Skip to main content
Log in

Kardiale Hämodynamik bei Schock

Management im klinischen Alltag

Cardiac hemodynamics during shock

Management in daily clinical routine

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In der Versorgung von kritisch kranken Patienten spielt die differenzierte Therapie zur Behandlung von hämodynamischer Instabilität mit Schock im Sinne von akutem zirkulatorischem Versagen als häufiges Vollbild dieser Instabilität eine wesentliche Rolle. In Abhängigkeit der Schockform – distributiver Schock, kardiogener Schock, hypovolämer Schock oder obstruktiver Schock, wobei diese Komplexe überlappend vorliegen können – sind dabei Vorlast, Nachlast, Herzzeitvolumen und Kontraktilität in unterschiedlicher Art verändert. Die moderne intensivmedizinische Therapie nutzt zusätzlich zur klinischen Evaluation die Möglichkeiten des hämdoynamischen Monitorings und der bettseitigen echokardiographischen Bildgebung, um die zugrunde liegende Ursache und die daraus resultierenden Störungen zu behandeln. Die intravasale Volumentherapie unter Berücksichtigung von Volumenreagibilität und -notwendigkeit, die Therapie mit Vasopressoren unter Berücksichtigung von mikrozirkulatorischen Störungen und die positiv inotrope Therapie ggf. in Kombination mit Vasodilatation sind die Eckpfeiler der Behandlung des kritisch kranken Patienten. Vorlast, Nachlast, Herzzeitvolumen und Kontraktilität müssen dabei patienten- und situationsspezifisch evaluiert und therapiert werden.

Abstract

In caring for critically ill patients, a sophisticated approach to treating hemodynamic instability in acute circulatory failure is a major concern of modern critical care. Depending on the form of shock—distributive, cardiogenic, hypovolemic or obstructive, with the possibility of overlapping forms of shock—preload, afterload, cardiac output, and contractility are altered in various ways. Modern critical care uses hemodynamic monitoring and bedside echocardiography in addition to clinical evaluation to treat the underlying cause and sequelae of shock. Fluid therapy taking volume responsiveness and need for volume into account, vasopressor therapy taking microcirculatory derangement into account, and therapy using inotropes, sometimes in combination with vasodilators are the cornerstones of critical care treatment in this regard. Preload, afterload, cardiac output, and contractility must thereby be evaluated and treated in a patient- and situation-specific manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40(12):1795–1815

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul J‑L et al (2015) Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study. Intensive Care Med 41(9):1529–1537

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A (2011) What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care 17(3):290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costa MG, Della Rocca G, Chiarandini P, Mattelig S, Pompei L, Barriga MS, Reynolds T, Cecconi M, Pietropaoli P (2008) Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs. lithium dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 34:257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J et al (2010) Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med 362(9):779–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Pálizas F Jr., Murias G, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Pálizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C (2009) Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood ow: a prospective study. Crit Care 13:R92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dünser MW, Mayr AJ, Tür A, Pajk W, Barbara F, Knotzer H, Ulmer H, Hasibeder WR (2003) Ischemic skin lesions as a complication of continuous vasopressin infusion in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock: incidence and risk factors. Crit Care Med 31:1394–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dünser MW, Takala J, Brunauer A, Bakker J (2013) Re-thinking resuscitation: leaving blood pressure cosmetics behind and moving forward to permissive hypotension and a tissue perfusion-based approach. Crit Care 17(5):326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dünser MW, Takala J, Ulmer H et al (2009) Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcome. Intensive Care Med 35(7):1225–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jansen TC, Bommel J van, Schoonderbeek FJ et al (2010) Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182(6):752–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Labovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M et al (2010) Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emer- gent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1225–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landesberg G, Gilon D, Meroz Y et al (2012) Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock. Eur Heart J 33(7):895–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lima A, Jansen TC, Bommel J van, Ince C, Bakker J (2009) The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 37:934–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lima A, Bommel J van, Sikorska K, Genderen M van, Klijn E, Lesaffre E, Ince C, Bakker J (2011) The relation of near-infrared spectroscopy with changes in peripheral circulation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 39:1649–1654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lira A, Pinsky MR (2014) Choices in fluid type and volume during resuscitation: impact on patient outcomes. Ann Intensive Care 4(1):38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul J‑L (2011) Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 1(1):1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul J‑L (2016) Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med:1–13

  18. Monnet X, Teboul J‑L (2015) Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid! Crit Care 19(1):18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG (2013) Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med 369(13):1243–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354(24):2564–2575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nichol AD, Egi M, Pettila V, Bellomo R, French C, Hart G, Davies A, Stachowski E, Reade MC, Bailey M, Cooper DJ (2010) Relative hyperlactatemia and hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a retrospective multi-centre study. Crit Care 14:R25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Payen D, Pont AC de, Sakr Y et al (2008) A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care 12(3):R74

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J et al (2008) Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 358(9):877–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A (1999) Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 25:843–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent J‑L et al (2006) Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med 34(3):589–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW, Binanay C, O’Connor CM, Sopko G, Cali RM (2005) Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 294:1664–1670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takala J (2016) Volume responsive, but does the patient need volume? Intensive Care Med:1–3

  28. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup, Dellinger RP, Levy MM (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39(2):165–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Torgersen C, Dünser MW, Schmittinger CA et al (2011) Current approach to the haemodynamic management of septic shock patients in European intensive care units: a cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire-based survey. Europ J Anaesth 28(4):284

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vincent J‑L, De Backer D (2013) Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 369(18):1726–1734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vincent J‑L, Rhodes A, Perel A et al (2011) Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring – a consensus of 16. Crit Care 15(4):229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Weil MH, Afifi AA (1970) Experimental and clinical studies on lactate and pyruvate as indicators of the severity of acute circulatory failure (shock). Circulation 41:989–1001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weil MH, Shubin H (1971) Proposed reclassification of shock states with special reference to distributive defects. Adv Exp Med Biol 23:13–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weil MH, Shubin H (1969) The “VIP” approach to the bedside management of shock. JAMA 207:337–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Werdan K, Ruß M, Buerke M et al (2011) Deutsch-österreichische S3-Leitlinie Infarktbedingter kardiogener Schock – : Diagnose, Monitoring und Therapie. Intensivmed Notfallmedizin 48(4):291–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kersten.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Kersten gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

L. Engelmann, Leipzig

U. Janssens, Eschweiler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kersten, A. Kardiale Hämodynamik bei Schock. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 111, 590–595 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-016-0168-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-016-0168-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation