Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Many surgeons believe that increasing the tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is beneficial with regard to maximal postoperative flexion. Review of the clinical literature, however, does not confirm this hypothesis, neither does it give an answer to the question of how much flexion gain can be expected per degree extra tibial slope. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to evaluate and quantify the influence of tibial slope on maximal postoperative flexion in contemporary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-retaining TKA. Twenty-one cadaver simulations of a standard PCL-retaining TKA were studied while reproducing identical deep flexion femorotibial kinematics as documented by three-dimensional computer-aided videofluoroscopy from patients with well-functioning TKAs of the same design. In each knee the tibial component was consecutively implanted with 0° posterior slope, 4° posterior slope, and 7° posterior slope. Maximal flexion was recorded for each configuration. Average maximal flexion at 0° tibial slope was 104°, and increased significantly to 112° when the same knees were implanted with 4° tibial slope. Increasing the slope further to 7° again significantly improved average maximal flexion to 120°. When postoperative radiographic tibial slope was compared to maximal flexion, an average gain of 1.7° flexion for every degree extra tibial slope was noted. Increasing the tibial slope in PCL-retaining TKA does indeed improve maximal flexion before tibial insert impingement occurs against the femoral bone. The surgeon can expect an average gain of 1.7° flexion for every degree extra tibial slope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi M, Ueo T, Matsusue Y, Akiyama H, Nakamura T (1997) Improved range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56:225–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akagi M, Nakamura T, Matsusue Y, Ueo T, Nishijyo K, Ohnishi E (2000) The bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1626–1633

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F, Elting J, Stiehl J (1996) Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 331:87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H, Whiteside L, Harman M, Hodge A (2003) Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 410:131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) In vivo kinematics of cruciate retaining and substituting knee replacements. J Arthroplasty 12:297–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moermans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. The influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B:50–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bertin K, Komistek R, Dennis D, Hoff W, Anderson D, Lang T (2002) In vivo determination of posterior femoral rollback for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:1040–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonnin M (1990) La subluxation tibial antérieure en appui monopodal dans les ruptures du ligaments croisés antérieure. Etude clinique et bioméchanique. Thèse Med. Lyon, No. 180

  9. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop 356:47–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jordan L, Siegel J, Olivo J (1995) Early flexion routine. An alternative method of continuous passive motion. Clin Orthop 315:231–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim J, Myung-Sang M (1994) Squatting following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 313:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R (1997) Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 97-B:626–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Migaud H, De Ladoucette A, Dohin B, Cloutier J, Gougeon F, Duquennoy A (1996) Influence of the tibial slope on tibial translation and mobility of non-constrained total knee prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82:7–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagamine R, White S, McCarthy D, Whiteside L (1995) Effect of rotational malposition of the femoral component on knee stability kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:265–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schurman D, Parker J, Ornstein D (1985) Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1006–1014

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stiehl J, Komistek RD, Dennis DA (1990) Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 365:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stiehl J, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA (2000) In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 13:13–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uvehammer J, Karrholm J, Brandsson S, Herberts P, Carlsson L, Karlsson J, Regner L (2000) In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty: flat compared with concave tibial joint surface. J Orthop Res 18:856–864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker P (1989) Requirements for successful total knee replacements. Design considerations. Orthop Clin North Am 20:15–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walker P, Garg A (1989) Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis. Clin Orthop 262:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wasielewski R, Galante J, Leighty R, Natarajan R, Rosenberg A (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 299:31–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bellemans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellemans, J., Robijns, F., Duerinckx, J. et al. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 193–196 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0557-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0557-x

Keywords

Navigation