Dear Editor,
Originating in China in late 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic reached Europe in March 2020. In its most severe expression, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia presents as the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mandating intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) [1]. Bacterial coinfections, well documented in other respiratory viral infections, notably influenza [2], have not yet been investigated at the onset of COVID-19 pneumonia.
To address this, we conducted a prospective cohort study in three ICUs of Lyon University-Affiliated Hospital. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (Comité d’Ethique du CHU de Lyon, N°20-42). Consecutive patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring IMV for ARDS (Berlin definition) were recruited from March 16th to April 6th 2020, and were followed-up for 28 days. Endotracheal aspirates (ETA) or bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) were sampled in the 24 h following tracheal intubation, and microbiology analyses were performed, including conventional culture and a multiplex PCR assay (BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel; bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) [3]. Early bacterial coinfection was defined as the identification of at least 1 bacterial species by conventional culture and/or PCR, with a threshold of ≥ 105 colony forming units or genome copies per milliliter in ETA, and ≥ 104 in BAL, respectively.
From 56 eligible patients, the 47 consecutive patients with respiratory secretions sampled in the 24 h following tracheal intubation were predominantly male (sex ratio: 3.3), most were younger than 70 years of age (n = 32, 68.1%), with a high prevalence of obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg.m−2, n = 23, 48.9%). Using ETA (n = 45) and BAL (n = 2), early bacterial coinfection was documented in 13 patients [27.7%, by PCR (n = 12) and conventional culture (n = 1)]; the median interval between intubation and tracheal sampling was 3 h [IQR (1–9)]. Among the 39 patients with both standard culture and PCR, 29 (74.4%) had both negative culture and negative PCR and 10 (25.6%) both positive culture and positive PCR. There was no significant difference in either characteristics and outcomes according to the presence of coinfection (Table 1). Three bacterial species accounted for ≥ 90% of all identified bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (all methicillin-sensitive), Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Coinfection with multiple bacterial species was documented in 5 patients (10.6%). All coinfected patients were treated appropriately with first-line beta-lactam antibiotics.
COVID-19 patients have been shown to display a complex immune dysfunction that could render them susceptible to secondary infections [4]. The present study is the first to investigate early bacterial coinfections (involving common bacterial species) in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. To our knowledge, such a high prevalence of coinfections have never been documented in other viral infections such as influenza. Of note, this prevalence might be underestimated in view of the high proportion of patients receiving initial empiric antibiotherapy. Also, due to the limited sample size, the high concordance we observed between conventional culture and PCR must be interpreted with caution. As another limitation of the present study, it can be challenging to differentiate infection from colonization in these patients. However, we attempted to account for this by considering the upper range of commonly accepted thresholds of bacterial quantification in respiratory secretions.
These data are also in line with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines [5], arguing for initial empirical antibiotic coverage in COVID-19 patients until microbiology results become available. Further research is needed to extend these findings in larger cohorts, and to determine the impact of early microbiological analyses, on antibiotic stewardship in patients with ARDS related to COVID-19.
References
Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A et al (2020) Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5394
Martin-Loeches I, Schultz JM, Vincent J-L et al (2017) Increased incidence of co-infection in critically ill patients with influenza. Intensive Care Med 43:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4578-y
Yugueros-Marcos J, Barraud O, Iannello A et al (2018) New molecular semi-quantification tool provides reliable microbiological evidence for pulmonary infection. Intensive Care Med 44:2302–2304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5417-0
Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Netea MG, Rovina N et al (2020) Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.009
Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM et al (2020) Surviving sepsis campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5
Acknowledgments
We thank Myriam Chabani and Victor Bibollet for their help data collection, and the intensivists and the nursing staff of the ICUs for their commitment to patient care. We also thank Philip Robinson (Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l’Innovation, Hospices Civils de Lyon) for help in manuscript preparation.
Funding
This study had no specific funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and design: LK, MS, LA. Acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data: LK, CM, OD, MS, LA. Statistical analysis: LK. Drafting of the manuscript: LK, LA. Critical revision of the manuscript: LK, CM, OD, MS, LA.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
CM has received lecture fees from bioMérieux. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest pertaining to this study.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee (Comité d’Ethique du CHU de Lyon, N°20-42) with a waiver for informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kreitmann, L., Monard, C., Dauwalder, O. et al. Early bacterial co-infection in ARDS related to COVID-19. Intensive Care Med 46, 1787–1789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06165-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06165-5