Skip to main content
Log in

When the Fourier transform is one loop exact?

  • Published:
Selecta Mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the question: for which functions \(f(x_1,\ldots ,x_n),~g(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\) the asymptotic expansion of the integral \(\int g(x_1,\ldots ,x_n) e^{\frac{f(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)+x_1y_1+\dots +x_ny_n}{\hbar }}dx_1\ldots dx_n\) consists only of the first term. We reveal a hidden projective invariance of the problem which establishes its relation with geometry of projective hypersurfaces of the form \(\{(1:x_1:\ldots :x_n:f)\}\). We also construct various examples, in particular we prove that Kummer surface in \({\mathbb {P}}^3\) gives a solution to our problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here and in the sequel we use vector notations like \(\vec {x}=(x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\), \(\vec {t}=(t_1,\ldots ,t_n)\) etc. We will also use the notation for dot product \(\vec {x}\cdot \vec {y}=x_1y_1+\dots +x_ny_n\).

  2. The name is not totally precise as the Feynman graphs appearing in the expansion (1.4) are not necessarily connected, see “Appendix”.

  3. In the sequel we will often use notation \(y_1=x_{n+1},\ldots ,y_n=x_{2n}\).

  4. We will see later that it is more natural to consider differential operators acting on half-densities instead of functions.

  5. There is another approach (not described in this paper) based on Gelfand–Kazhdan type formal geometry.

  6. For any non-degenerate hypersurface in \({\mathbb {P}}({\mathbb {A}}^{n+2})\) the corresponding germ of cones satisfies above constraints at generic point.

  7. In invariant terms, we have a hypersurface in affine space \({\mathbb {A}}^{n+1}\), endowed with a volume element.

  8. Generically, the invariance under the second copy of GL(1) means that L is a conormal bundle to a subvariety in \({\mathbb {A}}^{n+2}\) of arbitrary dimension. The invariance under the first copy of GL(1) means that this subvariety is conical.

  9. Recall that C is defined by equation \(F_1=0\) and therefore, G is proportional to \(\delta (F_1)\). For example, we have \(P(x_0,\ldots ,x_{n+1})\delta (P(x_0,\ldots ,x_{n+1}))=0\) for an arbitrary polynomial P.

  10. Computation of this Taylor series is not a straightforward problem because while arguments of \(F_2\) pairwise commute, parts of these arguments at different powers of \(\hbar \) does not, for example \(\hbar \partial _{x_i}\) does not commute with \(Q_i\).

  11. Holonomicity at generic point means that the space of \(G_1\) is finite-dimensional.

References

  1. Etingof, P., Kazhdan, D., Polishchuk, A.: When is the Fourier transform of an elementary function elementary? Sel. Math. New Ser. 8, 27–66 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kazhdan, D.: An Algebraic Integration, Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives, pp. 93–115. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kontsevich, M., Odesskii, A.: Multiplication kernels. Lett. Math. Phys. 111(6), 152 (2021)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bessis, D., Itzykson, C., Zuber, J.B.: Quantum field theory techniques in graphical enumeration. Adv. Appl. Math. 1(2), 109–157 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Moyal, J.: Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 45, 99 (1949)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Brylinski, J.L.: Transformations canoniques, Dualité projective, Théorie de Lefschetz, Transformations de Fourier et sommes trigonométriques. Asterisque 140–141, 3–134 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Encyclopedia of Special Functions: The Askey-Bateman Project, Tables of Integral Transforms, vol. II. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. (1954). Section 8.6, formula 23

  8. Coffman, A., Schwartz, A., Stanton, C.: The Algebra and geometry of Steiner and other quadratically parametrizable surfaces. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 13(3), 257–286 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dolgachev, I.: Kummer surfaces: 200 years of study. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 67(10), 1 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilczynski, E.I.: Projective-differential geometry of curved surfaces. Trans. AMS 8, 233–260 (1907)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilczynski, E.I.: Projective-differential geometry of curved surfaces. Trans. AMS 9, 79–120, 293–315 (1908)

  12. Wilczynski, E.I.: Projective-differential geometry of curved surfaces. Trans. AMS 10176–200, 279–296 (1909)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Robert Bryant and Joseph M. Landsberg for useful discussions. We are grateful to Nikolai Perkhunkov for useful advises and help with managing huge Maple computations. A.O. is grateful to IHES for invitations and an excellent working atmosphere.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Odesskii.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Explicit formulas for equations

Appendix: Explicit formulas for equations

Recall that fg are functions in variables \(\vec {x}=(x_1,x_2,\dots ,x_n)\) and we assume that the Hessian matrix \(\partial ^2 f:=(\partial _i \partial _j f)_{1\le i,j \le n}\) is non-degenerate. Denote by

$$\begin{aligned} (p^{ij})_{1\le i,j\le n}:=(\partial ^2 f)^{-1} \end{aligned}$$

the inverse matrix-valued function.

Main notation: for \(k\ge 1\) (all summation variables and indices are assumed to be integers),

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} A_k:=\sum _{v\in [0,2k]} \sum _{\begin{array}{c} d_0\in [0,\infty );\\ d_1,\dots ,d_v\in [3,\infty )\\ \text{ such } \text{ that } \\ \sum _i d_i=2(k+v),\\ d_1\ge d_2\ge \dots \ge d_v \end{array}} \sum _{\begin{array}{c} a_{ij}\in [0,\infty )\\ \text{ where } {0\le i\le j\le v},\\ \text{ satisfying } \forall i:\\ d_i=\sum _{j<i} a_{ji}+\\ +2a_{ii}+\sum _{j>i}a_{ij} \end{array}} \frac{(-1)^v}{\text {Sym}_{(d_i),(a_{ij})}}\sum _{\begin{array}{c} b_{ijl},c_{ijl}\in [1,n]\\ \text{ where } \\ 1\le i\le j\le v\\ \text{ and } 1\le l\le a_{ij} \end{array}} \left( \prod _{\begin{array}{c} i,j\in [1,v]\\ l\in [1, a_{ij}] \\ \text{ such } \text{ that } \\ i\le j \end{array}}p^{b_{ijl},c_{ijl}}\right) \cdot \\{} & {} \quad \cdot \left[ \prod _{l_1\in [1, a_{00}]} (\partial _{b_{00l_1}}\partial _{c_{00l_1}})\prod _{\begin{array}{c} i\in [1,v]\\ l_2 \in [1,a_{0i}] \end{array}}\partial _{b_{0il_2}}g\right] \\{} & {} \quad \cdot \prod _{i\in [1,v]}\left[ \prod _{\begin{array}{c} j\in [0,i)\\ l_1\in [1,a_{ji}] \end{array}}\partial _{c_{jil_1}} \prod _{l_2\in [1,a_{ii}]}(\partial _{b_{iil_2}}\partial _{c_{iil_2}})\prod _{\begin{array}{c} j\in (i ,v]\\ l_3\in [1,a_{ij}] \end{array}} \partial _{b_{ijl_3}}f\right] \end{aligned}$$

Here the symmetry factor is defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \text {Sym}_{(d_i),(a_{ij})}=\prod _i m_i!\cdot \prod _{\begin{array}{c} i,j\in [0,v]\\ \text{ such } \text{ that }\\ i\le j \end{array}}{a_{ij}!}\cdot \prod _{i\in [0,v]}{2^{a_{ii}}} \end{aligned}$$

where \(m_1,m_2,\dots \ge 1\) are multiplicities of the repeating terms in sequence \((d_1,d_2,\dots ,d_v)\), i.e.

$$\begin{aligned} d_1=\cdots =d_{m_1}>d_{m_1+1}=\cdots =d_{m_1+m_2}>d_{m_1+m_2+1}=\cdots \end{aligned}$$

Meaning: let us expand f at some point \(\vec {x}^{(0)}\) as

$$\begin{aligned} f=f_0+f_1+f_2+f_{\ge 3} \end{aligned}$$

where \(f_0=f(\vec {x}^{(0)})\) is a constant, \(f_1,f_2\) are homogeneous polynomials in \(\vec {x}-\vec {x}^{(0)}\) of degree 1 and 2 respectively, and \(f_{\ge 3}\) is a series in \(\vec {x}-\vec {x}^{(0)}\) containing terms of degrees \(\ge 3\) only.

Then the formal Fourier transform, at point

$$\begin{aligned} \vec {y}^{(0)}=\partial f_{|\vec {x}^{(0)}}:=(\partial _1 f,\dots ,\partial _n f)_{|\vec {x}^{(0)}} \end{aligned}$$

is equal, after normalization, to

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \int g \,e^{-\frac{f-f_0-f_1}{\hbar }} d^n\vec {x}=\int g \,e^{-\frac{f_2+f_{\ge 3}}{\hbar }} d^n\vec {x}\\{} & {} \quad =\sum _{v\ge 0} \frac{(-1)^v}{v!}\hbar ^{-v}\int g f_{\ge 3}^v\,e^{-\frac{f_2}{\hbar }} d^n\vec {x}\\{} & {} \quad =(2\pi \hbar )^{n/2}\det (\partial ^2 f_{|\vec {x}^{(0)}})^{-1/2}\left( g_{|\vec {x}^{(0)}}+\sum _{k\ge 1} \hbar ^k {A_k}_{|\vec {x}^{(0)}}\right) \end{aligned}$$

In terms of (not connected) Feynman graphs, \(v\ge 0\) denotes the number of vertices at which we put Taylor coefficients of \(f_{\ge 3}\) (and at exactly one exceptional vertex we put Taylor coefficients of g). We label vertices by \(\{0,1,\dots ,v\}=[0,v]\cap {\mathbb {Z}}\) where 0 corresponds to g, and the rest to \(f_{\ge 3}\). Moreover, we assume that the ordering of vertices is chosen in such a way that \(d_1\ge d_2\ge \cdots \ge d_v\ge 3\) where for all \(i\in [0,v]\) number \(d_i\) is the degree (valency) of vertex labeled by i. Denote by \(a_{ij}\ge 0\) the number of edges connecting vertices i and j. We enumerate edges connecting i and j by \(\{1,\dots , a_{ij}\}\). Then we put two space indices \(b_{ijl},c_{ijl}\in [1,n]\) on two ends of the edge corresponding to \(l\in [1,a_{ij}]\). The factors \(\prod _i m_i!\), \(\prod _{ij}a_{ij}!\) and \(\prod _i 2^{a_{ii}}\) come from symmetry, the rest is the usual Wick formula.

The total number of edges e satisfies constraints:

$$\begin{aligned} e\ge {3\over 2}v, \quad k=e-v\implies e\in \{k,\dots ,3k\}\,, \end{aligned}$$

hence in the expression \(A_k\) the propagator \((p^{ij})_{1\le i,j\le n}\) appears at most 3k times.

One-loop exactness is equivalent to an infinite sequence of differential equations:

$$\begin{aligned} A_1=0,~A_2=0,\dots \end{aligned}$$
(A.47)

Up to symmetry, the number of distinct graphs for \(A_1,A_2,A_3\) is 5, 41, 378 respectively.

For example, 5 graphs appearing in \(A_1\) are the following:

figure a

and the expression \(A_1\) is

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} {1\over 2}\sum _{i,j}p^{ij}\,\partial _{ij} g-{1\over 2}\sum _{i_1 j_1 i_2 j_2}p^{i_1 j_1}p^{i_2 j_2}\,\partial _{i_1}g\, \partial _{j_1 i_2 j_2}f\\{} & {} \quad -{1\over 8}\,g\sum _{i_1 j_2 i_2 j_2}p^{i_1 j_1}p^{i_2 j_2}\,\partial _{i_1 j_1 i_2 j_2}f+{1\over 8}\,g\sum _{i_1 j_2 i_2 j_2 i_3 j_3}p^{i_1 j_1}p^{i_2 j_2}p^{i_3 j_3}\,\partial _{i_1 j_1 i_2}f \,\partial _{j_2 i_3 j_3}f\\{} & {} \quad +{1\over 12}\,g\sum _{i_1 j_1 i_2 j_2 i_3 j_3}p^{i_1 j_1}p^{i_2 j_2}p^{i_3 j_3}\,\partial _{i_1 i_2 i_3}f\,\partial _{j_1 j_2 j_3}f\,. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kontsevich, M., Odesskii, A. When the Fourier transform is one loop exact?. Sel. Math. New Ser. 30, 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-024-00920-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-024-00920-y

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation