No correlation between rotation of femoral components in the transverse plane and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty
- 46 Downloads
It was hypothesized that malrotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will significantly impact clinical outcome.
Eighty-eight consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were prospectively evaluated. They received a cemented posterior stabilized TKA (NexGen, Zimmer/Biomet® Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA). The femoral component was placed in 3° of external rotation referenced to the posterior condylar line. Postoperatively, a CT scan was performed to evaluate rotation of femoral component in the transverse plane. SF-36, KSS, and WOMAC, as well as their range of motion was assessed prior to surgery, after 6 and 24 months. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), as well as range if applicable. Correlation analysis was performed between the placement of the femoral component in the transverse plane and the clinical outcome.
Femoral component placement was on average 0.1° [SD 2.5°, range − 6.5° to + 6.5°] referenced to the surgical transepicondylar line showing a wide range between the two landmarks after surgery. After 6 months, WOMAC category ‘physical function’ correlated significantly with femoral component rotation (r = − 0.28, p = 0.007). After 24 months, WOMAC categories ‘physical function’ and ‘pain’ correlated significantly with femoral rotation (r = − 0.41, p < 0.001; and r = − 0.33, p = 0.001). No significant correlations were found between femoral component rotation and range of motion (r = 0.04), WOMAC category “stiffness”, KSS, as well as SF-36 questionnaires. These reported formally significant correlations were without any clinical relevance.
The study showed that there is a significant patients specific femoral component placement in the transverse plane. Internal or external malrotation of the femoral component does not correlate automatically with poor knee function. The lack of correlation between femoral component position and clinical as well as functional outcome underlines complexity and significant individuality of each patient. The surgeon should be aware of the finding and attention should be paid during surgery when significant divergency is seen between the two landmarks. Soft tissue balancing might be very crucial in these specific patients, which needs to be studied in depth in the future.
Level of evidence
KeywordsFemoral component placement Rotation Clinical outcome Total knee arthroplasty Total knee replacement TKA Observational study
There was no funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
I have no potential conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Council of Brandenburg, Germany (AS 67(bB)/2014).
- 3.Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hernandez-Vaquero D, Noriega-Fernandez A, Fernandez-Carreira JM, Fernandez-Simon JM, De Los Rios JL (2014) Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3127–3134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14Google Scholar
- 39.Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Paternostre F, Koch P (2014) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: anthropometric measurements with CT-based patient-specific instruments planning show high variability of the posterior condylar angle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2995–3002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Verlinden C, Uvin P, Labey L, Luyckx JP, Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H (2010) The influence of malrotation of the femoral component in total knee replacement on the mechanics of patellofemoral contact during gait: an in vitro biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:737–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar