2017) Wear mechanisms of PVD-coated cutting tools during continuous turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Precis Eng 47:434–444

    Google Scholar 

  47. Da Silva RB, Machado ÁR, Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Sales WF (2013) Tool life and wear mechanisms in high speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with PCD tools under various coolant pressures. J Mater Process Technol 213(8):1459–1464

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yigit R, Celik E, Findik F, Koksal S (2008) Tool life performance of multilayer hard coatings produced by HTCVD for machining of nodular cast iron. Int J Refrac Met Hard Mater 26(6):514–524

    Google Scholar 

  49. Settineri L, Bucciotti F, Cesano F, Faga MG (2007) Surface properties of diamond coatings for cutting tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):573–576

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ferreira R, Carou D, Lauro CH, Davim JP (2016) Surface roughness investigation in the hard turning of steel using ceramic tools. Mater Manuf Process 31(5):648–652

    Google Scholar 

  51. North B (1987) Ceramic cutting tools, a review. Int J High Technol Ceram 3:113–127

    Google Scholar 

  52. Aruna M, Dhanalakshmi V, Mohan S (2010) Wear analysis of ceramic cutting tools in finish turning of Inconel 718. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(9):4253–4262

    Google Scholar 

  53. Uhlmann E, Hübert C (2011) Tool grinding of end mill cutting tools made from high performance ceramics and cemented carbides. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):359–362

    Google Scholar 

  54. Çelik A, Lazoglu I, Kara A, Kara F (2015) Investigation on the performance of SiAlON ceramic drills on aerospace grade CFRP composites. J Mater Process Technol 223:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ceramic based solutions. http://www.pesmag.co.uk/features/93/20136/2376/

  56. Gerchman MC (1986) Specifications and manufacturing considerations of diamond machined optical components, Proc. SPIE 0607, Optical Component Specifications for Laser-based Systems and Other Modern Optical Systems, 36

  57. Dearnley PA, Grearson AN (1986) Evaluation of principal wear mechanisms of cemented carbides and ceramics used for machining titanium alloy IMI 318. Mater Sci Technol 2(1):47–58

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rashid RAR, Palanisamy S, Sun S, Dargusch MS (2016) Tool wear mechanisms involved in crater formation on uncoated carbide tool when machining Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9-12):1457–1465

    Google Scholar 

  59. Davoodi B, Eskandari B (2015) Tool wear mechanisms and multi-response optimization of tool life and volume of material removed in turning of N-155 iron-nickel-base superalloy using RSM. Measurement 68:286–294

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ginting A, Nouari M (2009) Surface integrity of dry machined titanium alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(3):325–332

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ren XP, Liu ZQ (2016) Influence of cutting parameters on work hardening behavior of surface layer during turning superalloy Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5-8):2319–2327

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mather I (1934) Determination of initial stress by measuring the deformation around drilled holes. Trans ASME 56(4):249–254

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zuccarello B, Menda F, Scafidi M (2016) Error and uncertainty analysis of non-uniform residual stress evaluation by using the ring-core method. Exp Mech 56(9):1531–1546

    Google Scholar 

  64. Smith M, Levesque J-B, Bichler L, Sediako D, Gholipour J, Wanjara P (2017) Residual stress analysis in linear friction welded in-service Inconel 718 superalloy via neutron diffraction and contour method approaches. Mater Sci Eng A 691:168–179

    Google Scholar 

  65. Moussaoui K, Segonds S, Rubio W, Mousseigne M (2016) Studying the measurement by X-ray diffraction of residual stresses in Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 667:340–348

    Google Scholar 

  66. Withers PJ (2013) Synchrotron X-ray diffraction, practical residual stress measurement methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  67. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O'Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):717–739

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jawahir IS, Brinksmeier E, M'Saoubi R, Aspinwall DK, Outeiro JC, Meyer D, Umbrello D, Jayal AD (2011) Surface integrity in material removal processes: recent advances. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(2):603–626

    Google Scholar 

  69. Subhas BK, Bhat R, Ramachandra KS, Balakrishna HK (2000) Simultaneous optimization of machining parameters for dimensional instability control in aero gas turbine components made of Inconel 718 alloy. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 122(3):20–31

    Google Scholar 

  70. Axinte DA, Dewes RC (2002) Surface integrity of hot work tool steel after high speed milling-experimental data and empirical models. J Mater Process Technol 127(3):325–335

    Google Scholar 

  71. Joshi SV, Vizhian SP, Sridhar BR, Jayaram K (2008) Parametric study of machining effect on residual stress and surface roughness of nickel base super alloy UDIMET 720. Adv Mater Res 47-50:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  72. Shi J, Wang JY, Liu CR (2006) Modeling white layer thickness based on the cutting parameters of hard machining. J Eng Manuf 220(2):119–128

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sridhar BR, Devananda G, Ramachandra K, Bhat R (2003) Effect of machining parameters and heat treatment on the residual stress distribution in titanium alloy IMI-834. J Mater Process Technol 139(1):628–634

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yang D, Liu ZQ, Ren XP, Zhuang P (2016) Hybrid modeling with finite element and statistical methods for residual stress prediction in peripheral milling of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mech Sci 108-109:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  75. El-Axir MH (2002) A method of modeling residual stress distribution in turning for different materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(9):1055–1063

    Google Scholar 

  76. Arisoy YM, Guo CS, Kaftanoğlu B, Özel T (2016) Investigations on microstructural changes in machining of Inconel 100 alloy using face turning experiments and 3D finite element simulations. Int J Mech Sci 107:80–92

    Google Scholar 

  77. Capello E (2005) Residual stresses in turning part I: influence of process parameters. J Mater Process Technol 160(2):221–228

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ulutan D, Arisoy YM, Özel T, Mears L (2014) Empirical modeling of residual stress profile in machining nickel-based superalloys using the sinusoidal decay function. Procedia CIRP 13:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pawade RS, Joshi SS, Brahmankar PK (2008) Effect of machining parameters and cutting edge geometry on surface integrity of high-speed turned Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(1):15–28

    Google Scholar 

  80. Yang D, Liu ZQ (2015) Surface plastic deformation and surface topography prediction in peripheral milling with variable pitch end mill. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 91:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zhang PR, Liu ZQ (2016) Modeling and prediction for 3D surface topography in finish turning with conventional and wiper inserts. Measurement 94:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ulutan D, Alaca BE, Lazoglu I (2007) Analytical modelling of residual stresses in machining. J Mater Process Technol 183(1):77–87

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wu DW, Matsumoto Y (1990) The effect of hardness on residual stresses in orthogonal machining of AISI 4340 steel. ASME J Eng Ind 112(3):245–252

    Google Scholar 

  84. Liu CR, Barash MM (1976) The mechanical state of the sublayer of a surface generated by chip-removal process—part 2: cutting with a tool with flank wear. ASME J Eng Ind 98(4):1202–1208

    Google Scholar 

  85. Liang SY, Su JC (2007) Residual stress modeling in orthogonal machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):65–68

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  86. Soo SL, Aspinwall DK, Dewes RC (2004) Three-dimensional finite element modelling of high-speed milling of Inconel 718. Proc Inst Mech Eng B: J Eng Manuf 218(11):1555–1561

    Google Scholar 

  87. Guo YB, Liu CR (2002) 3D FEA modeling of hard turning. ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng 124(2):189–199

    Google Scholar 

  88. Marusich TD, Ortiz M (2010) Modeling and simulation of high-speed machining. Int J Numer Meth Eng 38(21):3675–3694

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Ding HT, Shin YC (2014) Dislocation density-based grain refinement modeling of orthogonal cutting of titanium. ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(4):152–161

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wang QQ, Liu ZQ, Wang B, Song QH, Wan Y (2016) Evolutions of grain size and micro-hardness during chip formation and machined surface generation for Ti-6Al-4V in high-speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9-12):1725–1736

    Google Scholar 

  91. Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2008) A new material model for 2D numerical simulation of serrated chip formation when machining titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(3):275–288

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ranganath S, Guo C, Hegde P (2009) A finite element modeling approach to predicting white layer formation in nickel superalloys. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):77–80

    Google Scholar 

  93. Arisoy YM, Özel T (2015) Prediction of machining induced microstructure in Ti-6Al-4V alloy using 3-D FE-based simulations: Effects of tool micro-geometry, coating and cutting conditions. J Mater Process Technol 220:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  94. Seddiki O, Harnagea C, Levesque L, Mantovani D, Rosei F (2014) Evidence of antibacterial activity on titanium surfaces through nanotextures. Appl Surf Sci 308(3):275–284

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kwong J, Axinte DA, Withers PJ, Hardy MC (2009) Minor cutting edge-workpiece interactions in drilling of an advanced nickel-based superalloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(7):645–658

    Google Scholar 

  96. Arunachalam RM, Mannan MA, Spowage AC (2004) Residual stress and surface roughness when facing age hardened Inconel 718 with CBN and ceramic cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(9):879–887

    Google Scholar 

  97. Coelho RT, Silva LR, Braghini A Jr, Bezerra AA (2004) Some effects of cutting edge preparation and geometric modifications when turning Inconel 718TM at high cutting speeds. J Mater Process Technol 148(1):147–153

    Google Scholar 

  98. Nalbant M, Altın A, Gökkaya H (2007) The effect of coating material and geometry of cutting tool and cutting speed on machinability properties of Inconel 718 super alloys. Mater Des 28(5):1719–1724

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ezugwu EO, Tang SH (1995) Surface abuse when machining cast iron (G-17) and nickel-base superalloy (Inconel 718) with ceramic tools. J Mater Process Technol 55(2):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  100. Dogra M, Sharma VS, Dureja J (2011) Effect of tool geometry variation on finish turning—a review. J Eng Sci. Technol Rev 4(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  101. Özel T, Karpat Y, Srivastava A (2008) Hard turning with variable micro-geometry PcBN tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):73–76

    Google Scholar 

  102. Özel T (2009) Computational modelling of 3D turning: influence of edge micro-geometry on forces, stresses, friction and tool wear in PcBN tooling. J Mater Process Technol 209(11):5167–5177

    Google Scholar 

  103. Ulutan D, Özel T (2011) Effects of tool micro-geometry and coatings in turning of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Conference: NAMRC, At Corvallis, OR, 39:395–402

  104. Davim JP, Figueira L (2007) Comparative evaluation of conventional and wiper ceramic tools on cutting forces, surface roughness, and tool wear in hard turning AISI D2 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221(4):625–633

    Google Scholar 

  105. Grzesik W, Wanat T (2006) Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(15):1988–1995

    Google Scholar 

  106. Dombovari Z, Stepan G (2012) The effect of helix angle variation on milling stability. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 134(5):051015 (6 pages)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Sims ND, Mann B, Huyanan S (2008) Analytical prediction of chatter stability for variable pitch and variable helix milling tools. J Sound Vib 317(3-5):664–686

    Google Scholar 

  108. Yang D, Liu ZQ (2015) Surface topography analysis and cutting parameters optimization for peripheral milling titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Refrac Met Hard Mater 51:192–200

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wang B, Liu ZQ, Su GS, Ai X (2015) Brittle removal mechanism of ductile materials with ultrahigh-speed machining. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 137(6):061002 (9 pages)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Sutter G, List G (2013) Very high speed cutting of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy - change in morphology and mechanism of chip formation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 66:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  111. Arulkirubakaran D, Senthilkumar V (2017) Performance of TiN and TiAlN coated micro-grooved tools during machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Int J Refrac Met Hard Mater 62:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  112. Kawasegi N, Ozaki K, Morita N, Nishimura K, Yamaguchi M (2017) Development and machining performance of a textured diamond cutting tool fabricated with a focused ion beam and heat treatment. Precis Eng 47:311–320

    Google Scholar 

  113. Sugihara T, Nishimoto Y, Enomoto T (2017) Development of a novel cubic boron nitride cutting tool with a textured flank face for high-speed machining of Inconel 718. Precis Eng 48:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  114. Field M, Kahles JF (1971) Review of surface integrity of machined components. Ann CIRP 20(2):153–162

    Google Scholar 

  115. Arrazola PJ, Özel T, Umbrello D, Davies M, Jawahir IS (2013) Recent advances in modelling of metal machining processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):695–718

    Google Scholar 

  116. Jafarian F, Umbrello D, Jabbaripour B (2016) Identification of new material model for machining simulation of Inconel 718 alloy and the effect of tool edge geometry on microstructure changes. Simul Model Pract Th 66:273–284

    Google Scholar 

  117. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2015) The effect of tool nose radius on surface integrity and residual stresses when turning Inconel 718TM. J Mater Process Technol 216:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  118. Yang D, Liu ZQ (2016) Quantification of microstructural features and prediction of mechanical properties of a dual-phase Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Materials 9(8):628 (14 pages)

