Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
B cells play an important role in driving the development of type 1 diabetes; however, it remains unclear how they contribute to local beta cell destruction during disease progression. Here, we use gene expression profiling of B cell subsets identified in inflamed pancreatic tissue to explore their primary functional role during the progression of autoimmune diabetes.
Methods
Transcriptional profiling was performed on FACS-sorted B cell subsets isolated from pancreatic islets and the pancreatic lymph nodes of NOD mice.
Results
B cells are highly modified by the inflamed pancreatic tissue and can be distinguished by their transcriptional profile from those in the lymph nodes. We identified both a discrete and a core shared gene expression profile in islet CD19+CD138– and CD19+CD138+ B cell subsets, the latter of which is known to have enriched autoreactivity during diabetes development. On localisation to pancreatic islets, compared with CD138– B cells, CD138+ B cells overexpress genes associated with adhesion molecules and growth factors. Their shared signature consists of gene expression changes related to the differentiation of antibody-secreting cells and gene regulatory networks associated with IFN signalling pathways, proinflammatory cytokines and Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation. Finally, abundant TLR7 expression was detected in islet B cells and was enhanced specifically in CD138+ B cells.
Conclusions/interpretation
Our study provides a detailed transcriptional analysis of islet B cells. Specific gene signatures and interaction networks have been identified that point towards a functional role for B cells in driving autoimmune diabetes.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Type 1 diabetes is an organ-specific autoimmune disease characterised by immune-mediated beta cell destruction, resulting in insulin deficiency. Among current immune-targeting therapies, B cell depletion therapy (rituximab) has successfully temporarily delayed the loss of C-peptide in type 1 diabetes [1] and this success has also been mirrored in numerous animal studies [2, 3]. Immunohistological analysis has revealed the presence of pancreatic CD20+ B cells in individuals with type 1 diabetes [4, 5] and their number correlates with age at diagnosis. Younger children (<13 years at disease onset) have the greatest proportion of infiltrating CD20+ cells and more aggressive disease [6], highlighting the need for further interrogation of the role of B cells in immune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta cells.
In the NOD mouse model, B1 B cells that are present in the pancreas early in the disease process are important in the initiation of type 1 diabetes [7, 8], whereas established islet B cells have a more follicular phenotype [9]. During established insulitis, B cells become CD5 negative and upregulate CD138 (syndecan-1) [10, 11], a common plasma cell marker [12].
We have described distinct pancreatic populations of B cells in NOD mice during a stage of aggressive insulitis that are distinguished by the expression of CD138, IgD and CD19 [11, 13] (see Electronic supplementary material [ESM] Table 1). These subsets included a population of B cells that expressed CD138 at an intermediate level and importantly were enriched with insulin-specific autoreactive B cells [11]. A small subset of proliferating B cells that resemble a murine plasmablast phenotype [14], characterised by high levels of expression of CD138 and CD44 and lower levels of expression of CD19, were noted [13]. We also identified a CD138+ subset that showed reduced CD19 and IgD expression [11]. Here, we use comprehensive transcriptional analyses of these distinct B cell subsets to explore their primary functional role at the tissue level during the development of autoimmune diabetes.
Methods
Mice
NOD/Caj mice, originally from Yale University, were bred and maintained in specific pathogen-free isolators or scantainers at Cardiff University, UK. All animals received water and food ad libitum and were housed in a 12 h dark/light cycle. The animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and associated guidelines. Female 16- to 20-week-old NOD mice were chosen at random and processed in groups for gene array experiments. Experiments were performed unblinded.
Tissue preparation
Pancreatic lymph nodes (PLNs) were disrupted and pancreases were inflated as previously described [11, 13]. See ESM Methods for further details.
Flow cytometry and fluorescent activated cell sorting
Cells were stained as previously described [11, 13]. See ESM Methods for further details of the antibodies used. Cell suspensions were either acquired on an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analysed using FlowJo v10.1 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) or sorted on a FACSAria III (BD Biosciences).
Immunofluorescence
Pancreatic tissues were frozen in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) medium, sectioned at 7–10 μm thickness and stained as previously described [13]. See ESM Methods for further details.
RNA isolation
RNA was isolated from cells using the Qiagen RNeasy Micro Kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. See ESM Methods for further details.
Clariom S array
RNA amplification was achieved using low-cycle PCR followed by linear amplification using T7 in vitro transcription technology. See ESM Methods for further details.
Gene array analyses
CEL files generated from Affymetrix Clariom S mouse arrays were imported into the Bioconductor package oligo v1.56.0 [15] or Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) software version 4.0 (ThermoFisher). First, DNA microarray analyses were performed in R v4.0.3 and normalised using the Robust Multichip Average (RMA) algorithm [16]. Differential expression analysis was performed using the linear models for microarray data (limma) package v3.48.1 [17]. Linear models were determined for each transcript cluster and global variance was calculated using an empirical Bayes approach [18]. A moderated t statistic was computed for each transcript cluster with the resulting p values corrected using the Benjamini–Hochberg method to control for the false discovery rate (FDR). See ESM Methods for more details.
Quantitative PCR
Samples were prepared for quantitative PCR (qPCR) using a EPMotion P5073 liquid handling robot (Eppendorf) and amplified in duplicate alongside a housekeeping gene on a ViiA7 real-time PCR system (ThermoFisher). Normalisation of samples was performed by dividing the value of the gene of interest by the value of the housekeeping gene (Gapdh) (ΔCt) and a mean ΔCt is presented.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed in R software (https://www.r-project.org/index.html) or GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Genes were discarded if differential expression was not significant (adjusted p value <0.05; Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing). Other statistical tests used are provided in the figure legends.
Results
Abundance of B cell subsets in the pancreas during autoimmune diabetes development
We have previously described B cell subsets localised in pancreatic islets, differentiated according to the expression of CD138, among which a CD19+CD138+ population (intermediate expression levels) is enriched in autoreactive B cells [11]. We investigated the abundance of CD19+CD138– and CD19+CD138+ islet B cells in NOD mice during diabetes development (Fig. 1). Compared with the abundance of pancreatic CD19+CD138– (mean ± SEM 7.1 ± 1.09%) and CD19+CD138+ (mean ± SEM 3.6 ± 2.7%) B cells in younger NOD mice (6–8 weeks) [13], there was a significant increase in both CD19+CD138– (p<0.01) and CD19+CD138+ (p<0.05) B cells in 16- to 20-week-old NOD mice (Fig. 1a) and a shift towards a 1:1 ratio as islet inflammation progressed (p=0.07) (Fig. 1b). At diabetes onset, we identified both CD138– and CD138+ B cells in the remaining insulin-containing islets and in immune cell clusters (Fig. 1c), using CD20 as a B cell marker. CD138+ cells, with no CD20+ expression, were also evident (Fig. 1c), corroborating our previous phenotyping by flow cytometry [11]. Overall, both CD19+CD138– and CD19+CD138+ B cells were prominent in the pancreatic islet immune infiltrates of NOD mice.
CD19+CD138– and CD19+CD138+ B cells have similar transcriptional profiles
Previously, in NZB/W mice, splenic CD19+CD138+ mature B cells were described at an early intermediary antibody-secreting cell (ASC) stage [19]. We now show that NOD splenic CD19+CD138+ B cells also display a mature follicular B cell phenotype (ESM Fig. 1a–c), in common with islet B cells, during established insulitis (IgD+IgMlow) [9].
We determined the transcriptional profile of the different B cell subsets localised in the pancreas by gene expression array. B cell populations (CD19+CD138–, CD19+CD138+, CD19–CD138+) were purified by FACS (ESM Fig. 1d) from pancreatic islets and the PLNs of pooled 16- to 20-week-old female NOD mice followed by isolation of RNA. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with more than a twofold change with an FDR<0.05 were compared between CD19+CD138– and CD19+CD138+ B cells from PLNs and pancreatic islets (Fig. 2). Sdc1 (encoding CD138) was the only DEG that was upregulated (FDR<0.05) (Fig. 2a) in the CD19+CD138+ subset, in both PLNs and islets. The heatmap in Fig. 2a demonstrates DEGs with an uncorrected p value of <0.001. The upregulated genes in both tissues were compared with data in the Immunological Genome Project (ImmGen) database [20]. CD19+CD138+ B cells were associated with more mature ImmGen B cell subsets, including memory and plasmablast-like B cells (ESM Fig. 1e). An ASC signature gene, Endou [21], was also upregulated in these cells.
Both innate lymphocytes and fully differentiated plasma cells are enriched in the CD19–CD138+ cell subset in pancreatic islets
Previously, we suggested that CD19–CD138+ cells located within the pancreas are a heterogenous mix of B cells differentiating into ASCs [13], owing to the expression of CD138. However, because of the absence of CD19 and the observation that other cell types can express CD138 [22, 23], we wanted to ascertain if the CD19–CD138+ cell subset expresses ASC- or B cell-associated genes. In PLNs, CD19–CD138+ B cells were compared with CD19+CD138– B cells in the gene array dataset, identifying a significant number of DEGs between these populations (1658 genes; FDR<0.05, more than a twofold change) (ESM Table 2). The top 20 upregulated genes (by fold change) in the CD19–CD138+ subset were clustered (ESM Fig. 2a), revealing that some of the highly upregulated genes (e.g. Il7r, Cd7, Klrb1b) are abundantly expressed by innate lymphocytes [24, 25]. These findings were replicated in the B cells from the pancreatic islets (ESM Fig. 2b, ESM Table 3). Jchain (expressed in plasma cells [20]) was also highly upregulated in CD19–CD138+ cells (ESM Fig. 2a, ESM Tables 2 and 3). Other DEGs, including Tmem176a and Tmem176b, are expressed both in plasma cells [26] and in innate lymphoid cells [27]. Upregulated genes in CD19–CD138+ cells from both tissues were compared with ASC signature genes [21], with shared genes found in both tissues (Fig. 2b). Overexpressed genes included Prdm1 (B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 [BLIMP-1]) and Xbp1 (X-box binding protein 1 [XBP-1]) and are essential for plasma cell differentiation [28, 29]. The top plasma cell-related genes (Fig. 2c) were upregulated by more than sevenfold (FDR<0.05). As the Jchain gene encodes the protein component of IgA, we examined if IgA+ cells are present in the pancreatic tissue of NOD mice. Occasional groups of IgA+ cells, mostly CD138+, were seen in immune cell clusters (Fig. 2d). Thus, the CD19–CD138+ subset identified in both PLN and pancreatic tissue in NOD mice contains cells with a more differentiated plasma cell phenotype and a population of innate-like lymphocytes.
B cell populations are significantly modified by the inflamed pancreatic environment
As CD19+ B cells represent the more abundant population [13] (vs CD19-CD138+ cells), we focused on the CD19+ B cells in pancreatic islets, investigating the effects of the inflamed environment comparing the B cell subsets with those in the PLNs (Fig. 3). In the CD19+CD138– B cell subset, we identified 437 upregulated and 190 downregulated DEGs (Fig. 3a). Similarly, in the CD19+CD138+ B cell subset, 427 DEGs were upregulated and 274 DEGs were downregulated (Fig. 3a) (FDR<0.05, more than a twofold change). While both B cell subsets from pancreatic islets and PLNs shared DEGs (388 genes, 41.3%, ESM Table 4 [Tab 3]), we identified a substantial number of DEGs that distinguished these two subsets (Fig. 3b, ESM Table 4 [Tab 4, 5]), with individual upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) genes highlighted in volcano plots (Fig. 3c,d). Hierarchical clustering of the top 50 shared DEGs (Fig. 3e) in both subsets demonstrated that the majority of DEGs were upregulated. Finally, principal component analysis, measuring the transcriptional distance between the subsets in both tissues, revealed two discrete clusters. This confirmed the distinction between the populations found in PLNs and pancreatic islets (Fig. 3f) but highlighted the close relationships between the different CD19+ B cell subsets located within the respective tissues, particularly in the PLNs. Taken together these data indicate that both B cell subsets are heavily influenced by their environment yet are transcriptionally similar when resident in the islets but significantly different from their counterparts in PLNs.
B cells localised in the pancreas are enriched in genes associated with antibody-secreting cells
We noted that the key genes regulating plasma cell differentiation, Prdm1 and Irf4 [30, 31], were upregulated in both islet B cell subsets. Therefore, we compared the gene sets from both B cell populations with genes associated with the ASC differentiation pathway, either as activated or repressed targets [21, 32] (Fig. 4).
Activated genes in the ASC list were compared with DEGs in both gene sets and, surprisingly, both subsets had a modest number of genes in common with genes activated in the ASC pathway (Fig. 4a), with the majority of the shared DEGs being activated (FDR<0.05, more than a twofold change) (Fig. 4b). Additionally, Ly6a (stem cell antigen-1 [Sca-1]), a surface antigen used for plasma cell gating strategies in mice [33, 34], was highly upregulated (Fig. 3c,d). Genes that were significantly altered in expression (FDR<0.01) and are part of an ASC gene signature [21] were identified in both CD19+CD138– (green) and CD19+CD138+ (blue) B cells (Fig. 4). Activation of the genes Ly6a and Prdm1 in both subsets in pancreatic islets compared with PLNs was confirmed by qPCR (ESM Fig. 3).
We next assessed the repressed genes identified in our subsets, previously identified as downregulated in ASC [21, 32]. Again, some genes were shared by the populations, while others were exclusive to one or the other (FDR<0.05, more than a twofold change) (Fig. 4c). Of the 92 shared genes, 23 were induced, including several IFN-related genes (listed in ESM Table 5 [Tab 6]). However, key genes involved in antigen presentation and B cell activation, including Ciita and Cd40, were repressed on localisation of the B cells to pancreatic islets (arrows, Fig. 4d).
We next studied whether CD138+ B cells had more mature ASC-like changes on translocation to islets by interrogating the datasets for patterns in the levels of expression of ASC-related genes or for exclusive genes in either subset. We show each B cell gene set that was upregulated and associated with ASCs (ESM Fig. 4). Key genes (Prdm1 and Irf4) were induced to a similar extent (vs their respective PLN subsets). A selection of genes unique to each cell subset was also identified. Genes selectively expressed in CD19+CD138– B cells included Alcam (activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule) and Pycr1 (CD19+CD138+, FDR>0.1) (ESM Fig. 4), whereas CD19+CD138+ B cells selectively expressed Tns3 and Epcam (CD19+CD138–, FDR>0.1). Furthermore, in the CD19+CD138+ gene set, Cd9 expression was increased compared with the CD19+CD138– gene set (FDR<0.05, more than a twofold change [ESM Table 5, Tab 7]). Similarly, among the repressed genes, Bcl6, Il4ra and Ms4a1 (CD20) were restricted to the CD19+CD138+ subset (ESM Table 5 [Tab 8]). Several genes were significantly changed in the CD19+CD138– cells, but by more than twofold. ESM Table 5 (Tab 7, 8) shows all differentially expressed ASC-related genes with an FDR<0.05, irrespective of the extent of the fold change. Of note, Pax5, a gene directly repressed by Prmd1, was significantly downregulated by >1.5-fold in both subsets. These data show that CD138+ B cells have substantially more genes repressed on islet translocation than CD138– B cells, but they do not show expression of a single group of genes characteristic of a more mature ASC cell. Overall, these data suggest that, on arrival in the inflamed environment in pancreatic islets, both B cell subsets favour the induction of key ASC-associated genes.
Identifying gene expression differences in CD19+CD138+ B cells in pancreatic islets
Another goal of our gene profiling experiments was to identify any additional transcriptional changes in the CD19+CD138+ B cell subset. We therefore extended our investigation using gene ontology (GO) analysis, employing the PANTHER classification system [35] for an ‘in-depth’ analysis of the DEGs in both B cell subsets (Fig. 5). Genes either up or downregulated in each set (FDR<0.05, more than a twofold change) were tested for over-represented biological processes. The bubble plot in Fig. 5a shows the most significant biological processes from DEGs either upregulated (top 20, red) or downregulated (top 20, blue) in CD19+CD138+ B cells. Gene numbers are plotted against GO terms, while FDR p values are indicated by the bubble size. GO terms in the double-positive B cells were compared with gene numbers and corrected p values in the upregulated (yellow) and downregulated (green) DEGs in CD19+CD138– B cells. Figure 5b shows a bubble plot of the top GO terms for CD19+CD138– B cells, with gene numbers and corrected p values compared with the double-positive B cells. A full description of GO terms is provided in ESM Fig. 5.
Although many of the top GO terms overlapped, we observed some important differences. The CD19+CD138– B cell subset was enriched in upregulated genes associated with metabolic processes. In the CD19+CD138+ B cells, more B cell activation genes were downregulated, but ‘programmed cell death’ or the ‘apoptotic process’ genes were upregulated. Therefore, we studied the genes associated with these processes and selected 30 genes that were significantly expressed in CD19+CD138+ cells (compared with CD19+CD138– cells; FDR>0.05) (Fig. 5c). However, genes such as Spp1 and Lmna gave a corrected p value <0.08 in the CD19+CD138– gene set (data not shown). Therefore, we eliminated genes (Fig. 5c) that were expressed in single-positive B cells and had a p<0.05 (not corrected), identifying eight genes (Igf2r, Stil, Tnfrsf1a, Fam72a, Serpinb9, Erbb3, Rnf7 and Tcp1) expressed exclusively in CD19+CD138+ B cells. The top three DEGs expressed only in CD19+CD138+ B cells are presented in Fig. 5d.
Taken together, these data suggest that CD19+CD138+ B cells have a subtle but clear difference in their gene profile compared with CD19+CD138– B cells on trafficking to the pancreas. On arrival in the vicinity of islets, double-positive B cells appear to overexpress genes associated with adhesion, growth factors and later stages of the cell cycle.
CD19+ B cell subsets acquire an innate immune signature on translocation to pancreatic islets
We next explored enriched gene regulatory networks in B cells localised in the pancreas using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) (Fig. 6). This provided the top five canonical pathways that displayed significant increases in activation (corrected p<0.01). The activation status of each canonical pathway, for each B cell subset, is denoted by the z score (orange = activated) in Fig. 6a, with corresponding p values for each pathway in Fig. 6b. Activated pathways indicated that IFN-induced gene expression is enriched in B cells. We used the activated IPA pathways and GO analysis to identify signature genes upregulated by CD19+CD138– (Fig. 6c) and CD19+CD138+ (Fig. 6d) B cells after translocation. Most genes were significantly upregulated in both B cell subsets, including cytokines encoded by Il6 (IL-6), Il1b (IL-1β) and Ccl4 (macrophage inflammatory protein 1β [MIP-1β]), transcription factors encoded by Irf7 and Prdm1 and key antiviral proteins encoded by Mx1 and Mx2. Other overexpressed genes included Tlr7 and Pdcd1 (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1]); we confirmed the upregulation of Tlr7 and Irf7 in both B cell subsets by qPCR (Fig. 6e). Three DEGs were upregulated in the CD19+CD138– gene set but not in that from CD19+CD138+ cells (FDR>0.1), including Alcam (also identified above) and the early cell cycle gene Cdk6 (Fig. 6f). Specific to CD19+CD138+ B cells was upregulation of the viral response genes Lcn2 and Mfsd6, the latter of which is involved in MHC I antigen presentation (Fig. 6g).
Pancreatic-localised B cells express Toll-like receptor 7
Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7)-deficient mice are protected from autoimmune diabetes [36] and, in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus, TLR7 can drive autoreactive naive B cells to differentiate into pathogenic plasma cell precursors [37]. Here, we observed relatively high Tlr7 gene expression in B cells (Fig. 6, heatmap) localised to the pancreas and hypothesised that this would be a detectable protein. We confirmed the expression of the TLR7 protein in the pancreas of NOD mice, in insulin-expressing beta cells in the remaining insulin-containing islets (Fig. 7a) and in many B cells with abundant CD20 expression (Fig. 7b). Double-positive (CD20+TLR7+) B cells were also observed in or around insulin-deficient islets (Fig. 7c). Furthermore, in the remaining islet structures and immune cell clusters, we observed both CD20+TLR7+ cells and CD20–TLR7+ cells in proximity (Fig. 7d). We demonstrated TLR7 expression in islet B cells using flow cytometry (Fig. 7e–g), enabling demarcation of our B cell subsets in PLNs and pancreatic islets (Fig. 7e). Expression of TLR7 was significantly increased in both islet CD19+ B cell subsets compared with their PLN counterparts, corroborating our gene expression observations (Fig. 7f, g). Of note, CD19–CD138+ cells (grey gate) showed little TLR7 expression (data not shown). However, we observed a higher level of expression of TLR7 in CD19+CD138+ B cells than in the CD19+CD138– subset in pancreatic islets, which was not observed in PLNs (Fig. 7g).
Discussion
We show that, in NOD mice with established insulitis, the gene expression profiles of B cells are dramatically influenced by the pancreatic environment, with inflammation favouring the upregulation of IFN-associated genes and the induction of genes promoting plasma cell differentiation. Gene expression analysis revealed a clear distinction between the populations of B cells found in PLNs and those infiltrating islets during disease development. Activated pathways were associated with innate immune signalling and included the upregulation of Irf7 and Tlr7 alongside proinflammatory cytokines including Il6, Il1b and Ccl4. Interestingly, repressed genes were associated with antigen presentation and activation, suggesting that B cells localised in the pancreas may primarily facilitate local beta cell damage by producing proinflammatory cytokines.
Our approach also highlighted a population of CD138int cells enriched in pancreatic islets (compared with secondary lymphoid organs) of NOD mice, which we have previously described as a heterogeneous population of plasmablast or plasma-like cells, with downregulated CD19 and IgD but encompassing a population of insulin-specific B cells [11]. These CD138+ cells remain in the minority and are not selectively expanded in the pancreas during diabetes development [13] (data not shown). However, our data suggest that further expression markers, in addition to CD19 and CD138, are required to identify the bona fide B cells or plasma cells in this CD19–CD138+ pancreatic population, as we observed DEGs including both key innate lymphocyte genes and plasma cell-related genes in the gene set comparison. Recent work shows that CD138 is a marker for NKT17 cells [22], suggesting that, in pancreatic islets, such cells might be present during diabetes development. In support of this, the Il17re gene was activated to a greater extent in the CD138+CD19– population than in CD19+ B cells. Furthermore, the CD138+ cell population is enriched in differentiated plasma cells, as Jchain was highly upregulated and a small number of IgA+ plasma cells were detected. Notably, in other autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, IgA+ B cells are enriched in inflammatory lesions in the CNS in both humans [38] and mice [39], with a role in attenuating disease via IL-10 production. The roles, significance and origin of IgA+ plasma cells in the pancreas are currently unknown and require further investigation.
Comparing the gene expression profile of CD19+ B cells in the pancreas with equivalent cells in PLNs revealed the induction of both IFN- and plasma cell-related genes. Blimp-1 and IFN regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) are key transcription factors regulating plasma cell differentiation [28, 40] and the expression of Blimp-1 leads to repression of the B cell commitment gene Pax5, among others [32]. Blimp-1 directly targets the MHC II regulating gene Ciita [30], which we show is highly repressed in B cells that have migrated to pancreatic islets. Repression of Pax5 is required for the initiation of ASC development [41] and it is repressed in B cells present in the pancreas (FDR<0.05, >1.5-fold change). However, no difference was seen in the expression of the transcription factor XBP-1, a target of Pax-5 that acts downstream of Blimp-1 to regulate the unfolded protein response [29, 42], a process essential for the secretion of immunoglobulins. These results imply that CD19+ B cells located in the pancreas upregulate genes associated with antibody secretion but do not secrete immunoglobulins. Based only on gene expression profiles, we cannot discern whether pancreatic CD19+ B cells are precursors or pre-plasmablasts, as many genes in this pathway are transitional or are expressed continuously [26]. Functional assays and assessment of protein expression using CD19+ B cells from both lymph nodes and pancreas may provide more definitive evidence.
Blimp-1 and IRF4 can be activated by factors other than B cell receptor signalling, such as IL-21 and IL-6 [43] or IFNα and IL-6 [44], cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. IL-21 can directly induce Prdm1 gene expression, requiring both signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and IRF4 [45], which were both induced in islet B cells in this study. IFNα and IL-6, produced by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), can induce CD40-activated B cells to differentiate into ASCs [44]. IFNα-producing pDCs in the pancreatic islets during the early stages of autoimmune diabetes are crucial for initiation of disease [7] and we demonstrate that B cells are influenced by, and acquire, this innate signature during the establishment of insulitis.
IFNα is expressed by the beta cells of patients with type 1 diabetes [46] and IFN-associated genes are overexpressed in islets of newly diagnosed individuals [47], implying a major role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Type 1 IFNs enhance the expression of, and response to, TLR7 [48, 49], which we find highly expressed in the B cells found in pancreatic islets of NOD mice. Furthermore, in combination with IFNα, TLR7 activation augments IL-6 production and isotype switching in B cells [48]. In NOD mice, TLR7 deficiency delays and reduces the development of autoimmune diabetes and alters the functional responses of B cells [36]. Therefore, it is likely that the heightened expression of IFNα enhances TLR7 expression in pancreatic B cells and that this synergistically amplifies IL-6 and proinflammatory cytokine production. It is also important to note that TLR7-driven CD11c+ B cells are enhanced in autoimmune-prone mice [50] and enriched in individuals with autoimmunity [37]. The status of TLR7 in those CD20+ B cells in the pancreatic islets of individuals with type 1 diabetes is currently unknown, but, given that an elevated proportion of infiltrating B cells correlates with earlier diagnosis and more rapidly progressive disease [6], targeting of TLR7 could be of interest therapeutically.
Of particular importance is the heightened expression of the TLR7 protein in CD19+CD138+ islet B cells, which encompass a substantial proportion of the B cell population in the pancreas during the development and onset of diabetes in NOD mice. Furthermore, a substantial number of CD138int B cells are autoreactive [11, 51]. Understanding the role of both CD138–/+ B cells and their relationship in the pancreatic tissue may have important consequences for B cell-targeted immunotherapy. Our gene array data revealed little difference in the CD19+ B cell subsets once localised within the tissue (either lymph nodes or pancreas), as each subset displayed a similar gene expression profile. However, distinct signatures were found when comparing the equivalent B cell subsets in the PLNs and pancreas, notably in the expression of selected genes such as Igf2r. Further studies are required to fully understand if CD138+ B cells fulfil a specific functional role or if they are more responsive to TLR7 ligands. It is also worth considering that the two subsets of CD19+ B cells are at different stages of differentiation or activation when harvested from the tissue, particularly as CD138 (syndecan-1) can be shed from the cell surface after ligand engagement [52].
Unbiased single-cell RNA sequencing studies of the pancreas of NOD mice during diabetes development [53], together with application of the approach we have employed, may shed further light on the heterogeneity among these specific B cell subsets. A further limitation of the present study is that we do not address B cell specificity, which, if understood more fully, may help to highlight key differences in functionality of the CD138+ B cell subsets. Despite this, our observations provide new and important findings indicating how B cells may contribute to local beta cell damage and perpetuate tissue inflammation. Taken together, our study provides novel insights into potential therapeutic avenues that may be effective in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ASC:
-
Antibody-secreting cell
- Blimp-1:
-
B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1
- DEG:
-
Differentially expressed gene
- FDR:
-
False discovery rate
- GO:
-
Gene ontology
- IRF4:
-
IFN regulatory factor 4
- IPA:
-
Ingenuity pathway analysis
- PLN:
-
Pancreatic lymph node
- qPCR:
-
Quantitative PCR
- TLR7:
-
Toll-like receptor 7
- XBP-1:
-
X-box binding protein 1
References
Pescovitz MD, Greenbaum CJ, Bundy B et al (2014) B-lymphocyte depletion with rituximab and β-cell function: two-year results. Diabetes Care 37(2):453–459. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0626
Hu CY, Rodriguez-Pinto D, Du W et al (2007) Treatment with CD20-specific antibody prevents and reverses autoimmune diabetes in mice. J Clin Invest 117(12):3857–3867. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI32405
Fiorina P, Vergani A, Dada S et al (2008) Targeting CD22 reprograms B-cells and reverses autoimmune diabetes. Diabetes 57(11):3013–3024. https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-0420
Arif S, Leete P, Nguyen V et al (2014) Blood and islet phenotypes indicate immunological heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 63(11):3835–3845. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0365
Willcox A, Richardson SJ, Bone AJ, Foulis AK, Morgan NG (2009) Analysis of islet inflammation in human type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 155(2):173–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03860.x
Leete P, Willcox A, Krogvold L et al (2016) Differential insulitic profiles determine the extent of β-cell destruction and the age at onset of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 65(5):1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-1615
Diana J, Simoni Y, Furio L et al (2013) Crosstalk between neutrophils, B-1a cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells initiates autoimmune diabetes. Nat Med 19(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3042
Kendall PL, Woodward EJ, Hulbert C, Thomas JW (2004) Peritoneal B cells govern the outcome of diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Eur J Immunol 34(9):2387–2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200324744
Ryan GA, Wang CJ, Chamberlain JL et al (2010) B1 cells promote pancreas infiltration by autoreactive T cells. J Immunol 185(5):2800–2807. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1000856
Serreze DV, Chapman HD, Niens M et al (2011) Loss of intra-islet CD20 expression may complicate efficacy of B-cell-directed type 1 diabetes therapies. Diabetes 60(11):2914–2921. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-0705
Boldison J, Da Rosa LC, Buckingham L, Davies J, Wen L, Wong FS (2019) Phenotypically distinct anti-insulin B cells repopulate pancreatic islets after anti-CD20 treatment in NOD mice. Diabetologia https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-04974-y
Pracht K, Meinzinger J, Daum P et al (2017) A new staining protocol for detection of murine antibody-secreting plasma cell subsets by flow cytometry. Eur J Immunol 47(8):1389–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201747019
Boldison J, Thayer TC, Davies J, Wong FS (2021) Natural protection from type 1 diabetes in NOD mice is characterized by a unique pancreatic islet phenotype. Diabetes 70(4):955–965. https://doi.org/10.2337/db20-0945
Matsumoto M, Baba A, Yokota T et al (2014) Interleukin-10-producing plasmablasts exert regulatory function in autoimmune inflammation. Immunity 41(6):1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.016
Carvalho BS, Irizarry RA (2010) A framework for oligonucleotide microarray preprocessing. Bioinformatics 26(19):2363–2367. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq431
Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, Speed TP (2003) Summaries of affymetrix gene chip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res 31(4):e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gng015
Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D et al (2015) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43(7):e47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007
Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article3. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1027
Lacotte S, Decossas M, Le Coz C, Brun S, Muller S, Dumortier H (2013) Early differentiated CD138(high) MHCII+ IgG+ plasma cells express CXCR3 and localize into inflamed kidneys of lupus mice. PLoS One 8(3):e58140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058140
Heng TS, Painter MW, Immunological Genome Project Consortium et al (2008) The immunological genome project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat Immunol 9(10):1091–1094. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1008-1091
Shi W, Liao Y, Willis SN et al (2015) Transcriptional profiling of mouse B cell terminal differentiation defines a signature for antibody-secreting plasma cells. Nat Immunol 16(6):663–673. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3154
Dai H, Rahman A, Saxena A et al (2015) Syndecan-1 identifies and controls the frequency of IL-17-producing naive natural killer T (NKT17) cells in mice. Eur J Immunol 45(11):3045–3051. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545532
Jaiswal AK, Sadasivam M, Hamad ARA (2017) Syndecan-1-coating of interleukin-17-producing natural killer T cells provides a specific method for their visualization and analysis. World J Diabetes 8(4):130–134. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v8.i4.130
Li N, van Unen V, Hollt T et al (2018) Mass cytometry reveals innate lymphoid cell differentiation pathways in the human fetal intestine. J Exp Med 215(5):1383–1396. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20171934
Artis D, Spits H (2015) The biology of innate lymphoid cells. Nature 517(7534):293–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14189
Grasseau A, Boudigou M, Michee-Cospolite M et al (2021) The diversity of the plasmablast signature across species and experimental conditions: A meta-analysis. Immunology 164(1):120–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13344
Robinette ML, Fuchs A, Cortez VS et al (2015) Transcriptional programs define molecular characteristics of innate lymphoid cell classes and subsets. Nat Immunol 16(3):306–317. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3094
Shapiro-Shelef M, Lin KI, McHeyzer-Williams LJ, Liao J, McHeyzer-Williams MG, Calame K (2003) Blimp-1 is required for the formation of immunoglobulin secreting plasma cells and pre-plasma memory B cells. Immunity 19(4):607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00267-x
Shaffer AL, Shapiro-Shelef M, Iwakoshi NN et al (2004) XBP1, downstream of Blimp-1, expands the secretory apparatus and other organelles, and increases protein synthesis in plasma cell differentiation. Immunity 21(1):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.010
Shaffer AL, Lin KI, Kuo TC et al (2002) Blimp-1 orchestrates plasma cell differentiation by extinguishing the mature B cell gene expression program. Immunity 17(1):51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00335-7
Low MSY, Brodie EJ, Fedele PL et al (2019) IRF4 activity is required in established plasma cells to regulate gene transcription and mitochondrial homeostasis. Cell Rep 29(9):2634–2645 e2635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.097
Minnich M, Tagoh H, Bonelt P et al (2016) Multifunctional role of the transcription factor Blimp-1 in coordinating plasma cell differentiation. Nat Immunol 17(3):331–343. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3349
Tellier J, Nutt SL (2017) Standing out from the crowd: how to identify plasma cells. Eur J Immunol 47(8):1276–1279. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201747168
Wilmore JR, Jones DD, Allman D (2017) Protocol for improved resolution of plasma cell subpopulations by flow cytometry. Eur J Immunol 47(8):1386–1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201746944
Mi H, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD (2013) Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat Protoc 8(8):1551–1566. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.092
Huang J, Peng J, Pearson JA et al (2021) Toll-like receptor 7 deficiency suppresses type 1 diabetes development by modulating B-cell differentiation and function. Cell Mol Immunol 18(2):328–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-00590-8
Jenks SA, Cashman KS, Zumaquero E et al (2018) Distinct effector B cells induced by unregulated toll-like receptor 7 contribute to pathogenic responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity 49(4):725–739 e726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.015
Probstel AK, Zhou X, Baumann R et al (2020) Gut microbiota-specific IgA(+) B cells traffic to the CNS in active multiple sclerosis. Sci Immunol 5(53):eabc7191. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abc7191
Rojas OL, Probstel AK, Porfilio EA et al (2019) Recirculating intestinal IgA-producing cells regulate neuroinflammation via IL-10. Cell 176(3):610–624.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.035
Mittrucker HW, Matsuyama T, Grossman A et al (1997) Requirement for the transcription factor LSIRF/IRF4 for mature B and T lymphocyte function. Science 275(5299):540–543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5299.540
Lin KI, Angelin-Duclos C, Kuo TC, Calame K (2002) Blimp-1-dependent repression of Pax-5 is required for differentiation of B cells to immunoglobulin M-secreting plasma cells. Mol Cell Biol 22(13):4771–4780. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.13.4771-4780.2002
Reimold AM, Iwakoshi NN, Manis J et al (2001) Plasma cell differentiation requires the transcription factor XBP-1. Nature 412(6844):300–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/35085509
Eto D, Lao C, DiToro D et al (2011) IL-21 and IL-6 are critical for different aspects of B cell immunity and redundantly induce optimal follicular helper CD4 T cell (Tfh) differentiation. PLoS One 6(3):e17739. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017739
Jego G, Palucka AK, Blanck JP, Chalouni C, Pascual V, Banchereau J (2003) Plasmacytoid dendritic cells induce plasma cell differentiation through type I interferon and interleukin 6. Immunity 19(2):225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00208-5
Kwon H, Thierry-Mieg D, Thierry-Mieg J et al (2009) Analysis of interleukin-21-induced Prdm1 gene regulation reveals functional cooperation of STAT3 and IRF4 transcription factors. Immunity 31(6):941–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.008
Foulis AK, Farquharson MA, Meager A (1987) Immunoreactive alpha-interferon in insulin-secreting beta cells in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Lancet 2(8573):1423–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91128-7
Lundberg M, Krogvold L, Kuric E, Dahl-Jørgensen K, Skog O (2016) Expression of interferon-stimulated genes in insulitic pancreatic islets of patients recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 65(10):3104–3110. https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-0616
Bekeredjian-Ding IB, Wagner M, Hornung V et al (2005) Plasmacytoid dendritic cells control TLR7 sensitivity of naive B cells via type I IFN. J Immunol 174(7):4043–4050. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.4043
Green NM, Laws A, Kiefer K et al (2009) Murine B cell response to TLR7 ligands depends on an IFN-beta feedback loop. J Immunol 183(3):1569–1576. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803899
Rubtsov AV, Rubtsova K, Fischer A et al (2011) Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7)-driven accumulation of a novel CD11c(+) B-cell population is important for the development of autoimmunity. Blood 118(5):1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-01-331462
Culton DA, O'Conner BP, Conway KL et al (2006) Early preplasma cells define a tolerance checkpoint for autoreactive B cells. J Immunol 176(2):790–802. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.790
Endo K, Takino T, Miyamori H et al (2003) Cleavage of syndecan-1 by membrane type matrix metalloproteinase-1 stimulates cell migration. J Biol Chem 278(42):40764–40770. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306736200
Zakharov PN, Hu H, Wan X, Unanue ER (2020) Single-cell RNA sequencing of murine islets shows high cellular complexity at all stages of autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med 217(6):e20192362. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20192362
Acknowledgements
We thank Central Biotechnology Services at Cardiff University and the Histology Services Unit at the University of Bristol.
Authors’ relationships and activities
FSW is a member of the editorial board of Diabetologia. The other authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.
Contribution statement
JB designed the experiments, acquired and analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. JD and JH contributed to the experimental procedures. JP, PL, SR, NGM and FSW contributed to interpreting the results and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript. JB conceived the project and is the guarantor of this work.
Funding
This work was funded by Diabetes UK (19/0006032). JB is supported by an Independent Fellowship funded by Research England’s Expanding Excellence in England (E3) fund via EXCEED.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM
(PDF 1103 kb)
ESMTables 2–5
(XLSX 416 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Boldison, J., Hopkinson, J.R., Davies, J. et al. Gene expression profiling in NOD mice reveals that B cells are highly educated by the pancreatic environment during autoimmune diabetes. Diabetologia 66, 551–566 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05839-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05839-7