Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of process parameters on thickness thinning and mechanical properties of the formed parts in incremental sheet forming

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incremental sheet forming (ISF) is a promising method for forming metal sheets, by which parts can be manufactured without the use of dedicated dies. However, the process has not been widely used for industrial application due to the unsatisfactory service performance of the formed parts. This paper focuses on improving the thickness distribution and mechanical properties (e.g., hardness, yield strength, and tensile strength) through process optimization. The response surface methodology with a Box-Behnken design is used to investigate how different process parameters affect the thickness thinning and mechanical properties. A set of experiments with 15 tests for pyramid-forming process is performed, and three parameters including step-down size, sheet thickness, and tool diameter are considered. The results show that the maximum thinning rate is lower with larger step-down size and larger tools. In addition, compared with the initial sheet, the values of hardness, yield strength, and tensile strength have been increased considerably due to the strain hardening. The present work provides useful guidance in improving the product quality formed by incremental sheet forming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emmens WC, Sebastiani G, Van den Boogaard AH (2010) The technology of incremental sheet forming—a brief review of the history. J Mater Process Technol 210(8):981–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Y, Chen X, Liu Z, Sun J, Li F, Li J, Zhao G (2017) A review on the recent development of incremental sheet-forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:2439–2462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raju C, Haloi N, Sathiya Narayanan C (2017) Strain distribution and failure mode in single point incremental forming (SPIF) of multiple commercially pure aluminum sheets. J Manuf Process 30:328–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ambrogio G, Filice L, Fratini L, Micari L (2004) Process mechanics analysis in single point incremental forming. Columbus. Ohio,USA:AIP Conference Proceedings 922(712): 922–927

  5. King JM, Allwood GPF, Duflou J (2005) A structured search for applications of the incremental sheet-forming process by product segmentation. Proc Inst Mech Eng B 219(2):239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Essa K, Hartley (2011) An assessment of various process strategies for improving precision in single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 4(4):401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meier H, Magnus C, Smukala V (2011) Impact of superimposed pressure on dieless incremental sheet metal forming with two moving tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):327–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bambach M, Taleb Araghi B, Hirt G (2009) Strategies to improve the geometric accuracy in asymmetric single point incremental forming. Prod Eng 3(2):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu H, Michael K, Li Y, Liu S, Daniel WJT, Meehan PA (2016) Model predictive control of incremental sheet forming for geometric accuracy improvement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9–12):1781–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobayashi S, Hall IK, Thomsen EG (1961) A theory of shear spinning of cones. Tran ASME, J Eng Indust 83:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeswiet J, Young D (2005) Forming limit diagrams for single point incremental forming of aluminium sheet. Proc Inst Mech Eng B 219(4):359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Young D, Jeswiet J (2004) Wall thickness variations in single point incremental forming. Proc Inst Mech Eng B 218(B11):204–210

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kegg Richard L (1961) A new test method for determination of spinnability of metals. J Eng Ind-T ASME 83(2):119–124

  14. Kim TJ, Yang DY (2000) Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 42(7):1271–1286

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu B, Daniel WJT, Li Y, Liu S, Meehan PA (2014) Multi-pass deformation design for incremental sheet forming: analytical modeling, finite element analysis and experimental validation. J Mater Process Technol 214(3):620–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mirnia MJ, Dariani BM, Vanhove H, Duflou JR (2014) An investigation into thickness distribution in single point incremental forming using sequential limit analysis. Int J Mater Form 7(4):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Daniel WJT, Meehan PA (2017) Deformation analysis in single-point incremental forming through finite element simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Y, Daniel WJT, Liu Z, Lu H, Meehan PA (2015) Deformation mechanics and efficient force prediction in single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 221:100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Behera AK, de Sousa RA, Ingarao G, Oleksik V (2017) Single point incremental forming: an assessment of the progress and technology trends from 2005 to 2015. J Manuf Process 27:37–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian H, Kang D (2003) A study on determining hardening curve for sheet metal. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(12):1253–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nayebi A, Bartier O, Mauvoisin G (2001) Abdi R EI. New methods to determine the mechanical properties of heat treated steels. Int J Mech Sci 43(11):2679–2697

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rojacz H, Mozdzen G, Winkelmann H (2014) Deformation and strain hardening of different steels in impact dominated systems. Mater Charact 90:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan G, Li G (2014) Mechanical property of Ti-6Al-4V sheet in one-sided electric hot incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(5–8):989–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(2):623–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ambrogio G, Gagliardi F, Bruschi S, Filice L (2013) On the high speed single point incremental forming of titanium alloys. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Long Y, Li Y, Sun J, Ille I, Li J, Twiefel J (2018) Effects of process parameters on force reduction and temperature variation during ultrasonic assisted incremental sheet forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1–4):13–24

  27. Kim YH, Park JJ (2002) Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 130:42–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51605258), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2016M592180), Postdoctoral innovation project of Shandong Province (201701011), and State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University (Kfkt2017-04).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liming Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Chen, X., Zhai, W. et al. Effects of process parameters on thickness thinning and mechanical properties of the formed parts in incremental sheet forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 3071–3080 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2469-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2469-9

Keywords

Navigation