Abstract
This study explores the application of machine learning algorithms for supporting complex product manufacturing quality through a focus on quality assurance and control. We aim to take advantage of ML technics to solve one of the complex manufacturing problems of the tempered glass manufacturing industry as a first attempt to automate product quality prediction and optimization in this industrial field as an alternative to destructive testing methodologies. The choice of this application field was motivated by the lack of a robust engineering technique to assess the production quality in real time; this arises the need of using advanced smart manufacturing solution as AI to save the extremely high cost of destructive tests. As methodology, this paper investigates the performance of machine learning techniques including Ridge Regression, Linear Regression, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and Lasso Regression, for predicting the product thermal treatment quality within the selected type of industry. In the first part, we applied the selected machine learning models to a dataset collected manually and made up of the more relevant process parameters of the heating and the quenching process. Evaluating the results of the applied models, based on several performance indicators such as mean absolute error, mean squared error, and r-squared, declared that Ridge Regression was the most accurate model with a mean error of 14.33 which is significantly acceptable in a business point of view and not reachable by any human level experience of prediction. The second part consists of developing a digitalized device connected to the manufacturing process to provide predictions in real time. This device operates as an error-proofing system that sends a reverse signal to the machine in case the prediction shows a non-compliant quality of the current processed product. This study can be expanded to predict the optimal process parameters to use when the predicted values do not meet the desired quality and can advantageously replace the trial-and-error approach that is generally adopted for defining those parameters. The contribution of our work relies on the introduction of a clear methodology (from idea to industrialization) for the design and deployment of an industrial-grade predictive solution within a new field which is the glass transformation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data, material, and codes used in this paper are available.
References
Ab ronen A, Karvinen R (2018) Effect of glass temperature before cooling and cooling rate on residual stresses in tempering. Glass Structures & Engineering 3(1):3–15
Akeyoshi K, Kanai E, Yamamoto K, Shima S (1967) Study on the physical tempering of glass plates. Rep Res Lab Asahi Glass 17(1):23–26
Arlot S, Celisse A (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics surveys 4:40–79
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine learning 45(1):5–32
Ciulla G, D’Amico A (2019) Building energy performance forecasting: a multiple linear regression approach. Appl Energy 253:113500
El Mazgualdi C, Masrour T, El Hassani I, Khdoudi A (2020) A deep reinforcement learning (DRL) decision model for heating process parameters identification in automotive glass manufacturing. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence & Industrial Applications (pp. 77–87). Springer, Cham
El Mazgualdi CE, Masrour T, El Hassani I, Khdoudi A (2020) Machine learning for KPIs prediction: a case study of the overall equipment effectiveness within the automotive industry. Soft Computing, 1–19
Gardon R (1958) Calculation of temperature distributions in glass plates undergoing heat-treatment. J Am Ceram Soc 41(6):200–209
Gardon R (1980) Thermal tempering of glass in Glass: Science and Technology, ed. DR Uhlmann et NJ Kreidl
Guoline K (2017) LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, In International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 3149–3157
Hornik K (1991) Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw 4(2):251–257
Huang GB (2003) Learning capability and storage capacity of two-hidden-layer feedforward networks. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 14(2):274–281
Hunter D, Yu H, Pukish MS III, Kolbusz J, Wilamowski BM (2012) Selection of proper neural network sizes and architectures—a comparative study. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 8(2):228–240
Karvinen R, Rantala M, Pesonen T (2003) Heat transfer in glass tempering and forming processes. In Advances in Heat Transfer Engineering. 4th Baltic Heat Transfer Conference (pp. 25–27)
Khdoudi A, Masrour T, El Mazgualdi C (2019) Using machine learning algorithms for the prediction of industrial process parameters based on product design. In International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (pp. 728–749). Springer, Cham
Marshall DB, Lawn BR (1978) Strength degradation of thermally tempered glass plates. J Am Ceram Soc 61(1–2):21–27
Narayanaswamy OS (1978) Stress and structural relaxation in tempering glass. J Am Ceram Soc 61(3–4):146–152
Nielsen JH, Olesen JF, Poulsen PN, Stang H (2010) Simulation of residual stresses at holes in tempered glass: a parametric study. Mater Struct 43(7):947–961
Rantala M (2015) Heat transfer phenomena in float glass heat treatment processes
Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117
Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM (1996) Artificial neural networks: A tutorial. Computer 29(3):31–44
Silverman MP, Strange W, Bower J, Ikejimba L (2012) Fragmentation of explosively metastable glass. Phys Scr 85(6):065403
Yamasaki M (1993) The lower bound of the capacity for a neural network with multiple hidden layers. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 546–549). Springer, London
Mon HR, Del Giorgio E, De María M, Querel, Figuerola C (2018) "Evaluation of technological development for the definition of Industries 4.0," 2018 Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Informática y Desarrollos de Investigación (CACIDI), 2018, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/CACIDI.2018.8584187.
Bajic B, Rikalovic A, Suzic N, Piuri V (2021) Industry 4.0 implementation challenges and opportunities: a managerial perspective. IEEE Syst J 15(1):546–559. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.3023041
Alcácer V, Rodrigues C, Carvalho H et al (2021) Tracking the maturity of industry 4.0: the perspective of a real scenario. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116:2161–2181
Zhang X, Ming X, Liu Z et al (2019) A reference framework and overall planning of industrial artificial intelligence (I-AI) for new application scenarios. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:2367–2389
Dafflon B, Moalla N, Ouzrout Y (2021) The challenges, approaches, and used techniques of CPS for manufacturing in Industry 4.0: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:2395–2412
Kraus MA, Drass M (2020) Artificial intelligence for structural glass engineering applications — overview, case studies and future potentials. Glass Struct Eng 5:247–285
Tarbeev VV (1998) Production of sheet and safety glass. Glass Ceram 55:176–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors’ contributions are as follows: Abdelmoula Khdoudi: Conceptualization and design of study, implementation, writing—original draft, results analysis, and approval of the version of the manuscript to be published. Noureddine Barka: Conceptualization and design of study, interpretation of results, writing—reviewing and editing, validation, and approval of the version of the manuscript to be published. Tawfik Masrour: Conceptualization and design of study, interpretation of results, writing—reviewing and editing, validation, and approval of the version of the manuscript to be published. Ibtissam El-Hassani: Conceptualization and design of study, interpretation of results, writing—reviewing and editing, validation, and approval of the version of the manuscript to be published. Choumicha El Mazgualdi: Conceptualization and design of study, interpretation of results, writing—reviewing and editing, validation, and approval of the version of the manuscript to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not involve human or animal participation or data, therefore ethics approval is not applicable.
Consent to participate
This article does not involve human or animal participation or data; therefore, consent to participate is not applicable.
Consent for publication
This article does not involve human or animal participation or data; therefore, consent to publication is not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khdoudi, A., Barka, N., Masrour, T. et al. Online prediction of automotive tempered glass quality using machine learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 1577–1602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10649-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10649-7