Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review on conventional and advanced minimum quantity lubrication approaches on performance measures of grinding process

  • Critical Review
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grinding is one of the important machining processes that are widely applied in precision manufacturing. In the beginning, studies mostly focused on dry machining. In time, emerging technologies have led to change in the development of the machining process. New techniques and tools have been developed over the last decade that has brought the process to an advanced place. At first, flood cooling has removed the burning problems in the grinding process. After that, a new technique was developed which is known as minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). This technique is a recognized opportunity to eliminate environmental concerns. This paper reviews some of the common as well as advanced MQL systems specifically used in grinding operations. The effect of MQL and other cutting parameters on cutting forces, surface roughness of the machined workpiece, tool wear, temperature, specific cutting energy, and residual stress is outlined. This paper also addressees the recent trend of cooling systems in the grinding process. After reading this research paper, one can easily get an overview of the previously conducted research to find the output parameter trends in MQL condition. The reader can infer from this paper in which direction the development trend in grinding is in the machining process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Aslan A, Salur E, Düzcükoğlu H, Şahin ÖS, Ekrem M (2021) The effects of harsh aging environments on the properties of neat and MWCNT reinforced epoxy resins. Constructions and Building Materials:272

  2. Sarıkaya M, Güllü A (2014) Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. Journal of Cleaner Production 65:604–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uzun M, Usca UA (2018) Effect of Cr particulate reinforcements in different ratios on wear performance and mechanical properties of Cu matrix composites. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 40(4):197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Salur E, Acarer M, Şavkliyildiz İ (2021) Improving mechanical properties of nano-sized TiC particle reinforced AA7075 Al alloy composites produced by ball milling and hot pressing. Materials Today Communications:102202

  5. Singh AK, Kumar A, Sharma V, Kala P (2020) Sustainable techniques in grinding: state of the art review. Journal of Cleaner Production:121876

  6. Altintas Y, Weck M (2004) Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding. CIRP annals 53(2):619–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Malkin S, Guo C (2007) Thermal analysis of grinding. CIRP annals 56(2):760–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pimenov DY, Mia M, Gupta MK, Machado AR, Tomaz ÍV, Sarikaya M, Wojciechowski S, Mikolajczyk T, Kapłonek W (2021) Improvement of machinability of Ti and its alloys using cooling-lubrication techniques: a review and future prospect. Journal of materials research and technology

  9. Khanna N, Agrawal C, Pimenov DY, Singla AK, Machado AR, da Silva LRR, Gupta MK, Sarikaya M, Krolczyk GM (2021) Review on design and development of cryogenic machining setups for heat resistant alloys and composites. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 68:398–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta MK, Song Q, Liu Z, Sarikaya M, Jamil M, Mia M, Kushvaha V, Singla AK, Li Z (2020) Ecological, economical and technological perspectives based sustainability assessment in hybrid-cooling assisted machining of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 26:e00218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta MK, Song Q, Liu Z, Sarikaya M, Jamil M, Mia M, Khanna N, Krolczyk GM (2021) Experimental characterisation of the performance of hybrid cryo-lubrication assisted turning of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Tribology International 153:106582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarıkaya M, Şirin Ş, Yıldırım ÇV, Kıvak T, Gupta MK (2021) Performance evaluation of whisker-reinforced ceramic tools under nano-sized solid lubricants assisted MQL turning of Co-based Haynes 25 superalloy. Ceramics International 47(11):15542–15560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel T, Khanna N, Yadav S, Shah P, Sarikaya M, Singh D, Gupta MK, Kotkunde N (2021) Machinability analysis of nickel-based superalloy Nimonic 90: a comparison between wet and LCO 2 as a cryogenic coolant. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 113(11):3613–3628

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jamil M, Zhao W, He N, Gupta MK, Sarikaya M, Khan AM, Siengchin S, Pimenov DY (2021) Sustainable milling of Ti–6Al–4V: a trade-off between energy efficiency, carbon emissions and machining characteristics under MQL and cryogenic environment. Journal of Cleaner Production 281:125374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta MK, Song Q, Liu Z, Sarikaya M, Mia M, Jamil M, Singla AK, Bansal A, Pimenov DY, Kuntoğlu M (2021) Tribological performance based machinability investigations in cryogenic cooling assisted turning of α-β titanium alloy. Tribology International 160:107032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jamil M, He N, Zhao W, Li L, Gupta MK, Sarikaya M, Khan AM, Singh R (2021) Heat transfer efficiency of cryogenic-LN2 and CO2-snow and their application in the turning of Ti-6AL-4V. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 166:120716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta MK, Song Q, Liu Z, Sarikaya M, Jamil M, Mia M, Singla AK, Khan AM, Khanna N, Pimenov DY (2021) Environment and economic burden of sustainable cooling/lubrication methods in machining of Inconel-800. Journal of Cleaner Production 287:125074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta MK, Mia M, Singh G, Pimenov DY, Sarikaya M, Sharma VS (2019) Hybrid cooling-lubrication strategies to improve surface topography and tool wear in sustainable turning of Al 7075-T6 alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 101(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krolczyk G, Maruda R, Krolczyk J, Wojciechowski S, Mia M, Nieslony P, Budzik G (2019) Ecological trends in machining as a key factor in sustainable production–a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 218:601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krolczyk G, Maruda R, Krolczyk J, Nieslony P, Wojciechowski S, Legutko S (2018) Parametric and nonparametric description of the surface topography in the dry and MQCL cutting conditions. Measurement 121:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen Z, Wong K, Li W, Liang SY, Stephenson DA (2001) Cutting fluid aerosol generation due to spin-off in turning operation: analysis for environmentally conscious machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 123(3):506–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gunter KL, Sutherland JW (1999) An experimental investigation into the effect of process conditions on the mass concentration of cutting fluid mist in turning. Journal of Cleaner Production 7(5):341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossmoore HW (1995) Microbiology of metalworking fluids: deterioration, disease and disposal. Lubrication engineering 51(2):112–118

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maruda RW, Krolczyk GM, Feldshtein E, Pusavec F, Szydlowski M, Legutko S, Sobczak-Kupiec A (2016) A study on droplets sizes, their distribution and heat exchange for minimum quantity cooling lubrication (MQCL). International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 100:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tawakoli T, Hadad M, Sadeghi M (2010) Investigation on minimum quantity lubricant-MQL grinding of 100Cr6 hardened steel using different abrasive and coolant–lubricant types. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 50(8):698–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuntoğlu M, Sağlam H (2019) Investigation of progressive tool wear for determining of optimized machining parameters in turning. Measurement 140:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuntoğlu M, Sağlam H (2021) Investigation of signal behaviors for sensor fusion with tool condition monitoring system in turning. Measurement 173:108582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krolczyk G, Nieslony P, Maruda R, Wojciechowski S (2017) Dry cutting effect in turning of a duplex stainless steel as a key factor in clean production. Journal of Cleaner Production 142:3343–3354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Salur E, Aslan A, Kuntoglu M, Gunes A, Sahin OS (2019) Experimental study and analysis of machinability characteristics of metal matrix composites during drilling. Composites Part B: Engineering 166:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grzesik W (2008) Advanced machining processes of metallic materials: theory, modelling and applications. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ding W, Zhang L, Li Z, Zhu Y, Su H, Xu J (2017) Review on grinding-induced residual stresses in metallic materials. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 88(9):2939–2968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuntoğlu M, Aslan A, Pimenov DY, Usca ÜA, Salur E, Gupta MK, Mikolajczyk T, Giasin K, Kapłonek W, Sharma S (2020) A review of indirect tool condition monitoring systems and decision-making methods in turning: critical analysis and trends. Sensors 21(1):108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aslan A (2020) Optimization and analysis of process parameters for flank wear, cutting forces and vibration in turning of AISI 5140: A Comprehensive Study. Measurement:107959

  34. Krolczyk G, Legutko S, Gajek M (2013) Predicting the surface roughness in the dry machining of duplex stainless steel (DSS). Metalurgija 52(2):259–262

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhong Z, Venkatesh V (2009) Recent developments in grinding of advanced materials. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 41(5-6):468–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pashnyov V, Pimenov DY, Erdakov I, Koltsova M, Mikolajczyk T, Patra K (2017) Modeling and analysis of temperature distribution in the multilayer metal composite structures in grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91(9):4055–4068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Snoeys R (1978) Thermally induced damage in grinding.

  38. Irani R, Bauer R, Warkentin A (2005) A review of cutting fluid application in the grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 45(15):1696–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sap E, Usca UA, Gupta M, Kuntoğlu M (2021) Tool wear and machinability investigations in dry turning of Cu/Mo-SiCp hybrid composites. International journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

  40. Şap E, Usca ÜA, Gupta MK, Kuntoğlu M, Sarıkaya M, Pimenov DY, Mia M (2021) Parametric optimization for improving the machining process of Cu/Mo-SiCP composites produced by powder metallurgy. Materials 14(8):1921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sharma AK, Tiwari AK, Dixit AR (2016) Effects of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in machining processes using conventional and nanofluid based cutting fluids: a comprehensive review. Journal of cleaner production 127:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Singh G, Aggarwal V, Singh S (2020) Critical review on ecological, economical and technological aspects of minimum quantity lubrication towards sustainable machining. Journal of Cleaner Production:122185

  43. Klocke F, Brinksmeier E, Weinert K (2005) Capability profile of hard cutting and grinding processes. CIRP annals 54(2):22–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sarikaya M, Gupta MK, Tomaz I, Danish M, Mia M, Rubaiee S, Jamil M, Pimenov DY, Khanna N (2021) Cooling techniques to improve the machinability and sustainability of light-weight alloys: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 62:179–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gupta MK, Mia M, Jamil M, Singh R, Singla AK, Song Q, Liu Z, Khan AM, Rahman MA, Sarikaya M (2020) Machinability investigations of hardened steel with biodegradable oil-based MQL spray system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 108:735–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Puvanesan M, Rahman M, Najiha M, Kadirgama K (2013) Experimental investigation of minimum quantity lubrication on tool wear in aluminum alloy 6061-t6 using different cutting tools. Universiti Malaysia Pahang

    Google Scholar 

  47. EJd S, Bianchi EC, JFGd O, PRd A (2002) The inlet engine valves grinding using different types of cutting fluids and grinding wheels. Materials Research 5(2):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Şirin Ş, Sarıkaya M, Yıldırım ÇV, Kıvak T (2021) Machinability performance of nickel alloy X-750 with SiAlON ceramic cutting tool under dry, MQL and hBN mixed nanofluid-MQL. Tribology International 153:106673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li K-M, Lin C-P (2012) Study on minimum quantity lubrication in micro-grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 62(1-4):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Barczak L, Batako A, Morgan M (2010) A study of plane surface grinding under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 50(11):977–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Verma N, ManojKumar K, Ghosh A (2017) Characteristics of aerosol produced by an internal-mix nozzle and its influence on force, residual stress and surface finish in SQCL grinding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 240:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shao Y, Fergani O, Li B, Liang SY (2016) Residual stress modeling in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 83(5-8):743–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. da Silva LR, da Silva DA, dos Santos FV, Duarte FJ (2019) Study of 3D parameters and residual stress in grinding of AISI 4340 steel hardened using different cutting fluids. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 100(1-4):895–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Jia D, Yang M (2016) Grinding temperature and energy ratio coefficient in MQL grinding of high-temperature nickel-base alloy by using different vegetable oils as base oil. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 29(4):1084–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nadolny K, Kieraś S (2020) Experimental studies on the centrifugal mql-cca method of applying coolant during the internal cylindrical grinding process. Materials 13(10):2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Choudhary A, Naskar A, Paul S (2018) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication on surface integrity in high-speed grinding of sintered alumina using single layer diamond grinding wheel. Ceramics International 44(14):17013–17021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tawakoli T, Hadad M, Sadeghi MH, Daneshi A, Sadeghi B (2011) Minimum quantity lubrication in grinding: effects of abrasive and coolant–lubricant types. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(17-18):2088–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Awale AS, Vashista M, Yusufzai MZK (2020) Multi-objective optimization of MQL mist parameters for eco-friendly grinding. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 56:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Khan AM, Jamil M, Mia M, Pimenov DY, Gasiyarov VR, Gupta MK, He N (2018) Multi-objective optimization for grinding of AISI D2 steel with Al2O3 wheel under MQL. Materials 11(11):2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tawakoli T, Hadad M, Sadeghi M, Daneshi A, Stöckert S, Rasifard A (2009) An experimental investigation of the effects of workpiece and grinding parameters on minimum quantity lubrication—MQL grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 49(12-13):924–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Balan A, Vijayaraghavan L, Krishnamurthy R, Kuppan P, Oyyaravelu R (2016) An experimental assessment on the performance of different lubrication techniques in grinding of Inconel 751. Journal of advanced research 7(5):709–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tawakoli T, Hadad M, Sadeghi M (2010) Influence of oil mist parameters on minimum quantity lubrication–MQL grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 50(6):521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rodriguez RL, Lopes JC, Mancini SD, de Ângelo Sanchez LE, de Almeida Varasquim FMF, Volpato RS, de Mello HJ, de Aguiar PR, Bianchi EC (2019) Contribution for minimization the usage of cutting fluids in CFRP grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103(1):487–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Morgan M, Barczak L, Batako A (2012) Temperatures in fine grinding with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 60(9-12):951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sadeghi M, Haddad M, Tawakoli T, Emami M (2009) Minimal quantity lubrication-MQL in grinding of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 44(5):487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mao C, Tang X, Zou H, Huang X, Zhou Z (2012) Investigation of grinding characteristic using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 13(10):1745–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hadad M, Hadi M (2013) An investigation on surface grinding of hardened stainless steel S34700 and aluminum alloy AA6061 using minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) technique. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 68(9):2145–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Batako AD, Tsiakoumis V (2015) An experimental investigation into resonance dry grinding of hardened steel and nickel alloys with element of MQL. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 77(1-4):27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sadeghi M, Hadad M, Tawakoli T, Vesali A, Emami M (2010) An investigation on surface grinding of AISI 4140 hardened steel using minimum quantity lubrication-MQL technique. International Journal of Material Forming 3(4):241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Barczak LM, Batako AD (2012) Application of minimum quantity lubrication in grinding. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 27(4):406–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Balan A, Vijayaraghavan L, Krishnamurthy R (2013) Minimum quantity lubricated grinding of Inconel 751 alloy. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 28(4):430–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Emami M, Sadeghi MH, Sarhan AAD, Hasani F (2014) Investigating the minimum quantity lubrication in grinding of Al2O3 engineering ceramic. Journal of Cleaner Production 66:632–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Emami M, Sadeghi M, Sarhan AA (2013) Investigating the effects of liquid atomization and delivery parameters of minimum quantity lubrication on the grinding process of Al2O3 engineering ceramics. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 15(3):374–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Rabiei F, Rahimi A, Hadad M, Ashrafijou M (2015) Performance improvement of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in surface grinding by modeling and optimization. Journal of Cleaner Production 86:447–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Li M, Yu T, Zhang R, Yang L, Ma Z, Li B, Wang X, Wang W, Zhao J (2020) Experimental evaluation of an eco-friendly grinding process combining minimum quantity lubrication and graphene-enhanced plant-oil-based cutting fluid. Journal of Cleaner Production 244:118747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hecker RL, Liang SY (2003) Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 43(8):755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Esmaeilzare A, Rahimi A, Rezaei S (2014) Investigation of subsurface damages and surface roughness in grinding process of Zerodur® glass–ceramic. Applied Surface Science 313:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kelly J, Cotterell M (2002) Minimal lubrication machining of aluminium alloys. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 120(1-3):327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. da Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Fusse RY, Catai RE, Franca TV, Aguiar PR (2007) Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant—MQL in grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47(2):412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Braga DU, Diniz AE, Miranda GW, Coppini NL (2002) Using a minimum quantity of lubricant (MQL) and a diamond coated tool in the drilling of aluminum–silicon alloys. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 122(1):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Davim J, Sreejith P, Gomes R, Peixoto C (2006) Experimental studies on drilling of aluminium (AA1050) under dry, minimum quantity of lubricant, and flood-lubricated conditions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 220(10):1605–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Silva L, Bianchi E, Catai R, Fusse R, França T, Aguiar P (2005) Study on the behavior of the minimum quantity lubricant-MQL technique under different lubricating and cooling conditions when grinding ABNT 4340 steel. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 27(2):192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Alves MCS, Bianchi EC, Aguiar PRd, Canarim R (2011) Influence of optimized lubrication-cooling and minimum quantity lubrication on the cutting forces, on the geometric quality of the surfaces and on the micro-structural integrity of hardened steel parts. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro) 16 (3):754-766

  84. de Jesus OD, Guermandi LG, Bianchi EC, Diniz AE, de Aguiar PR, Canarim RC (2012) Improving minimum quantity lubrication in CBN grinding using compressed air wheel cleaning. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 212(12):2559–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Alves JAC, Fernandes UB, CEd SJ, Bianchi EC, PRd A, EJd S (2009) Application of the minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in the plunge cylindrical grinding operation. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 31(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Zhang D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental evaluation of MoS2 nanoparticles in jet MQL grinding with different types of vegetable oil as base oil. Journal of Cleaner Production 87:930–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Hadad M, Tawakoli T, Sadeghi M, Sadeghi B (2012) Temperature and energy partition in minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 54:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Kedare S, Borse D, Shahane P (2014) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on surface roughness of mild steel of 15HRC on universal milling machine. Procedia Materials Science 6:150–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Belentani RM, Funes Júnior H, Canarim RC, Diniz AE, Hassui A, Aguiar PR, Bianchi EC (2014) Utilization of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) with water in CBN grinding of steel. Materials Research 17(1):88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wójcik R, Nadolny K (2017) Effects of a variety of cutting fluids administered using the minimum quantity lubrication method on the surface grinding process for nickel-based alloys. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A 18(9):728–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Bhuiyan M, Choudhury I (2014) 13.22—Review of sensor applications in tool condition monitoring in machining. Comprehensive Materials Processing 13:539–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ambhore N, Kamble D, Chinchanikar S, Wayal V (2015) Tool condition monitoring system: a review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2(4-5):3419–3428

    Google Scholar 

  93. Dutta S, Pal S, Mukhopadhyay S, Sen R (2013) Application of digital image processing in tool condition monitoring: a review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 6(3):212–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Yin S, Ohmori H, Dai Y, Uehara Y, Chen F, Tang H (2009) ELID grinding characteristics of glass-ceramic materials. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 49(3-4):333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Nguyen D, Yin S, Tang Q, Son PX (2019) Online monitoring of surface roughness and grinding wheel wear when grinding Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy using ANFIS-GPR hybrid algorithm and Taguchi analysis. Precision Engineering 55:275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Javaroni RL, Lopes JC, Garcia MV, Ribeiro FSF, de Angelo Sanchez LE, de Mello HJ, Aguiar PR, Bianchi EC (2020) Grinding hardened steel using MQL associated with cleaning system and cBN wheel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology:1–16

  97. Javaroni RL, Lopes JC, Diniz AE, Garcia MV, Ribeiro FSF, Tavares AB, Talon AG, de Angelo Sanchez LE, de Mello HJ, Aguiar PR (2020) Improvement in the grinding process using the MQL technique with cooled wheel cleaning jet. Tribology International 152:106512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Adibi H, Esmaeili H, Rezaei S (2018) Study on minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in grinding of carbon fiber-reinforced SiC matrix composites (CMCs). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 95(9):3753–3767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Garcia MV, Lopes JC, Diniz AE, Rodrigues AR, Volpato RS, de Angelo Sanchez LE, de Mello HJ, Aguiar PR, Bianchi EC (2020) Grinding performance of bearing steel using MQL under different dilutions and wheel cleaning for green manufacture. Journal of Cleaner Production 257:120376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Javaroni R, Lopes J, Sato B, Sanchez L, Mello H, Aguiar P, Bianchi E (2019) Minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) as an eco-friendly alternative to the cutting fluids in advanced ceramics grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103(5):2809–2819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Li HN, Axinte D (2018) On the inverse design of discontinuous abrasive surface to lower friction-induced temperature in grinding: an example of engineered abrasive tools. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 132:50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Jiang J, Ge P, Sun S, Wang D, Wang Y, Yang Y (2016) From the microscopic interaction mechanism to the grinding temperature field: an integrated modelling on the grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 110:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Li HN, Axinte D (2017) On a stochastically grain-discretised model for 2D/3D temperature mapping prediction in grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 116:60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wang X, Yu T, Sun X, Shi Y, Wang W (2016) Study of 3D grinding temperature field based on finite difference method: considering machining parameters and energy partition. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 84(5-8):915–927

    Google Scholar 

  105. Sasahara H, Kikuma T, Koyasu R, Yao Y (2014) Surface grinding of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) with an internal coolant supplied through grinding wheel. Precision Engineering 38(4):775–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Hadad M, Sadeghi B (2012) Thermal analysis of minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 63:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Shen B, Shih AJ (2009) Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding using vitrified CBN wheels. Transactions of NAMRI/SME 37:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  108. Sanchez J, Pombo I, Alberdi R, Izquierdo B, Ortega N, Plaza S, Martinez-Toledano J (2010) Machining evaluation of a hybrid MQL-CO2 grinding technology. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(18):1840–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Salonitis K (2015) Energy efficiency assessment of grinding strategy. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 9:20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Zhang D, Li C, Jia D, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2015) Specific grinding energy and surface roughness of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication in grinding. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 28(2):570–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Zhang D, Li C, Zhang Y, Jia D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental research on the energy ratio coefficient and specific grinding energy in nanoparticle jet MQL grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 78(5-8):1275–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Lyu Y, Yu H, Wang J, Chen C, Xiang L (2017) Study on the grinding temperature of the grinding wheel with an abrasive phyllotactic pattern. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91(1):895–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Outeiro J (2020) Residual stresses in machining. Mechanics of Materials in Modern Manufacturing Methods and Processing Techniques, Elsevier, pp 297–360

    Google Scholar 

  114. Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Li B, Jia D, Hou Y, Mao C (2016) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication properties of the wheel/workpiece interface in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding using different types of vegetable oils. Journal of Cleaner Production 127:487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Chakule RR, Chaudhari SS, Talmale P (2017) Evaluation of the effects of machining parameters on MQL based surface grinding process using response surface methodology. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 31(8):3907–3916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Ling H, Yang C, Feng S, Lu H (2020) Predictive model of grinding residual stress for linear guideway considering straightening history. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 176:105536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Ding Z, Sun G, Guo M, Jiang X, Li B, Liang SY (2020) Effect of phase transition on micro-grinding-induced residual stress. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 281:116647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Shao Y, Fergani O, Ding Z, Li B, Liang SY (2016) Experimental investigation of residual stress in minimum quantity lubrication grinding of AISI 1018 steel. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 138(1)

  119. Naskar A, Singh BB, Choudhary A, Paul S (2018) Effect of different grinding fluids applied in minimum quantity cooling-lubrication mode on surface integrity in cBN grinding of Inconel 718. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 36:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Huang X, Ren Y, Jiang W, He Z, Deng Z (2017) Investigation on grind-hardening annealed AISI5140 steel with minimal quantity lubrication. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 89(1):1069–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Li B, Yang M, Zhang X, Guo S, Liu G (2016) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication properties of the wheel/workpiece interface in MQL grinding with different nanofluids. Tribology International 99:198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Sinha MK, Madarkar R, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2017) Application of eco-friendly nanofluids during grinding of Inconel 718 through small quantity lubrication. Journal of cleaner production 141:1359–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Shen B, Shih AJ, Tung SC (2008) Application of nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Tribology Transactions 51(6):730–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Hosseini S, Emami M, Sadeghi M (2018) An experimental investigation on the effects of minimum quantity nano lubricant application in grinding process of Tungsten carbide. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 35:244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Nandakumar A, Rajmohan T, Vijayabhaskar S (2019) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication performance in MQL grinding of nano SiC reinforced al matrix composites. Silicon 11(6):2987–2999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Setti D, Sinha MK, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2015) Performance evaluation of Ti–6Al–4V grinding using chip formation and coefficient of friction under the influence of nanofluids. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 88:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. ManojKumar K, Ghosh A (2016) Assessment of cooling-lubrication and wettability characteristics of nano-engineered sunflower oil as cutting fluid and its impact on SQCL grinding performance. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 237:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Jia D, Li C, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2014) Experimental verification of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication effectiveness in grinding. Journal of nanoparticle research 16(12):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Lee P-H, Lee SW, Lim S-H, Lee S-H, Ko HS, Shin S-W (2015) A study on thermal characteristics of micro-scale grinding process using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing 16(9):1899–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Shen B, Malshe AP, Kalita P, Shih AJ (2008) Performance of novel MoS2 nanoparticles based grinding fluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Transactions of Namri/SME 36(357):357–364

    Google Scholar 

  131. Babar H, Ali HM (2019) Towards hybrid nanofluids: preparation, thermophysical properties, applications, and challenges. Journal of Molecular Liquids 281:598–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Yang L, Ji W, Mao M, J-n H (2020) An updated review on the properties, fabrication and application of hybrid-nanofluids along with their environmental effects. Journal of Cleaner Production 257:120408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Kumar A, Ghosh S, Aravindan S (2019) Experimental investigations on surface grinding of silicon nitride subjected to mono and hybrid nanofluids. Ceramics International 45(14):17447–17466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Zhang X, Li C, Zhang Y, Jia D, Li B, Wang Y, Yang M, Hou Y, Zhang X (2016) Performances of Al 2 O 3/SiC hybrid nanofluids in minimum-quantity lubrication grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 86(9):3427–3441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Zhang D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication performance of MoS2/CNT nanofluid for minimal quantity lubrication in Ni-based alloy grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 99:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Rabiei F, Rahimi A, Hadad M (2017) Performance improvement of eco-friendly MQL technique by using hybrid nanofluid and ultrasonic-assisted grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 93(1):1001–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Taghizadeh B, Zarepour H (2018) The effect of Al2O3-MWCNT hybrid nanofluid on surface quality in grinding of Inconel 600. Journal of Modern Processes in Manufacturing and Production 7(3):71–82

