Abstract
Purpose
Navigation systems have recently been developed to achieve highly reliable prosthetic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, component alignment in the sagittal plane is less reliable than that in the coronal plane even when navigation systems are used. Previous reports examining men showed differences in targeted sagittal prosthetic alignments of TKA achieved using the conventional technique and various navigation systems. However, there have been few studies examining the use of this technique in women, who are the primary candidates for TKA.
Methods
Radiographs of the entire lower extremity were obtained from 20 elder women while standing and sagittal prosthetic alignments in TKA were planned using the conventional technique as well as three navigation approaches to establish reference frames, and the observations were compared.
Results
Sagittal alignments simulated using the radiographs for the conventional technique and navigation systems differed within a mean of 3.2° ± 1.7° (mean ± SD) to 6.3° ± 2.0°. The use of different reference points on the distal femoral condyles (insertion point of the intramedullary rod, center of the anteroposterior direction of the femoral condyles, and most distal point of the femoral condyles) for each navigation system resulted in differences in the sagittal plane up to 3.0° ± 1.5°. The use of navigation systems resulted in a more hyperextended position between the femoral and tibial components compared to that for the conventional technique.
Conclusions
Targeted sagittal prosthetic alignments of TKA achieved using the conventional technique and various navigation systems differed in elderly women. The use of different reference points on the distal femoral condyle for navigation systems resulted in different alignment in the sagittal plane. This study showed that alignment tendencies are similar in men and women.
Level of evidence
Prognostic studies, IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47
Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M (2009) Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee 16:22–29
Callaghan JJ, O’Rourke MR, Goetz DD, Schmalzried TP, Campbell PA, Johnston RC (2002) Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:83–88
Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT protocol). J Bone Jt Surg Br 86:818–823
Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2011) Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8
Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Ginn SD, Engh GA (2005) Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:2702–2708
Egol KA, Chang EY, Cvitkovic J, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Mismatch of current intramedullary nails with the anterior bow of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 18:410–415
Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q (2011) Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1695-6
Hasegawa M, Yoshida K, Wakabayashi H, Sudo A (2011) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:904–910
Ishiguchi T (2005) Radiation dose of CT. J Jpn Med Assoc 134:1732
Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:709–714
Jung YB, Lee HJ, Jung HJ, Song KS, Lee JS, Yang JJ (2009) Comparison of the radiological results between fluoroscopy-assisted and navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:286–292
Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH (2007) Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:471–476
Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, Rubash HE (2005) Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 23:536–541
Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:236–243
Matziolis G, Hube R, Perka C, Matziolis D (2011) Increased flexion position of the femoral component reduces the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1704-9
Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Sugama R, Iwakiri K, Kadoya Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K (2008) Sagittal alignment of the lower extremity while standing in Japanese male. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:435–442
Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Ohashi H, Takaoka K (2009) TKA sagittal alignment with navigation systems and conventional techniques vary only a few degrees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1000–1006
Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:419–426
Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G (2004) Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:620–628
Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85:830–835
Stulberg SD (2003) How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:177–184
Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 67:551–556
Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:31–43
Zhang GQ, Chen JY, Chai W, Liu M, Wang Y (2011) Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93:1190–1196
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sugama, R., Minoda, Y., Kobayashi, A. et al. Conventional or navigated total knee arthroplasty affects sagittal component alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 2454–2459 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1889-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1889-6