Skip to main content
Log in

Wear analysis when machining AISI 304 with ethylene glycol/TIO2 nanoparticle-based coolant

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discuss the tool life and wear mechanism in the end-milling of AISI304 stainless steel using a TiN-coated carbide insert with water-soluble coolant and nanoparticle-based coolant (TiO2/EG). The cutting variables are cutting speed, feed rate, and axial depth. The end-milling operation using nanoparticle-based coolant (TiO2/EG) obtains a high tool life compared with the end-milling operation using water-soluble coolant. In general, the tool failure when milling with water-soluble coolant was flank wear, cracking, chipping, and fracture at a cutting distance of 720 mm, but the milling process with nanoparticle-based coolant (TiO2/EG) showed chipping and fracture at a cutting distance of 1200 mm. According to ISO 8688-2-1989 (E), the wear criterion for milling with water-soluble coolant is reached at an average cutting distance of 800 mm, but milling with nanoparticle-based coolant (TiO2/EG) reached the ISO 8688-2-1989 (E) wear criterion at a cutting distance of 1300 mm. The SEM and EDX spectra show that there are nanolayers of Ti nanoparticles from the nanofluid embedded in and filling the holes in the insert, forming a layer which acts as a thermal bridge for the cutting insert. Attrition and oxidation at the cutting edge were the main tool wear mechanisms present during the end-milling operation with nanoparticle-based coolant (TiO2/EG). An oxide layer formed during the oxidation wear which shielded the cutting tool from impact during the milling process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abou-El-Hossein KA et al (2007) Prediction of cutting force in end-milling operation of modified AISI P20 tool steel. J Mater Process Technol 182(1–3):241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shao H, Liu L, Qu H (2007) Machinability study on 3% Co–12% Cr stainless steel in milling. Wear 263(1):736–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xavior MA, Adithan M (2009) Determining the influence of cutting fluids on tool wear and surface roughness during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):900–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yazid M et al (2011) Surface integrity of Inconel 718 when finish turning with PVD coated carbide tool under MQL. Procedia Eng 19:396–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doshi SJ, Jain P, Mehta N (2013) Prospective applications of nano fluid during machining process. Int J Mach Mach Mater 14(3):257–274

    Google Scholar 

  6. Behrens B-A et al (2007) Precision forging processes for high-duty automotive components. J Mater Process Technol 185(1):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coromant S (1994) Modern metal cutting: a practical handbook. Sandvik Coromant

  8. Astakhov VP, Stanley A (2015) Polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool material: emerging applications, problems, and possible solutions, in traditional machining processes. Springer, pp 1–32

  9. Eriksson L (2008) Design of experiments: principles and applications. MKS Umetrics AB

  10. Ulutan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):250–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Knight WA, Boothroyd G (2005) Fundamentals of metal machining and machine tools, vol 69. CRC Press

  12. Astakhov VP (2006) Tribology of metal cutting, vol 52. Elsevier

  13. Astakhov VP (2007) Effects of the cutting feed, depth of cut, and workpiece (bore) diameter on the tool wear rate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(7–8):631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pham DT et al (2007) An investigation of tube and rod electrode wear in micro EDM drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(1–2):103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez P, Labarga JE (2015) Tool deflection model for micromilling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(1–4):199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liew WYH et al (2014) The effectiveness of palm oil methyl ester as lubricant additive in milling and four–ball tests. Int J Surf Sci Eng 8(2):153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahoo RR, Bhattacharjee S, Das T (2013) Development of nanofluids as lubricant to study friction and wear behavior of stainless steels. In: International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series. World Scientific

  18. Esfe MH et al (2014) Thermal conductivity modeling of MgO/EG nanofluids using experimental data and artificial neural network. J Therm Anal Calorim 118(1):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu W et al (2009) Investigation of thermal conductivity and viscosity of ethylene glycol based ZnO nanofluid. Thermochim Acta 491(1):92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brousseau EB, Dimov SS, Pham DT (2010) Some recent advances in multi-material micro- and nano-manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(1–4):161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khandekar S et al (2012) Nano-cutting fluid for enhancement of metal cutting performance. Mater Manuf Process 27(9):963–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murshed S, Leong K, Yang C (2008) Thermophysical and electrokinetic properties of nanofluids–a critical review. Appl Therm Eng 28(17):2109–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xuan Y, Li Q (2003) Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of nanofluids. J Heat Transf 125(1):151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liew WYH (2010) Low-speed milling of stainless steel with TiAlN single-layer and TiAlN/AlCrN nano-multilayer coated carbide tools under different lubrication conditions. Wear 269(7):617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarıkaya M, Güllü A (2014) Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. J Clean Prod 65:604–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vajjha RS, Das DK, Ray DR (2015) Development of new correlations for the Nusselt number and the friction factor under turbulent flow of nanofluids in flat tubes. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 80:353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2010) An experimental study on the heat transfer performance and pressure drop of TiO< sub> 2</sub>−water nanofluids flowing under a turbulent flow regime. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 53(1):334–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Longo GA, Zilio C (2011) Experimental measurement of thermophysical properties of oxide–water nano-fluids down to ice-point. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 35(7):1313–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding G-L, Jiang W-T, Gao Y-F (2007) A Prediction method for thermal conductivity and electric conductivity of nanofluids based on particles aggregation theory. In: 2007 First International Conference on Integration and Commercialization of Micro and Nanosystems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  30. Philip Selvaraj D, Chandramohan P, Mohanraj M (2014) Optimization of surface roughness, cutting force and tool wear of nitrogen alloyed duplex stainless steel in a dry turning process using Taguchi method. Measurement 49:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ulutan D, Özel T (2013) Determination of tool friction in presence of flank wear and stress distribution based validation using finite element simulations in machining of titanium and nickel based alloys. J Mater Process Technol 213(12):2217–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim DH et al (2014) Experimental study on micro end-milling process of Ti-6AL-4V using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). In: ASME 2014 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the JSME 2014 International Conference on Materials and Processing and the 42nd North American Manufacturing Research Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  33. Gerth J et al (2014) Adhesion phenomena in the secondary shear zone in turning of austenitic stainless steel and carbon steel. J Mater Process Technol 214(8):1467–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kosaraju S, Anne VG (2013) Optimal machining conditions for turning Ti-6Al-4V using response surface methodology. Adv Manuf 1(4):329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Karagüzel U et al (2014) High performance turning of high temperature alloys on multi-tasking machine tools, in new production technologies in aerospace industry. Springer, pp 1–9

  36. Thamizhmanii S, Hasan S (2006) Analyses of roughness, forces and wear in turning gray cast iron. Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 17

  37. Liew K, Yang J, Wu Y (2006) Nonlinear vibration of a coating-FGM-substrate cylindrical panel subjected to a temperature gradient. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(9):1007–1026

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Leong K, Yang C, Murshed S (2006) A model for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids—the effect of interfacial layer. J Nanoparticle Res 8(2):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Uhlmann E, Sammler F (2014) CVD coated diamond tools for the machining of lightweight materials. Adv Mater Res 907:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2013) Crater and flank wear resistance of cutting tools having micro textured surfaces. Precis Eng 37(4):888–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kadirgama K et al (2011) Tool life and wear mechanism when machining Hastelloy C-22HS. Wear 270(3–4):258–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Silliman JD (1992) Cutting and grinding fluids: selection and application. Soc Manuf Eng

  43. Ma XD et al (2014) Wear behavior of Ti (N, C)-Al2O3 coated cemented carbide tools during milling Ti2AlNb-based alloy. Key Eng Mater 589:361–365

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pramanik A et al (2013) Machining and tool wear mechanisms during machining titanium alloys. Adv Mater Res 651:338–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Oliveira AJ, Diniz AE, Ursolino DJ (2009) Hard turning in continuous and interrupted cut with PCBN and whisker-reinforced cutting tools. J Mater Process Technol 209(12):5262–5270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Karagöz S, Fischmeister H (1998) Cutting performance and microstructure of high speed steels: contributions of matrix strengthening and undissolved carbides. Metall Mater Trans A 29(1):205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. König W, Fritsch R, Kammermeier D (1991) Physically vapor deposited coatings on tools: performance and wear phenomena. Surf Coat Technol 49(1):316–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu Z et al (2013) Wear performance of (nc-AlTiN)/(a-Si3N4) coating and (nc-AlCrN)/(a-Si3N4) coating in high-speed machining of titanium alloys under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions. Wear 305(1–2):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Kadirgama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muthusamy, Y., Kadirgama, K., Rahman, M.M. et al. Wear analysis when machining AISI 304 with ethylene glycol/TIO2 nanoparticle-based coolant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82, 327–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7360-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7360-3

Keywords

Navigation