Skip to main content
Log in

Grinding force model for gear profile grinding based on material removal mechanism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional force models fail to predict the grinding force for gear profile grinding accurately owing to the specific grinding geometry and kinematics. On the other hand, few researchers about gear profile grinding concern the grinding force. To address this issue, a model to predict the grinding force for gear profile grinding is proposed. This comprehensive study consists of three aspects, namely, the wheel model, the kinematics model, and the force model. Unlike other wheel models for the grinding process, the cumulative number of grinding points in this wheel model is a variable depending on the radius infeed depth. A specific model for grinding geometry and kinematics of gear profile grinding are established based on the processing principle and grain-workpiece contact. Then, the force model is proposed considering the effect of grinding stages and the transformation matrix of the local coordinate system for abrasive grain. To verify the proposed model, experiments are conducted based on specific operations to overcome measurement restrictions, and the effects of grinding parameters on force components are investigated. The proposed models not only predict the grinding force but also reveal the differences between the material removal mechanism for gear profile grinding and that for surface grinding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

\({a}_{p}\) :

Cutting depth

\({C}_{\mathrm{1,2}}\) :

Constant coefficient

\(C\) :

Grain number per unit area

\({C}_{L}\) :

Grain number per unit length

\({d}_{cc}\) :

Critical penetration depth for cutting stage

\({d}_{cp}\) :

Critical penetration depth for plowing stage

\({d}_{e}\) :

Equivalent diameter

\({d}_{i}\) :

Undeformed chip thickness of ith grain

\({d}_{imax}\) :

Maximum undeformed chip thickness of grains

\({d}_{s}\) :

Wheel diameter corresponding to grinding point

\({d}_{w}\) :

Workpiece diameter corresponding to the grinding point

\({E}_{w}\) :

Young's modulus of the workpiece material

\({F}_{n}^{i}\) :

Normal grinding force of abrasive ith grain

\({F}_{nc}\) :

Normal cutting force

\({F}_{np}\) :

Normal plowing force

\({F}_{nr}\) :

Normal rubbing force

\({F}_{t}^{i}\) :

Tangential grinding force of abrasive ith grain

\({F}_{tc}\) :

Tangential cutting force

\({F}_{tn}\) :

Normal grinding force in tooth coordinate system

\({F}_{tp}\) :

Tangential plowing force

\({F}_{tr}\) :

Tangential rubbing force

\({F}_{tt}\) :

Tangential grinding force in tooth coordinate system

\({{\varvec{F}}}_{{\varvec{e}}}\) :

Force in equipment coordinate system

(\({F}_{ex},{F}_{ey},{F}_{ez}\)):

Total force in X-, Y-, and Z-directions in equipment coordinate system

\({{\varvec{F}}}_{{\varvec{l}}{\varvec{n}}{\varvec{c}}{\varvec{s}}}^{{\varvec{i}}}\) :

Force matrix in local normal coordinate system of ith grain

\({{\varvec{F}}}_{{\varvec{t}}}\) :

Total force matrix in tooth coordinate system

\({{\varvec{F}}}_{{\varvec{t}}}^{{\varvec{i}}}\) :

Force matrix in tooth coordinate system of ith grain

(\({F}_{tx},{F}_{ty},{F}_{tz}\)):

Total force in X-, Y-, and Z-directions in tooth coordinate system

(\({F}_{tx}^{i},{F}_{tx}^{i},{F}_{tz}^{i}\)):

Force component in X-, Y-, and Z-directions in tooth coordinate system of ith grain

H:

Vicker’s hardness

\({h}_{i}\) :

Protrusion height of ith grain

\({h}_{imax}\) :

Maximum protrusion height of grains

\(\overrightarrow{k}\) :

Tangential direction of tooth flank

\({L}_{i}\) :

Length of involute line

\({N}_{i}\) :

Number of cutting edges participated in the grinding

\(\overrightarrow{n}\) :

Normal direction of tooth flank

\(P({h}_{i})\) :

Fitting results of protrusion height

\({R}_{d}\) :

Distance between wheel center and gear center

\({R}_{i}\) :

Grinding radius of ith grain

\({R}_{ti}\) :

The radius of tooth surface corresponding to ith grain

\({r}_{b}\) :

Base circle radius

\(r\) :

Ratio of chip width and thickness

\({{\varvec{T}}}_{{\varvec{e}}{\varvec{t}}}\) :

Transformation matrix from tooth coordinate to equipment coordinate system

\({{\varvec{T}}}_{{\varvec{t}}{\varvec{l}}}^{{\varvec{i}}}\) :

Transformation matrix from local normal coordinate system to tooth coordinate of ith grain

\({v}_{s}\) :

Wheel speed

\({v}_{w}\) :

Feed speed

w :

Diameter of wear flat

(\({X}_{wi},{Y}_{wi},{Z}_{wi}\)):

X, Y, And Z coordinates of wheel rotation center corresponding to ith grain

(\({x}_{gi},{y}_{gi},{z}_{gi}\)):

X, Y, And Z coordinates of ith grain

(\({x}_{i},{y}_{i},{z}_{i}\)):

X, Y, And Z coordinates of gear surface corresponding to the involute angle

z :

Tooth number

\({\alpha }_{p}\) :

Pressure angle

\(\alpha\) :

Half vertex angle

\({\beta }_{\alpha }\) :

Friction angle

\({\epsilon }_{w}\) :

Poisson’s ratio of the workpiece material

ε :

Ratio of mean contact pressure contact area to Vicker’s hardness of workpiece material

\({\theta }_{e}\) :

Angle between the equipment coordinate system and tooth coordinate system

\({\theta }_{n}^{i}\) :

Angle between wheel radius direction and surface normal corresponding to ith grain

\({\mu }_{p}\) :

Plowing friction coefficient

\({\mu }_{r}\) :

Rubbing friction coefficient

\(\tau\) :

Flow stress

\({\phi }_{\alpha }\) :

Shear angle

\({\varphi }_{i}\) :

Involute angle

\({\varphi }_{iend}\) :

Involute angle corresponding to addendum circle

\(\omega\) :

Wheel rotation angle

References

  1. Kopac J, Krajnik P (2006) High-performance grinding-a review. J Mater Process Technol 175:278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hecker RL, Ramoneda IM, Liang SY (2003) Analysis of wheel topography and grit force for grinding process modeling. J Manuf Process 5:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(03)70036-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perl J (2014) Modelling and simulation of grinding processes. Comput Sci Sport: Res Pract 41:110–153. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881782-14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Werner G (1978) Influence of work material on grinding forces. Annals CIRP 27:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mishra VK, Salonitis K (2013) Empirical estimation of grinding specific forces and energy based on a modified Werner grinding model. Procedia CIRP 8:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malkin S (1989) Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives. Industrial Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patnaik Durgumahanti US, Singh V, Venkateswara Rao P (2010) A new model for grinding force prediction and analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang H, Wang JJJ (2008) A stochastic grinding force model considering random grit distribution. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Li C, Ji H et al (2017) Analysis of grinding mechanics and improved predictive force model based on material-removal and plastic-stacking mechanisms. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 122:81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jamshidi H, Budak E (2020) An analytical grinding force model based on individual grit interaction. J Mater Process Technol 283:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116700

  11. Li C, Li X, Wu Y et al (2019) Deformation mechanism and force modelling of the grinding of YAG single crystals. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 143:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dai C, Yin Z, Ding W, Zhu Y (2019) Grinding force and energy modeling of textured monolayer CBN wheels considering undeformed chip thickness nonuniformity. Int J Mech Sci 157–158:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.04.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng Z, Huang K, Lin C et al (2022) An analytical force and energy model for ductile-brittle transition in ultra-precision grinding of brittle materials. Int J Mech Sci 220:107107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rasim M, Mattfeld P, Klocke F (2015) Analysis of the grain shape influence on the chip formation in grinding. J Mater Process Technol 226:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Axinte D, Butler-Smith P, Akgun C, Kolluru K (2013) On the influence of single grit micro-geometry on grinding behavior of ductile and brittle materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 74:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dai C, Ding W, Xu J et al (2017) Influence of grain wear on material removal behavior during grinding nickel-based superalloy with a single diamond grain. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 113:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tian L, Fu Y, Xu J et al (2015) The influence of speed on material removal mechanism in high speed grinding with single grit. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou W, Tang J, Shao W (2020) Study on surface generation mechanism and roughness distribution in gear profile grinding. Int J Mech Sci 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105921

  19. Zhou W, Tang J, Chen H et al (2019) Modeling of tooth surface topography in continuous generating grinding based on measured topography of grinding worm. Mech Mach Theory 131:189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jia K, Guo J, Zheng S, Hong J (2019) A general mathematical model for two-parameter generating machining of involute cylindrical gears. Appl Math Model 75:37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao Y, Wang S, Ma C et al (2022) Numerical modeling of material removal mechanism and surface topography for gear profile grinding. J Manuf Process 76:719–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Zhang W, Liu Y (2018) Analysis model for surface residual stress distribution of spiral bevel gear by generating grinding. Mech Mach Theory 130:477–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun C, Lu Y, Xiu S et al (2021) Analysis on the removal mechanism of disc grinding based on dynamic thermal–mechanical coupling. Int J Mech Mater Des 17:831–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-021-09539-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yi J, Jin T, Zhou W, Deng Z (2020) Theoretical and experimental analysis of temperature distribution during full tooth groove form grinding. J Manuf Process 58:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao Y, Wang S, Ma C et al (2021) Measurement and modeling methods of grinding-induced residual stress distribution of gear tooth flank. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07392-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xia C, Wang S, Ma C et al (2020) Crucial geometric error compensation towards gear grinding accuracy enhancement based on simplified actual inverse kinematic model. Int J Mech Sci 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105319

  27. Ardashev DV, Dyakonov AA (2017) Mathematical model of the grinding force with account for blunting of abrasive grains of the grinding wheel. J Manuf Sci E T ASME 139:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang J, Qiu Z, Li T (2019) A novel measurement method and application for grinding wheel surface topography based on shape from focus. Measurement 133:495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Malkin S, Cook NH (1971) The wear of grinding wheels: part 1-attritious wear. J Manuf Sci E T ASME 93:1129–1133. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3428052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jackson MJ, Hitchiner MP (2013) High performance grinding and advanced cutting tools. SpringerBriefs Appl Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3116-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li HN, Yu TB, Wang ZX et al (2017) Detailed modeling of cutting forces in grinding process considering variable stages of grain-workpiece micro interactions. Int J Mech Sci 126:319–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Litvin FL, Fuentes A (2004) Gear Geometry and Applied Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang C, Zhou M, Zhang H (2022) Investigations on the micro-interactions of grit-workpiece and forces prediction in ultrasonic vibration side grinding of optical glass. J Mater Process Technol 300:117415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang D, Ge P, Bi W, Jiang J (2013) Grain trajectory and grain workpiece contact analyses for modeling of grinding force and energy partition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:2111–2123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5428-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li L, Ren X, Feng H et al (2021) A novel material removal rate model based on single grain force for robotic belt grinding. J Manuf Process 68:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals. Oxford Classic Texts Phys Sci

  37. Zhao Y, Marietta DM, Chang L (2000) An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow. J Tribol 122:479–480. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.555389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Knothe K, Tan S, Bezin Y (2011) Contact mechanics and friction: physical principles and applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 225:341–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409711403547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Le ZhuW, Yang Y, Li HN et al (2019) Theoretical and experimental investigation of material removal mechanism in compliant shape adaptive grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 142:76–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. De Vathaire M, Delamare F, Felder E (1981) An upper bound model of ploughing by a pyramidal indenter. Wear 66:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(81)90032-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Challen JM, Oxley PLB (1979) An explanation of the different regimes of friction and wear using asperity deformation models. Wear 53:229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(79)90080-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sin H, Saka N, Suh NP (1979) Abrasive wear mechanisms and the grit size effect. Wear 55:163–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(79)90188-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Park HW, Liang SY (2008) Force modeling of micro-grinding incorporating crystallographic effects. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1658–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun Y, Su ZP, Gong YD et al (2020) An experimental and numerical study of micro-grinding force and performance of sapphire using novel structured micro abrasive tool. Int J Mech Sci 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105741

  45. Brecher C, Brumm M, Hübner F (2015) Approach for the calculation of cutting forces in generating gear grinding. Procedia CIRP 33:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tang J, Du J, Chen Y (2009) Modeling and experimental study of grinding forces in surface grinding. J Mater Process Technol 209:2847–2854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51905057) and National Science and Technology Major Project (2019-VII-0017–0158).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yuliang Xiao: methodology, formal analysis, writing — original draft, visualization, validation.

Shilong Wang*: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration.

Chi Ma: methodology, writing — review and editing, funding acquisition.

Sibao Wang: investigation, writing — review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilong Wang.

Ethics declarations

—All authors of this paper have directly participated in planning, execution, and analysis of this research.

—The contents of this paper have not been copyrighted or published previously.

—The contents of this paper are not now under consideration for publication elsewhere.

—The contents of this paper will not be copyrighted, submitted, or published elsewhere, while acceptance by International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology is under consideration.

Ethics approval

All authors agree with the ethical responsibilities of authors.

Consent to participate

All authors have participated into this work and agree with the participation.

Consent for publication

All authors agree with the publication standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

According to the geometric characteristics of the grinding wheel for the gear profile grinding, the wheel matrix is established by transforming the 3D grinding wheel into the side view [21]. The position of the abrasive grain is expressed by the row number and the column number of the wheel matrix, and the corresponding element value denotes other information about the wheel grains, such as the protrusion height and size.

The maximum row number and the maximum column number of the wheel matrix can be calculated by the following:

$${i}_{w\mathrm{max}}={r}_{b}\left({\left(\left(z+2\right)/z\mathrm{cos\alpha }\right)}^{2}-1\right)/2\Delta {i}_{w}+1$$
$${j}_{w\mathrm{max}}=2\uppi \left({R}_{d}-{Y}_{\mathrm{end}}+{L}_{i}\right)/\Delta {j}_{w}+1$$

\({Y}_{\mathrm{end}}\) is the Y-value of the end point for the involute and can be determined by the involute equation; \(\Delta {i}_{w}\) and \(\Delta {j}_{w}\) denote the distance between rows and columns of the wheel matrix, respectively.

As for an abrasive grain, the corresponding row number and column number can be calculated by the following:

$$\left\{\begin{array}{c}{i}_{w}=\left(R-\left({R}_{d}-{Y}_{\mathrm{end}}\right)\right)/\Delta {i}_{w}+1\\ {j}_{w}=\left(R\theta -\updelta \left({i}_{w}\right)\right)/\Delta {j}_{w}+1\end{array}\right.$$

where \(R\) and \(\theta\) denote the radius and the orientation angle of the abrasive grain in the side view; \(\updelta \left({i}_{w}\right)\) denotes the gap length of (iw)th row and can be calculated by

$$\delta\left(i_w\right)=\backslash\mathrm{uppi}\left(R_2-R\right)$$

\(R_2\)denotes the maximum radius of grains and is determined by the size of the grinding wheel.

Appendix 2

To calculate the force to resist the chip formation in the cutting stage, the Johnson–Cook model is adopted to express the flow stress of the material, and the stress is expressed as follows:

$$\tau =\left(A+B\bullet {\varepsilon }^{n}\right)\left(1+C\bullet \mathrm{ln}\dot{\varepsilon }\right)\left(1-{\left(\frac{T-{T}_{r}}{{T}_{m}-{T}_{r}}\right)}^{m}\right)$$

where A, B, and C are the constitutive parameters of the material and are 890, 521, and 0.014 in this case, respectively; n and m are the constants that relate to the stress flow with the strain hardening and thermal softening effects of the material and are 0.25 and 1.02 in this case, respectively. \({T}_{r}\) and \({T}_{m}\) are the room and melting temperature points of the material, respectively. As given in Ref. [46], \(\varepsilon\) and \(\dot{\varepsilon }\) denote the effective plastic strain and normalized effective plastic strain rate, which can be expressed as follows:

$$\varepsilon =\frac{\mathrm{cos}{\beta }_{\alpha }}{\mathrm{sin}{\phi }_{\alpha }\mathrm{cos}\left({\phi }_{\alpha }-{\beta }_{\alpha }\right)}$$
$$\dot{\varepsilon }=\frac{10{v}_{s}^{i}\mathrm{sin}{\phi }_{\alpha }\mathrm{cos}{\beta }_{\alpha }}{w\mathrm{cos}\left({\phi }_{\alpha }-{\beta }_{\alpha }\right)}$$

where \({v}_{s}^{i}\) denotes the wheel velocity that corresponds to the ith grain. Since the grinding radius depends on the corresponding involute angle of abrasive grain, the wheel speed of the ith grain is different from that of another one, which can be expressed as follows:

$${v}_{s}^{i}=2{R}_{i}{v}_{s}/{d}_{s}$$

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, Y., Wang, S., Ma, C. et al. Grinding force model for gear profile grinding based on material removal mechanism. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 743–762 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10739-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10739-6

Keywords

Navigation