Skip to main content
Log in

A novel global sensitivity analysis method for vital geometric errors of five-axis machine tools

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geometric error is one of the important errors that affect the machining of five-axis machine tools and how to identify th8e vital geometric error is effective for compensation. For this reason, the global sensitivity analysis of geometric errors for five-axis machine tools is an effective means to find the vital geometric error items that affect the machining accuracy of machine tools. However, it is difficult to deal with the higher order items of error parameter coupling in the global sensitivity analysis. In this paper, a novel global sensitivity analysis method for vital geometric error based on multi-body theory and truncated Fourier expansion is proposed. First, multi-body system (MBS) and homogeneous transformation matric (HTM) methods are used to establish the position error of the machine tool. Then, the output value of the error parameter is represented as the amplitude of the truncated Fourier series and the global sensitivity index is represented by the ratio of its amplitude variance to the total function variance through normalization processing. Moreover, the global sensitivity analysis method is presented to calculate the sensitivity index of each geometric error parameter and the vital geometric error parameters have been identified. Finally, an experiment on compensating for vital geometric error parameters is performed and the experimental results show that the proposed method is feasible and accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Code availability

The authors confirm that the code supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Fan JW, Tang YH, Chen DJ, Wu CJ (2017) A geometric error tracing method based on the Monte Carlo theory of the five-axis gantry machining center. Adv Mech Eng 9(7):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y, Wan M, Xing W-J, Zhang W-H (2018) Identification of position independent geometric errors of rotary axis for five-axis machine tools with structural restrictions. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 53:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools —a review: Part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryan JB (1982) A simple method for testing measuring machines and machine tools part 1: principles and applications. Precis Eng 4:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsutsumi M, Saito A (2003) Identification and compensation of systematic deviations particular to 5-axis machining centers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:771–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ibaraki S, Oyama C, Otsubo H (2011) Construction of an error map of rotary axis on a five-axis machining center by static R-test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu G, Fu J, Gao H, Yao X (2017) Squareness error modeling for five-axis machine tools via synthesizing the motion of the axis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9):2993–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen GS, Mei XS, Li HL (2013) Geometric error modeling and compensation for large-scale grinding machine tools with five-axis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):2583–2592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JH, Liu Y, Yang SH (2006) Accuracy improvement of miniaturized machine tool: geometric error modeling and compensation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(12–13):1508–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J, Zhuang L, Yan K (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu W, Wang Z, Yamazaki K (2010) Machine tool component error extraction and error compensation by incorporating statistical analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(1):798–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang H, Yang J, Zhang Y, Shen J, Wang C (2011) Measurement and compensation for volumetric positioning errors of CNC machine tools considering thermal effect. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(1):275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He Z, Fu J, Zhang X, Shen H (2016) A uniform expression model for volumetric errors of machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 100:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Pandey MD (2015) Global sensitivity analysis of a CNC machine tool : application of MDRM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1–4):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang T, Li Y, Tang GB, Li SW, Zhao XY, White House DJ, Chetewyn DG, Liu XP (2002) Error modeling, sensitivity analysis and assembly process of a class of 3-DOF parallel kinematic machines with parallelogram struts. Sci China (Series E) 45(5):467–476

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang P (2011) Research on the accuracy assurance of a class of 3-DOF spacial parallel manipulators. Tsinghua University, China

  17. Xing K, Achiche S, Mayer JRR (2019) Five-axis machine tools accuracy condition monitoring based on volumetric errors and vector similarity measures. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 138:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q (2018) A sensitivity method to analyze the volumetric error of five-axis machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:1791–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. International Standards Organization (ISO) (2002) ISO 230–6: test code for machine tools, Part 6: determination of positioning accuracy on body and face diagonals (Diagonal displacement tests)

  20. Li Z, Sato R, Shirase K, Ihara Y, Milutinovic DS (2019) Sensitivity analysis of relationship between error motions and machined shape errors in five-axis machining center — peripheral milling using square end mill as test case. Precis Eng 60:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 51775010 and 51705011), the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (grant No. 2019ZX040 06001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jinwei Fan and Peitong Wang provided ideas for this study, wrote codes and manuscripts. Xingfei Ren were responsible for the experiment in this study. All authors contributed to this study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peitong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The research does not involve ethical issues.

Consent for publication

All the authors agreed to publish this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 4 Position transformation matrix between adjacent bodies
Table 5 Position motion transformation matrix between adjacent bodies

Appendix 2

$$ {\delta}_{\mathrm{x}}(x)=\frac{-0.0129x}{5000}+0.0046\sin \left(\frac{2.2633\pi x}{5000}-0.6332\right) $$
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\delta}_{\mathrm{y}}(x)=0.0296\sin \left(\frac{2.5828\pi x}{5000}+1.4918\right)+0.4288\sin \left(\frac{5.0024\pi x}{5000}-3.3295\right)\\ {}+0.4245\sin \left(\frac{5.0331\pi x}{5000}-0.2304\right)\end{array}} $$
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\delta}_{\mathrm{z}}(x)=0.0376\sin \left(\frac{0.0136\pi x}{5000}+3.0638\right)+0.0124\sin \left(\frac{2.6840\pi x}{5000}+3.5962\right)\\ {}+0.0145\sin \left(\frac{6.2096\pi x}{5000}+2.3885\right)\end{array}} $$
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{z}}(x)=2.9529\times {10}^{-5}\sin \left(\frac{0.5271\pi x}{5000}+2.7075\right)+7.4715\times {10}^{-6}\sin \left(\frac{4.3723\pi x}{5000}+2.9819\right)\\ {}+7.7088\times {10}^{-6}\sin \left(\frac{7.4411\pi x}{5000}-0.5413\right)\end{array}} $$
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{y}}(x)=2.9990\times {10}^{-6}\sin \left(\frac{2.0054\pi x}{5000}+2.4608\right)+4.1933\times {10}^{-17}\sin \left(\frac{3.5549\pi x}{5000}+0.2324\right)\\ {}+7.3236\times {10}^{-6}\sin \left(\frac{6.000\pi x}{5000}-0.9056\right)\end{array}} $$
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{x}}(x)=1.0384\times {10}^{-4}\sin \left(\frac{0.1089\pi x}{5000}+5.9992\right)+2.7342\times {10}^{-5}\sin \left(\frac{0.6971\pi x}{5000}+2.0011\right)\\ {}+3.4038\times {10}^{-6}\sin \left(\frac{4.7893\pi x}{5000}+1.9626\right)\end{array}} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, J., Wang, P. & Ren, X. A novel global sensitivity analysis method for vital geometric errors of five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117, 3515–3527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07926-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07926-2

Keywords

Navigation