Abstract
We investigate the question: for which functions \(f(x_1,\ldots ,x_n),~g(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\) the asymptotic expansion of the integral \(\int g(x_1,\ldots ,x_n) e^{\frac{f(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)+x_1y_1+\dots +x_ny_n}{\hbar }}dx_1\ldots dx_n\) consists only of the first term. We reveal a hidden projective invariance of the problem which establishes its relation with geometry of projective hypersurfaces of the form \(\{(1:x_1:\ldots :x_n:f)\}\). We also construct various examples, in particular we prove that Kummer surface in \({\mathbb {P}}^3\) gives a solution to our problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here and in the sequel we use vector notations like \(\vec {x}=(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\), \(\vec {t}=(t_1,\ldots ,t_n)\) etc. We will also use the notation for dot product \(\vec {x}\cdot \vec {y}=x_1y_1+\dots +x_ny_n\).
The name is not totally precise as the Feynman graphs appearing in the expansion (1.4) are not necessarily connected, see “Appendix”.
In the sequel we will often use notation \(y_1=x_{n+1},\ldots ,y_n=x_{2n}\).
We will see later that it is more natural to consider differential operators acting on half-densities instead of functions.
There is another approach (not described in this paper) based on Gelfand–Kazhdan type formal geometry.
For any non-degenerate hypersurface in \({\mathbb {P}}({\mathbb {A}}^{n+2})\) the corresponding germ of cones satisfies above constraints at generic point.
In invariant terms, we have a hypersurface in affine space \({\mathbb {A}}^{n+1}\), endowed with a volume element.
Generically, the invariance under the second copy of GL(1) means that L is a conormal bundle to a subvariety in \({\mathbb {A}}^{n+2}\) of arbitrary dimension. The invariance under the first copy of GL(1) means that this subvariety is conical.
Recall that C is defined by equation \(F_1=0\) and therefore, G is proportional to \(\delta (F_1)\). For example, we have \(P(x_0,\ldots ,x_{n+1})\delta (P(x_0,\ldots ,x_{n+1}))=0\) for an arbitrary polynomial P.
Computation of this Taylor series is not a straightforward problem because while arguments of \(F_2\) pairwise commute, parts of these arguments at different powers of \(\hbar \) does not, for example \(\hbar \partial _{x_i}\) does not commute with \(Q_i\).
Holonomicity at generic point means that the space of \(G_1\) is finite-dimensional.
References
Etingof, P., Kazhdan, D., Polishchuk, A.: When is the Fourier transform of an elementary function elementary? Sel. Math. New Ser. 8, 27–66 (2002)
Kazhdan, D.: An Algebraic Integration, Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives, pp. 93–115. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000)
Kontsevich, M., Odesskii, A.: Multiplication kernels. Lett. Math. Phys. 111(6), 152 (2021)
Bessis, D., Itzykson, C., Zuber, J.B.: Quantum field theory techniques in graphical enumeration. Adv. Appl. Math. 1(2), 109–157 (1980)
Moyal, J.: Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 45, 99 (1949)
Brylinski, J.L.: Transformations canoniques, Dualité projective, Théorie de Lefschetz, Transformations de Fourier et sommes trigonométriques. Asterisque 140–141, 3–134 (1986)
Encyclopedia of Special Functions: The Askey-Bateman Project, Tables of Integral Transforms, vol. II. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. (1954). Section 8.6, formula 23
Coffman, A., Schwartz, A., Stanton, C.: The Algebra and geometry of Steiner and other quadratically parametrizable surfaces. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 13(3), 257–286 (1996)
Dolgachev, I.: Kummer surfaces: 200 years of study. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 67(10), 1 (2020)
Wilczynski, E.I.: Projective-differential geometry of curved surfaces. Trans. AMS 8, 233–260 (1907)
Wilczynski, E.I.: Projective-differential geometry of curved surfaces. Trans. AMS 9, 79–120, 293–315 (1908)
Wilczynski, E.I.: Projective-differential geometry of curved surfaces. Trans. AMS 10176–200, 279–296 (1909)
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Robert Bryant and Joseph M. Landsberg for useful discussions. We are grateful to Nikolai Perkhunkov for useful advises and help with managing huge Maple computations. A.O. is grateful to IHES for invitations and an excellent working atmosphere.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Explicit formulas for equations
Appendix: Explicit formulas for equations
Recall that f, g are functions in variables \(\vec {x}=(x_1,x_2,\dots ,x_n)\) and we assume that the Hessian matrix \(\partial ^2 f:=(\partial _i \partial _j f)_{1\le i,j \le n}\) is non-degenerate. Denote by
the inverse matrix-valued function.
Main notation: for \(k\ge 1\) (all summation variables and indices are assumed to be integers),
Here the symmetry factor is defined by
where \(m_1,m_2,\dots \ge 1\) are multiplicities of the repeating terms in sequence \((d_1,d_2,\dots ,d_v)\), i.e.
Meaning: let us expand f at some point \(\vec {x}^{(0)}\) as
where \(f_0=f(\vec {x}^{(0)})\) is a constant, \(f_1,f_2\) are homogeneous polynomials in \(\vec {x}-\vec {x}^{(0)}\) of degree 1 and 2 respectively, and \(f_{\ge 3}\) is a series in \(\vec {x}-\vec {x}^{(0)}\) containing terms of degrees \(\ge 3\) only.
Then the formal Fourier transform, at point
is equal, after normalization, to
In terms of (not connected) Feynman graphs, \(v\ge 0\) denotes the number of vertices at which we put Taylor coefficients of \(f_{\ge 3}\) (and at exactly one exceptional vertex we put Taylor coefficients of g). We label vertices by \(\{0,1,\dots ,v\}=[0,v]\cap {\mathbb {Z}}\) where 0 corresponds to g, and the rest to \(f_{\ge 3}\). Moreover, we assume that the ordering of vertices is chosen in such a way that \(d_1\ge d_2\ge \cdots \ge d_v\ge 3\) where for all \(i\in [0,v]\) number \(d_i\) is the degree (valency) of vertex labeled by i. Denote by \(a_{ij}\ge 0\) the number of edges connecting vertices i and j. We enumerate edges connecting i and j by \(\{1,\dots , a_{ij}\}\). Then we put two space indices \(b_{ijl},c_{ijl}\in [1,n]\) on two ends of the edge corresponding to \(l\in [1,a_{ij}]\). The factors \(\prod _i m_i!\), \(\prod _{ij}a_{ij}!\) and \(\prod _i 2^{a_{ii}}\) come from symmetry, the rest is the usual Wick formula.
The total number of edges e satisfies constraints:
hence in the expression \(A_k\) the propagator \((p^{ij})_{1\le i,j\le n}\) appears at most 3k times.
One-loop exactness is equivalent to an infinite sequence of differential equations:
Up to symmetry, the number of distinct graphs for \(A_1,A_2,A_3\) is 5, 41, 378 respectively.
For example, 5 graphs appearing in \(A_1\) are the following:
and the expression \(A_1\) is
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.