Skip to main content
Log in

Sagittal alignment of the lower extremity while standing in Japanese male

  • Basic Science
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is little information available regarding the sagittal mechanical axis of the lower extremity of normal subjects under weight-bearing conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the sagittal alignment of the lower extremity under such conditions. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken of the 20 lower extremities of 10 healthy male Japanese volunteers (mean age, 27 years) while standing. The coronal mechanical axis passed through 33.9% medial to the proximal tibial articulating surface. The sagittal mechanical axis passed through 38.0% anterior to the distal femoral condyle and 27.9% anterior to the proximal tibial articulating surface, and also passed 5.2 mm anterior to the intercondylar notch. Our study therefore showed that the coronal and sagittal mechanical axes of the lower extremity do not always pass through the center of the knee. This has important implications for alignment in surgery of lower extremities such as total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews M, Noyes FR, Hewett TE, Andriacchi TP (1996) Lower limb alignment and foot angle are related to stance phase knee adduction in normal subjects: a critical analysis of the reliability of gait analysis data. J Orthop Res 14:289–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooke TD, Li J, Scudamore RA (1994) Radiographic assessment of bony contributions to knee deformity. Orthop Clin North Am 25:387–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 55:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:745–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY (2000) Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1603–1608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:830–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:419–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:551–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:31–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koshino T, Tsuchiya K (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. Clinical and histological observations. Int Orthop 3:37–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stindel E, Briard JL, Merloz P (2002) Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 7:156–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishiguchi T (2005) Radiation dose of CT. J Jpn Med Assoc 134:1732

    Google Scholar 

  17. White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW (1991) Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:582–586

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maurer F, Wassmer G (2006) High tibial osteotomy: does navigation improve results? Orthopedics 29(10 Suppl):130–132

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G (2004) Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthrop 19:620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akio Kobayashi.

Additional information

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minoda, Y., Kobayashi, A., Iwaki, H. et al. Sagittal alignment of the lower extremity while standing in Japanese male. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 435–442 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0528-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0528-z

Keywords

Navigation