Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical modelling and experimental analysis on angular strain induced by bead-on-plate SS316L GMAW using inherent strain and thermomechanical methods

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a basic investigation on angular strain behaviour of substrate using experiment and three different numerical computations based on elastic and elastic–plastic FEM methods. In simulation, a 3D simplified rectangular weld bead geometry was modelled and computed using general purposed numerical software MSC Marc/Mentat. While elastic FEM with well-known inherent strain method-user defined (ISM-UD) and new ISM weld-kinematics (ISM-WK) were applied in which the inherent strain values were empirically estimated with regard to process parameters, physical properties, and effective area on heat affected zone, the most popular elastic–plastic or thermo-mechanical method (TMM) considers temperature-dependent isotropic hardening rule and heat source model. For verification purpose, experimental analysis was conducted as bead-on-plate process with austenitic stainless steel material SS316L using GMAW robotic welding. It can be concluded that TMM can predict the total experimental angular strain with mean percentage error up to ca. 7% compared to ISM with 19% for weld kinematics and 29% for user defined. In terms of computational time, ISM gave higher potential to be implemented with only 10% of TMM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ueda Y, Yamakawa T (1971) Analysis of thermal elastic-plastic stress and strain during welding by finite element method. Trans Japan Weld Soc 2(2):90–100

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liang W, Deng D, Sone S, Murakawa H (2005) Prediction of welding distortion by elastic finite element analysis using inherent deformation estimated through inverse analysis. Weld World 49:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03266500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lundbäck A (2003) Finite element modelling and simulation of welding of aerospace components, Luleả University of Technology

  4. Ueda Y, Yamakawa T (1973) Analysis of thermal elastic-plastic behavior of metals during welding by finite element method. J Japan Weld Soc 42(6):567–577. https://doi.org/10.2207/qjjws1943.42.567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo Y, Murakawa H, Ueda Y (1996) Prediction of welding deformation and residual stress by elastic fem based on inherent strain (Report I): Mechanism of inherent strain production(mechanics, strength & structure design). Trans JWRI 26:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birk-Sørensen M (1999) Simulation of welding distortions in ship section, Technical University of Denmark

  7. Deng D, Murakawa H, Liang W (2007) Numerical simulation of welding distortion in large structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(45–48):4613–4627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.023

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang X, Cheng L, Chen Q, Yang Q, To AC (2018) A modified method for estimating inherent strains from detailed process simulation for fast residual distortion prediction of single-walled structures fabricated by directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 23:471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malik AM, Qureshi EM, Ullah Dar N, Khan I (2008) Analysis of circumferentially arc welded thin-walled cylinders to investigate the residual stress fields. Thin-Walled Struct 46(12):1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2008.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldak JA, Akhlaghi M (2005) Computational welding mechanics. Springer International Publishing, US. https://doi.org/10.1007/b101137

  11. Ahmad SN, Manurung YHP, Taufek T, Leitner M (2021) Numerical simulation on residual stress and substrate deformation of bead-on-plate of ss316l using inherent strain method. Lect Notes Mech Eng 46:723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9505-9_65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B 15(2):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02667333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zain-ul-abdein M, Nélias D, Jullien JF, Deloison D (2010) Experimental investigation and finite element simulation of laser beam welding induced residual stresses and distortions in thin sheets of AA 6056–T4. Mater Sci Eng A 527(12):3025–3039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindgren LE (2001) Finite element modeling and simulation of welding. Part 2: Improved material modeling. J Therm Stress 24(3):195–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/014957301300006380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Theofilos-Ioannis M (2012) Elastoplastic constitutive models in finite element analysis, National Technical University Athens

  16. Asserin O, Loredo A, Petelet M, Iooss B (2011) Global sensitivity analysis in welding simulations — what are the material data you really need. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(9):1004–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qureshi EM, Malik AM, Dar NU (2009) Residual stress fields due to varying tack welds orientation in circumferentially welded thin-walled cylinders. Adv Mech Eng 2009(10):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/351369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pasternak H, Launert B, Krausche T (2015) Welding of girders with thick plates — fabrication, measurement and simulation. J Constr Steel Res 115:407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Q, Liu XS, Wang P, Xiong X, Fang HY (2017) Numerical simulation of residual stress in 10Ni5CrMoV steel weldments. J Mater Process Technol 240:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ding J, Colegrove P, Mehnen J, Williams S, Wang F, Almeida PS (2014) A computationally efficient finite element model of wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5261-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Il Seo S, Jang CD (1999) Study on the prediction of deformations of welded ship structures. J Ship Prod 15(02):73–81. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsp.1999.15.2.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gouge M, Michaleris P (2017) Thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Elsevier Inc, First edit