    Google Scholar 

  138. Molaie MM, Zahedi A, Akbari J (2018) Effect of water-based nanolubricants in ultrasonic vibration assisted grinding. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2(4):80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Zhang X, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li B, Yang M, Guo S, Liu G, Zhang N (2017) Lubricating property of MQL grinding of Al2O3/SiC mixed nanofluid with different particle sizes and microtopography analysis by cross-correlation. Precision Engineering 47:532–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Molaie M, Akbari J, Movahhedy M (2016) Ultrasonic assisted grinding process with minimum quantity lubrication using oil-based nanofluids. Journal of cleaner production 129:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Huang WT, Liu WS (2016) Investigations into lubrication in grinding processes using MWCNTs nanofluids with ultrasonic-assisted dispersion. Journal of cleaner production 137:1553–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Li B, Yang M, Zhang X, Guo S, Liu G, Zhai M (2017) Comparative evaluation of the lubricating properties of vegetable-oil-based nanofluids between frictional test and grinding experiment. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 26:94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Dambatta YS, Sayuti M, Sarhan AA, Hamdi M, Manladan S, Reddy M (2019) Tribological performance of SiO2-based nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding of Si3N4 ceramic. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 41:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Choudhary A, Naskar A, Paul S (2018) An investigation on application of nano-fluids in high speed grinding of sintered alumina. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 35:624–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Zhang J, Li C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Jia D, Liu G, Hou Y, Li R, Zhang N, Wu Q (2018) Experimental assessment of an environmentally friendly grinding process using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication with cryogenic air. Journal of cleaner production 193:236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Jia D, Li C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Wang Y, Guo S, Cao H (2017) Specific energy and surface roughness of minimum quantity lubrication grinding Ni-based alloy with mixed vegetable oil-based nanofluids. Precision Engineering 50:248–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Prabhu S, Uma M, Vinayagam B (2015) Surface roughness prediction using Taguchi-fuzzy logic-neural network analysis for CNT nanofluids based grinding process. Neural Computing and Applications 26(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Wang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Zhang X, Zhang N, Dai J (2017) Experimental evaluation on tribological performance of the wheel/workpiece interface in minimum quantity lubrication grinding with different concentrations of Al2O3 nanofluids. Journal of Cleaner Production 142:3571–3583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Li B, Wang Y, Yang M, Hou Y, Zhang X (2016) Experimental study on the effect of nanoparticle concentration on the lubricating property of nanofluids for MQL grinding of Ni-based alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 232:100–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Rabiei F, Rahimi A, Hadad M, Saberi A (2017) Experimental evaluation of coolant-lubricant properties of nanofluids in ultrasonic assistant MQL grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 93(9):3935–3953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Zhang Y, Li C, Yang M, Jia D, Wang Y, Li B, Hou Y, Zhang N, Wu Q (2016) Experimental evaluation of cooling performance by friction coefficient and specific friction energy in nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication grinding with different types of vegetable oil. Journal of cleaner production 139:685–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Kumar A, Ghosh S, Aravindan S (2017) Grinding performance improvement of silicon nitride ceramics by utilizing nanofluids. Ceramics International 43(16):13411–13421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Jia D, Yang M, Zhang N, Wu Q, Han Z, Sun K (2017) Heat transfer performance of MQL grinding with different nanofluids for Ni-based alloys using vegetable oil. Journal of Cleaner Production 154:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Seyedzavvar M, Abbasi H, Kiyasatfar M, Ilkhchi RN (2020) Investigation on tribological performance of CuO vegetable-oil based nanofluids for grinding operations. Advances in Manufacturing 8(3):344–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Pashmforoush F, Bagherinia RD (2018) Influence of water-based copper nanofluid on wheel loading and surface roughness during grinding of Inconel 738 superalloy. Journal of Cleaner Production 178:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Singh H, Sharma VS, Singh S, Dogra M (2019) Nanofluids assisted environmental friendly lubricating strategies for the surface grinding of titanium alloy: Ti6Al4V-ELI. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 39:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Li C, Li J, Wang S, Zhang Q (2013) Modeling and numerical simulation of the grinding temperature field with nanoparticle jet of MQL. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 5:986984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Saidur R, Leong K, Mohammed HA (2011) A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 15(3):1646–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Xuan Y, Li Q, Tie P (2013) The effect of surfactants on heat transfer feature of nanofluids. Experimental thermal and fluid science 46:259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Namburu PK, Das DK, Tanguturi KM, Vajjha RS (2009) Numerical study of turbulent flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids considering variable properties. International journal of thermal sciences 48(2):290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Liu L-H, Métivier R, Wang S, Wang H (2012) Advanced nanohybrid materials: surface modification and applications. Hindawi,

    Google Scholar 

  162. Benedicto E, Carou D, Rubio E (2017) Technical, economic and environmental review of the lubrication/cooling systems used in machining processes. Procedia engineering 184:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are grateful to the China Post-Doctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2019TQ0186), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51922066), the Natural Science Outstanding Youth Fund of Shandong Province (ZR2019JQ19), the Postdoctoral Innovation Project of Shandong Province, and the Key Laboratory of High-efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture at Shandong University, Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

    Munish Kumar Gupta, Qinghua Song & Zhanqiang Liu

  2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland

    Munish Kumar Gupta

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Narowal Campus, Narowal, 51600, Pakistan

    Aqib Mashood Khan

  4. National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

    Qinghua Song & Zhanqiang Liu

  5. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Peshawar, 814 KPK, Pakistan

    Qazi Salman Khalid

  6. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, People’s Republic of China

    Muhammad Jamil

  7. Mechanical Engineering Department, Technology Faculty, Selcuk University, Selçuklu, Konya, 42130, Turkey

    Mustafa Kuntoğlu

  8. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Bingöl University, Bingöl, Turkey

    Üsame Ali Usca

  9. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey

    Murat Sarıkaya

  10. Department of Automated Mechanical Engineering, South Ural State University, Lenin Prospekt, 76, 454080, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    Danil Yu Pimenov

Authors
  1. Munish Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aqib Mashood Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qinghua Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhanqiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qazi Salman Khalid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Jamil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mustafa Kuntoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Üsame Ali Usca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Murat Sarıkaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Danil Yu Pimenov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghua Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The consent to submit this paper has been received explicitly from all co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, M.K., Khan, A.M., Song, Q. et al. A review on conventional and advanced minimum quantity lubrication approaches on performance measures of grinding process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117, 729–750 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07785-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07785-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation