Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiologische Diagnostik von Lebertumoren

Teil 1: Allgemeine Krankheitsaspekte und radiologische Verfahren

Diagnostic radiology of liver tumors. Part 1: General disease aspects and radiological procedures

  • CME Weiterbildung • Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Fokale Leberläsionen können maligne Erkrankungen und gutartige Veränderungen darstellen. Bei den malignen Läsionen sind neben dem hepatozellulären Karzinom v. a. Lebermetastasen zu nennen. Dagegen sind gutartige Läsionen wie die fokal noduläre Hyperplasie und hepatozelluläre Adenome seltener anzutreffen. Verschiedene radiologische Verfahren werden zur (Diffenzial)diagnose eingesetzt. Die transabdominelle Ultraschalluntersuchung wird durch Farbdopplerverfahren, den kontrastverstärkten bzw. intraoperativen Ultraschall ergänzt. Die Computertomographie sollte sowohl nativ als auch nach Applikation moderner nichtionischer jodhaltiger wasserlöslicher Kontrastmittel durchgeführt werden, Standard ist heute die Multidetektor-Spiral-CT. Bei vergleichbarer optimaler Technik vor Ort ist jedoch dem (kontrastverstärkten) MRT der Vorzug zu geben. Durch die Schnittbildverfahren hat die intraarterielle selektive Angiographie ihre Bedeutung in Nachweis und Charakterisierung von herdförmigen Leberveränderungen vollständig verloren. Die Frage, ob eine sonographie- oder CT-gestützte Leberbiopsie zur weiterführenden Diagnostik notwendig, ein abwartendes Verhalten gerechtfertigt oder eine Operation zur Abklärung der Diagnose nötig ist, ist stets individuell zu beantworten.

Abstract

Besides malignant disease, focal liver lesions can also represent benign changes. Among the malignant lesions, in addition to hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases should be mentioned. In contrast, benign lesions such as focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma are rarely encountered. Various radiological procedures are employed for the (differential) diagnosis. The transabdominal ultrasound examination is supplemented by color Doppler procedures, contrast-enhanced or intraoperative ultrasound. Computed tomography (CT) should be performed with native images as well as after using modern nonionic, iodine-containing water-soluble contrast agents; multidetector spiral CT is today’s standard. If comparable optimal technology is available on-site, (contrast-enhanced) MRI is preferable. Intra-arterial selective angiography has become less important for detecting and characterizing focal liver changes with the advent of tomographic procedures. The question of whether sonography- or CT-guided biopsy of the liver is needed for further diagnostic work-up, whether a wait-and-see approach is justified, or whether surgery is required to clarify the diagnosis should always be answered on a case-by-case basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9

Literatur

  1. Choi BI, Lee HJ, Han JK et al. (1997) Detection of hypervascular nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: value of triphasic helial CT compared with iodized-oil CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168: 219–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chu KM, Lai EC, Al-Hedeedi S et al. (1997) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 21: 301–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delorme S, Krix M, Albrecht T (2005) Ultraschallkontrastmittel – Grundlagen und klinische Anwendung. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 178: 155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Bisceglie AM (1997) Hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 26: 34S–38S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietrich CF, Kratzer W, Strobe D et al. (2006) Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 12: 1699–1705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ernst H, Hahn EG, Balzer T et al. (1996) Colour doppler ultrasound of liver lesions: signal enhancement after intravenous injection of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist. J Clin Ultrasound 24: 31–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frederick MG, Paulson EK, Nelson RC (1997) Helical CT for detecting focal liver lesions in patients with breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast phase, hepatic artery phase, and portal venous phase. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21: 229–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hellman S (1995) Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol 13: 8–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang GJ, Kim MJ, Yoo HS, Lee JT (1997) Nodular hepatocellular carcinomas: detection with arterial-, portal-, and delayed-phase images at spiral CT. Radiology 202: 383–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Irie T, Takeshita K, Wada Y et al. (1995) CT evaluation of hepatic tumors: comparison of CT wirth arterial portography, CT with infusion hepatic arteriography, and simultaneous of both techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164: 1407–1412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanematsu M, Hoshi H, Imaeda T et al. (1997) Detection and characterization of hepatic tumors: value of combined helical CT hepatic arteriography and CT during arterial portography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168: 1193–1198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirchin MA, Pirovano GP, Spinazzi A (1998) Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). An overview. Invest Radiol 33: 798–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Layer G, Runge I, Conrad R et al. (1999) Portal kontrastverstärkte Spiral-Computertomographie der Leber – Korrelation radiologischer und intraoperativer Befunde und Beurteilung der Resektabilität. Fortschr Röntgenstr 171: 455–460

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Layer G (1999) Bildgesteuerte Interventionen bei Lebertumoren. Radiologe 39: 750–755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Navano S et al. (2006) Hepatic metastases: Diffusion-weighted sensitivity-encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 239: 122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oi H, Murakami T, Kim T et al. (1996) Dynamic MR imaging and early-phase helical CT for detecting small intrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 369–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Onishi H, Murakami T, Kim T et al. (2006) Hepatic metastases: detection with multi-detector row CT, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, and both techniques combined. Radiology 239: 131–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker SL, Tong T, Baden S, Wingo PA (1996) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 46: 5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Daldrup HE et al. (1997) Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging. Eur Radiol 7: 275–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rofsky NM, Earls JP (1996) Mangafodipir trisodium injection (Mn-DPDP). A contrast agent for abdominal MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 4: 73–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahani D, Kalva SP, Tanabe KK et al. (2004) Intraoperative US in patients undergoing surgery for liver neoplasms: comparison with MR imaging. Radiology 232: 810–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spreafico C, Marchiano A, Mazzaferro V et al. (1997) Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who undergo liver transplantation: sensitivity of CT with iodized oil. Radiology 203: 457–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Strobel D, Raeker S, Martus P et al. (2003) Phase inversion harmonic imaging versus contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography fort the characterization of focal liver lesions. Int J Colorectal Dis 18: 63–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stroszczynski C, Gaffke G, Gnauck M et al. (2004) Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA. Radiologe 44: 1185–1191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Taourel PG, Pageaux GP, Coste V et al. (1995) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients undergoing liver transplantation: detection with CT after injection of iodized oil. Radiology 197: 377–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ward J, Robinson PJ, Guthrie JA et al. (2005) Liver metastases in candidates for hepatic resection: comparison of helical CT and gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 237: 170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization (2000) Classification of tumours. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA (eds) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. IARC Press, Lyon

Download references

Danksagung

Die Abb. 9a–c wurden freundlicherweise durch das Institut für Röntgendiagnostik des Klinikums rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München (Direktor: Prof. Dr. E.J. Rummeny) überlassen.

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehung/en hin: Referentenhonorare für Fa. Altana.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Layer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Layer, G., Bohrer, M. Radiologische Diagnostik von Lebertumoren. Radiologe 47, 819–832 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-007-1553-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-007-1553-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation