Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fibular axes are not a reliable landmark for tibial mechanical axes of osteoarthritic knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The sagittal fibular axis serves as an intra-operative landmark during conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, only a few relevant anatomical studies have been published regarding its use as an extramedullary guide. Furthermore, the correlation between the coronal fibular and tibial mechanical axes in osteoarthritic knees has been only reported once. Here, the hypothesis of this study is that the fibula can be a reliable intra-operative landmark, in the sagittal and coronal planes, among patients with osteoarthritis who have undergone TKA.

Methods

Osteoarthritic knees (n = 62) after TKA were evaluated using three-dimensional image-matching software. The angles between the tibial mechanical axis and the fibular shaft axis were measured in the sagittal and coronal planes. Moreover, correlations between the angles and patient-specific factors were evaluated.

Results

The mean angle between the tibial mechanical and fibular shaft axes was 2.6° ± 2.3° for posterior inclination in the sagittal plane and 0.9° ± 2.0° for varus inclination in the coronal plane. The percentage of subjects with the fibular shaft axis within 2° of the tibial mechanical axis was 17.7 and 69.3 % in the sagittal and coronal planes, respectively. No patient-specific factors were correlated with the angle between the tibial mechanical and fibular shaft axes.

Conclusions

The angle between the tibial mechanical and fibular shaft axes differed among patients, independent of patient-specific factors, and did not appear to be a reliable intra-operative landmark. Surgeons should use values from individual pre-operative evaluations of the axis as reference for conventional TKA.

Level of evidence

Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2004) An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai B, Baez J, Testa N, Kummer FJ (2000) Effect of posterior cut angle on tibial component loading. J Arthroplast 15(7):916–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H (2005) The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee surg Sports Traumatol Arthros 13(3):193–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cashman JP, Carty FL, Synnott K, Kenny PJ (2011) Intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment of the tibial component in the triathlon knee. J Orthop Surg Res 6:44

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chinzei N, Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Kuroda Y, Kitagawa A, Kuroda R, Akisue T, Nishida K, Kurosaka M, Tsumura N (2013) Evaluation of patellofemoral joint in ADVANCE Medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(3):509–515

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dennis DA, Channer M, Susman MH, Stringer EA (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 8(1):43–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Han HS, Chang CB, Seong SC, Lee S, Lee MC (2008) Evaluation of anatomic references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(4):373–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(3):506–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jojima H, Whiteside LA, Ogata K (2004) Effect of tibial slope or posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:194–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim D, Seong SC, Lee MC, Lee S (2012) Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(2):337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38(2):379–385

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laskin RS (2003) Instrumentation pitfalls: you just can’t go on autopilot! J Arthroplasty 18(3 Suppl 1):18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Higaki H, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y (2006) The effect of ankle rotation on cutting of the tibia in total knee arthroplasty. J Joint Bone Surg 88(12):2632–2636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paley D, Pfeil J (2000) Principles of deformity correction around the knee. Orthopade 29(1):18–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajadhyaksha AD, Mehta H, Zelicof SB (2009) Use of tibialis anterior tendon as distal landmark for extramedullary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: an anatomical study. Am J Orthop 38(3):E68–E70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sahin N, Atici T, Ozturk A, Ozkaya G, Ozkan Y, Avcu B (2012) Accuracy of anatomical references used for rotational alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(3):565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider M, Heisel C, Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ (2007) Use of palpable tendons for extramedullary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(2):219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao JJ, Parker Vail T, Wang QJ, Shen H, Chen YS, Wang Q, Jiang Y, Zhang XL (2013) Anatomical references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of three anatomical axes based on 3D reconstructed CT images. Chin Med J 126(20):3840–3844

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugimura N, Ikeuchi M, Izumi M, Aso K, Ushida T, Tani T (2013) The dorsal pedis artery as a new distal landmark for extramedullary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2461-8

  20. Tei K, Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Sasaki H, Shibanuma N, Akisue T, Nishida K, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2012) Novel image-matching software for postoperative evaluation after TKA. Orthopedics 35(12):e1711–e1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsukeoka T, Lee TH, Tsuneizumi Y, Suzuki M (2012) The tibial crest as a practical useful landmark in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(1):283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Waelchli B, Romero J (2001) Dislocation of the polyethylene inlay due to anterior tibial slope in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(5):296–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazunari Ishida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuroda, Y., Ishida, K., Matsumoto, T. et al. Fibular axes are not a reliable landmark for tibial mechanical axes of osteoarthritic knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 3362–3367 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3170-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3170-7

Keywords

Navigation