Skip to main content
Log in

Development and verification of six-degree-of-freedom error measurement system based on geometrical optics for linear stage

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) error measurement system based on geometric optics is proposed for linear stages. This measurement system uses an additional linear stage that drags the sensor onto the stage so that the light spot projected on the sensor moves back and forth with the moving stage. This method achieves long-range 6DOF measurement. Compared with commercial laser interferometers, the proposed measurement system has the advantages of a lower cost, a simpler structure, and the capability of measuring 6DOF errors simultaneously. Zemax software was used to simulate the relationships between the 6DOF errors and the values of position-sensitive detectors. MATLAB software was then used to construct the forward and inverse mathematical kinematic models of the optical paths and simplify the models through curve fitting. Finally, to address installation and manufacturing errors, a reverse kinematic mathematical solution was obtained through the use of a six-axis Stewart platform. The proposed measurement system was experimentally implemented on a commercial linear stage to measure the 6DOF errors and verified against results obtained with a commercial interferometer and electronic level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Chen YT, More P, Liu CS, Cheng CC (2019) Identification and compensation of position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and three spheres. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:3077–3089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen YT, More P, Liu CS (2019) Identification and verification of location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and a sphere. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:2653–2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Lacalle NL, Mentxaka AL (2009) Machine tools for high performance machining. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng WC, Xia HJ, Wang SJ, Chen XD (2018) Measurement and identification of geometric errors of translational axis based on sensitivity analysis for ultra-precision machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5–8):2905–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan KC, Chen MJ, Huang WM (1998) A six-degree-of-freedom measurement system for the motion accuracy of linear stages. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang YB, Fan KC, Lou ZF, Sun W (2020) A novel modeling of volumetric errors of three-axis machine tools based on Abbe and Bryan principles. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 151:103527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo S, Jiang G, Mei X (2017) Investigation of sensitivity analysis and compensation parameter optimization of geometric error for five-axis machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:3229–3243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li QZ, Wang W, Zhang J, Shen R, Li H, Jiang Z (2019) Measurement method for volumetric error of five-axis machine tool considering measurement point distribution and adaptive identification process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 147:103465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng Q, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Sun B, Gu P (2018) Machining accuracy reliability analysis of multi-axis machine tool based on Monte Carlo simulation. J Intell Manuf 29:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu H, Xiang H, Chen J (2018) Measurement and compensation of machine tool geometry error based on Abbe principle. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:2769–2774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao W, Weng L, Zhang J (2020) An improved machine tool volumetric error compensation method based on linear and squareness error correction method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:4731–4744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguado S, Samper D, Santolaria J, Aguilar JJ (2012) Identification strategy of error parameter in volumetric error compensation of machine tool based on laser tracker measurements. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 53:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gomez-Acedo E, Olarra A, Zubieta M et al (2015) Method for measuring thermal distortion in large machine tools by means of laser multilateration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen YT, Lin WC, Liu CS (2017) Design and experimental verification of novel six-degree-of freedom geometric error measurement system for linear stage. Opt Lasers Eng 92:94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng Q, Zhang B, Cui C, Kuang C, Zhai Y, You F (2013) Development of a simple system for simultaneously measuring 6DOF geometric motion errors of a linear guide. Opt Express 21:25805–25819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang W, Kweon SH, Hwang CS, Kang NC, Kim YS, Yang SH (2009) Development of an optical measuring system for integrated geometric errors of a three-axis miniaturized machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao S, Zhang B, Feng Q, Cui C, Chen S, Zhao Y (2015) Errors crosstalk analysis and compensation in the simultaneous measuring system for five-degree-of-freedom geometric error. Appl Optics 54:458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a review: Part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang P, Li Y, Wei H, Ren L, Zhao S (2013) Five-degrees-of-freedom measurement system based on a monolithic prism and phase-sensitive detection technique. Appl Opt 52:6607–6615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang T, Feng Q, Cui C, Zhang B (2014) Research on error compensation method for dual-beam measurement of roll angle based on rhombic prism. Chin Opt Lett 12:071201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Furutani R (2017) Measurement of six-degree motion error of linear stage. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 211:012001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu CS, Lai JJ, Luo YT (2019) Design of a measurement system for six-degree-of-freedom geometric errors of a linear guide of a machine tool. Sensors 19:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu CS, Pu YF, Chen YT, Luo YT (2018) Design of a measurement system for simultaneously measuring six-degree-of-freedom geometric errors of a long linear stage. Sensors 18:3875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen JS, Kou TW, Chiou SH (1999) Geometric error calibration of multi-axis machines using an auto-alignment laser interferometer. Precis Eng 23:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao S, Zhang B, Feng Q (2015) Errors crosstalk analysis and compensation in the simultaneous measuring system for five-degree-of-freedom geometric error. Appl Opt 54:458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao Y, Zhang B, Feng Q (2017) Measurement system and model for simultaneously measuring 6DOF geometric errors. Opt Express 25:20993–21007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng F, Feng Q, Zhang B, Li J, Zhao Y (2020) A high-precision laser method for directly and quickly measuring 21 geometric motion errors of three linear axes of computer numerical control machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:1285–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang Y, Fan KC, Sun W (2019) Embedded sensor system for five-degree-of-freedom error detection on machine tools. Mech Eng Sci 1(2):8–17

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu CS, Zeng JY, Chen YT (2021) Development of positioning error measurement system based on geometric optics for long linear stage. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115:2595–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng F, Feng Q, Zhang B, Li J, Zhao Y (2020) Effect of detector installation error on the measurement accuracy of multi-degree-of-freedom geometric errors of a linear axis. Meas Sci Technol 31:094018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cui FK, Song ZB, Wang XQ, Zhang FS, Li Y (2010) Study on Laser Triangulation Measurement Principle of Three Dimensional Surface Roughness. Adv Mater Res 136:91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin PD (2014) New computation methods for geometrical optics. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Newport, HXP50-MECA [Online]. Available: https://www.newport.com/p/HXP50-MECA

  34. Rodríguez-Navarro D, Lázaro-Galilea JL, Bravo-Muñoz I, Gardel-Vicente A, Tsirigotis G (2016) Analysis and calibration of sources of electronic error in PSD sensor response. Sensors 16:619

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to this study by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant Nos. MOST 106–2628-E-006–010-MY3 and 110–2221-E-006–126-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wei-Che Tai was involved in writing—original draft preparation, conceptualization, methodology, software, validation. Chien-Sheng Liu helped in writing—reviewing and editing, supervision, project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Sheng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tai, WC., Liu, CS. Development and verification of six-degree-of-freedom error measurement system based on geometrical optics for linear stage. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119, 3903–3916 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08650-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08650-1

Keywords

Navigation