    Google Scholar 

  119. Cullity BD (1978) Elements of X-ray diffraction. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, California

    Google Scholar 

  120. Jang DY, Liou JH, Watkins TR, Kozaczek KJ, Hubbard CR (1995) Characterization of surface integrity in machined austenitic stainless steel. Manuf Sci Eng 3(1):399–413

    Google Scholar 

  121. El-Khabeery MM, Fattouh M (1989) Residual stress distribution caused by milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 29(3):391–401

    Google Scholar 

  122. Bellows G (1972) Applying surface integrity principles in jet engine production. Met Eng Quart 55–58

  123. Thiele JD, Melkote SN (2000) The effect of tool edge geometry on workpiece subsurface deformation and through-thickness residual stress for hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Manuf Process 2(4):270–276

    Google Scholar 

  124. Matsumoto Y, Hashimoto F, Lahoti G (1999) Surface integrity generated by precision hard turning. Ann CIRP 48(1):59–62

    Google Scholar 

  125. Abboud E, Attia H, Shi B, Damir A, Thomson V, Mebrahtu Y (2016) Residual stresses and surface integrity of Ti-alloys during finish turning-guidelines for compressive residual stresses. Procedia CIRP 45:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  126. Tanaka H, Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2016) High speed machining of Inconel 718 focusing on wear behaviors of PCBN cutting tool. Procedia CIRP 46:545–548

    Google Scholar 

  127. Akhtar W, Sun JF, Chen WY (2016) Effect of machining parameters on surface integrity in high speed milling of super alloy GH4169/Inconel 718. Mater Manuf Process 3(5):620–627

    Google Scholar 

  128. Biksa A, Yamamoto K, Dosbaeva G, Veldhuis SC, Fox-Rabinovich GS, Elfizy A, Wagg T, Shuster LS (2010) Wear behavior of adaptive nano-multilayered AlTiN/MexN PVD coatings during machining of aerospace alloys. Trib Int 43(8):1491–1499

    Google Scholar 

  129. Liu J, Ma CY, Tu GZ, Long Y (2016) Cutting performance and wear mechanism of Sialon ceramic cutting inserts with TiCN coating. Surf Coat Technol 307:146–150

    Google Scholar 

  130. Thakur DG, Ramamoorthy B, Vijayaraghavan L (2012) Some investigations on high speed dry machining of aerospace material Inconel 718 using multicoated carbide inserts. Mater Manuf Process 27(10):1066–1072

    Google Scholar 

  131. Ucun I, Aslantas K, Bedir F (2013) An experimental investigation of the effect of coating material on tool wear in micro milling of Inconel 718 super alloy. Wear 300(1-2):8–19

    Google Scholar 

  132. Motorcu AR, Kus A, Durgun I (2014) The evaluation of the effects of control factors on surface roughness in the drilling of Waspaloy superalloy. Measurement 58:394–408

    Google Scholar 

  133. Bushlya V, Zhou J, Ståhl JE (2012) Effect of cutting conditions on machinability of superalloy Inconel 718 during high speed turning with coated and uncoated PCBN Tools. Procedia CIRP 3:370–375

    Google Scholar 

  134. Zhou JM, Bushlya V, Ståhl JE (2012) An investigation of surface damage in the high speed turning of Inconel 718 with use of whisker reinforced ceramic tools. J Mater Process Technol 212(2):372–384

    Google Scholar 

  135. Thakur A, Gangopadhyay S, Maity KP (2014) Effect of cutting speed and CVD multilayer coating on machinability of Inconel 825. Surf Eng 30(7):516–523

    Google Scholar 

  136. Thakur A, Mohanty A, Gangopadhyay S (2014) Comparative study of surface integrity aspects of Incoloy 825 during machining with uncoated and CVD multilayer coated inserts. Appl Surf Sci 320:829–837

    Google Scholar 

  137. Pawade RS, Joshi SS, Brahmankar PK, Rahman M (2007) An investigation of cutting forces and surface damage in high-speed turning of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 192-193:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  138. Zhou JM, Bushlya V, Avdovic P, Ståhl JE (2012) Study of surface quality in high speed turning of Inconel 718 with uncoated and coated CBN tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(1-4):141–151

    Google Scholar 

  139. M’Saoubi R, Larsson T, Outeiro J, Guo Y, Suslov S, Saldana C, Chandrasekar S (2012) Surface integrity analysis of machined Inconel 718 over multiple length scales. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):99–102

    Google Scholar 

  140. Ranganath S, Guo CS, Holt S (2009) Experimental investigations into the carbide cracking phenomenon on Inconel 718 superalloy material. ASME Int Manuf Sci Eng Conf 2:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  141. Swain N, Venkatesh V, Kumar P, Srinivas G, Ravishankar S, Barshilia HC (2017) An experimental investigation on the machining characteristics of Nimonic 75 using uncoated and TiAlN coated tungsten carbide micro-end mills. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 16:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  142. Zhou JM, Bushlya V, Peng RL, Chen Z, Johansson S (2014) Analysis of subsurface microstructure and residual stresses in machined Inconel 718 with PCBN and Al2O3-SiCw tools. Procedia CIRP 13:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  143. Du J, Liu ZQ (2012) Effect of cutting speed on surface integrity and chip morphology in high-speed machining of PM nickel-based superalloy FGH95. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9-12):893–899

    Google Scholar 

  144. Aramcharoen A, Mativenga PT (2008) White layer formation and hardening effects in hard turning of H13 tool steel with CrTiAlN and CrTiAlN/MoST-coated carbide tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36(7):650–657

    Google Scholar 

  145. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2006) An analysis of the residual stresses generated in Inconel 718TM when turning. J Mater Process Technol 173(3):359–367

    Google Scholar 

  146. Outeiro JC, Pina JC, M’Saoubi R, Pusavec F, Jawahir IS (2008) Analysis of residual stresses induced by dry turning of difficult-to-machine materials. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):77–80

    Google Scholar 

  147. Ulutan D, Özel T (2013) Multiobjective optimization of experimental and simulated residual stresses in turning of nickel-alloy IN100. Mater Manuf Process 28(7):835–841

    Google Scholar 

  148. Musfirah AH, Ghani JA, Che Haron CH (2017) Tool wear and surface integrity of inconel 718 in dry and cryogenic coolant at high cutting speed. Wear 376-377:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  149. Costes JP, Guillet Y, Poulachon G, Dessoly M (2007) Tool-life and wear mechanisms of CBN tools in machining of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(7-8):1081–1087

    Google Scholar 

  150. Bermingham MJ, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2012) Understanding the tool wear mechanism during thermally assisted machining Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 62:76–87

    Google Scholar 

  151. Yang HC, Chen ZT, Zhou ZT (2015) Influence of cutting speed and tool wear on the surface integrity of the titanium alloy Ti-1023 during milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5-8):1113–1126

    Google Scholar 

  152. Liang XL, Liu ZQ (2017) Experimental investigations on effects of tool flank wear on surface integrity during orthogonal dry cutting of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5-8):1617–1626

    Google Scholar 

  153. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2004) Workpiece surface integrity and tool life issues when turning Inconel 718™ nickel based superalloy. Mach Sci Technol 8(3):399–414

    Google Scholar 

  154. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM, Okeke CI (1999) Tool life and surface integrity when machining Inconel 718 with PVD and CVD coated tools. Trib Trans 42(2):353–360

    Google Scholar 

  155. Aspinwall DK, Dewes RC, Ng E-G, Sage C, Soo SL (2007) The influence of cutter orientation and workpiece angle on machinability when high-speed milling Inconel 718 under finishing conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(12):1839–1846

    Google Scholar 

  156. Sadat AB (1987) Surface characteristics of machined Inconel-718 nickel-base superalloy using natural and controlled contact length tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 27(3):333–342

    Google Scholar 

  157. Kishway HA, Elbestawi MA (1999) Effects of process parameters on material side flow during hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(7):1017–1030

    Google Scholar 

  158. Warnecke G, Bach P (1988) Mechanical and material influences on machined surface in precision turning of steel with ceramics. Transactions of the North American Research Conference 16:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  159. Guo Y, Saldana C, Compton WD, Chandrasekar S (2011) Controlling deformation and microstructure on machined surfaces. Acta Mater 59(11):4538–4547

    Google Scholar 

  160. Wang QQ, Liu ZQ, Wang B, Mohsan AUH (2017) Stress-induced orientation relationship variation for phase transformation of α-Ti to β-Ti during high speed machining Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng A 690:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  161. Hughes JI, Sharman ARC, Ridgway K (2005) The effect of cutting tool material and edge geometry on tool life and workpiece surface integrity. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 220(2):93–107

    Google Scholar 

  162. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2008) Surface integrity and tool life when turning Inconel 718 using ultra-high pressure and flood coolant systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 222(6):653–664

    Google Scholar 

  163. Axinte DA, Andrews P, Li W, Gindy N, Withers PJ (2006) Turning of advanced Ni based alloys obtained via powder metallurgy route. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55(1):117–120

    Google Scholar 

  164. Ibrahim GA, Che-Haron CH, Ghani JA (2009) Surface integrity of Ti-6Al-4V ELI when machined using coated carbide tools under dry cutting condition. Int J Mech Mater Eng 4(2):191–196

    Google Scholar 

  165. Zhou JM, Bushlya V, Peng RL, Johansson S, Avdovic P, Ståhl JE (2011) Effects of tool wear on subsurface deformation of nickel-based superalloy. Procedia Eng 19:407–413

    Google Scholar 

  166. Arunachalam R, Mannan MA (2000) Machinability of nickel-based high temperature alloys. Mach Sci Technol 4(1):127–168

    Google Scholar 

  167. M'Saoubi R, Ryde L (2005) Application of the EBSD technique for the characterisation of deformation zones in metal cutting. Mater Sci Eng A 405(1):339–349

    Google Scholar 

  168. Imran M, Mativenga PT, Gholinia A, Withers PJ (2015) Assessment of surface integrity of Ni superalloy after electrical-discharge, laser and mechanical micro-drilling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:1303–1311

    Google Scholar 

  169. Agmell M, Ahadi A, Zhou JM, Peng RL, Bushlya V, Ståhl JE (2017) Modeling subsurface deformation induced by machining of Inconel 718. Mach Sci Technol 21(1):103–120

    Google Scholar 

  170. Nouari M, Makich H (2014) On the physics of machining titanium alloys: interactions between cutting parameters, microstructure and tool wear. Metals 4(3):335–358

    Google Scholar 

  171. Wang WF, Wang MC, Zhang J, Sun FJ, Huang DW (2008) Research on the microstructure and wear resistance of titanium alloy structural members repaired by laser cladding. Opt Laser Eng 46(11):810–816

    Google Scholar 

  172. Abdel-Hady M, Hinoshita K, Morinaga M (2006) General approach to phase stability and elastic properties of β- type Ti-alloys using electronic parameters. Scripta Mater 55(5):477–480

    Google Scholar 

  173. Soo SL, Khan SA, Aspinwall DK, Harden P, Mantle AL, Kappmeyer G, Pearson D, M’Saoubi R (2016) High speed turning of Inconel 718 using PVD-coated PCBN tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65(1):89–92

    Google Scholar 

  174. Chen L, El-Wardany TI, Harris WC (2004) Modeling the effects of flank wear land and chip formation on residual stresses. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(1):95–98

    Google Scholar 

  175. Peng RL, Zhou J, Johansson S, Billenius A, Bushlya V, Ståhl JE (2013) Surface integrity and the influence of tool wear in high speed machining of Inconel 718. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Fracture, Beijing, China, June 16-21

  176. Sadat AB, Reddy MY (1992) Surface integrity of Inconel 718 nickel-base superalloy using controlled and natural contact length tools Part 1: Lubricated. Exp Mech 32(3):282–288

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705293, 51425503), and the Major Science and Technology Program of High-end CNC Machine Tools and Basic Manufacturing Equipment (2014ZX04012014 and 2015ZX04005008). This work was also supported by project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M610422), International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program and grants from Taishan Scholar Foundation (TS20130922).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, People’s Republic of China

    Bing Wang

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture of MOE, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, People’s Republic of China

    Bing Wang & Zhanqiang Liu

  3. Key National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Jinan, 250061, People’s Republic of China

    Zhanqiang Liu

Authors
  1. Bing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhanqiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhanqiang Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Liu, Z. Influences of tool structure, tool material and tool wear on machined surface integrity during turning and milling of titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 1925–1975 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2314-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2314-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation