Sensor location optimization for fault diagnosis with a comparison to linear programming approaches
- 353 Downloads
The critical importance of sustaining fault diagnosis, as a major system tool, is unquestionable if the high performance and reliability of increasingly complex engineering systems is to be sustained over time and across a wide operating range. However, it is quite difficult to retain the joint ability of fault detection and isolation as it requires a strong system architecture. That is why, before designing an industrial supervision system, the determination of a system’s monitoring ability based on technical specifications is important as finding the source of the failure is not trivial in systems with a large number of components and complex component relationships. This paper presents an efficient and cost-effective fault detection and isolation (FDI) scheme that evolved from an earlier work . FDI specifications are translated into constraints of the optimization problem considering that the whole set of analytical redundancy relations has been generated, under the assumption that all candidate sensors are installed and later on tested by an optimization algorithm using binary and relaxed versions of linear and nonlinear programming. By doing so, critical information about the presence or absence of a fault is gained in the shortest possible time, with not only confirmation of the findings but also an accurate unfolding in time of the finer details of the fault, thus completing the overall diagnostic picture of the system under test. The proposed scheme is evaluated extensively on a two-tank process used in industry, exemplified by a benchmarked laboratory-scale coupled-tank system.
KeywordsSensor location Optimization Fault detection and isolation Analytical redundancy relations Linear programming Benchmarked laboratory-scale two-tank system
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Sarrate R, Puig V, Escobet T, Rosich A (2007) Optimal sensor placement for model-based fault detection and isolation. Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, USA, December 12–14, pp 2584–2589Google Scholar
- 4.Rahim M A, Khalid H M, Khoukhi A (2012) Nonlinear constrained optimal control problem: a PSO–GA-based discrete augmented Lagrangian approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3810-8
- 5.Bagajewicz M (2000) Design and upgrade of process plant instrumentation. Technomic Publishers, LancasterGoogle Scholar
- 6.Spanache S, Escobet T, Travé-Massuyès L (2004) Sensor placement optimization using genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX’04), Carcassonne, France, June 23–25Google Scholar
- 9.Maquin D, Luong M, Ragot J (1997) Fault detection and isolation and sensor network design. Europ J Autom 31(13):396–406Google Scholar
- 12.Frisk E, Krysander M (2007) Sensor placement for maximum fault isolability. Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX’07), Nashville, TN, USA, May 29–31Google Scholar
- 13.Gertler J (1998) Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 23.Krysander M (2006) Design and analysis of diagnosis systems using structural methods. PhD dissertation, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, SwedenGoogle Scholar