Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of femoral component rotation on the five-year outcome of cemented mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Performing total knee replacement, accurate alignment and neutral rotation of the femoral component are widely believed to be crucial for the ultimate success. Contrary to absolute bone referenced alignment, using a ligament balancing technique does not automatically rotate the femoral component parallel to the transepicondylar axis. In this context we established the hypothesis that rotational alignment of the femoral component parallel to the transepicondylar axis (0° ± 3°) results in better outcome than alignment outside of this range.

Methods

We analysed 204 primary cemented mobile bearing total knee replacements five years postoperatively. Femoral component rotation was measured on axial radiographs using the condylar twist angle (CTA). Knee society score, range of motion as well as subjective rating documented outcome.

Results

In 96 knees the femoral component rotation was within the range 0 ± 3° (neutral rotation group), and in 108 knees the five-year postoperative rotational alignment of the femoral component was outside of this range (outlier group). Postoperative CTA showed a mean of 2.8° (±3.4°) internal rotation (IR) with a range between 6° external rotation (ER) and 15° IR (CI 95). No difference with regard to subjective and objective outcome could be detected.

Conclusion

The present work shows that there is a large given natural variability in optimal rotational orientation, in this study between 6° ER and 15° IR, with numerous co-factors determining correct positioning of the femoral component. Further studies substantiating pre- and postoperative determinants are required to complete the understanding of resulting biomechanics in primary TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:173–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, Lo WH (2002) The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prosthesis—a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 140:149

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT (1993) The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:170–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziehlmann MS, Stacoff A, Roméro J, Krames-de-Quervain I, Stüssi E (2005) Biomechanical background and clinical observations of rotational malalignment in TKA: literature review and consequences. Clin Biomech 20:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boldt JG, Stiehl JB, Hodler J, Zanetti M, Munzinger U (2006) Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 30:420–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanada H, Whiteside LA, Steiger J, Dyer P, Naito M (2007) Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hungerford D, Krackow K (1985) Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:23–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laskin R (1995) Flexion gap configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 10:657–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 40–47

  11. Arima J, Whiteside LA, Mccarthy DS, White SE (1995) Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1331–1334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Churchill D, Incavo SJ, Christopher J, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller MC, Berger R, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Büchel F (2002) Surgical technique of the LCS. In: Hamelynck KJ, Stiehl JB (eds) LCS-mobile bearing knee arthroplasty. Springer, New York, pp 121–135

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matziolis G, Boenicke H, Pfiel S, Wassilew G, Perka C (2011) The gap technique does not rotate the femur parallel to the epicondylar axis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:163–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heesterbeek PJC, Jacobs WCH, Wymenga AB (2009) Effects of the balanced gap technique on femoral component rotation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1015–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee DS, Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ (2011) Effect of balanced gap total knee arthroplasty on intraoperative laxities and femoral component rotation. J Arthroplast 26(5):699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanekasu K, Kondo M, Kadoya Y (2005) Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:193–197

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edwald F (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petrie A (2010) Statistical power in testing a hypothesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1192–1194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berger R, Crossett L, Jacobs J, Rubash H (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat 11:144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boldt JG, Stiehl JB, Munzihger U, Beyerland D, Keblish PA (2006) Femoral component rotation in mobile-bearing total K arthroplasty. Knee 13:284–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dennis D (2008) Measured resection: an outdated technique on total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 31:940–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chiavetta J, Fehring T, Odum S, Griffin W, Bohannon Mason J (2006) Importance of balanced-gap technique in rotation platform knees. Orthopedics 29:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fehring T (2002) Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2005) The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2276–2280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplast 24:570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dennis D, Komistek R, Mahfouz M (2005) Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty; do the polyethylene bearings rotate? Clin Orthop Relat Res 11:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fehring T (2006) Ligamentous balancing in rotating-platform knees. Orthop Traum Surg Res 29:56–59

    Google Scholar 

  30. Colwell C Jr, Chen P, D’Lima D (2010) Extensor malalignment arising from femoral component malrotation in knee arthroplasty: effect of rotating-bearing. Clin Biomech 26:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ball ST, Sanchez HB, Mahoney OM, Schmalried TP (2011) Fixed versus rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. J Arthroplast 26(4):531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schache AG, Baker R, Lamoreux LW (2006) Defining the knee joint flexion-extension axis for purposes of quantitative gait analysis: an evaluation of methods. Gait Posture 24:100–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lovejoy CO (2007) The natural history of human gait and posture. Part 3. The knee. Gait Posture 25:325–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Parratte S, Pagano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 92:2143–2149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Rienmüller.

Additional information

Level of evidence

Level IV, retrospective study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rienmüller, A., Guggi, T., Gruber, G. et al. The effect of femoral component rotation on the five-year outcome of cemented mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 2067–2072 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1628-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1628-0

Keywords

Navigation