Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability-based design optimization of a pouch battery module using Gaussian process modeling in the presence of cell swelling

  • Industrial Application Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pouch battery pack includes multi-stacked battery module structures that protect the inner pouch battery cells from external hazards and deformation that may arise due to swelling effects. Recent research has found that the stack pressure, which is the suppressing force on the battery cells inside the battery module structure, has a significant impact on the degree to which the state-of-health (SOH) degrades and amount that the mechanical properties of pouch batteries change. Consequently, it is important to optimize the battery module structure design with consideration of the SOH and the structural reliability. To identify how significantly design affect the SOH and the mechanical properties, experiments under different levels of initial stack pressure and uncertainty quantification using Gaussian process are explored in this research. Reliability-based design optimization for the pouch battery module optimize the structural design that minimizes volume while satisfying structural reliability and SOH requirements. This work suggests a data-driven approach for achieving reliability-based design using experiment. Further, this research suggests formulations to calculate the performance functions, which are significant factors for reliable design of pouch battery modules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An H, Youn BD, Kim HS (2021) Reliability-based design optimization of laminated composite structures under delamination and material property uncertainties. Int J Mech Sci 205:106561

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghout T, Benbouzid M (2022) A systematic guide for predicting remaining useful life with machine learning. Electronics 11:1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichon BJ, Eldred MS, Mahadevan S, McFarland JM (2013) Efficient global surrogate modeling for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 135:011009

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cannarella J, Arnold CB (2014a) State of health and charge measurements in lithium-ion batteries using mechanical stress. J Power Sources 269:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannarella J, Arnold CB (2014b) Stress evolution and capacity fade in constrained lithium-ion pouch cells. J Power Sources 245:745–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi YH, Lim HK, Seo JH, Shin WJ, Choi JH, Park JH (2018) Development of standardized battery pack for next-generation PHEVs in considering the effect of external pressure on lithium-ion pouch cells. SAE Int J Altern Powertrains 7:195–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MA, Lipu MH, Hussain A, Mohamed A (2017) A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: challenges and recommendations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:834–854

    Google Scholar 

  • He J, Tian Y, Wu L (2022) A hybrid data-driven method for rapid prediction of lithium-ion battery capacity. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 226:108674

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Youn BD, Wang P (2019) Engineering design under uncertainty and health prognostics. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Song J (2021) Reliability-based design optimization using quantile surrogates by adaptive Gaussian process. J Eng Mech 147:04021020

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei Y, Li N, Guo L, Li N, Yan T, Lin J (2018) Machinery health prognostics: a systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 104:799–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Wang Z (2019) Surrogate model uncertainty quantification for reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 192:106432

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Meng Z, Hu H (2015) An adaptive hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 51:1051–1065

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y-H, Li Y-F, Zio E (2016) Reliability assessment of systems subject to dependent degradation processes and random shocks. IIE Trans 48:1072–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu XM, Arnold CB (2016) Effects of cycling ranges on stress and capacity fade in lithium-ion pouch cells. J Electrochem Soc 163:A2501

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Tan C, Leng F (2015) A reliability-based design concept for lithium-ion battery pack in electric vehicles. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 134:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zheng Z, Büyüktahtakın İE, Zhou Z, Wang P (2021) Battery asset management with cycle life prognosis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 216:107948

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo C, Bouquain D, Hibon S, Hissel D (2021) Synthesis of degradation mechanisms and of their impacts on degradation rates on proton-exchange membrane fuel cells and lithium-ion nickel–manganese–cobalt batteries in hybrid transport applications. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 212:107369

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng H, Li Y-F (2019) A review on prognostics and health management (PHM) methods of lithium-ion batteries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 116:109405

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002) How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Struct Equ Model 9:599–620

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WB (2009) Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans, and data analysis, vol 344. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Noh Y, Choi K, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level under input model uncertainty due to limited test data. Struct Multidisc Optim 43:443–458

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Omar N et al (2014) Lithium iron phosphate based battery—assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model. Appl Energy 113:1575–1585

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen CE (2003) Gaussian processes in machine learning. In: Summer school on machine learning, 2003. Springer, pp 63–71

  • Samad NA, Kim Y, Siegel JB, Stefanopoulou AG (2016) Battery capacity fading estimation using a force-based incremental capacity analysis. J Electrochem Soc 163:A1584

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw LH, Ye Y, Tay AA (2016) Integration issues of lithium-ion battery into electric vehicles battery pack. J Clean Prod 113:1032–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan S, Wang GG (2008) Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:1218–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu Y, Feng Q, Liu H (2019) Using degradation-with-jump measures to estimate life characteristics of lithium-ion battery. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 191:106515

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu X, Shen J, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Lin Y (2022) Remaining capacity estimation for lithium-ion batteries via co-operation of multi-machine learning algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 228:108821

    Google Scholar 

  • Shui L, Chen F, Garg A, Peng X, Bao N, Zhang J (2018) Design optimization of battery pack enclosure for electric vehicle. Struct Multidisc Optim 58:331–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Su L et al (2016) Identifying main factors of capacity fading in lithium ion cells using orthogonal design of experiments. Appl Energy 163:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang T, Yuan H (2022) A hybrid approach based on decomposition algorithm and neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 217:108082

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang A, Li J, Lou L, Shan C, Yuan X (2019) Optimization design and numerical study on water cooling structure for power lithium battery pack. Appl Therm Eng 159:113760

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdebenito MA, Schuëller GI (2010) A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 42:645–663

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Liu Y, Li M (2022a) Time-dependent reliability-based optimization for structural–topological configuration design under convex-bounded uncertain modeling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 221:108361

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R-Z et al (2022b) A data-driven roadmap for creep-fatigue reliability assessment and its implementation in low-pressure turbine disk at elevated temperatures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 225:108523

    Google Scholar 

  • Wünsch M, Kaufman J, Sauer DU (2019) Investigation of the influence of different bracing of automotive pouch cells on cyclic lifetime and impedance spectra. J Energy Storage 21:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie L, Ustolin F, Lundteigen MA, Li T, Liu Y (2022) Performance analysis of safety barriers against cascading failures in a battery pack. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 228:108804

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Tang S, Yu C, Xie J, Han X, Ouyang M (2021) Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on wiener process under time-varying temperature condition. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 214:107675

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK (2004a) An investigation of nonlinearity of reliability-based design optimization approaches. J Mech Des 126:403–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK (2004b) A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 82:241–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK (2004c) Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 42:124–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Wang P (2008) Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidisc Optim 36:107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125:221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi K, Yang R-J, Gu L (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidisc Optim 26:272–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J (2018) State of health prediction of lithium-ion batteries: multiscale logic regression and Gaussian process regression ensemble. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 174:82–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Yucesan YA, Dourado A, Viana FA (2021) A survey of modeling for prognosis and health management of industrial equipment. Adv Eng Inform 50:101404

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G et al (2014) Interconnected hollow carbon nanospheres for stable lithium metal anodes. Nat Nanotechnol 9:618–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou T, Mahadevan S (2006) A direct decoupling approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 31:190–200

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Hyundai Motor Group and in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIT, No. 2020R1A2C3003644)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Byeng D. Youn (bdyoun@snu.ac.kr) and Guesuk Lee (gslee88@keti.re.kr) are co-corresponding authors of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byeng D. Youn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Replication of results

A MATLAB code is disclosed for replication of the reliability-based design optimization outlined in Sect. 4. The code implements sampling-based reliability analysis method based of 99 line RBDO code from the reference (Hu et al. 2019). The main code obtains the GP model value from the function (Modeloutput.m) and uses the ‘fmincon’ function in ‘Optimization Toolbox’ in MATLAB libraries for optimization algorithm.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Lei Wang

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(M 7 kb)

(M 1 kb)

(MAT 4282 kb)

(M 1 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1: Statistical moments of SOH

Derivation of the statistical moments of the SOH model by the statistical moments of the capacity fade function.

$$\begin{aligned} {\text{E}} [{\text{SOH}} (t;\;SP_{initial} )] & = \{ 1 - {\text{E}} [F_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]\} \times 100\% = \left\{ {1 - {\text{E}} \left[ {\int_{0}^{t} {f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )dt} } \right]} \right\} \times 100\% \\ & = \left\{ {1 - \int_{0}^{t} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} dt} \right\} \times 100\% = \left\{ {1 - \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} } \right\} \times 100\% \\ \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} {\text{E}} [SOH^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )] & = \{ {\text{E}} [1 - 2F_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} ) + F_{Cap}^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]\} \times (100\% )^{2} \\ & = \{ 1 - 2{\text{E}} [F_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )] + {\text{E}} [F_{Cap}^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]\} \times (100\% )^{2} \\ & = \left\{ {1 - 2{\text{E}} \left[ {\int_{0}^{t} {f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )dt} } \right] + E\left[ {\int_{0}^{t} {f_{Cap}^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )dt} } \right]} \right\} \times (100\% )^{2} \\ & = \left\{ {1 - 2\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} + \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap}^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} } \right\} \times (100\% )^{2} , \\ \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} {\text{Var}} [SOH(t;\;SP_{initial} )] & = {\text{E}} [SOH^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )] - {\text{E}} [SOH(t;\;SP_{initial} )]^{2} \\ & = \left\{ {1 - 2\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} + \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap}^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} } \right\} \times (100\% )^{2} \\ &\quad - \left( {1 - \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} } \right)^{2} \times (100\% )^{2} \\ & = \left\{ {\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap}^{2} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} - \left( {\sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{E}} [f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} )]} } \right)^{2} } \right\} \times (100\% )^{2} \\ & = \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n} {{\text{Var}} [f_{Cap} (t;\;SP_{initial} ) \times 100\% ]} . \\ \end{aligned}$$

Appendix 2: R2

The formulation of the R2 consists of the variability in the response and the outputs. The sum of the variability of the response (Syy) has a variability of the yi (SSR) and the residual of the variability left (SSE).

$$R^{2} = \frac{{SS_{R} }}{{S_{yy} }} = 1 - \frac{{SS_{E} }}{{S_{yy} }} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {(\hat{y}_{i} - \overline{y})^{2} } }}{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {(y_{i} - \overline{y})^{2} } }}.$$

Mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) is a measure that quantify the error with mean of absolute differences and root mean square of differences.

$$MAE = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left| {\hat{y}_{i} - y_{i} } \right|} \quad {\text{and}}\quad RMSE = \sqrt {\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {\hat{y}_{i} - y_{i} } \right)}^{2} } .$$

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, H., Son, H., Choi, Y.H. et al. Reliability-based design optimization of a pouch battery module using Gaussian process modeling in the presence of cell swelling. Struct Multidisc Optim 66, 227 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03662-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03662-1

Keywords

Navigation