Abstract
To avoid degradation of material properties, high equipment investment, low efficiency, and potential safety issues caused by conventional technologies like line heating, multi-point plate forming, and explosive forming, a new die-less single-tool multi-point plate forming (DS-MPF) technology is proposed. In DS-MPF, a moving bar is used as a single forming tool and combined with horizontal and vertical motions relative to the plate. To reduce forming force component from the membrane stress, simple support boundary condition is preferred to avoid the plate edge being bent, trimmed, or thinning after being formed. However, this boundary may easily cause instability of the forming process and worse geometric accuracy of a formed part if an unsuitable toolpath is employed. In this paper, the forming mechanism and toolpath design principle are clarified to develop this new technology. Numerical and experimental forming case from an 8-mm SS400 steel plate into a spherical surface with a radius of curvature of 1000 mm was performed to validate the new technology and its design principle. The strain analysis of results shows DS-MPF tends to be a local forming method. The formed plate normally has local positive bending strain at the tool-contacted area and limited negative bending strain at the tool-uncontacted area between adjacent strokes. Forming a 3D curved shape with high geometric accuracy in DS-MPF can be achieved with appropriate control of the local bending strain produced in each stroke, stroke position, and forming sequence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Das B, Biswas P (2018) A review of plate forming by line heating. J Ship Product Des 34(2):155–167
Li M, Liu Y, Su S, Li G (1999) Multi-point forming: a flexible manufacturing method for a 3-d surface sheet. J Mater Process Technol 87(1-3):277–280
Heo SC, Seo YH, Ku TW, Kang BS (2010) A study on thick plate forming using flexible forming process and its application to a simply curved plate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1-4):103–115
Shen W, Yan RJ, Lin Y, Fu HQ (2018) Residual stress analysis of hull plate in multi-point forming. J Constr Steel Res 148:65–76
Zhongyi C, Mingzhe L (2001) Optimum path forming technique for sheet metal and its realization in multi-point forming. J Mater Process Technol 110(2):136–141
Jia BB, Wang WW (2017) New process of multi-point forming with individually controlled force-displacement and mechanism of inhibiting springback. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(9):3801–3810
Dang X, He K, Li W, Zuo Q, Du R (2017) Incremental bending of three-dimensional free form metal plates using minimum energy principle and model-less control. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(7)
Li Y, Shi Z, Rong Q, Zhou W, Lin J (2019) Effect of pin arrangement on formed shape with sparse multi-point flexible tool for creep age forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 140:48–61
Silva MB, Skjødt M, Martins PA, Bay N (2008) Revisiting the fundamentals of single point incremental forming by means of membrane analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(1):73–83
Young D, Jeswiet J (2004) Wall thickness variations in single-point incremental forming. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 218(11):1453–1459
Behera AK, de Sousa RA, Ingarao G, Oleksik V (2017) Single point incremental forming: an assessment of the progress and technology trends from 2005 to 2015. J Manuf Process 27:37–62
Tiesheng Z, Zhensheng L, Changji G, Zheng T (1992) Explosive forming of spherical metal vessels without dies. J Mater Process Technol 31(1-2):135–145
Zhang R, Iyama H, Fujita M, Zhang TS (1999) Optimum structure design method for non-die explosive forming of spherical vessel technology. J Mater Process Technol 85(1-3):217–219
Mehrasa H, Liaghat G, Javabvar D (2012) Experimental analysis and simulation of effective factors on explosive forming of spherical vessel using prefabricated four cones vessel structures. Open Eng 2(4):656–664
Availability of data and material
All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.
Code availability
Not applicable
Funding
This work is supported by the Amada Foundation (AF-2018010: R&D of Die-less Incremental Plate Forming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Song Wu: Methodology, equipment design, completion of experiment and simulation, and paper writing. Ninshu Ma: Conceptualization, modification, project management, and funding acquisition. Sherif Rashed: Manuscript modification and language proofing. Naoki Osawa: Modification. Thanks for the assistance in experiment provided by Mr. Matsuoka (Yusuke Matsuoka) from Osaka University.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix. Toolpath compensation for spring back
Appendix. Toolpath compensation for spring back
Due to the elastic strain component εelastic, spring back of plate after each stroke will lead to some deviation from the target. Modifying the toolpath to compensate for this deviation is needed. All strokes in this toolpath are kept at the same position X and Y. Only Z coordinates are adjusted. Since the behavior is nonlinear, compensation is carried out by iteration in several steps. The result of each iteration step, by analysis or physical testing, is used to find out the stroke Z of the next step, until the resulting surface converges to the target surface within the allowable tolerances. The strokes Z of the last iteration is to be used in forming. Fig. 24 shows a cross section of four surfaces used in compensation calculations: (A) plate surface after spring back, (B) the surface of the target, (C) surface used to calculate Z coordinates of the toolpath in the last iteration cycle n, and (D) surface to be used to calculate Z coordinates of the toolpath in the next iteration cycle n+1. Z coordinate of each point on surface D is calculated as given by Eq. (12). The logic behind this equation is that if a toolpath calculated using surface C produces surface A, then a toolpath calculated using surface D, as corrected by Eq. 12, should produce surface B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, S., Ma, N., Rashed, S. et al. Development of die-less single-tool multi-point plate forming technology for 3D curved shape. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117, 3631–3646 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07883-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07883-w