Skip to main content
Log in

Machining accuracy reliability evaluation of CNC machine tools based on the milling stability optimization

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The machining accuracy reliability of machine tools has important practical significance for the quality of processed parts. In the milling process, the geometric errors and vibration errors are the two key error sources which severely decrease the machining accuracy reliability of machine tools. To ensure that machine tools can maintain high machining accuracy and reliability for a long time, the paper proposes a machining accuracy reliability evaluation method that considers both the geometric and vibration errors. Based on the milling dynamics theory and the full-discretization method (FDM), a four degrees of freedom (DOF) milling dynamics model of the tool-workpiece vibration system and a vibration error prediction model of the tool-workpiece system are established. The former is used for the milling stability prediction and the milling parameter optimization, while the latter is used for the vibration errors prediction. Utilizing the multi-body system (MBS) theory, a comprehensive error model considering both the geometric and vibration errors is established to explain the influence of errors on machining accuracy. Based on the Monte Carlo simulation of directional importance sampling (DIS-MCS), a machining accuracy reliability model is proposed to evaluate the machining ability of machine tools. The method is applied to a five-axis CNC machine tool, and the application results explain the correctness and competitiveness of the proposed method. It can realize the milling parameter optimization, the vibration error prediction of the tool-workpiece system, and the machining accuracy reliability evaluation of machine tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu C, Fan J, Wang Q, Chen D (2018) Machining accuracy improvement of non-orthogonal five-axis machine tools by a new iterative compensation methodology based on the relative motion constraint equation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 124:80–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Wang D, Zhang S et al (2022) Design and development of a five-axis machine tool with high accuracy, stiffness and efficiency for aero-engine casing manufacturing. Chinese J Aeronaut 35(4):485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Niu P, Cheng Q, Liu Z, Chu H (2021) A machining accuracy improvement approach for a horizontal machining center based on analysis of geometric error characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112(9):2873–2887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng Q, Qi B, Liu Z, Zhang C, Xue D (2019) An accuracy degradation analysis of ball screw mechanism considering time-varying motion and loading working conditions. Mech Mach Theory 134:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Z, Liu Z, Cheng Q, Qi Y, Cai L (2017) An approach of comprehensive error modeling and accuracy allocation for the improvement of reliability and optimization of cost of a multi-axis NC machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(1–4):561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu M, Wu Z, Gao F, Liu L, Song E (2020) Error modeling and accuracy optimization of rotating ultrasonic vibration assisted EDM machine tool. J Mech Sci Technol 34(7):2751–2760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Z, Feng S, Ding Y, Mei X, Tao Z (2022) Thermal error modeling of spindle and dynamic machining accuracy reliability analysis of CNC machine tools based on IA and LHSMC. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 24(1):100–113

  8. Hu W, Guan J, Li B, Cao Y, Yang J (2015) Influence of tool assembly error on machined surface in peripheral milling process. Procedia CIRP 27:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng Q, Zhang Z, Zhang G, Gu P, Cai L (2015) Geometric accuracy allocation for multi-axis CNC machine tools based on sensitivity analysis and reliability theory. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 229(6):1134–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan AW, Chen W (2011) A methodology for systematic geometric error compensation in five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5):615–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng Q, Sun B, Liu Z, Feng Q, Gu P (2018) Geometric error compensation method based on Floyd algorithm and product of exponential screw theory. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 232(7):1156–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan Y, Xu J, Wiercigroch M (2019) Modelling of regenerative and frictional cutting dynamics. Int J Mech Sci 156:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moradi H, Vossoughi G, Movahhedy MR (2013) Experimental dynamic modelling of peripheral milling with process damping, structural and cutting force nonlinearities. J Sound Vib 332(19):4709–4731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bayly PV, Mann BP, Schmitz TL, Peters DA, Stepan G, Insperger T (2002) Effects of radial immersion and cutting direction on chatter instability in end-milling. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 3641, p 351–363

  15. Insperger T, Stepan G (2002) Semi-discretization method for delayed systems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 55(5):503–518

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding Y, Zhu L, Zhang X, Ding H (2010) A full-discretization method for prediction of milling stability. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(5):502–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozoegwu CG, Omenyi SN, Ofochebe SM (2015) Hyper-third order full-discretization methods in milling stability prediction. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 92:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang WA, Huang C, Cai XL, You Y (2020) Effective and fast prediction of milling stability using a precise integration-based third-order full-discretization method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(9):4477–4498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu YY, Wang SS (2007) A new compensation method for geometry errors of five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian W, Liu S, Liu X (2017) Accuracy design of high precision machine tools using error sensitivity analysis methodology. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 231(18):3401–3413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu H, Zheng H, Li X, Wang W, Xiang X, Meng X (2020) A geometric accuracy analysis and tolerance robust design approach for a vertical machining center based on the reliability theory. Measurement 161:107809

  22. Cheng Q, Zhao H, Zhang G, Gu P, Cai L (2014) An analytical approach for crucial geometric errors identification of multi-axis machine tool based on global sensitivity analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(1–4):107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu H, Ling SY, Wang LD, Yu ZJ, Wang XD (2021) An optimized algorithm and the verification methods for improving the volumetric error modeling accuracy of precision machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112(11):3001–3015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao D, Bi Y, Ke Y (2017) An efficient error compensation method for coordinated CNC five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 123:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng Q, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Sun B, Gu P (2018) Machining accuracy reliability analysis of multi-axis machine tool based on Monte Carlo simulation. J Intell Manuf 29(1):191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang ZL, Cheng Q, Qi BB, Tao ZQ (2021) A general approach for the machining quality evaluation of S-shaped specimen based on POS-SQP algorithm and Monte Carlo method. J Manuf Syst 60:553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leimeister M, Kolios A (2021) Reliability-based design optimization of a spar-type floating offshore wind turbine support structure. Reliability Eng Syst Safety 213:107666

  28. Huang C, El Hami A, Radi B (2017) Overview of structural reliability analysis methods—part I: Local reliability methods. Incert Fiabilité des Systèmes Multiphysiques 17:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huang B, Du X (2008) Probabilistic uncertainty analysis by mean-value first order saddlepoint approximation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(2):325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang C, El Hami A, Radi B (2016) Overview of structural reliability analysis methods—Part II: Sampling methods. ISTE OpenScience: London, UK

  31. Cai L, Zhang Z, Cheng Q, Liu Z, Gu P (2015) A geometric accuracy design method of multi-axis NC machine tool for improving machining accuracy reliability. Eksploat Niezawodn 17(1):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Z, Cai L, Cheng Q, Liu Z, Gu P (2019) A geometric error budget method to improve machining accuracy reliability of multi-axis machine tools. J Intell Manuf 30(2):495–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pan Q, Dias D (2017) An efficient reliability method combining adaptive support vector machine and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 67:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Niu P, Cheng Q, Zhang C, Hao X, Yang C, Chen C (2021) A novel method for machining accuracy reliability and failure sensitivity analysis for multi-axis machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–14

  35. Nie J, Ellingwood BR (2000) Directional methods for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 22(3):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu G, Li G, Pan W et al (2021) A state-of-art review on chatter and geometric errors in thin-wall machining processes. J Manuf Process 68:454–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ding Y, Niu J, Zhu L, Ding H (2016) Numerical integration method for stability analysis of milling with variable spindle speeds. J Vibration Acoustics 138(1):011010

  38. Guo Q, Liu Y, Chen B, Zhao Y (2020) An active learning Kriging model combined with directional importance sampling method for efficient reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 60:103054

  39. Bjerager P (1991) Methods for structural reliability computations. In Reliability problems: general principles and applications in mechanics of solids and structures, Springer, Vienna, p 89–135

Download references

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51905334, grant no.51975019), Shanghai Sailing Program (grant no.19YF1418600, grant no.19YF1452400, grant no.19YF1418900), and the National Science and Technology Major Project (grant no.2019ZX04001001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ziling Zhang and Ying Li are responsible for providing overall research ideas; Ziling Zhang and Yujie Yang are responsible for the data simulation of the paper; Guowei Li, Yin Qi, and Ying Li are responsible for the measurement of machine tool error data, Cong Yue and Yongli Hu is responsible for experimental data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Yang, Y., Li, G. et al. Machining accuracy reliability evaluation of CNC machine tools based on the milling stability optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 4057–4074 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08832-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08832-x

Keywords

Navigation