Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid manufacturing: a review of the synergy between directed energy deposition and subtractive processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is one of the pillars of Industry 4.0, where automation to create smart factories is the main target. The hybridization of processes is one of the leading strategies to implement a more flexible, efficient, and interconnected manufacturing environment. Nowadays, different researches are focused on the hybridization of metal AM and subtractive manufacturing (SM). Based on the working principles of AM and SM, it can be established that they are complementary processes. Hence, a synergy between them allows conceiving a unique process. As a result, the advantages are magnified, and the limitations of each one are minimized or eliminated. This review presents the latest developments, challenges, limitations, and future perspectives for the integration between directed energy deposition (DED) and SM. DED is a versatile AM process for metal parts fabrication, where the geometrical complexity is its main advantage. Nevertheless, the low surface quality and the difficult dimensional control of the parts create the need for post-processing. Traditional post-processing involves a higher production time, and the barriers cannot be completely overcome. Then, a hybrid process constitutes a powerful concept to combine both technologies efficiently, to produce complex parts with less waste of material and energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015(E) (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing – general principles – terminology. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  2. Monzón M, Ortega Z, Martínez A, Ortega F (2015) Standardization in additive manufacturing: activities carried out by international organizations and projects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5):1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6334-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sames WJ, List F, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61(5):315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Everton SK, Hirsch M, Stravroulakis P, Leach RK, Clare AT (2016) Review of in–situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 95:431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu QY, Wong CH (2017) Applications of non–destructive testing techniques for post–process control of additively manufactured parts. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(4):301. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1357319

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Herzog D, Seyda V, Wycisk E, Emmelmann C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater 117:371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones J (2014) The synergies of hybridizing CNC and additive manufacturing. Hybrid Manufacturing Technologies Ltd

  9. Lu X, Lin X, Chiumenti M, Cervera M, Hu Y, Ji X, Ma L, Yang H, Huang W (2019) Residual stress and distortion of rectangular and S-shaped Ti–6Al–4V parts by directed energy deposition: modelling and experimental calibration. Addit Manuf 26:166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DebRoy T, Wei H, Zuback J, Mukherjee T, Elmer J, Milewski J, Beese AM, Wilson-Heid A, De A, Zhang W (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salonitis K, D’Alvise L, Schoinochoritis B, Chantzis D (2016) Additive manufacturing and post–processing simulation: laser cladding followed by high speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(9-12):2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7989-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Du W, Bai Q, Zhang B (2016) A novel method for additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of metallic parts. Procedia Manuf 5:1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Newman ST, Dhokia V (2016) Hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools–research and industrial developments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 101:79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heigel J, Michaleris P, Reutzel EW (2015) Thermo–mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V. Addit Manuf 5:9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Wu L, Guo X, Kane S, Deng Y, Jung YG, Lee JH, Zhang J (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic materials: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 27(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2747-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Szost BA, Terzi S, Martina F, Boisselier D, Prytuliak A, Pirling T, Hofmann M, Jarvis DJ (2016) A comparative study of additive manufacturing techniques: residual stress and microstructural analysis of CLAD and WAAM printed Ti–6Al–4V components. Mater Des 89:559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolff SJ, Lin S, Faierson EJ, Liu WK, Wagner GJ (2017) A framework to link localized cooling and properties of directed energy deposition (DED)–processed Ti–6Al–4V. J Cao, Acta Mater 132:106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dass A, Moridi A (2019) State of the art in directed energy deposition: from additive manufacturing to materials design. Coatings 9(7):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9070418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolff S, Lee T, Faierson E, Ehmann K, Cao J (2016) Anisotropic properties of directed energy deposition (DED)–processed Ti–6Al–4V. J Manuf Processes 24:397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kistler NA, Corbin DJ, Nassar AR, Reutzel EW, Beese AM (2019) Effect of processing conditions on the microstructure, porosity, and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V repair fabricated by directed energy deposition. J Mater Process Technol 264:172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keist JS, Palmer TA (2016) Role of geometry on properties of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V structures fabricated using laser based directed energy deposition. Mater Des 106:482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park JS, Park JH, Lee MG, Sung JH, Cha KJ, Kim DH (2016) Effect of energy input on the characteristic of AISI H13 and D2 tool steels deposited by a directed energy deposition process. Metall Mater Trans A 47(5):2529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3427-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jinoop A, Paul C, Bindra K (2019) Laser–assisted directed energy deposition of nickel super alloys: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt L J Mater Des Appl 233(11):2376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420719852658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saboori A, Gallo D, Biamino S, Fino P, Lombardi M (2017) An overview of additive manufacturing of titanium components by directed energy deposition: microstructure and mechanical properties. Appl Sci 7(9):883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7090883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saboori A, Aversa A, Marchese G, Biamino S, Lombardi M, Fino P (2019) Application of directed energy deposition–based additive manufacturing in repair. Appl Sci 9(16):3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park JS, Lee MG, Cho YJ, Sung JH, Jeong MS, Lee SK, Choi YJ, Kim DH (2016) Effect of heat treatment on the characteristics of tool steel deposited by the directed energy deposition process. Met Mater Int 22(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-016-5372-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shim DS, Baek GY, Seo JS, Shin GY, Kim KP, Lee KY (2016) Effect of layer thickness setting on deposition characteristics in direct energy deposition (DED) process. Opt Laser Technol 86:69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones J, McNutt P, Tosi R, Perry C, Wimpennym DI (2012) Remanufacture of turbine blades by laser cladding, machining and in–process scanning in a single machine. In: 23rd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. University of Texas, pp 821–827

  29. Strong D, Kay M, Wakefield T, Sirichakwal I, Conner B, Manogharan G (2019) Rethinking reverse logistics: role of additive manufacturing technology in metal remanufacturing. J Manuf Technol Manag 31(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2018-0119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liang X, Cheng L, Chen Q, Yang Q, To AC (2018) A modified method for estimating inherent strains from detailed process simulation for fast residual distortion prediction of single–walled structures fabricated by directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 23:471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carroll BE, Otis RA, Borgonia JP, Suh JO, Dillon RP, Shapiro AA, Hofmann DC, Liu ZK, Beese AM (2016) Functionally graded material of 304L stainless steel and inconel 625 fabricated by directed energy deposition: characterization and thermodynamic modeling. Acta Mater 108:46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hwang T, Woo YY, Han SW, Moon YH (2018) Functionally graded properties in directed–energy–deposition titanium parts. Opt Laser Technol 105:80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.02.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Traxel KD, Bandyopadhyay A (2019) First demonstration of additive manufacturing of cutting tools using directed energy deposition system: StelliteTM–based cutting tools. Addit Manuf 25:460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Piscopo G, Atzeni E, Salmi A (2019) A hybrid modeling of the physics–driven evolution of material addition and track generation in laser powder directed energy deposition. Materials 12(17):2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sahasrabudhe H, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2018) Laser–based additive manufacturing processes. In: Advances in laser materials processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101252-9.00017-0. Elsevier, pp 507–539

  36. Attar H, Ehtemam-Haghighi S, Kent D, Wu X, Dargusch MS (2017) Comparative study of commercially pure titanium produced by laser engineered net shaping, selective laser melting and casting processes. Mater Sci Eng., A 705:385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Abe T, Sasahara H (2016) Dissimilar metal deposition with a stainless steel and nickel–based alloy using wire and arc–based additive manufacturing. Precis Eng 45:387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Demir AG (2018) Micro laser metal wire deposition for additive manufacturing of thin–walled structures. Opt Lasers Eng 100:9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brandl E, Palm F, Michailov V, Viehweger B, Leyens C (2011) Mechanical properties of additive manufactured titanium (Ti–6Al–4V) blocks deposited by a solid–state laser and wire. Mater Des 32 (10):4665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Beese AM, Carroll BE (2016) Review of mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V made by laser–based additive manufacturing using powder feedstock. JOM 68(3):724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1759-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Haley JC, Zheng B, Bertoli US, Dupuy AD, Schoenung JM, Lavernia EJ (2019) Working distance passive stability in laser directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Mater Des 161:86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lia F, Park J, Tressler J, Martukanitz R (2017) Partitioning of laser energy during directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 18:31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carroll BE, Palmer TA, Beese AM (2015) Anisotropic tensile behavior of Ti–6Al–4V components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 87:309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yan Z, Liu W, Tang Z, Liu X, Zhang N, Li M, Zhang H (2018) Review on thermal analysis in laser–based additive manufacturing. Opt Laser Technol 106:427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.04.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Khodabakhshi F, Farshidianfar M, Bakhshivash S, Gerlich A, Khajepour A (2019) Dissimilar metals deposition by directed energy based on powder–fed laser additive manufacturing. J Manuf Processes 43:83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weisz-Patrault D (2020) Fast simulation of temperature and phase transitions in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 31:100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gibson B, Bandari YK, Richardson B, Henry WC, Vetland EJ, Sundermann T, Love L (2020) Melt pool size control through multiple closed–loop modalities in laser–wire directed energy deposition of Ti–6Al–4V. Addit Manuf 100993:32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bax B, Rajput R, Kellet R, Reisacher M (2018) Systematic evaluation of process parameter maps for laser cladding and directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 21:487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams SW, Martina F, Addison AC, Ding J, Pardal G, Colegrove P (2016) Wire + arc additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 32(7):641. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Brandl E, Baufeld B, Leyens C, Gault R (2010) Additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V using welding wire: comparison of laser and arc beam deposition and evaluation with respect to aerospace material specifications. Phys Procedia 5(Pt 2):595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Michel F, Lockett H, Ding J, Martina F, Marinelli G, Williams S (2019) A modular path planning solution for wire + arc additive manufacturing. Rob Comput Integr Manuf 60:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Buhl J, Israr R, Bambach M (2019) Modeling and convergence analysis of directed energy deposition simulations with hybrid implicit/explicit and implicit solutions. J Mach Eng 19:94. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.4086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) Wire–feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1-4):465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xiong J, Zhang G, Gao H, Wu L (2013) Modeling of bead section profile and overlapping beads with experimental validation for robotic GMAW–based rapid manufacturing. Rob Comput Integr Manuf 29(2):417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2012.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nilsiam Y, Sanders P, Pearce JM (2017) Slicer and process improvements for open–source GMAW–based metal 3–D printing. Addit Manuf 18:110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lin J, Lv Y, Liu Y, Xu B, Sun Z, Li Z, Wu Y (2016) Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V wall deposited by pulsed plasma arc additive manufacturing. Mater Des 102:30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rojas JM, Wolfe T, Fleck B, Qureshi AJ (2018) Plasma transferred arc additive manufacturing of Nickel metal matrix composites. Manuf Lett 18:31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Baufeld B, Widdison R, Dutilleul T (2017) Wire based electron beam additive manufacturing. In: 70th IIW Assembly and International Conference, Shanghai, China, pp 35–39

  59. Dinda G, Dasgupta A, Mazumder J (2012) Evolution of microstructure in laser deposited Al–11.28% Si alloy. Surf Coat Technol 206(8-9):2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.09.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Oyelola O, Crawforth P, M’Saoubi R, Clare AT (2018) On the machinability of directed energy deposited Ti6Al4V. Addit Manuf 19:39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Oyelola O, Crawforth P, M’Saoubi R, Clare AT (2016) Machining of additively manufactured parts: implications for surface integrity. In: Procedia CIRP, vol 45. Elsevier, pp 119–122, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.066

  62. Manogharan G, Wysk R, Harrysson O, Aman R (2015) AIMS–A metal additive–hybrid manufacturing system: system architecture and attributes. Procedia Manuf 1:273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Xue A, Wang L, Lin X, Wang J, Chen J, Huang W (2020) Effect of boron on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V produced by laser directed energy deposition after heat treatment. J Laser Appl 32(1):012007. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5098074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hayes BJ, Martin BW, Welk B, Kuhr SJ, Ales TK, Brice DA, Ghamarian I, Baker AH, Haden CV, Harlow DG et al (2017) Predicting tensile properties of Ti–6Al–4V produced via directed energy deposition. Acta Mater 133:120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Waryoba DR, Keist JS, Ranger C, Palmer T (2018) Microtexture in additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V fabricated using directed energy deposition. Mater Sci Eng A 734:149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Woo WS, Kim EJ, Jeong HI, Lee CM (2020) Laser–Assisted machining of Ti–6Al–4V fabricated by DED additive manufacturing. Int J Pr Eng Man-GT 1–14

  67. Lewandowski JJ, Seifi M (2016) Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties. Annu Rev Mater Res 46:151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Keist J, Nayir S, Palmer T (2020) Impact of hot isostatic pressing on the mechanical and microstructural properties of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V fabricated using directed energy deposition. Mater Sci Eng A:139454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Gangireddy S, Faierson E, Mishra R (2018) Influences of post–processing, location, orientation, and induced porosity on the dynamic compression behavior of Ti–6Al–4V alloy built through additive manufacturing. J Dyn Behav Mater 4(4):441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-018-0157-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Li P, Warner D, Pegues J, Roach M, Shamsaei N, Phan N (2019) Investigation of the mechanisms by which hot isostatic pressing improves the fatigue performance of powder bed fused Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Fatigue 120:342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Gordon J, Hochhalter J, Haden C, Harlow DG (2019) Enhancement in fatigue performance of metastable austenitic stainless steel through directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Mater Des 107630:168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Kumara C, Segerstark A, Hanning F, Dixit N, Joshi S, Moverare J, Nylén P (2019) Microstructure modelling of laser metal powder directed energy deposition of alloy 718. Addit Manuf 25:357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Khanzadeh M, Chowdhury S, Tschopp MA, Doude HR, Marufuzzaman M, Bian L (2019) In-situ monitoring of melt pool images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition processes. IISE Trans 51(5):437. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2017.1417656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wolff SJ, Wu H, Parab N, Zhao C, Ehmann KF, Sun T, Cao J (2019) In-situ high–speed X–ray imaging of piezo–driven directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Sci Rep 9(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36678-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Haley JC, Schoenung JM, Lavernia EJ (2018) Observations of particle–melt pool impact events in directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 22:368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. DMG MORI products. https://en.dmgmori.com/products/. Accessed 26 May 2020

  77. ROMI products. https://www.romi.com/produtos/. Accessed 26 May 2020

  78. Hybrid manufacturing technologiesTM products. http://www.hybridmanutech.com/products.html. Accessed 26 May 2020

  79. The integration of additive manufacturing technology and multi-tasking machining. https://www.mazakeu.co.uk/AM/. Accessed 27 May 2020

  80. LENS systems – 3D printed metals. https://optomec.com/3d-printed-metals/lens-printers/. Accessed 27 May 2020

  81. Mitsui seiki products. http://www.mitsuiseiki.com/products/. Accessed 27 May 2020

  82. MU-8000V LASER EX. https://www.okuma.com/products/mu-8000v-laser-ex. Accessed 27 May 2020

  83. Kakinuma Y, Mori M, Oda Y, Mori T, Kashihara M, Hansel A, Fujishima M (2016) Influence of metal powder characteristics on product quality with directed energy deposition of Inconel 625. CIRP Ann 65(1):209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Chen N, Barnawal P, Frank MC (2018) Automated post machining process planning for a new hybrid manufacturing method of additive manufacturing and rapid machining. Rapid Prototyp. J. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2017-0057

  85. Hansel A, Mori M, Fujishima M, Oda Y, Hyatt G, Lavernia E, Delplanque JP (2016) Study on consistently optimum deposition conditions of typical metal material using additive/subtractive hybrid machine tool. Procedia CIRP 46:579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Saboori A, Bosio F, Librera E, de Chirico M, Biamino S, Lombardi M, Fino P (2018) Accelerated process parameter optimization for directed energy deposition of 316L stainless steel. In: Proceedings of the Euro PM2018 Congress Exhibition, Bilbao, Spain, pp 14–18

  87. Soshi M, Ring J, Young C, Oda Y, Mori M (2017) Innovative grid molding and cooling using an additive and subtractive hybrid CNC machine tool. CIRP Ann 66 (1):401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Chen N, Frank M (2019) Process planning for hybrid additive and subtractive manufacturing to integrate machining and directed energy deposition. Procedia Manuf 34:205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ding Y, Dwivedi R, Kovacevic R (2017) Process planning for 8–axis robotized laser–based direct metal deposition system: a case on building revolved part. Rob Comput Integr Manuf 44:67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Li L, Haghighi A, Yang Y (2018) A novel 6–axis hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing process: Design and case studies. J Manuf Processes 33:150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kyubok L, Haeseong J, Mech J (2015) Slicing algorithms for multi–axis 3–D metal printing of overhangs. Sci Technol 29:5139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1113-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Yang Y, Gong Y, Qu S, Xin B, Xu Y, Qi Y (2019) Additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of 316L stainless steel powder: densification, microhardness and residual stress. J Mech Sci Technol 33 (12):5797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-1126-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Wang Z, Liu R, Sparks T, Liu H, Liou F (2015) Stereo vision based hybrid manufacturing process for precision metal parts. Precis Eng 42:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Mozaffar M, Paul A, Al-Bahrani R, Wolff S, Choudhary A, Agrawal A, Ehmann K, Cao J (2018) Data–driven prediction of the high–dimensional thermal history in directed energy deposition processes via recurrent neural networks. Manuf Lett 18:35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Yamazaki T (2016) Development of a hybrid multi–tasking machine tool: integration of additive manufacturing technology with CNC machining. Procedia Cirp 42:81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Grzesik W (2018) Hybrid additive and subtractive manufacturing processes and systems: a review. J Mach Eng 18:5. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.7629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Terrassa KL, Haley JC, MacDonald BE, Schoenung JM (2018) Reuse of powder feedstock for directed energy deposition. Powder Technol 338:819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Caiazzo F, Alfieri V (2018) Laser–aided directed energy deposition of steel powder over flat surfaces and edges. Materials 11(3):435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11030435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Liu R, Wang Z, Sparks T, Liou F, Newkirk J (2017) Aerospace applications of laser additive manufacturing. In: Laser additive manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00013-0. Elsevier, pp 351–371

  100. Yang Q, Zhang P, Cheng L, Min Z, Chyu M, To AC (2016) Finite element modeling and validation of thermomechanical behavior of Ti–6Al–4V in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 12:169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Wang Y, Shi J (2019) Microstructure and properties of Inconel 718 fabricated by directed energy deposition with in-situ ultrasonic impact peening. Metall Mater Trans B 50(6):2815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-019-01672-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhong RY, Xu X, Klotz E, Newman ST (2017) Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: a review. Engineering 3(5):616. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Dilberoglu UM, Gharehpapagh B, Yaman U, Dolen M (2017) The role of additive manufacturing in the era of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf 11:545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Olsen TL, Tomlin B (2020) Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges for operations management. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 22(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Oztemel E, Gursev S (2020) Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell Manuf 31(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Cortina M, Arrizubieta JI, Ruiz JE, Ukar E, Lamikiz A (2018) Latest developments in industrial hybrid machine tools that combine additive and subtractive operations. Materials 11(12):2583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Rousseau JN, Bois-Brochu A, Blais C (2018) Effect of oxygen content in new and reused powder on microstructural and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V parts produced by directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 23:197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Carrion PE, Soltani-Tehrani A, Phan N, Shamsaei N (2019) Powder recycling effects on the tensile and fatigue behavior of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V parts. , JOM 71(3):963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3248-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Gorji NE, O’Connor R, Mussatto A, Snelgrove M, González PM, Brabazon D (2019) Recyclability of stainless steel (316 L) powder within the additive manufacturing process. Materialia 100489:8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Jones J (2016) Repurposing mainstream CNC machine tools for laser–based additive manufacturing. In: Laser 3D manufacturing III. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217901, vol 9738. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 973811

  111. Lorenz K, Jones J, Wimpenny D, Jackson M (2015) A review of hybrid manufacturing. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Conference Proceedings, vol 53, pp 96–108

  112. Boisselier D, Sankaré S, Engel T (2014) Improvement of the laser direct metal deposition process in 5–axis configuration. Phys Procedia 56:239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Urbanic RJ, Hedrick B (2018) Additive manufacturing bead deposition based rotary tool path applications. In: ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, pp 1–11, DOI https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-86461, (to appear in print)

  114. Jena MC, Mishra SK, Moharana HS (2020) Application of Industry 4.0 to enhance sustainable manufacturing. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 39(1):13360. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

J.L. Dávila is grateful to Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SENESCYT/Ecuador), for admitting his stay as a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Information Technology “Renato Archer” (CTI).

Funding

This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP/Brazil), grant #2016/11309–0. J.L. Dávila expresses thanks for the postdoctoral fellowship from FAPESP (grant #2019/02772–7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nucleus of Three–Dimensional Technologies (NT3D), Center for Information Technology “Renato Archer” (CTI), Campinas, 13069-901, Brazil

    José Luis Dávila, Paulo Inforçatti Neto, Pedro Yoshito Noritomi & Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva

  2. Nucleus for Advanced Manufacturing (NUMA), School of Engineering of São Carlos (EESC), University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, 13566-590, Brazil

    Reginaldo Teixeira Coelho

Authors
  1. José Luis Dávila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paulo Inforçatti Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pedro Yoshito Noritomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reginaldo Teixeira Coelho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luis Dávila.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dávila, J.L., Neto, P.I., Noritomi, P.Y. et al. Hybrid manufacturing: a review of the synergy between directed energy deposition and subtractive processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110, 3377–3390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06062-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06062-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation