Abstract
Alpine habitats are characterized by a high rate of range restricted species compared to those of lower elevations. This is also the case for the Irano-Anatolian global biodiversity hotspot in South-West Asia, which is a mountainous area harbouring a high amount of endemic species. Using two quantitative approaches, Endemicity Analysis and Network-Clustering, we want to identify areas of concordant species distribution patterns in the alpine zone of this region as well as to test the hypothesis that, given the high proportion of endemics among alpine species, delimitation of these areas is determined mainly by endemic alpine species, i.e., areas of concordant species distribution patterns are congruent with areas of endemism. Endemicity Analysis identified six areas of concordant species distribution patterns irrespective of dataset (total alpine species versus endemic alpine species), whereas the Network-Clustering approach identified five and four Bioregions from total alpine species and endemic alpine species, respectively. Most of these areas have been previously identified using the endemic flora of different elevational zones. The identified units using both methods and both datasets are strongly congruent, proposing that they reveal meaningful distribution patterns. Bioregionalization in the Irano-Anatolian biodiversity hotspot appears to be strongly influenced by the endemic alpine species, a pattern likely to hold in alpine regions outside the Irano-Anatolian hotspot.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
High mountains are biodiversity hotspots with a high endemic richness (Antonelli et al. 2018; Muellner-Riehl et al. 2019; Rahbek et al. 2019). This is largely due to alpine ecosystems (i.e., those above the treeline), which are distributed across all continents and latitudes and cover almost three percent of the terrestrial land outside the Antarctic (Körner et al. 2011; Testolin et al. 2020). Alpine habitats are characterized by a high rate of endemism compared to the lower zones in most mountain ranges (Körner 2003; Tribsch and Schönswetter 2003; Hobohm 2014; Noroozi et al. 2018), which is due to the complex origins of high elevations, climate changes, geographic isolation, and considerable microhabitat variation (Agakhanjanz and Breckle 1995; Körner 1995; Dirnböck et al. 2011; Sandel et al. 2011).
The Irano-Anatolian region is a mountainous area in South-West (SW) Asia and one of the 35 global biodiversity hotspots (Mittermeier et al. 2011). More than 40% of the plant species of this area are endemic (Mittermeier et al. 2005), and the rate of endemism increases sharply with increasing elevation (Noroozi et al. 2018, 2019a, c). The higher extinction risk of range-restricted species compared to widely distributed species emphasizes their relevance for conservation biology (Myers et al. 2000; Brooks et al. 2006). Climate change is one of the most important threats for global biodiversity (Thomas et al. 2004; Willis and Bhagwat 2009; Urban 2015), and alpine species are among the most sensitive organisms to this phenomenon (Dullinger et al. 2012; Gottfried et al. 2012; Ernakovich et al. 2014). Therefore, identifying areas of endemism of these habitats is very important for conservation biology.
Areas of endemism (AEs), i.e., areas with at least two co-occurring species being essentially restricted to this area (Szumik et al. 2002; Szumik and Goloboff 2004), are principal units of analyses in historical biogeography (Nelson and Platnick 1981; Morrone 1994; Morrone 2008), which can be used for designing biogeographical regionalization schemes (Morrone 2014). Recognition of AEs has been popular in the recent decades (Harold and Mooi 1994; Morrone 2008) to explain their evolutionary and ecological causes (Nelson and Platnick 1981; Major 1988; Anderson 1994) and because of their significance in defining conservation priorities (Linder 2001; Jetz et al. 2004). A wide array of methods is available to identify AEs (Morrone 1994; Szumik et al. 2002; Hausdorf and Hennig 2003; Dos Santos et al. 2008; Dos Santos et al. 2012; Torres-Miranda et al. 2013; Vilhena and Antonelli 2015; Salinas and Wheeler 2019). The same toolbox can be used, however, to identify areas of concordant species distribution patterns (hereinafter referred to as ACDs) from a dataset including also non-endemic biota (for an example see Aagesen et al. 2009), which is expected to improve the identification of biogeographic units (Vilhena and Antonelli 2015). Although AEs are also ACDs, but based on endemic species only, we will hereinafter use ACDs for those cases, where, also or exclusively, non-endemics are considered.
In this study, we want to identify ACDs and AEs in the alpine habitats of the Irano-Anatolian region using two quantitative approaches, Endemicity Analysis (Szumik et al. 2002) and Network-Clustering (Vilhena and Antonelli 2015; Edler et al. 2017), to answer the following questions: (1) Where are the main ACDs and AEs of the alpine flora in the Irano-Anatolian region? (2) Do inferences based on the total alpine flora differ from those of the endemic alpine flora, i.e., are ACDs congruent with AEs? As the study area is a global biodiversity hotspot with a high proportion of endemic species and as the rate of endemism is particularly high at higher elevations (i.e., in the alpine zone), it can be expected that ACDs and AEs will be largely congruent, i.e., that ACDs will be determined essentially by alpine endemics.
Methods
Study area
The Irano-Anatolian Plateau is a mountainous region in SW Asia and a meeting point of three biogeographical regions (Irano-Anatolian, Euro-Siberian and Saharo-Sindian; Zohary 1973) and of three global biodiversity hotspots (Irano-Anatolian, Caucasian and Mediterranean; Mittermeier et al. 2005). The major part of the region is covered by the Irano-Anatolian global biodiversity hotspot, comprising high elevations of central and eastern Turkey, Armenia, north-eastern Iraq, and of Iran (Fig. 1). Being part of the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic system, the uplift of high mountain ranges of the region occurred from the Late Oligocene to the Late Miocene (Stöcklin 1968; Berberian and King 1981). Major mountain ranges of the area are Taurus Mountains, Pontic Mountains, Hakkari Mountains, Armenian Mountains, Azerbaijan Plateau, Alborz, Kopet Dagh-Khorassan, Zagros and the Yazd-Kerman Massif (Fig. 1).
Plant distribution data
The (sub)alpine species, i.e., species with mean elevational distribution above 2300 m a.s.l. for Turkey and the Armenian Mountains, above 2500 m a.s.l. for Alborz, the Azerbaijan Plateau and Kopet Dagh-Khorassan, above 2700 m a.s.l. for Zagros, and above 3000 m a.s.l. for the Yazd-Kerman Massif, were compiled. These thresholds were chosen based on the cutoff for the subalpine–alpine habitats established by previous publications (Noroozi et al. 2016; Fayvush and Aleksanyan 2020; Parolly 2020). The distribution data of these species were extracted from different floras (ca. 80% of data points; Rechinger 1963-2015; Davis 1965-1985; Assadi et al. 1989-2018), relevant publications pertaining to species and records published after these floras (ca. 5% of data points), and our own data (ca. 15% of data points). Thus, the total (sub)alpine species dataset included 1672 species (Table S1) from 19,680 localities, georeferenced with a precision of at least 0.25° × 0.25° (records that could not be georeferenced to at least this level of resolution were not included). Of those species, 1267 species (76%) were categorized as endemic or subendemic (i.e., having no more than 20% of its distribution range outside the study region) corresponding to 14,285 localities (the endemic alpine species); the complimentary set of 405 species and 5395 localities constituted the non-endemic alpine species. Most of the studied species are rare and known only from a few localities: 53% of the species have maximally 5 records, 70% of species have maximally 10 records, and 83% of species have maximally 20 records. The number of records per species is given in Table S1.
Data analyses
Endemicity Analysis (Szumik et al. 2002), as implemented in NDM/VNDM3 (Szumik and Goloboff 2004), is one of the most commonly applied approaches to identify AEs (Martínez-Hernández et al. 2015; Szumik and Goloboff 2015; Elías and Aagesen 2016; Hoffmeister and Ferrari 2016; Zhang et al. 2016; Weirauch et al. 2017; Noroozi et al. 2018, 2019c; Lago-Barcia et al. 2020). In this method, an endemicity score for each assumed AE (i.e., set of grid cells) is measured as the sum of the endemicity scores of each contributing species (Szumik and Goloboff 2004). In this study, the data were analysed with a cell size of 1.23° × 1.23°, the optimal size as determined by the program. The following parameters were used: a set must have at least 10 contributing species with an endemicity score of at least 2 (the threshold of 10 species was determined experimentally as the number at which delimitation of AEs became stable); temporarily saving sets within 0.99 of the current score; keeping overlapping subsets when 30% of the species were unique; using 100 replicates. To reduce the level of redundancy in the inferred AEs or ACDs, consensus areas were assembled using the loose consensus rule (considered sufficiently detailed for large-scale studies: Aagesen et al. 2013), i.e., areas were added when each area shares at least 10% of its defining species with at least one, but not necessarily all, of the other areas in the consensus.
As a second method we used the Network-Clustering approach (Vilhena and Antonelli 2015) implemented in the web application Infomap Bioregions (Edler et al. 2017; https://www.mapequation.org/bioregions/). This method generates a bipartite network (i.e., a network describing the associations between species and locations), where primary locations (point data or polygons describing distribution ranges) are discretized into bins, i.e., quadratic grid cells; this discretizing may be done using adaptive binning, where each grid cell can be, but does not have to be, recursively divided into four cells, thus accounting for different spatial resolutions of the input data (Vilhena and Antonelli 2015). Then, groups of nodes of this bipartite network are partitioned into clusters using the map equation (Rosvall and Bergstrom 2008, 2011). The map equation specifies the (theoretical) limit of how concisely the trajectory of a random walker on a network can be described (Rosvall et al. 2009); minimizing the map equation over all possible partitions allows an optimal partitioning scheme to be identified. Finally, these clusters are mapped to geographic space, where they then constitute bioregions. For the present study, the maximum and the minimum cell size were set to 1° (only cell sizes in increments of doubling the size from 1/8° onward are possible, i.e., 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, etc.); whereas this effectively prevents adaptive binning, it is a good compromise between resolution of the input data (minimum resolution of the georeferenced records is 0.25°; see above) and the correspondence between grid cells and the distribution of subalpine–alpine regions. Using a fixed cell size permitted us to retain only a single occurrence per species and grid cell (filtered manually), as densely sampled grid cells may be identified as separate clusters, even if they hardly differ in their species composition from neighbouring cells as was observed for one grid cell in central Alborz, for which a large dataset from vegetation relevés was available (data not shown). Minimum and maximum cell capacity, i.e., the minimum and maximum number of observations per cell, were set to 40 (ca. 0.2% of all records) and 400, respectively; different combinations of cell capacities were tested, and this combination was identified as one around which the number and the delimitation of clusters remained stable. Clustering was achieved using 10 trials and applying a cluster cost of 1.0; this cost allows tuning the clustering algorithm to search for fewer (by increasing the cost) or more (by decreasing the cost) clusters. As this approach cannot infer overlapping units and instead may identify transitional zones as separate bioregions (Vilhena and Antonelli 2015; Bloomfield et al. 2018; Droissart et al. 2018), clusters with a proportion of unique species below 30% were considered as transitional zones.
Results
Endemicity Analysis identified six ACDs and six AEs for the total alpine and the endemic alpine flora, respectively. The identified areas were highly congruent among the two species datasets covering almost the same territories (Fig. 2; Table 1) and will, therefore, be referred to as AEs. These six areas were: (1) Taurus AE, covering the Taurus Mountains in southern Turkey, situated close to or even within the Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot; (2) Eastern Taurus AE, nested within the former; (3) Anatolian–Armenian AE, covering the high mountains of eastern Taurus, the Pontic Mountains, the Hakkari Mountains, as well as mountain ranges of Armenia, north-eastern Iraq and north-western Iran reaching the Talysh Mountains; this was the largest AE with a high amount of alpine endemics; (4) Alborz AE, covering the entire Alborz range plus the Azerbaijan Plateau in north-western Iran; (5) Zagros AE, encompassing high elevations of the Zagros mountains in western Iran; and (6) Yazd-Kerman AE including the Yazd-Kerman massifs in southern Iran. The list of species contributing to the scores of each ACD and AE is provided in Tables S2 and S3.
Using the Network-Clustering approach implemented in InfoMap, a total of nine units were identified for each dataset. For the total alpine flora, five units were considered as Bioregions (BR; with unique species proportion ranging from 31 to 51%; Table 2) and four units considered as transitional zones (with unique species proportion ranging from 4 to 14%; Table 2), whereas for the endemic alpine flora, four units were considered as BRs (with unique species proportion ranging from 34 to 58%; Table 2) and five as transitional zones (with unique species proportion ranging from 5 to 25%; Table 2). The identified areas were: (1) Taurus BR in southern Turkey; (2) the Anatolian–Armenian BR in eastern Turkey and in Armenia; (3) Alborz BR in northern Iran; (4) Zagros BR in western Iran; and (5) Yazd-Kerman BR in southern Iran (identified only by the total alpine species; Fig. 3, Table 2). Except one transitional zone in north-western Turkey (Uludağ), all transitional zones were located in an area from south-eastern Turkey to north-western Iran (Fig. 3). The list of species present in each Bioregion is provided in Tables S4 and S5.
ACDs inferred from the non-endemic alpine species differed substantially from ACDS and AEs identified with the other two datasets (the total alpine and the endemic alpine flora, respectively). With Endemicity Analysis, only the Alborz and the Anatolian–Armenian area were identified as ACDs, but both just covering part of the areas identified by endemics and total alpine species datasets (Figure S1). Using the Network-Clustering approach, the Iranian mountains and the Armenian mountains as well as several small areas in Anatolia were identified as bioregions (Figure S2).
Discussion
The aim of this study is to identify major ACDs and AEs in the alpine zone of the Irano-Anatolian region, a global biodiversity hotspot (Mittermeier et al. 2005), using two methodological approaches, Endemicity Analysis and Network-Clustering. Reassuringly, the identified ACDs and AEs are largely congruent (Figs. 2, 3), discrepancies being mostly due to the inability of Network-Clustering to infer overlapping or even nested ACDs or AEs. Apart from the Taurus mountains in southern Turkey, where Endemicity Analysis infers two essentially nested ACDs or AEs (Fig. 2), the major differences concern south-eastern Turkey and north-western Iran. This region is located between the high mountains of Anatolia and Armenia on one side and Alborz and Zagros on the other side and constitutes a transitional zone combining elements of adjacent regions. Whereas Endemicity Analysis can accommodate this by inferring partially overlapping ACDs and AEs, Network-Clustering recognizes one to several additional bioregions (Figs. 2, 3). Additional information, such as the proportion of unique species, can help to address the nature of such transitional zones as overlapping ACDs or AEs. Still, bioregionalization using the Network-Clustering approach should be supplemented by methods that can directly address these transitions, such as Endemicity Analysis (Szumik et al. 2002) or Fuzzy Logics (Olivero et al. 2012).
Given the high degree of endemism in the alpine zone it can be expected that the delimitation of ACDs will be determined nearly exclusively by the endemic species, i.e., that AEs will be largely congruent with ACDs. This is actually the case for those areas identified by Endemicity Analysis, where the level of resolution (number and position of ACDs and AEs, respectively) is the same between the total alpine species datasets (used to infer ACDs) and the endemic alpine species (used to infer AEs), differences being mainly restricted to the scores of some cells (Table 1, Fig. 2). In line with this, the non-endemic alpine species just confirmed AEs already identified by the endemic alpine species and could do this only in the northern part of the study region, where the proportion of alpine species also occurring in mountain ranges outside the study area, most notably the Greater Caucasus, is higher (Noroozi et al. 2008). In contrast to Endemicity Analysis, the differences between datasets were bigger for Network-Clustering. Specifically, using the alpine endemics dataset resulted in decreased resolution (fewer bioregions) in western Anatolia (Uludağ merged with Taurus) and in south-eastern Iran (Yazd-Kerman merged with Zagros), but in increased resolution (more bioregions) in the Anatolian–Armenian area (separation of the Hakkari region in southeastern Turkey). A reason for this may be the higher sensitivity of Network-Clustering to quantitative features of the data, as was observed when comparing inferences from an unfiltered (duplicates retained) and a filtered dataset (duplicates removed; data not shown). Still, the non-endemic alpine species contribute little to delimiting bioregions. Jointly, these results demonstrate that in alpine habitats using fewer data, i.e., those from the endemic species only, can suffice to reliably identify congruent distribution patterns of the alpine flora.
Most of the AEs identified in this study, e.g., Taurus, Zagros or Alborz, have been identified before (Noroozi et al. 2018, 2019c). An exception is the Yazd-Kerman Massif, identified here as a separate unit, especially using Endemicity Analysis, in contrast to previous inferences based on the Iranian endemic species of Asteraceae (Noroozi et al. 2018). Despite the considerable surface area size of the Yazd-Kerman Massif, it harbours low species and endemic richness compared to Zagros and Alborz (Noroozi et al. 2019a; Doostmohammadi et al. 2020), which likely is due to the dry climate of the region (Djamali et al. 2011). However, the endemicity rate is high because of its topographic and climatic isolation, especially in the higher elevations (Djamali et al. 2011; Doostmohammadi et al. 2020).
Two AEs inferred in previous studies are not confirmed, because they are not found by Endemicity Analysis but are only identified as transitional zones by Network Clustering. The first area is the Hakkari area in south-eastern Turkey identified by Noroozi et al. (2019c) using data from three vascular plant families of Turkey. Compared to the other transitional zones, this region has a relatively high number of species and of unique species (Fig. 3, Table 2), but the proportion of unique species is below our threshold for recognizing an independent AE. Whereas this threshold is ad hoc, it allows separating areas (bioregions) supported also by Endemicity Analysis from those (transitional zones) not supported by Endemicity Analysis. Yet it is possible that additional analyses with more data may support recognition of the Hakkari area as an independent AE. The second area is the Azerbaijan Plateau in north-western Iran identified by Noroozi et al. (2018) based on Iranian endemic Asteraceae. Reasons for these discrepancies may include the different taxonomic coverage (wider in the current study) and the broader geographic coverage (both regions are close the edge of their respective study regions, Turkey and Iran).
Conclusion
In general, the units identified using both approaches and both datasets (total alpine and endemic alpine species) are strongly congruent, suggesting that they reflect meaningful distribution patterns. As most of these areas have been identified before using the endemic flora of different elevational zones (Noroozi et al. 2018, 2019a, c), bioregionalization in the Irano-Anatolian hotspot appears to be strongly influenced by the alpine endemic species.
Identifying the major AEs (and ACDs) of the alpine flora inside the Irano-Anatolian biodiversity hotspot is a first step towards determining hotspots-within-hotspots (Cañadas et al. 2014). These AEs are not only areas with congruent distribution of alpine species, but are also regions with a high proportion of rare species at high elevations. Previous studies demonstrated that centres of endemism in the Irano-Anatolian biodiversity hotspot are poorly protected resulting in a high proportion of conservation gaps (Noroozi et al. 2019b) and that conservation efficiency in the already established nature reserves is lower than on the global average (Kolahi et al. 2013). As range restricted species of alpine habitats are highly threatened by ongoing climate change (Dullinger et al. 2012; Pauli et al. 2012) and by strong overgrazing (at least in the SW Asia; Kürschner and Parolly 2012; Kenar and Ketenoğlu 2016; Karimi and Jones 2020), putting more attention to the conservation status of these AEs is highly recommended.
Change history
14 February 2022
The missing funding note “Open access funding provided by Austrian Science Fund (FWF). ” has been added now.
References
Aagesen L, Szumik CA, Zuloaga FO, Morrone O (2009) Quantitative biogeography in the South America highlands—recognizing the Altoandina, Puna and Prepuna through the study of Poaceae. Cladistics 25(3):295–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00248.x
Aagesen L, Szumik CA, Goloboff PA (2013) Consensus in the search for areas of endemism. J Biogeogr 40(11):2011–2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12172
Agakhanjanz O, Breckle SW (1995) Origin and evolution of the mountain flora in Middle Asia and neighbouring mountain regions. In: Chapin FS, Körner C (eds) Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem consequences. Ecological studies, vol 113. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 63–80
Anderson S (1994) Area and endemism. Q Rev Biol 69:451–471. https://doi.org/10.1086/418743
Antonelli A, Kissling WD, Flantua SGA, Bermúdez MA, Mulch A, Muellner-Riehl AN, Kreft H, Linder HP, Badgley C, Fjeldså J, Fritz SA, Rahbek C, Herman F, Hooghiemstra H, Hoorn C (2018) Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity. Nat Geosci 11(10):718–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0236-z
Assadi M, Khatamsaz M, Maassoumi AA, Mozaffarian V (1989–2018) Flora of Iran. Research Institute of Forests & Rangelands, Tehran
Berberian M, King GCP (1981) Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Can J Earth Sci 18(2):210–265. https://doi.org/10.1139/e81-019
Bloomfield N, Knerr N, Encinas-Viso F (2018) A comparison of network and clustering methods to detect biogeographical regions. Ecography 41:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02596
Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313(5783):58–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127609
Cañadas EM, Fenu G, Peñas J, Lorite J, Mattana E, Bacchetta G (2014) Hotspots within hotspots: endemic plant richness, environmental drivers, and implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 170:282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.007
Davis PH (1965–1985) Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean islands, vol 1–10. University Press Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Dirnböck T, Essl F, Rabitsch W (2011) Disproportional risk for habitat loss of high-altitude endemic species under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 17(2):990–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02266.x
Djamali M, Akhani H, Khoshravesh R, Andrieu-Ponel V, Ponel P, Brewer S (2011) Application of the global bioclimatic classification to Iran: implications for understanding the modern vegetation and biogeography. Ecol Mediterr 37:91–114. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.2011.1350
Doostmohammadi M, Talebi A, Noroozi J (2020) Plant and vegetation. In: Noroozi J (ed) Plant biogeography and vegetation of high mountains of Central and South-West Asia, vol 17. Plant and Vegetation. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp 151–184
Dos Santos DA, Fernández HR, Cuezzo MG, Domínguez E (2008) Sympatry Inference and Network Analysis in Biogeography. Syst Biol 57(3):432–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802172192
Dos Santos DA, Gabriela Cuezzo M, Celina Reynaga M, Dominguez E (2012) Towards a dynamic analysis of weighted networks in biogeography. Syst Biol 61(2):240–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syr098
Droissart V, Dauby G, Hardy OJ, Deblauwe V, Harris DJ, Janssens S, Mackinder Barbara A, Blach-Overgaard A, Sonké B, Sosef MSM, Stévart T, Svenning J-C, Wieringa JJ, Couvreur TLP (2018) Beyond trees: Biogeographical regionalization of tropical Africa. J Biogeogr 45(5):1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13190
Dullinger S, Gattringer A, Thuiller W, Moser D, Zimmermann NE, Guisan A, Willner W, Plutzar C, Leitner M, Mang T, Caccianiga M, Dirnböck T, Ertl S, Fischer A, Lenoir J, Svenning J-C, Psomas A, Schmatz DR, Silc U, Vittoz P, Hülber K (2012) Extinction debt of high-mountain plants under twenty-first-century climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:619–622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1514
Edler D, Zizka A, Guedes T, Rosvall M, Antonelli A (2017) Infomap bioregions: Interactive mapping of biogeographical regions from species distributions. Syst Biol 66(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw087
Elías GDV, Aagesen L (2016) Areas of vascular plants endemism in the Monte desert (Argentina). Phytotaxa 266(3):161–182. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.266.3.1
Ernakovich JG, Hopping KA, Berdanier AB, Simpson RT, Kachergis EJ, Steltzer H, Wallenstein MD (2014) Predicted responses of arctic and alpine ecosystems to altered seasonality under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 20(10):3256–3269. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12568
Fayvush GM, Aleksanyan AS (2020) The Transcaucasian Highlands. In: Noroozi J (ed) Plant biogeography and vegetation of high mountains of Central and South-West Asia, vol 17. Plants and vegetation. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp 287–313
Gottfried M, Pauli H, Futschik A, Akhalkatsi M, Barančok P, Benito Alonso JL, Coldea G, Dick J, Erschbamer B, MaR Fernández Calzado, Kazakis G, Krajči J, Larsson P, Mallaun M, Michelsen O, Moiseev D, Moiseev P, Molau U, Merzouki A, Nagy L, Nakhutsrishvili G, Pedersen B, Pelino G, Puscas M, Rossi G, Stanisci A, Theurillat J-P, Tomaselli M, Villar L, Vittoz P, Vogiatzakis I, Grabherr G (2012) Continent-wide response of mountain vegetation to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1329
Harold AS, Mooi RD (1994) Areas of endemism: definition and recognition criteria. Syst Biol 43(2):261–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/2413466
Hausdorf B, Hennig C (2003) Biotic element analysis in biogeography. Syst Biol 52(5):717–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235584
Hobohm C (2014) Endemism in vascular plants. Springer, Dordrecht
Hoffmeister CH, Ferrari A (2016) Areas of endemism of arthropods in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil): an approach based on a metaconsensus criterion using endemicity analysis. Biol J Linn Soc 119(1):126–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12802
Jetz W, Rahbek C, Colwell RK (2004) The coincidence of rarity and richness and the potential signature of history in centres of endemism. Ecol Lett 7(12):1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00678.x
Karimi A, Jones K (2020) Assessing national human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation in Iran. Ambio 49:1506–1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01305-8
Kenar N, Ketenoğlu O (2016) The phytosociology of Melendiz Mountain in the Cappadocian part of Central Anatolia (Niğde, Turkey). Phytocoenologia 46:141–183. https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/2016/0065
Kolahi M, Sakai T, Moriya K, Makhdoum MF, Koyama L (2013) Assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas management in Iran: case study in Khojir National Park. Environ Manage 52(2):514–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0061-5
Körner C (1995) Alpine plant diversity: a global survey and functional interpretations. In: Chapin FSKC (ed) Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem consequences, vol 113. Ecolgical studies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 45–62
Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life—functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Körner C, Paulsen J, Spehn EM (2011) A definition of mountains and their bioclimatic belts for global comparisons of biodiversity data. Alp Bot 121(2):73–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-011-0094-4
Kürschner H, Parolly G (2012) The Central Anatolian Steppe. In: Werger MJA, van Staalduinen MA (eds) Eurasian Steppes ecological problems and livelihoods in a changing world. Plant and vegetation. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–171
Lago-Barcia D, DaSilva MB, Conti LA, Carbayo F (2020) Areas of endemism of land planarians (Platyhelminthes: Tricladida) in the Southern Atlantic Forest. PLOS One 15(7):e0235949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235949
Linder HP (2001) On areas of endemism, with an example from the African Restionaceae. Syst Biol 50(6):892–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351501753462867
Major J (1988) Endemism: a botanical perspective. In: Myers AA, Giller PS (eds) Analytical biogeography. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 117–146
Martínez-Hernández F, Mendoza-Fernández AJ, Pérez-García FJ, Martínez-Nieto MI, Garrido-Becerra JA, Salmerón-Sánchez E, Merlo ME, Gil C, Mota JF (2015) Areas of endemism as a conservation criterion for Iberian gypsophilous flora: a multi-scale test using the NDM/VNDM program. Plant Biosyst 149(3):483–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2015.1040481
Mittermeier RA, Robles GP, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, da Fonseca GAB (2005) Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Conservation International, Washington DC
Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (eds) Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–22
Morrone JJ (1994) On the identification of areas of endemism. Syst Biol 43(3):438–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/43.3.438
Morrone JJ (2008) Evolutionary biogeography: an integrative approach with case studies. Columbia University Press, New York
Morrone JJ (2014) Parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE) revisited. J Biogeogr 41(5):842–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12251
Muellner-Riehl AN, Schnitzler J, Kissling WD, Mosbrugger V, Rijsdijk KF, Seijmonsbergen AC, Versteegh H, Favre A (2019) Origins of global mountain plant biodiversity: testing the ‘mountain-geobiodiversity hypothesis.’ J Biogeogr 46(12):2826–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13715
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772):853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Nelson G, Platnick N (1981) Systematics and biogeography. Columbia Univ Press, New York, USA
Noroozi J, Akhani H, Breckle S-W (2008) Biodiversity and phytogeography of the alpine flora of Iran. Biodivers Conserv 17(3):493–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9246-7
Noroozi J, Moser D, Essl F (2016) Diversity, distribution, ecology and description rates of alpine endemic plant species from Iranian mountains. Alp Bot 126(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-015-0160-4
Noroozi J, Talebi A, Doostmohammadi M, Rumpf SB, Linder HP, Schneeweiss GM (2018) Hotspots within a global biodiversity hotspot—areas of endemism are associated with high mountain ranges. Sci Rep 8(1):10345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28504-9
Noroozi J, Talebi A, Doostmohammadi M, Manafzadeh S, Asgarpour Z, Schneeweiss GM (2019a) Endemic diversity and distribution of the Iranian vascular flora across phytogeographical regions, biodiversity hotspots and areas of endemism. Sci Rep 9(1):12991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49417-1
Noroozi J, Naqinezhad A, Talebi A, Doostmohammadi M, Plutzar C, Rumpf SB, Asgarpour Z, Schneeweiss GM (2019b) Hotspots of vascular plant endemism in a global biodiversity hotspot in Southwest Asia suffer from significant conservation gaps. Biol Conserv 237:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.005
Noroozi J, Zare G, Sherafati M, Mahmoodi M, Moser D, Asgarpour Z, Schneeweiss GM (2019c) Patterns of endemism in Turkey, the meeting point of three global biodiversity hotspots, based on three diverse families of vascular plants. Front Ecol Evol 7 (159). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00159
Olivero J, Márquez AL, Real R (2012) Integrating fuzzy logic and statistics to improve the reliable delimitation of biogeographic regions and transition zones. Syst Biol 62(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys061
Parolly G (2020) The Anatolian high-mountain ranges—plant biversity between two seas. In: Noroozi J (ed) Plant biogeography and vegetation of high mountains of Central and South-West Asia, vol 17. Plant and vegetation. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp 215–286
Pauli H, Gottfried M, Dullinger S, Abdaladze O, Akhalkatsi M, Alonso JLB, Coldea G, Dick J, Erschbamer B, Calzado RF, Ghosn D, Holten JI, Kanka R, Kazakis G, Kollár J, Larsson P, Moiseev P, Moiseev D, Molau U, Mesa JM, Nagy L, Pelino G, Puşcaş M, Rossi G, Stanisci A, Syverhuset AO, Theurillat J-P, Tomaselli M, Unterluggauer P, Villar L, Vittoz P, Grabherr G (2012) Recent plant diversity changes on Europe’s mountain summits. Science 336(6079):353–355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219033
Rahbek C, Borregaard MK, Colwell RK, Dalsgaard B, Holt BG, Morueta-Holme N, Nogues-Bravo D, Whittaker RJ, Fjeldså J (2019) Humboldt’s enigma: what causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science 365(6458):1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0149
Rechinger KH (1963–2015) Flora Iranica, vol 1–181. Akad. Druck-Verlagsanstalt. & Naturhist. Mus. Wien, Graz & Wien
Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT (2008) Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. PNAS 105(4):1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706851105
Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT (2011) Multilevel compression of random walks on networks reveals hierarchical organization in large integrated systems. PLOS One 6(4):e18209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018209
Rosvall M, Axelsson D, Bergstrom CT (2009) The map equation. Eur Phys J Spec Top 178(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2010-01179-1
Salinas NR, Wheeler WC (2019) Statistical modeling of distribution patterns: a Markov random field implementation and its application on areas of endemism. Syst Biol 69(1):76–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz033
Sandel B, Arge L, Dalsgaard B, Davies RG, Gaston KJ, Sutherland WJ, Svenning JC (2011) The influence of Late Quaternary climate-change velocity on species endemism. Science 334(6056):660–664. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210173
Stöcklin J (1968) Structural history and tectonics of Iran; a review. AAPG Bull 52(7):1229–1258
Szumik CA, Goloboff PA (2004) Areas of endemism: an improved optimality criterion. Syst Biol 53(6):968–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490888859
Szumik CA, Goloboff PA (2015) Higher taxa and the identification of areas of endemism. Cladistics 31(5):568–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12112
Szumik CA, Cuezzo F, Goloboff PA, Chalup AE (2002) An optimality criterion to determine areas of endemism. Syst Biol 51(5):806–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150290102483
Testolin R, Attorre F, Jiménez-Alfaro B (2020) Global distribution and bioclimatic characterization of alpine biomes. Ecography 43(6):779–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05012
Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Townsend Peterson A, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427(6970):145–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02121
Torres-Miranda A, Luna-Vega I, Oyama K (2013) New approaches to the biogeography and areas of endemism of red oaks (Quercus L., Section Lobatae). Syst Biol 62(4):555–573. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt021
Tribsch A, Schönswetter P (2003) Patterns of endemism and comparative phylogeography confirm palaeoenvironmental evidence for Pleistocene Refugia in the Eastern Alps. Taxon 52(3):477–497. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647447
Urban MC (2015) Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348(6234):571–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984
Vilhena DA, Antonelli A (2015) A network approach for identifying and delimiting biogeographical regions. Nat Commun 6:6848. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7848
Weirauch C, Seltmann KC, Schuh RT, Schwartz MD, Johnson C, Feist MA, Soltis PS (2017) Areas of endemism in the Nearctic: a case study of 1339 species of Miridae (Insecta: Hemiptera) and their plant hosts. Cladistics 33:279–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12169
Willis KJ, Bhagwat SA (2009) Biodiversity and climate change. Science 326(5954):806–807. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178838
Zhang D-C, Ye J-X, Sun H (2016) Quantitative approaches to identify floristic units and centres of species endemism in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, south-western China. J Biogeogr 43(12):2465–2476. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12819
Zohary M (1973) Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East 2. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Zahra Asgarpour for geo-referencing parts of the data.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Vienna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Noroozi, J., Khalvati, S., Nafisi, H. et al. Endemics determine bioregionalization in the alpine zone of the Irano-Anatolian biodiversity hotspot (South-West Asia). Alp Botany 131, 177–186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-021-00266-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-021-00266-7