Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the sensitivity of the three-dimensional random representative finite element model of multiple shot impacts to the SP-induced stress field, Almen intensity, and surface roughness

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite element method (FEM) has been proved to be powerful in studying the process of shot peening (SP). The random representative cell model is frequently utilized to simulate the SP process more realistically. In order to investigate the sensitivity of the random representative cell models to the finite element simulation results of the SP-induced stress field, Almen arc height, and surface roughness, the three-dimensional random representative cell model was developed to simulate the process of SP of Almen strip, and the SP-induced stress field and surface roughness were analyzed resultantly. A novel numerical calculation framework linking the random representative cell model with the finite element model of the whole Almen strip was further proposed to calculate the SP-induced Almen arc height, and the numerical prediction results of the Almen intensities are in good agreement with the experimental data with regard to the shot velocities of 30 m/s, 50 m/s, and 100 m/s. The effects of the shot velocity and SP coverage on the sensitivity of the random representative cell models to the simulation results of SP were accordingly discussed comprehensively and systematically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Soyama H, Chighizola CR, Hill MR (2021) Effect of compressive residual stress introduced by cavitation peening and shot peening on the improvement of fatigue strength of stainless steel. J Mater Process Tech 288:116877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Unal O, Maleki E, Karademir I, Husem F, Efe Y, Das T (2022) Effects of conventional shot peening, severe shot peening, re-shot peening and precised grinding operations on fatigue performance of AISI 1050 railway axle steel. Int J Fatigue 155:106613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nordin E, Alfredsson B (2016) Measuring shot peening media velocity by indent size comparison. J Mater Process Tech 235:143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohta T, Tsutsumi S, Ma NS (2021) Direct measurement of shot velocity and numerical analysis of residual stress from pneumatic shot peening. Surf Interfaces 22:100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Torres M, Voorwald H (2002) An evaluation of shot peening, residual stress and stress relaxation on the fatigue life of AISI 4340 steel. Int J Fatigue 24:877–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00205-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bag A, Delbergue D, Ajaja J, Bocher P, Levesque M, Brochu M (2020) Effect of different shot peening conditions on the fatigue life of 300 M steel submitted to high stress amplitudes. Int J Fatigue 130:105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang C, Wu G, He T, Zhou YJ, Zhou ZC (2020) Numerical study of fatigue crack propagation in a residual stress field induced by shot peening. J Mater Eng Perform 29:5525–5539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05029-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C, Lai YB, Wang L, Wang CL (2020) Dislocation-based study on the influences of shot peening on fatigue resistance. Surf Coat Tech 383:125247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kovaci H, Bozkurt YB, Yetim AF, Aslan M, Celik A (2019) The effect of surface plastic deformation produced by shot peening on corrosion behavior of a low-alloy steel. Surf Coat Tech 360:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang C, Wang L, Wang XG, Xu YJ (2018) Numerical study of grain refinement induced by severe shot peening. Int J Mech Sci 146:280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang C, Wang CL, Wang L, Lai YB, Li K, Zhou YJ (2020) A dislocation density-based comparative study of grain refinement, residual stresses, and surface roughness induced by shot peening and surface mechanical attrition treatment. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 108:505–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05413-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maleki E, Bagherifard S, Unal O, Bandini M, Farrahi GH, Guagliano M (2021) Introducing gradient severe shot peening as a novel mechanical surface treatment. Sci Rep 11(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01152-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin V, Vazquez J, Navarro C, Dominguez J (2020) Effect of shot peening residual stresses and surface roughness on fretting fatigue strength of Al7075-T651. Tribol Int 142:106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.106004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taro M, Chaise T, Nelias D (2015) A methodology to predict the roughness of shot peened surfaces. J Mater Process Tech 217:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Llaneza V, Belzunce FJ (2015) Study of the effects produced by shot peening on the surface of quenched and tempered steels: roughness, residual stresses and work hardening. Appl Surf Sci 356:475–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Unal O, Varol R (2015) Surface severe plastic deformation of AISI 304 via conventional shot peening, severe shot peening and repeening. Appl Surf Sci 351:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maleki E, Unal O, Kashyzadeh KR (2019) Efficiency analysis of shot peening parameters on variations of hardness, grain size and residual stress via taguchi approach. Met Mater Int 25:1436–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00290-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maleki E, Unal O, Kashyzadeh KR (2021) Influences of shot peening parameters on mechanical properties and fatigue behavior of 316 l steel: experimental, taguchi method and response surface methodology. Met Mater Int 27:4418–4440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01013-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trung PQ, Khun NW, Butler DL (2016) Effects of shot peening pressure, media type and double shot peening on the microstructure, mechanical and tribological properties of low-alloy steel. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 4:045001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672x/4/4/045001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghasemi A, Hassani-Gangaraj SM, Mahmoudi AH, Farrahi GH, Guagliano M (2016) Shot peening coverage effect on residual stress profile by FE random impact analysis. Surf Eng 32:861–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2016.1192336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pham TQ, Khun NW, Butler DL (2017) New approach to estimate coverage parameter in 3D FEM shot peening simulation. Surf Eng 33:687–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2016.1274536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin QJ, Liu HJ, Zhu CC, Parker RG (2019) Investigation on the effect of shot peening coverage on the surface integrity. Appl Surf Sci 489:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu JZ, Liu HJ, Wei PT, Zhu CC, Lin QJ (2020) Effect of shot peening coverage on hardness, residual stress and surface morphology of carburized rollers. Surf Coat Tech 384:125273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Almen JO, Black PH, Dolan TJ (1963) Residual stresses and fatigue in metals. J Appl Mech 31:368. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3629645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Z, Park JS, Lee Y (2014) A strip holding system for finite element simulation of Almen strip testing. J Mech Sci Technol 28:2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-014-0636-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalez J, Bagherifard S, Guagliano M, Pariente IF (2017) Influence of different shot peening treatments on surface state and fatigue behaviour of Al 6063 alloy. Eng Fract Mech 185:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Teo A, Ahluwalia K, Aramcharoen A (2020) Experimental investigation of shot peening: correlation of pressure and shot velocity to Almen intensity. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 106:4859–4868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04982-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bagherifard S, Ghelichi R, Guagliano M (2012) On the shot peening surface coverage and its assessment by means of finite element simulation: A critical review and some original developments. Appl Surf Sci 259:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin QJ, Wei PT, Liu HJ, Zhu JZ, Zhu CC, Wu JZ (2022) A CFD-FEM numerical study on shot peening. Int J Mech Sci 223:107259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruiz E, Ferreno D, Cuartas M, Arroyo B, Carrascal IA, Rivas I, Gutierrez-Solana F (2022) Application of machine learning algorithms for the optimization of the fabrication process of steel springs to improve their fatigue performance. Int J Fatigue 159:106785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Unal O (2016) Optimization of shot peening parameters by response surface methodology. Surf Coat Tech 305:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang XL, Wang Z, Wu G, Gan J, Yang Y, Huang HM, He JX, Zhong HL (2019) Combining the finite element method and response surface methodology for optimization of shot peening parameters. Int J Fatigue 129:105231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maleki E, Bagherifard S, Razavi SMJ, Bandini M, du Plessis A, Berto F, Guagliano M (2022) On the efficiency of machine learning for fatigue assessment of post-processed additively manufactured AlSi10Mg. Int J Fatigue 160:106841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maleki E, Unal O, Guagliano M, Bagherifard S (2022) Analysing the fatigue behaviour and residual stress relaxation of gradient nano-structured 316l steel subjected to the shot peening via deep learning approach. Met Mater Int 28:112–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-00995-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mori KI, Osakada K, Matsuoka N (1994) Finite element analysis of peening process with plasticity deforming shot. J Mater Process Tech 45:607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(94)90406-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim T, Lee H, Hyun HC, Jung S (2013) Effects of Rayleigh damping, friction and rate-dependency on 3D residual stress simulation of angled shot peening. Mater Design 46:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xie LC, Wang CX, Wang LQ, Wang Z, Jiang CH, Lu WJ, Ji V (2016) Numerical analysis and experimental validation on residual stress distribution of titanium matrix composite after shot peening treatment. Mech Mater 99:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim T, Lee JH, Lee H, Cheong SK (2010) An area-average approach to peening residual stress under multi-impacts using a three-dimensional symmetry-cell finite element model with plastic shots. Mater Design 31:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang C, Hu JC, Gu ZB, Xu YJ, Wang XG (2017) Simulation on residual stress of shot peening based on a symmetrical cell model. Chin J Mech Eng 30:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0084-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang JB, Lu SH, Zhou Z, Wu TR, Xu G (2017) Modeling of multiple shots for analyzing shot peening controlled parameters on formed curvature radius. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 93:1867–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0629-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Matuszak J, Zaleski K, Skoczylas A, Ciecielag K, Kecik K (2021) Influence of semi-random and regular shot peening on selected surface layer properties of aluminum alloy. Materials 14(24):7620. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Levesque M (2009) On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw 40:1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Hu DY, Gao Y, Meng FC, Song J, Wang YF, Ren MX, Wang RQ (2017) A unifying approach in simulating the shot peening process using a 3D random representative volume finite element model. Chin J Aeronaut 30:1592–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu JZ, Liu HJ, Wei PT, Lin QJ, Zhou SS (2020) Effect of shot peening coverage on residual stress and surface roughness of 18CrNiMo7–6 steel. Int J Mech Sci 183:105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin QJ, Liu HJ, Zhu CC, Chen DF, Zhou SS (2020) Effects of different shot peening parameters on residual stress, surface roughness and cell size. Surf Coat Tech 398:126054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cao W, Fathallah R, Castex L (1995) Correlation of Almen arc height with residual stresses in shot eening process. Mater Sci Tech-lond 11:967–973. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1995.11.9.967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Guagliano M (2001) Relating Almen intensity to residual stresses induced by shot peening: a numerical approach. J Mater Process Tech 110(3):277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00893-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Levesque M (2010) An analytical approach to relate shot peening parameters to Almen intensity. Surf Coat Tech 205:2055–2066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bhuvaraghan B, Srinivasan SM, Maffeo B (2011) Numerical simulation of Almen strip response due to random impacts with strain-rate effects. Int J Mech Sci 53:417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen Z, Yang F, Meguid SA (2014) Realistic finite element simulations of arc-height development in shot-peened Almen strips. J Eng Mater Technol 136(4):041002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bobba D, Ramaprabhu P, Cherukuri HP (2019) An integrated DEM-FEM model for shot peening applications. International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 58752: V002T03A054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2019-2885.

  52. Robertson GT (1971) The effects of shot size on the residual stresses resulting from shot peening. SAE Technical Paper 710284. doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/710284.

  53. Jebahi M, Gakwaya A, Lévesque J, Mechri O, Ba K (2016) Robust methodology to simulate real shot peening process using discrete-continuum coupling method. Int J Mech Sci 107:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Trung PQ, Butler DL, Idapalapati S (2018) A numerical and experimental study of distribution of the residual stress on the shot peened low alloy steel. J Eng Mater Technol 140(4):041006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ghanbari S, Bahr DF (2020) Predictions of decreased surface roughness after shot peening using controlled media dimensions. J Mater Sci Technol 58:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mylonas GI, Labeas G (2011) Numerical modelling of shot peening process and corresponding products: residual stress, surface roughness and cold work prediction. Surf Coat Tech 205:4480–4494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bagherifard S, Ghelichi R, Guagliano M (2012) Numerical and experimental analysis of surface roughness generated by shot peening. Appl Surf Sci 258:6831–6840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Qiang B, Li YD, Yao CR, Wang X (2018) Effect of shot peening coverage on residual stress field and surface roughness. Surf Eng 34:939–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2017.1391939

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are grateful for the supports provided by Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2008085QE228), Open Fund of Collaborative Innovation Center of High-end Laser Manufacturing Equipment Co-sponsored by Ministry and Province (JGKF-202202) and the Graduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund of Anhui University of Science and Technology (2022CX2067).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China

    Cheng Wang, Xinrong Tao, Kun Sun, Senhui Wang, Kun Li & Haishun Deng

  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of High-End Laser Manufacturing Equipment Co-Sponsored By Ministry and Province, Hangzhou, 310023, China

    Cheng Wang

  3. Anhui Key Laboratory of Mine Intelligent Equipment and Technology, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China

    Haishun Deng

Authors
  1. Cheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinrong Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kun Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Senhui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haishun Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Cheng Wang: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, writing—original draft. Xinrong Tao: numerical simulation, data curation. Kun Sun: Numerical modeling, validation. Senhui Wang: formal analysis, methodology. Kun Li: conceptualization, methodology. Haishun Deng: conceptualization, methodology, supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

It is approved that the paper is original and has been written based on the authors’ own finding. All the figures and tables are original, and every expression from other published works were acknowledged and referenced.

Consent to participate

All authors are aware and satisfied of the authorship order and correspondence of the paper.

Consent for publication

All authors are satisfied that the last revised version of the paper is published without any changes.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Tao, X., Sun, K. et al. On the sensitivity of the three-dimensional random representative finite element model of multiple shot impacts to the SP-induced stress field, Almen intensity, and surface roughness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 2549–2567 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10892-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10892-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation