Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis and evaluation of Indian industrial system requirements and barriers affect during implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, competition among the Indian manufacturing industries (IMI) has increased enormously in the global market. The current uncertainty in the market context is characterised and governed by the customised requirements of the customers. Thus, the manufacturing system in the industries should be capable of adapting the parameters like flexibility in scalability, variety, agility, system responsiveness, inter-connectivity, automatic data exchange with communication among the manufacturing systems, transparency and human–machine interaction, which are the main components and principles of Industry 4.0 (I4.0). Thus, adopting I4.0 plays a vital role to corroborate its long-term survival in the global marketplace. However, very few research work considerations contribute towards the issues induced during the adoption of I4.0 in manufacturing industries. This paper aims to minimise the gap between the existing Industrial System Requirements (ISRs) and the challenges faced during implementing I4.0 technologies in existing Industries. The identified ISRs and barriers were evaluated and analysed based on the data set collected from a questionnaire-based survey. Fuzzy multi-criteria analysis is conducted to identify the most weighted ISRs and barriers and ranked them concerning their importance. Furthermore, the inter-item correlation between both of them is analysed. This research work offers the researchers, practitioners, and industrialists an opportunity to formulate multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems through numerous case studies and prioritise the top barriers, system requirements and the inter-relationship shared between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The dataset was collected from a questionnaire-based survey as mentioned in Sects. 5.3 and 5.4, respectively.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hu SJ, Zhu X, Wang H, Koren Y (2008) CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains 57:45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pattanaik LN, Jena A (2019) Tri-objective optimisation of mixed model reconfigurable assembly system for modular products. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 32(1):72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1550673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang W, Koren Y (2012) Scalability planning for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 31(2):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lotter B, Wiendahl HP (2009) Changeable and reconfigurable assembly systems. In: ElMaraghy H. (eds) Changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Springer Ser Adv Manuf. Springer, London, pp 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-067-8_7

  5. Salam MA (2019) Analysing manufacturing strategies and Industry 4.0 supplier performance relationships from a resource-based perspective. Benchmarking An Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0428

  6. Gilchrist A, Bangken A, Thailand N (2016) The industrial Internet of things Industry 4.0: the industrial Internet of things. In Library of Congress Control Number. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2047-4

  7. Calia E, D'Aprile D (2020) Industry4.0. In Analytics for the sharing economy: mathematics, engineering and business perspectives, pp 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35032-1_18

  8. Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Gawankar SA (2018) Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:408–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Sharma R (2018) Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry. Comput Ind 101:107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.06.004

  10. Li L (2018) China's manufacturing locus in 2025: with a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0.” Technol Forecast Social Change 135(May 2017):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028

  11. Li L, Chen CLH, Lasi H, Kemper HG, Pikkarainen M, Pekkarinen S, Anderl R (2018) Industry 4.0 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Int J Prod Res 6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

  12. Matt DT, Rauch E (2020) SME 4.0: The role of small- and medium-sized enterprises in the digital transformation. In: Matt D., Modrák V., Zsifkovits H. (eds) Industry 4.0 for SMEs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25425-4_1

  13. Ustundag A, Cevikcan E (2018) Industry 4.0: Managing the digital transformation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5

  14. Frank AG, Dalenogare LS, Ayala NF, Stock T, Obenaus M, Kunz S, Downey J (2018) Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Res 6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

  15. Luthra S, Mangla SK (2018) Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanders A, Elangeswaran C, Wulfsberg J (2016) Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. J Ind Eng Manage 9(3):811. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1940

  17. Dean M, Spoehr J (2018) The fourth industrial revolution and the future of manufacturing work in Australia: challenges and opportunities. Labour Ind 28(3):166–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2018.1502644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fatorachian H, Kazemi H (2018) A critical investigation of Industry 4.0 in manufacturing: theoretical operationalisation framework. Prod Plan Control 29(8):633–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1424960

  19. Iyer A (2018) Moving from Industry 2.0 to Industry 4.0: A case study from India on leapfrogging in smart manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing 21:663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lasi H, Kemper HG (2019) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 56(4):239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3384-2_13

  21. Laudante E (2017) Industry 4.0, Innovation and Design. A new approach for ergonomic analysis in manufacturing system. Des J 20(1):2724–2734. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352784

  22. Moeuf A, Lamouri S, Pellerin R, Tamayo GS, Tobon VE, Eburdy R (2019) Identification of critical success factors, risks and opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs. Int J Prod Res 58(5):1384–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1636323

  23. Moktadir MA, Ali SM, Kusi-Sarpong S, Shaikh MAA (2018) Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:730–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rojko A (2017) Industry 4.0 concept: Background and overview. Int J Interact Mob Technol 11(5):77–90. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072

  25. Santos C, Mehrsai A, Barros AC, Araújo M, Ares E (2017) Towards Industry 4.0: an overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing 13:972–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou K, Liu T, Zhou L (2016) Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. 2015 12th Int Conf Fuzzy Syst Knowl Discov, pp 2147–2152. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2015.7382284

  27. Lu Y (2017) Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Ind Inf Integr 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu LD, Xu EL, Li L (2018) Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806

  29. Yin Y, Stecke KE, Li D (2018) The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):848–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1403664

  30. Cohen Y, Faccio M, Pilati F, Yao X (2019) Design and management of digital manufacturing and assembly systems in the Industry 4.0 era. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105(9):3565–3577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04595-0

  31. Roblek V, Meško M, Krapež A (2016) A complex view of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open 6(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653987

  32. Schmidt R, Möhring M, Härting RC, Reichstein C, Neumaier P, Jozinović P (2015) Industry 4.0 - Potentials for creating smart products: Empirical research results. Lecture Notes Bus Inf Process 208:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang S, Wan J, Li D, Zhang C (2016) Implementing smart factory of Industrie 4.0: an outlook. Int J Distrib Sensor Netw 12(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3159805

  34. Cheng G, Liu L, Qiang X, Liu Y (2016) Industry 4.0 development and application of intelligent manufacturing. Int Conf Inf Syst Artificial Intel (ISAI), Hong Kong, 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAI.2016.0092

  35. India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) (2016) The best of India in Engineering. 9. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/the-best-of-india-in-engineering-2017.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2019

  36. Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation (2019). http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/iip/Indices%20IIP2011-12%20Monthly_annual18082020.xlsx. Accessed 10 Nov 2019

  37. India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) (2019) Annual Manufacturing Report. Retrieved from www.ibef.org. Accessed 22 Oct 2019

  38. India's Readiness for Industry 4.0 – A Focus on Automotive Sector (2017) In Grant Thornton. Retrieved from http://www.grantthornton.in/insights/articles/indias-readiness-for-industry-4.0--a-focus-on-automotive-sector/. Accessed 20 Oct 2019

  39. Industry 4.0 India Inc. gearing up for change (2018) AIMA-KPMG Industry 4.0 Report. Retrieved from http://resources.aima.in/presentations/AIMA-KPMG-industry-4-0-report.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct2019

  40. Pasi BN, Mahajan SK, Rane SB (2020) The current sustainability scenario of Industry 4.0 enabling technologies in Indian manufacturing industries. Int J Prod Perform Manag 70(5):1017–1048. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0196

  41. Kumar R (2021) Espousal of Industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing organizations: analysis of enablers. In I. Management Association (ed), Research Anthology on Cross-Industry Challenges of Industry 4.0, 1244–1251. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8548-1.ch063

  42. Agarwal R (2018) Samarth Udyog Digitization of Markets and Industry in India. Retrieved from https://www.samarthudyog-i40.in/. Accessed 22 Jul 2019

  43. Petit JP, Brosset P, Bagnon P (2019) Smart factories@ scale. Capgemini 2019. Retrieved from https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Report-–-Smart-Factories.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2019

  44. Ghobakhloo M (2018) The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. J Manuf Technol Manage 29(6):910–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057

  45. Liao Y, Deschamps F, Loures EDFR, Ramos LFP (2017) Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int J Prod Res 55(12):3609–3629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576

  46. Mueller E, Chen XL, Riedel R (2017) Challenges and Requirements for the Application of Industry 4.0: A Special Insight with the Usage of Cyber-Physical System. Chin J Mech Eng (English Edition) 30(5):1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0164-7

  47. Pereira AC, Romero F (2017) A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Proc Manuf 13:1206–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pico-Valencia P, Holgado-Terriza JA (2018) Agentification of the Internet of Things: a systematic literature review. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 14(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147718805945

  49. Zhang X, Peek WA, Pikas B, Lee T (2016) The transformation and upgrading of the Chinese manufacturing industry: based on “German Industry 4.0.” J Appl Bus Econ 18(5):97–105. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1855298156?accountid=38738. Accessed 4 Jan 2020

  50. Tortorella GL, Fettermann D (2018) Implementation of industry 4.0 and lean production in brazilian manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2975–2987. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420

  51. Kamble S, Gunasekaran A, Dhone NC (2019) Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Res 58(5):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630772

  52. Fettermann DC, Cavalcante CG, Almeida TD, Tortorella GL (2018) How does Industry 4.0 contribute to operations management? J Ind Prod Eng 35(4):255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2018.1462863

  53. Oesterreich TD, Teuteberg F (2016) Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput Ind 83:121–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sevinç A, Gür Ş, Eren T (2018) Analysis of the difficulties of SMEs in Industry 4.0 applications by analytical hierarchy process and analytical network process. Processes 6(12):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6120264

  55. Shrouf F, Ordieres J, Miragliotta G (2014) Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm. IEEE Int Conf Ind Eng Eng Manage 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058728

  56. Sony M, Naik SS (2019) Ten Lessons for Managers while Implementing Industry 4.0. IEEE Eng Manage Rev 47(2):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2019.2913930

  57. Telukdarie A, Buhulaiga E, Bag S, Gupta S, Luo Z (2018) Industry 4.0 implementation for multinationals. Process Saf Environ Protect 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.030

  58. Xu J, Huang E, Hsieh L, Lee LH, Jia QS, Chen CH (2016) Simulation optimisation in the era of Industrial 4.0 and the Industrial Internet. J Simul 10(4):310–320. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41273-016-0037-6

  59. Sony M, Naik S (2020) Critical factors for the successful implementation of Industry 4.0: a review and future research direction. Prod Plan Control 31(10):799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1691278

  60. Iglesias-Urkia M, Orive A, Barcelo M, Moran A, Bilbao J, Urbieta A (2017) Towards a lightweight protocol for Industry 4.0: an implementation based benchmark. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and Their Application to Mechatronics, ECMSM 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECMSM.2017.7945894

  61. Singla A, Ahuja IS, Sethi AS (2019) An examination of effectiveness of technology push strategies for achieving sustainable development in manufacturing industries. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 10(1):73–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2017-0048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang C, Ma C, Xu J (2005) A new fuzzy MCDM method based on trapezoidal fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy integral. In: Wang L., Jin Y. (eds) Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 3614:466–474 Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11540007_57

  63. Malhotra MK, Grover V (1998) An assessment of survey research in POM: From constructs to theory. J Oper Manag 16(4):407–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00021-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. George D, Mallery P (2018) IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. In IBM SPSS Stat 25 Step by Step. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909

  65. Ho R, Popović BV (2015) Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS, second edition. J Appl Stat 42(10):2291–2291. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1015811

  66. Field A (2017) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books?id=QMI-DwAAQBAJ. Accessed 20 Sept 2020

  67. Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino AJ (2013) Performing Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books?id=SQgeAAAAQBAJ. Accessed 20 Sept 2020

  68. Saaty TL, Ergu D (2015) When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 14(6):1171–1187. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962201550025X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kaya I, Colak M, Terzi F (2019) A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Energ Strat Rev 24:207–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang TC, Liang L, Ho C (2006) Multi-Criteria decision analysis by using fuzzy VIKOR. Proceedings - ICSSSM'06: 2006 Int Conf Serv Syst Serv Manag 2:901–906. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2006.320751

  71. Liu P, Jin F (2012) A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on weighted geometric aggregation operators of interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl Math Model 36(6):2498–2509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Musani S, Jemain AA (2017) A Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating School Performance Based on Linguistic Information. AIP Conf Proc 1571:1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4858785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang X, Jin F, Liu P (2013) A grey relational projection method for multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number. Appl Math Model 37(5):3467–3477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.08.012

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Alcácer V, Rodrigues C, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V (2021) Tracking the maturity of industry 4.0: the perspective of a real scenario. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116(7–8):2161–2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07550-0

  75. Schroeder C (2016) The challenges of Industry 4.0 for small and medium-sized enterprises. Friedrich Ebert Foundation 1–28. Retrieved from www.fes-2017plus.de. Accessed 20 Nov 2019

  76. Yu F, Schweisfurth T (2020) Industry 4.0 technology implementation in SMEs – A survey in the Danish-German border region. Int J Innov Stud 4(3):76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.05.001

  77. Sargent JF (2017) Global Research and Development Expenditures: Fact Sheet. 1–4. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44283.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2022

  78. Department of Science & Technology M of S and T (2020) Research and Development Statistics 2019–20. 110016. Retrieved from https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/ResearchandDeveopmentStatistics2019–20_0.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2022

Download references

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both the authors mentioned in this manuscript contributed equally to selecting research tools, performing analysis, writing and evaluating this research work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abinash Jena.

Ethics declarations

We wish to submit an original research article entitled ‘Analysis and evaluation of Indian industrial system requirements and barriers affect during implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies’ for consideration by The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor it is currently considered for publication elsewhere.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors whose names are listed in this manuscript certify that they have NO conflict of interest also NO affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jena, A., Patel, S.K. Analysis and evaluation of Indian industrial system requirements and barriers affect during implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 2109–2133 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08821-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08821-0

Keywords

Navigation