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olson DL (1985) Prediction of austenitic weld metal microstructure and properties. Weld J (Miami, United States) 64(10). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6129873. Accessed 17 Aug 2021

  24. Kim TJ, Jang BS, Kang SW (2015) Welding deformation analysis based on improved equivalent strain method considering the effect of temperature gradients. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 7(1):157–173. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang YX, Zhang P, Hou ZG, Li CZ (2008) Inherent strain method and thermal elastic-plastic analysis of welding deformation of a thin-wall beam. J Mech 24(4):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1727719100002434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ueda Y, Murakawa H, Ma N (2013) Simulation procedures for welding heat conduction, welding deformation, and residual stresses using the FEM programs provided on the companion website. Elsevier, Welding Deformation and Residual Stress Prevention, pp 169–207

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jun-Mei C, Hao LU, Jian-Hua W et al (2002) Prediction of welding deformation with inherent strain method based on FEM. ANSYS Support

  28. Jang CD, Lee CH, Ko DE (2002) Prediction of welding deformations of stiffened panels. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ 216(2):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1243/147509002762224342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moslemi N, Redzuan N, Ahmad N, Hor TN (2015) Effect of current on characteristic for 316 stainless steel welded joint including microstructure and mechanical properties. Proc CIRP 26:560–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Joseph B, Katherasan D, Sathiya P et al (2012) Weld metal characterization of 316L(N) austenitic stainless steel by electron beam welding process. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4(2):69–176. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v4i2.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma N, Nakacho K, Ohta T, Ogawa N (2016) Inherent strain method for residual stress measurement and welding distortion prediction. ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2016-54184

  32. Venkatkumar D, Ravindran D (2019) Effect of boundary conditions on residual stresses and distortion in 316 stainless steel butt welded plate. High Temp Mater Proc 38:827–836. https://doi.org/10.1515/htmp-2019-0048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu J, Khurshid M, Barsoum Z (2019) Accuracy of computational welding mechanics methods for estimation of angular distortion and residual stresses. Weld World 63:1391–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-019-00746-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the staff members of Smart Manufacturing Research Institute (SMRI) and Research Interest Group: Advanced Manufacturing Technology (RIG:AMT) at School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam for encouraging this research.

Funding

This research is financially supported by ASEA-UNINET grant with the project number ASEA 2019/Montan/1, ERASMUS + (Montan University in Leoben), Geran Penyelidikan Khas (GPK) with Project Code: 600-RMC/GPK 5/3 (123/2020), Geran Konsortium Kecemerlangan Penyelidikan (Large Volume Additive Manufacturing/LVAM) from Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) in Malaysia, Geran Penyelidikan Khas (GPK) with Project Code: 600-RMC/GPK 5/3 (123/2020), and Technogerma Engineering and Consulting Sdn. Bhd. with Project Code: TEC/SMRI/2020–2021/01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Siti Nursyahirah Ahmad: Writing manuscript, simulation of TMM and ISM. Yupiter HP Manurung: Experiment using Robotic Welding and Simulation of TMM. Keval P Prajadhiana: Experiment using Robotic Welding. Yusuf O. Busari: Writing manuscript. Muhd Faiz Mat: Writing manuscript and measurement using CMM. NorAsiah Muhammad: Writing manuscript and measurement using CMM. Martin Leitner: Writing manuscript and analysis. Salina Saidin: Writing manuscript and analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yupiter H. P. Manurung.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, S.N., Manurung, Y.H.P., Prajadhiana, K.P. et al. Numerical modelling and experimental analysis on angular strain induced by bead-on-plate SS316L GMAW using inherent strain and thermomechanical methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 627–644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08684-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08684-5

Keywords

Navigation