Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Study of 3D parameters and residual stress in grinding of AISI 4340 steel hardened using different cutting fluids

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the grinding process, high temperatures occur due to the removal of materials and the residual stresses that are generated on the machined surface, thus affecting the mechanical behaviour of the material. The performance of this process depends largely on conditions of cooling to prevent overheat of the parts, which can interfere in surface integrity of the pieces. Residual stress is a key factor that influences the reliability, precision and life useful of final products. As such, 3D parameters are important in tribological studies, with many of them showing a strong correlation with surface operational performance. Therefore, this work aims to study, through the 3D surface parameter and residual stress, the surface behaviour of AISI 4340 hardened steel after plunge grinding, while using different cutting fluids (mix—50% based mineral oil and 50% soybean oil; synthetic cutting fluid and integral fluid—mineral oil-based lubricant), as well as the use of minimum quantity lubricant (MQL) technique. All the residual stresses found for in the grinding samples under all cooling conditions were compressive stresses, which are beneficial to machined components. The synthetic fluid had lower compressive stresses. In relation to the 3D parameters, integral and mixing fluids also obtained a better performance because these fluids allowed greater lubrication in comparison to other fluids used. The results showed that the type of cutting fluid influenced the surface integrity of the ground pieces. It was concluded that the results showed the use of the mix and MQL fluids as an alternative to the use of the integral and synthetic cutting fluids, thus contributing to an ecologically correct and sustainable manufacture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberdi R, Sanchez JA, Pombo I, Ortega N, Izquierdo B, Plaza S, Barrenetxea D (2011) Strategies for optimal use of fluids in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beranogirre A, Lopez de Lacalle LN (2013) Grinding of gamma TiAl intermetallic alloys. Process Eng 63:489–498

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malkin S, Guo C (2008) Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives. Industrial Press Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ding W, Zhang L, Li Z, Zhu Y, Su H, Xu J (2017) Review on grinding-induced residual stresses in metallic materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(29):39–68

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pala Z, Ganev N (2008) The impact of various cooling environments on the distribution of macroscopic residual stresses in near surface layers of ground steels. Mater Sci Eng A 497:200–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henriksen EK (1951) Residual stresses in machined surfaces. Trans ASME 73:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fergani O, Shao Y, Lazoglu I, Liang SY (2014) Temperature effects on grinding residual stress. Proc CIRP 14:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burakowski T, Wierzchon T (1999) Engineering of metals principles equipment technologies. New York: Boca Raton

  9. Zhang LC, Suto T, Noguchi H, Waida T (1992) An overview of applied mechanics in grinding. Manuf Rev 5:261–273

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu M, Nguyen T, Zhang LC, Wu Q, Sun DL (2015) Effect of grinding-induced cyclic heating on the hardened layer generation in the plunge grinding of a cylindrical component. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu YQ, Zhang T, Bai YM (2012) Analysis of the surface residual stress in grinding Aermet100. Mater Sci Forum 705:318–324

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith DJ, Farrahi GH, Zhu WX, Mcmahon CA (2001) Experimental measurement and finite element simulation of the interaction between residual stresses and mechanical loading. Int J Fatigue 23:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brinksmeier E, Heinzel C, Wittmann M (1999) Friction, cooling and lubrication in grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48(2):581–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marinescu ID, Hitchiner MP, Uhlman E, Rowe WB, Inasaki I (2006) Handbook of machining with grinding wheels. CRC Press

  15. Tawakoli T, Westkamper E, Rabiey M, Rasifard A (2007) Influence of the type of coolant lubricant in grinding with CBN tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:734–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davim JP, Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR (2008) Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel by ANN models. J Mater Process Technol 205:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong WP, Sullivan PJ, Stout KJ (1994) Comprehensive study of parameters for characterizing three-dimensional surface topography: III: parameters for characterizing amplitude and some functional properties. Wear 178:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gadelmawla ES, Koura MM, Maksoud TMA, Elewa IM, Soliman HH (2002) Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol 123(1):133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang XJ, Whitehouse DJ (2012) Technological shifts in surface metrology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):815–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deltombe R, Kubiak KJ, Bigerelle M (2014) How to select the most relevant 3D roughness parameters of a surface. J Scann Micros 36(1):150–160

    Google Scholar 

  21. Du S, Liu C, Huang D (2015) A shearlet-based separation method of 3D engineering surface using high definition metrology. Precis Eng 40:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. American Society for Testing and Materials. E2860-12 (2012) Standard test method for residual stress measurement by X-ray diffraction for bearing steels. West Conshohocken

  23. Waikar R, Guo Y (2007) A comprehensive characterization of 3D surface topography induced by hard turning versus grinding. J Mater Process Technol 197:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ray S, Chowdhury SKR (2011) Experimental investigation into the effect of 3D surface roughness parameters on flash temperature. Indus Lubrif Tribol 63(2):90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fukuhara Y, Suzuki S, Sasahara H (2018) Real-time grinding state discrimination strategy by use of monitor-embedded grinding. Precis Eng 51:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sedlacek M, Podgornik B, Vizintin J (2012) Correlation between standard roughness parameters skewness and kurtosis and tribological behaviour of contact surfaces. Tribol Int 48:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Franco LA, Sinatora A (2015) 3D surface parameters (ISO 25178-2): actual meaning of Spk and its relationship to Vmp. Precis Eng 40:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leach R (2013) Characterization of areal surface texture. Springer, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Kundrak J, Gyani K, Bana V (2008) Roughness of ground and hard-turned surfaces on the basis of 3D parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(1–2):110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malkin S (1989) Grinding technology theory and applications of machining with abrasives. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zubairova LK, Svirshchev H (2014) Residual stress in grinding. Russ Eng Res 34:603.605

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laamouri A, Sidhom H, Braham C (2013) Evaluation of residual stress relaxation and its effect on fatigue strength of AISI 316L stainless steel ground surfaces: experimental and numerical approaches. Int J Fatigue 48:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Navas VG, Rosales CG, Sevillano JG, Ferreres I, Marañón JÁ (2008) Hard turning plus grinding a combination to obtain good surface integrity in AISI 01 tool steel machined parts. Mach Sci Technol 12:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Joint report edited by J. £unarski (1989) Surface treatment (in Polish). Rzeszow Technical University, Rzeszów

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tubielewicz K (1993) Analysis of stresses formed in the superficial layer during the burnishing process (in Polish). Czêstochowa Technical University Periodicals, Czêstochowa

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brinksmeier E, Cammett JT, Koènig W, Leskovar P, Peters J, Tönshoff HK (1982) Residual stresses—measurement and causes in the machining process. CIRP Ann 31:491–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. El-Helieby SOA, Rowe GW (1980) A quantitative comparison between residual stresses and fatigue properties of surface ground bearing steel EN31. Wear 58:155–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu XX, Lau WS (1999) A finite-element analysis of residual stress in stretch grinding. J Mater Process Technol 94:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Leppert T, Peng RL (2012) Residual stresses in surface layer after dry and MQL turning of AISI 316L steel. Prod Eng 6(4–5):367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Navas VG, Gonzalo O, Bengoetxea I (2012) Effect of cutting parameters in the surface residual stresses generated by turning in AISI 4340 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 61:48–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen J, Fang Q, Zhang L (2014) Investigate on distribution and scatter of surface residual stress in ultra-high speed grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:615–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Maretll JJ, Liu CR, Shi J (2014) Experimental investigation on variation of machined residual stresses by turning and grinding of hardened AISI 1053 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1381–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Choi Y (2009) A comparative study of residual stress distribution induced by hard machining versus grinding. Tribol Lett 36:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hamdi H, Zahouani H, Bergheau JM (2004) Residual stresses computation in a grinding process. J Mater Process Technol 147:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Fusse RY, Catai RE, França TV, Aguiar PR (2007) Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant—MQL in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to CNPq for scholarship Research Productivity and to CEFET-MG for the scholarship and research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Materials Engineering Department, Federal Center of Technological Education of Minas Gerais—CEFET/MG, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP: 30421-169, Brazil

    Leonardo Roberto da Silva, Davi Alves da Silva, Francisco Vieira dos Santos & Fernando Júnio Duarte

Authors
  1. Leonardo Roberto da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Davi Alves da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco Vieira dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernando Júnio Duarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Roberto da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, L.R., da Silva, D.A., dos Santos, F.V. et al. Study of 3D parameters and residual stress in grinding of AISI 4340 steel hardened using different cutting fluids. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100, 895–905 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2763-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2763-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation