Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparable clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction over and under 40 years of age

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present meta-analysis was to update the literature on the outcomes and complications of ACL reconstruction in patients aged 40 years and older. It has been hypothesized that patients older than 40 years of age may have comparable clinical outcomes to those of younger patients.

Methods

A systematic review of articles from 1996 to 2018 was completed using Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar databases using the keyword terms “anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction” and “middle-aged OR elderly OR over 40 OR age factors.” Functional and clinical outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm and Tegner score and KT-1000 arthrometer), complication and graft failure rate were evaluated.

Results

Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. In total, 306 middle-aged patients and 566 younger patients were included in this study. The mean age of patients > 40 was 49 ± 7 (range 40–75) years with a mean follow-up of 25 ± 9 months (range 12–68). The mean age of younger patients was 26 ± 2.7 (range 15–39) years with a mean post-operative follow-up of 26.7 ± 11.5 months (range 3–64). The results were slightly higher (but no significantly different) towards the younger group in terms of objective IKDC (P = n.s.), Lysholm (P = n.s.) and Tegner (P = n.s.) scores and knee laxity assessment (P = n.s.). Complication rate (P = n.s.) and graft failure (P = n.s.) were low even in this cohort.

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis shows that patients older than 40 years achieve comparable clinical outcomes to those of younger patients following primary ACL reconstruction. This evidence may push the surgeons toward a more aggressive approach in this specific cohort of patients.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arbuthnot JE, Brink RB (2010) The role of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the older patients, 55 years or above. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bait C, Randelli P, Compagnoni R, Ferrua P, Papalia R, Familiari F, Tecame A, Adravanti P, Adriani E, Arnaldi E, Benazzo F, Berruto M, Bonaspetti G, Canata GL, Canè PP, Causero A, Coari G, Denti M, Farè M, Ferretti A, Fravisini M, Giron F, Gobbi A, Madonna V, Manunta A, Mariani PP, Mazzola C, Milano G, Pederzini L, Quaglia F, Ronga M, Schönhuber H, Stefani G, Volpi P, Zanon G, Zini R, Zorzi C, Zaffagnini S (2018) Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(6):1873–1881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker CL, Jones JC, Zhang J (2014) Long-term outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients 60 years and older. Orthop J Sports Med 2(12):1–4

  4. Bali T, Nagraj R, Kumar MN, Chandy T (2015) Patellar tendon or hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in patients aged above 50 years. Indian J Orthop 49(6):615–619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bansal A, Lamplot JD, Vanderberg JT, Brophy RH (2017) Meta-analysis of the risk of infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by graft type. Am J Sports Med 46(6):1500–1508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barber FA, Elrod BF, McGuire DA, Paulos LE (1996) Is an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome age dependent? Arthroscopy 12:720–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett G, Stokes D, White M (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years: allograft versus autograft patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 33:1505–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blyth MJ, Gosal HS, Peake WM, Bartlett RJ (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2- to 8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:204–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bottoni C, Smith E, Shaha J et al (2015) Autograft vs allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical study with a minimum 10-years follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:2501–2509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandsson S, Kartus J, Larsson J, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2000) A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16:178–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37:890–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown A, McAdams R, Harris A, Maffulli N, Safran M (2013) ACL reconstruction in patients aged 40 years and older. Am J Sports Med 41(9):2181–2190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buss DD, Min R, Skyhar M, Galinat B, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL (1995) Nonoperative treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a selected group of patients. Am J Sports Med 23:160–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chambat P, Guier C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Fayard JM, Thaunat M (2013) The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop 37:181–186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ciccotti MG, Lombardo SJ, Nonweiler B, Pink M (1994) Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients: results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 76:1315–1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cinque ME, Chahla J, Moatshe G, DePhilippo NN, Kennedy NI, Godin JA, LaPrade RF (2017) Outcomes and complication rates after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are similar in younger and older patients. Orthop J Sports Med 5(10):1–6

  17. Cinque ME, Dornan GJ, Chahla J, Moatshe G, La Prade RF (2017) High rates of osteoarthritis develop after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 46(8):2011–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Conteduca F, Caperna L, Ferretti A, Iorio R, Civitenga C, Ponzo A (2013) Knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than forty years: comparison between different age groups. Int Orthop 37:2265–2269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahm DL, Wulf CA, Dajani KA, Dobbs RE, Levy BA, Stuart MA (2008) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients over 50 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90:1446–1450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Delincè P, Ghafil D (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:48–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Desai N, Björnsson H, Samuelsson K, Karlson J, Forssblad M (2014) Outcomes after ACL reconstruction with focus on older patients: results from the Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:379–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2000) A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:76–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gee AO, Kinsella S, Huffmann GR, Sennett BJ, Tjoumakaris FP (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged %3e 40 years: a case–control study. Phys Sports Med 41(1):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heier KA, Mack DR, Moseley JB, Paine R, Bocell JR (1997) An analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in middle-aged patients. Am J Sports Med 25:527–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iorio R, Iannotti F, Ponzo A, Proietti L, Redler A, Conteduca F, Ferretti A (2018) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than fifty years: a comparison with a younger age group. Int Orthop 42(5):1043–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL et al (2001) Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Javernick MA, Potter BK, Mack A, Dekay KB, Murphy KP (2006) Autologous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 35:430–434

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, Huston LJ, Hewett TE, Flanigan DC, Spindler KP (2017) Change in anterior cruciate ligament graft choice and outcomes over time. Artroscopy 33(11):2007–2014

    Google Scholar 

  29. Khan RM, Prasad V, Gangone R, Kinmont JC (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years using hamstring autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:68–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim SJ, Park KH, Kim SH, Kim SG, Chun YM (2010) Anterior Cruciate ligament reconstruction improves activity-induced pain in comparison with pain at rest in middle-aged patients with significant cartilage degeneration. Am J Sports Med 38:1343–1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kinugasa K, Mae T, Matsumoto N, Nakagawa S, Yoneda M, Shino K (2011) Effect of patient age on morphology of anterior cruciate ligament grafts at second-look arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 27:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuechle DK, Pearson SE, Beach WR et al (2002) Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age. Arthroscopy 18:845–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Legnani C, Terzaghi C, Borgo E, Ventura A (2011) Management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years and older. J Orthopaed Traumatol 12:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mall NA, Frank RM, Saltzman BR, Cole BJ, Bach BR (2015) Results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years: how do they compare with younger patients? A systematic review and comparison with younger populations. Sports Health 8(2):177–181

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Marquass B, Hepp P, Engel T, Dusing T, Lill H, Josten C (2007) The use of hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:835–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft in patients with articular cartilage damage. Am J Sports Med 25:626–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Osti L, Papalia R, Del Buono A, Leonardi F, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2011) Surgery for ACL deficiency in patients over 50. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:412–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Plancher KD, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Hutton KS (1998) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients who are at least forty years old: a long-term follow-up and outcome study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 80:184–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shelbourne KD, Wilckens JH (1993) Intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the symptomatic arthritic knee. Am J Sports Med 21:685–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. Anz J Surg 73:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stein DA, Brown H, Bartolozzi AR (2006) Age and ACL reconstruction revisited. Orthopedics 29:533–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Struewer J, Frangen TM, Ishaque B, Bliemel C, Efe T, Ruchholtz S, Ziring E (2012) Knee function and prevalence of osteoarthritis after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: long-term follow-up. Int Orthop 36(1):171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Struewer J, Ziring E, Oberkircher L, Schüttler KF, Efe T (2013) Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Int Orthop 37:809–817

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tay SK, Chye Tan AH (2017) Clinical outcomes, return to sports, and patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young and middle-aged patients in an Asian population—a 2 year follow-up study. Arthroscopy 34(4):1054–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  47. Toanen C, Demey G, Ntagiopoulos PG, Ferrua P, Dejour D (2017) Is there any benefit in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 60 years? Am J Sports Med 45(4):832–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Trojani C, Sane JC, Coste JS, Boileau P (2009) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:22–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tsoukas D, Fotopoulos V, Basdekis G, Makridis KG (2016) No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2953–2959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Viola R, Vianello R (1999) Intra-articular ACL reconstruction in the over-40-year-old patient. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:25–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wierer G, Runer A, Hoser C, Herbst E, Gföller P, Fink C (2016) Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(5):1528–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zysk SP, Refior HJ (2000) Operative or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. A follow-up study of 133 patients between the ages of 40 and 59 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:59–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katia Corona.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corona, K., Ronga, M., Morris, B.J. et al. Comparable clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction over and under 40 years of age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 1932–1945 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05680-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05680-3

Keywords

Navigation