Abstract
A structural optimization approach based on beam modeling is formulated and investigated. Its computational efficiency and enhanced design freedom place it as a computationally cheap alternative to continuum topology optimization. The optimization uses a ground structure parametrization and consists of alternating shape and sizing-topology design phases. The sizing-topology phase controls the thicknesses of tapered beams. Linear constraints applied in the shape phase provide regularity and consistency to the structure and enable the shape design variables to benefit from large freedom of movement. A direct comparison to continuum-based topology optimization shows that the beam-based optimization can offer significant computational savings while generating designs that perform similarly to continuum designs. The result of the beam optimization can be utilized also as an effective starting point for further design iterations on a refined continuum model. The reduced computational effort facilitates the optimization of high resolution structures without separating to micro and macro scales, hence non-uniform and non-periodic porous structures can be designed in a single-level optimization process. Furthermore, the beam modeling allows to impose minimum and maximum length scales explicitly without any additional constraints. The applicability of the suggested approach is demonstrated on several cases of stiffness maximization and mechanism design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aage N, Andreassen E, Lazarov BS (2014) Topology optimization using petsc: An easy-to-use, fully parallel, open source topology optimization framework. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(3):565–572
Aage N, Andreassen E, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O (2017) Giga-voxel computational morphogenesis for structural design. Nature 550(7674):84
Achtziger W (2007) On simultaneous optimization of truss geometry and topology. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(4-5):285–304
Alexandersen J, Lazarov B (2015) Topology optimisation of manufacturable microstructural details without length scale separation using a spectral coarse basis preconditioner. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 290:156–182
Andreassen E, Lazarov B, Sigmund O (2014) Design of manufacturable 3d extremal elastic microstructure. Mech Mater 69(1):1–10
Bathe K-J (2006) Finite element procedures Klaus-Jurgen Bathe
Ben-Tal A, Kočvara M, Zowe J (1993) Two nonsmooth approaches to simultaneous geometry and topology design of trusses. In: Topology Design of Structures. Springer, pp 31–42
Bendsøe M, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69(9):635–654
Bendsøe M, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications Springer Science & Business Media
Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224
Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2143–2158
Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2001) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3443–3459
Challis V, Roberts A, Grotowski J (2014) High resolution topology optimization using graphics processing units (gpus). Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):315–325
Christensen PW, Klarbring A (2009) An introduction to structural optimization springer
Clausen A, Andreassen E (2017) On filter boundary conditions in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(5):1147–1155
Cleghorn W, Tabarrok B (1992) Finite element formulation of a tapered timoshenko beam for free lateral vibration analysis. J Sound Vib 152(3):461–470
Deaton J, Grandhi R (2014) A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(1):1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0956-z. ISSN 1615-147X
Eisenberger M (1991) Stiffness matrices for non-prismatic members including transverse shear. Comput Struct 40(4):831–835
Gavranovic S, Hartmann D, Wever U (2015) Topology optimization using gpgpu. Master’s thesis, Master’s thesis, Technical University Munich
Gil L, Andreu A (2001) Shape and cross-section optimisation of a truss structure. Comput Struct 79 (7):681–689
Groen J, Sigmund O (2017) Homogenization based topology optimization for high resolution manufacturable micro structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng
Guest J (2009) Imposing maximum length scale in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37 (5):463–473
Guest J, Prévost J, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(2):238– 254
Lazarov B, Wang F (2017) Maximum length scale in density based topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
Lazarov B, Wang F, Sigmund O (2016) Length scale and manufacturability in density-based topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 86(1-2):189–218
MATLAB (2013) MATLAB version 8.1.0.604 (R2013a). The MathWorks, Natick
Ramos JrA., Paulino G (2016) Filtering structures out of ground structures–a discrete filtering tool for structural design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(1):95–116
Schmidt S, Schulz V (2011) A 2589 line topology optimization code written for the graphics card. Comput Vis Sci 14(6):249–256
Schury F (2013) Two Scale Material Design From Theory to Practice. PhD thesis, University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, p 6
Schury F, Stingl M, Wein F (2012) Efficient two scale optimization of manufacturable graded structures. SIAM J Sci Comput 34(6): B711–B733
Sigmund O (1994) Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: an inverse homogenization problem. Int J Solids Struct 31(17):2313–2329
Sigmund O (2000) A new class of extremal composites. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 48 (2):397–428
Sigmund O (2009) Manufacturing tolerant topology optimization. Acta Mech Sinica 25(2):227–239
Sigmund O, Maute K (2013) Topology optimization approaches. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(6):1031–1055
Smith CJ, Gilbert M, Todd I, Derguti F (2016) Application of layout optimization to the design of additively manufactured metallic components. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(5):1297–1313
Suresh K (2013) Efficient generation of large-scale pareto-optimal topologies. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47 (1):49–61
Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotesa new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373
Wadbro E, Berggren M (2009) Megapixel topology optimization on a graphics processing unit. SIAM Rev 51(4):707–721
Wang F, Lazarov B, Sigmund O (2011) On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(6):767–784
Weaver W, Gere J (2012) Matrix analysis framed structures. Springer science & business media
Wu J, Aage N, Westermann R, Sigmund O (2016a) Infill optimization for additive manufacturing - approaching bone-like porous structures. arXiv:1608.04366
Wu J, Dick C, Westermann R (2016b) A system for high-resolution topology optimization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 22(3):1195–1208
Zegard T, Paulino GH (2013) Toward GPU accelerated topology optimization on unstructured meshes. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(3):473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0920-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Jose Herskovits
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amir, E., Amir, O. Topology optimization for the computationally poor: efficient high resolution procedures using beam modeling. Struct Multidisc Optim 59, 165–184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2058-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2058-4