Abstract
Industry 4.0 is generally defined as a development system that compels the digitalization of processes to create integrated and autonomous systems. The process tracking of parts is very important in terms of detecting missed faulty products. Some defects that escape from quality control directly affect the end-user. Machine learning algorithms have been used to predict changes in the quality control processes and defective products, toward real-time and effective data processing. Thus, the highest quality of the final product will be delivered to the customer and to reduce the defective production coming out of the manufacturing chain. In this article, the study aims to establish a predictive quality model that can detect defect-free approved but faulty products overlooked during the quality inspection operations. Machine learning methods are used to analyze the relationship between quality control data and customer complaints. For this purpose, we use the last quality stage data of an automobile manufacturer’s brake system from 2018 to 2020. Machine learning models are constructed using logistic regression, ridge regression, support vector machine, random forest classification tree, gradient boost, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost algorithms. The results of specificity and negative prediction value show that the Gradient Boost and CatBoost algorithms have the best classification benefit for detecting the rare events.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armani, C.G., de Oliveira, K.F., Munhoz, I.P., Akkari, A.C.S.: Proposal and application of a framework to measure the degree of maturity in Quality 4.0: a multiple case study. In: Advances in Mathematics for Industry 4.0, pp. 131–163. Academic Press (2021)
Sisodia, R., Villegas Forero, D.: Quality 4.0–how to handle quality in the Industry 4.0 revolution (2019)
Radziwill, N.: Let’s get digital. Qual. Prog. 51(10), 24–29 (2018)
Li, G., Hou, Y., Wu, A.: Fourth ındustrial revolution: technological drivers, impacts and coping methods. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 27(4), 626–637 (2017)
Horváth, P., Michel, U.: Industrie 4.0 controlling in the age of intelligent networks. Dream Car of the Dream Factory of the ICV, pp. 13–15 (2015)
Dallasega, P., Rauch, E., Linder, C.: Industry 4.0 as an enabler of proximity for construction supply chains: a systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. 99, 205–225 (2018)
Ramezani, J., Jassbi, J.: Quality 4.0 in action: smart hybrid fault diagnosis system in plaster production. Processes 8(6), 634 (2020)
Meyes, R., Donauer, J., Schmeing, A., Meisen, T.: A recurrent neural network architecture for failure prediction in deep drawing sensory time series data. Procedia Manuf. 34, 789–797 (2019)
Sarhan, A.A.: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach to predict tool wear accurately in turning operations for maximum cutting tool utilization. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(1), 93–98 (2015)
Longo, G.A., Mancin, S., Righetti, G., Zilio, C., Ortombina, L., Zigliotto, M.: Application of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for predicting low-GWP refrigerant boiling heat transfer inside Brazed Plate Heat Exchangers (BPHE). Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 160, 120204 (2020)
Turetskyy, A., Wessel, J., Herrmann, C., Thiede, S.: Data-driven cyber-physical system for quality gates in lithium-ion battery cell manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 93, 168–173 (2020)
Ou, X., Huang, J., Chang, Q., Hucker, S., Lovasz, J.G.: First time quality diagnostics and ımprovement through data analysis: a study of a crankshaft line. Procedia Manuf. 49, 2–8 (2020)
Schmitt, J., Bönig, J., Borggräfe, T., Beitinger, G., Deuse, J.: Predictive model-based quality inspection using machine learning and edge cloud computing. Adv. Eng. Inform. 45, 101101 (2020)
Escobar, C.A., Morales-Menendez, R.: Process-monitoring-for-quality—a robust model selection criterion for the logistic regression algorithm. Manuf. Lett. 22, 6–10 (2019)
Escobar, C.A., Abell, J.A., Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Morales-Menendez, R.: Process-monitoring-for-quality—big models. Procedia Manuf. 26, 1167–1179 (2018)
Escobar, C.A., Morales-Menendez, R., Macias, D.: Process-monitoring-for-quality—a machine learning-based modeling for rare event detection. Array 7, 100034 (2020)
Hill, T., Lewicki, P., Lewicki, P.: Statistics: methods and applications: a comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining. StatSoft, Inc. (2006)
Márquez, A.C., de la Fuente Carmona, A., Marcos, J.A., Navarro, J.: Designing CBM plans, based on predictive analytics and big data tools, for train wheel bearings. Comput. Ind. 122, 103292 (2020)
Hancock, J.T., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review. J. Big Data 7(1), 1–45 (2020)
Fiat Internal Norm 2.00102 & 2.00150/44
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Turkish Automobile Factory Joint-Stock Company (TOFAŞ) for their cooperation and their support on this study. Also, the authors would like to mention how grateful they are to Haydar Vural (Data Science and AI Lead at TOFAŞ) for the opportunity of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yorulmuş, M.H., Bolat, H.B., Bahadır, Ç. (2022). Predictive Quality Defect Detection Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Case Study from Automobile Industry. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A.C., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation. INFUS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85577-2_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85577-2_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85576-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85577-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)