Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On simultaneous optimization of truss geometry and topology

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper addresses the classical problem of optimal truss design where cross-sectional areas and the positions of joints are simultaneously optimized. Se-veral approaches are discussed from a general point of view. In particular, we focus on the difference between simultaneous and alternating optimization of geometry and topology. We recall a rigorously mathematical approach based on the implicit programming technique which considers the classical single load minimum compliance problem subject to a volume constraint. This approach is refined leading to three new problem formulations which can be treated by methods of Mathematical Programming. In particular, these formulations cover the effect of melting end nodes, i.e., vanishing potential bars due to changes in the geometry. In one of these new problem formulations, the objective function is a polynomial of degree three and the constraints are bilinear or just sign constraints. Because heuristics is avoided, certain optimality properties can be proven for resulting structures. The paper closes with two numerical test examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtziger W (1997) Topology optimization of discrete structures: an introduction in view of computational and nonsmooth aspects. In: Rozvany GIN (ed) Topology optimization in structural mechanics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 57–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger W (1998) Multiple load truss topology and sizing optimization: Some properties of minimax compliance. J Optim Theory Appl 98:255–280

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger W (2006) Simultaneous optimization of truss topology and geometry, revisited. In: Bendsøe M, Olhoff N, Sigmund O (eds) IUTAM Symposium on topological design optimization of structures, machines and materials: status and perspectives. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 413–423

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger W, Bendsøe MP, Ben-Tal A, Zowe J (1992) Equivalent displacement based formulations for maximum strength truss topology design. Impact Comput Sci Eng 4:315–345

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri E, Lombardi M (1998) Minimum weight shape and size optimization of truss structures made of uncertain materials. Struct Multidisc Optim 16:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Barta J (1957) On the minimum weight of certain redundant structures. Acta Tech Acad Sci Hung 18:67–76

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Kočvara M, Zowe J (1993) Two nonsmooth approaches to simultaneous geometry and topology design of trusses. In: Bendsøe M, Soares CM (eds) Topology optimization of structures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Ben-Tal A, Zowe J (1994) Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design. Struct Optim 7:141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke FH (1983) Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. Wiley, New York, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Gu S (2001) Design of truss-structures for minimum weight using genetic algorithms. Finite Elem Anal Des 37:447–465

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs MW, Felton LP (1969) Optimization of truss geometry. ASCE J Struct Div 95:2105–2118

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn W, Gomory R, Greenberg H (1964) Automatic design of optimal structures. J Méc 3:25–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleron P (1964) Minimum weight of trusses. Bygingsstatik Meddelelser 35:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Galante M (1996) Genetic algorithms as an approach to optimize real-world trusses. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:361–382

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gauvin J, Dubeau F (1982) Differential properties of the marginal function in mathematical programming. Math Program Stud 19:101–119

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gill P, Murray W, Saunders M (1997) User’s guide for SNOPT 5.3: A Fortran package for large-scale nonlinear programming. Tech. Rep. NA 97-5, Department of Mathematics, University of California, USA (revised 1998)

  • Hemp W (1973) Optimum structures. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörnlein H (1979) Ein Algorithmus zur Strukturoptimierung von Fachwerkkonstruktionen (in German). Diplomarbeit, Department of Mathematics, Ludwigs-Maximilian-Universität, Munich, Germany

  • Imai K, Schmit L (1981) Configuration optimization of trusses. ASCE J Struct Div 107:745–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U (1990) On the relationship between optimum structural topologies and geometries. Struct Optim 2:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kočvara M, Zowe J (1995) How to optimize mechanical structures simultaneously with respect to geometry and topology. In: Olhoff N, Rozvany G (eds) First world congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Pergamon, Oxford, UK, pp 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kočvara M, Zowe J (1996) How mathematics can help in design of mechanical structures. In: Griffiths D, Watson G (eds) Numerical analysis 1995. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, UK, pp 76–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev O (1978) Optimum truss geometry for two loading conditions. ASCE J Struct Div 104:1203–1210

    Google Scholar 

  • Outrata J, Kocvara M, Zowe J (1998) Nonsmooth approach to optimization problems with equilibrium constraints: theory, applications and numerical results. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen P (1970) On the minimum mass layout of trusses. In: AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 36 (AGARD-CP-36-70), NATO Research and Technology Organisation, pp 11.1–11.17, URL http://www.rta.nato.int/Abstracts.asp, Symposium on Structural Optimization, Istanbul, Turkey, 1969

  • Pedersen P (1972) On the optimal layout of multi-purpose trusses. Comput Struct 2:695–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen P (1973) Optimal joint positions for space trusses. ASCE J Struct Div 99:2459–2476

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringertz U (1985) On topology optimization for trusses. Eng Optim 9:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany G, Bendsøe M, Kirsch U (1995) Layout optimization of structures. Appl Mech Rev 48:41–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg K (1981) Optimization of geometry in truss design. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 28:63–80

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sved G (1954) The minimum weight of certain redundant structures. Aust J Appl Sci 5:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderplaats G, Moses F (1972) Automated design of trusses for optimum geometry. ASCE J Struct Div 98:671–690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Applied Mathematics, University of Dortmund, Vogelpothsweg 87, 44221, Dortmund, Germany

    Wolfgang Achtziger

Authors
  1. Wolfgang Achtziger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Achtziger.

Additional information

This research was supported by the German-Czech DAAD–AV ČR project D–CZ 7/05–06.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Achtziger, W. On simultaneous optimization of truss geometry and topology. Struct Multidisc Optim 33, 285–304 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0092-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0092-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation