Abstract
Scattering amplitudes in quantum field theories have intricate analytic properties as functions of the energies and momenta of the scattered particles. In perturbation theory, their singularities are governed by a set of nonlinear polynomial equations, known as Landau equations, for each individual Feynman diagram. The singularity locus of the associated Feynman integral is made precise with the notion of the Landau discriminant, which characterizes when the Landau equations admit a solution. In order to compute this discriminant, we present approaches from classical elimination theory, as well as a numerical algorithm based on homotopy continuation. These methods allow us to compute Landau discriminants of various Feynman diagrams up to 3 loops, which were previously out of reach. For instance, the Landau discriminant of the envelope diagram is a reducible surface of degree 45 in the three-dimensional space of kinematic invariants. We investigate geometric properties of the Landau discriminant, such as irreducibility, dimension and degree. In particular, we find simple examples in which the Landau discriminant has codimension greater than one. Furthermore, we describe a numerical procedure for determining which parts of the Landau discriminant lie in the physical regions. In order to study degenerate limits of Landau equations and bounds on the degree of the Landau discriminant, we introduce Landau polytopes and study their facet structure. Finally, we provide an efficient numerical algorithm for the computation of the number of master integrals based on the connection to algebraic statistics. The algorithms used in this work are implemented in the open-source Julia package Landau.jl available at https://mathrepo.mis.mpg.de/Landau/.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. A. Smirnov, Analytic tools for Feynman integrals, vol. 250 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34886-0 [INSPIRE].
S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod and M. von Hippel, Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 241601 [arXiv:1609.00669] [INSPIRE].
S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou, Six-Gluon amplitudes in planar \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory at six and seven loops, JHEP 08 (2019) 016 [arXiv:1903.10890] [INSPIRE].
A. L. Guerrieri, J. Penedones and P. Vieira, S-matrix bootstrap for effective field theories: massless pions, JHEP 06 (2021) 088 [arXiv:2011.02802] [INSPIRE].
A. Guerrieri and A. Sever, Rigorous Bounds on the Analytic S Matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 251601 [arXiv:2106.10257] [INSPIRE].
A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Miró, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau and F. Riva, Positive moments for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 036006 [arXiv:2011.00037] [INSPIRE].
A. J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang and S.-Y. Zhou, New positivity bounds from full crossing symmetry, JHEP 05 (2021) 255 [arXiv:2011.02400] [INSPIRE].
S. Caron-Huot and V. Van Duong, Extremal Effective Field Theories, JHEP 05 (2021) 280 [arXiv:2011.02957] [INSPIRE].
I. Prlina, M. Spradlin and S. Stanojevic, All-loop singularities of scattering amplitudes in massless planar theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 081601 [arXiv:1805.11617] [INSPIRE].
J. Drummond, J. Foster, O. Gürdogan and C. Kalousios, Algebraic singularities of scattering amplitudes from tropical geometry, JHEP 04 (2021) 002 [arXiv:1912.08217] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Lam and M. Spradlin, Non-perturbative geometries for planar \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 SYM amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2021) 065 [arXiv:1912.08222] [INSPIRE].
N. Henke and G. Papathanasiou, How tropical are seven- and eight-particle amplitudes?, JHEP 08 (2020) 005 [arXiv:1912.08254] [INSPIRE].
J. Mago, A. Schreiber, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, Symbol alphabets from plabic graphs, JHEP 10 (2020) 128 [arXiv:2007.00646] [INSPIRE].
J. Golden, A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich, Motivic Amplitudes and Cluster Coordinates, JHEP 01 (2014) 091 [arXiv:1305.1617] [INSPIRE].
D. Chicherin, J. M. Henn and G. Papathanasiou, Cluster algebras for Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 091603 [arXiv:2012.12285] [INSPIRE].
R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive and J. C. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix, Cambridge University Press (1966).
I. Todorov, Analytic Properties of Feynman Diagrams in Quantum Field Theory, International Series of Monographs in Natural Philosophy 38 (2014).
S. Timme, Mixed precision path tracking for polynomial homotopy continuation, arXiv:1902.02968.
S. Telen, M. V. Barel and J. Verschelde, A robust numerical path tracking algorithm for polynomial homotopy continuation, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 42 (2020) A3610 [arXiv:1909.04984].
J. Verschelde, Algorithm 795: PHCpack: A general-purpose solver for polynomial systems by homotopy continuation, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 25 (1999) 251.
D. J. Bates, A. J. Sommese, J. D. Hauenstein and C. W. Wampler, Numerically solving polynomial systems with Bertini, SIAM (2013).
P. Breiding and S. Timme, HomotopyContinuation.jl: A Package for Homotopy Continuation in Julia, in International Congress on Mathematical Software – ICMS 2018 Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 10931 (2018) 458.
J. D. Bjorken, Experimental tests of Quantum electrodynamics and spectral representations of Green’s functions in perturbation theory, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, U.S.A. (1959).
L. D. Landau, On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. 13 (1959) 181 [INSPIRE].
N. Nakanishi, Ordinary and Anomalous Thresholds in Perturbation Theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. 22 (1959) 128.
S. Mizera, Bounds on Crossing Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 081701 [arXiv:2101.08266] [INSPIRE].
S. Mizera, Crossing symmetry in the planar limit, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 045003 [arXiv:2104.12776] [INSPIRE].
F. C. S. Brown, On the periods of some Feynman integrals, arXiv:0910.0114 [INSPIRE].
S. Bloch and D. Kreimer, Feynman amplitudes and Landau singularities for 1-loop graphs, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 4 (2010) 709 [arXiv:1007.0338] [INSPIRE].
S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr and E. Gardi, Cuts from residues: the one-loop case, JHEP 06 (2017) 114 [arXiv:1702.03163] [INSPIRE].
K. Schultka, Microlocal analyticity of Feynman integrals, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany (2019), https://doi.org/10.18452/20161.
J. Collins, A new and complete proof of the Landau condition for pinch singularities of Feynman graphs and other integrals, arXiv:2007.04085 [INSPIRE].
M. Berghoff and D. Kreimer, Graph complexes and Feynman rules, arXiv:2008.09540 [INSPIRE].
M. Mühlbauer, Momentum Space Landau Equations Via Isotopy Techniques, arXiv:2011.10368 [INSPIRE].
H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz and C. Vergu, Implications of the Landau equations for iterated integrals, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L061701 [arXiv:2109.09744] [INSPIRE].
J. Boehm, D. Bendle, W. Decker, A. Georgoudis, F.-J. Pfreundt, M. Rahn et al., Module Intersection for the Integration-by-Parts Reduction of Multi-Loop Feynman Integrals, PoS MA2019 (2022) 004 [arXiv:2010.06895] [INSPIRE].
I. M. Gelfand, M. Kapranov and A. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional determinants, Springer Science & Business Media (2008).
D. R. Grayson and M. E. Stillman, Macaulay2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry, http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/.
J. D. Hauenstein and A. J. Sommese, Witness sets of projections, Applied Mathematics and Computation 217 (2010) 3349.
T. Duff, C. Hill, A. Jensen, K. Lee, A. Leykin and J. Sommars, Solving polynomial systems via homotopy continuation and monodromy, IMA J. Num. Anal. 39 (2019) 1421 [arXiv:1609.08722].
P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera, Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory, JHEP 02 (2019) 139 [arXiv:1810.03818] [INSPIRE].
M. Michalek and B. Sturmfels, Invitation to nonlinear algebra, vol. 211, American Mathematical Society (2021).
D. B. Fairlie, P. V. Landshoff, J. Nuttall and J. C. Polkinghorne, Singularities of the Second Type, J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962) 594.
D. Cox, J. Little and D. O’Shea, Ideals, varieties, and algorithms: an introduction to computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, Springer Science & Business Media (2013).
I. R. Shafarevich, Basic algebraic geometry. 1, Springer (2013) third ed..
G. W. Stewart, Perturbation theory for the singular value decomposition, SVD and Signal Processing, II: Algorithms, Analysis and Applications (1991) 99.
J. D. Hauenstein, J. I. Rodriguez and F. Sottile, Numerical computation of Galois groups, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 18 (2018) 867 [arXiv:1605.07806].
C. Risk, Analyticity of the Envelope Diagrams, J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 2168.
R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, J. C. Polkinghorne and J. C. Taylor, Acnodes and Cusps on Landau Curves, J. Math. Phys. 2 (1961) 656.
T. W. B. Kibble, Kinematics of General Scattering Processes and the Mandelstam Representation, Phys. Rev. 117 (1960) 1159 [INSPIRE].
S. Coleman and R. E. Norton, Singularities in the physical region, Nuovo Cim. 38 (1965) 438 [INSPIRE].
D. A. Cox, J. B. Little and H. K. Schenck, Toric varieties, vol. 124, American Mathematical Society (2011).
S. Telen, Solving systems of polynomial equations, doctoral dissertation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, https://simontelen.webnode.com/publications/ (2020).
L. de la Cruz, Feynman integrals as A-hypergeometric functions, JHEP 12 (2019) 123 [arXiv:1907.00507] [INSPIRE].
R. P. Klausen, Hypergeometric Series Representations of Feynman Integrals by GKZ Hypergeometric Systems, JHEP 04 (2020) 121 [arXiv:1910.08651] [INSPIRE].
T.-F. Feng, C.-H. Chang, J.-B. Chen and H.-B. Zhang, GKZ-hypergeometric systems for Feynman integrals, Nucl. Phys. B 953 (2020) 114952 [arXiv:1912.01726] [INSPIRE].
F. Tellander and M. Helmer, Cohen-Macaulay Property of Feynman Integrals, arXiv:2108.01410 [INSPIRE].
T. Duff, S. Telen, E. Walker and T. Yahl, Polyhedral Homotopies in Cox Coordinates, arXiv:2012.04255.
M. R. Bender and S. Telen, Toric eigenvalue methods for solving sparse polynomial systems, arXiv:2006.10654.
S. Telen, Numerical root finding via Cox rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 224 (2020) 106367 [arXiv:1903.12002].
N. Nakanishi, Parametric Integral Formulas and Analytic Properties in Perturbation Theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 18 (1961) 1.
F. Brown, Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 11 (2017) 453 [arXiv:1512.06409] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Hillman and S. Mizera, Feynman polytopes and the tropical geometry of UV and IR divergences, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 125013 [arXiv:2202.12296] [INSPIRE].
K. Schultka, Toric geometry and regularization of Feynman integrals, arXiv:1806.01086 [INSPIRE].
S. Bloch, H. Esnault and D. Kreimer, On Motives associated to graph polynomials, Commun. Math. Phys. 267 (2006) 181 [math/0510011] [INSPIRE].
A. Pak and A. Smirnov, Geometric approach to asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1626 [arXiv:1011.4863] [INSPIRE].
B. Ananthanarayan, A. Pal, S. Ramanan and R. Sarkar, Unveiling Regions in multi-scale Feynman Integrals using Singularities and Power Geometry, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 57 [arXiv:1810.06270] [INSPIRE].
T. Y. Semenova, A. V. Smirnov and V. A. Smirnov, On the status of expansion by regions, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 136 [arXiv:1809.04325] [INSPIRE].
E. Panzer, Hepp’s bound for Feynman graphs and matroids, arXiv:1908.09820 [INSPIRE].
M. Borinsky, Tropical Monte Carlo quadrature for Feynman integrals, arXiv:2008.12310 [INSPIRE].
E. Gawrilow and M. Joswig, Polymake: a framework for analyzing convex polytopes, in Polytopes — combinatorics and computation, Springer (2000), pp. 43–73.
A. Klemm, C. Nega and R. Safari, The l-loop Banana Amplitude from GKZ Systems and relative Calabi-Yau Periods, JHEP 04 (2020) 088 [arXiv:1912.06201] [INSPIRE].
M. Kaluba, B. Lorenz and S. Timme, Polymake.jl: A New Interface to polymake, in International Congress on Mathematical Software, Springer (2020), pp. 377–385 [arXiv:2003.11381].
A. Postnikov, V. Reiner and L. Williams, Faces of generalized permutohedra, Doc. Math. 13 (2008) 207 [math/0609184].
J. Huh, The maximum likelihood degree of a very affine variety, Compositio Mathematica 149 (2013) 1245 [arXiv:1207.0553].
B. Sturmfels and S. Telen, Likelihood Equations and Scattering Amplitudes, arXiv:2012.05041 [INSPIRE].
D. Agostini, T. Brysiewicz, C. Fevola, L. Kühne, B. Sturmfels and S. Telen, Likelihood Degenerations, arXiv:2107.10518 [INSPIRE].
Z. Liu and X. Zhao, Bootstrapping solutions of scattering equations, JHEP 02 (2019) 071 [arXiv:1810.00384] [INSPIRE].
K. Aomoto and M. Kita, Theory of Hypergeometric Functions, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer (2011).
K. Aomoto, On vanishing of cohomology attached to certain many valued meromorphic functions, J. Math. Soc. Japan 27 (1975) 248.
H. Frellesvig, F. Gasparotto, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, L. Mattiazzi and S. Mizera, Vector Space of Feynman Integrals and Multivariate Intersection Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 201602 [arXiv:1907.02000] [INSPIRE].
S. Mizera and A. Pokraka, From Infinity to Four Dimensions: Higher Residue Pairings and Feynman Integrals, JHEP 02 (2020) 159 [arXiv:1910.11852] [INSPIRE].
R. N. Lee and A. A. Pomeransky, Critical points and number of master integrals, JHEP 11 (2013) 165 [arXiv:1308.6676] [INSPIRE].
T. Bitoun, C. Bogner, R. P. Klausen and E. Panzer, Feynman integral relations from parametric annihilators, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) 497 [arXiv:1712.09215] [INSPIRE].
S. Mizera, Scattering Amplitudes from Intersection Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 141602 [arXiv:1711.00469] [INSPIRE].
H. Frellesvig, F. Gasparotto, S. Laporta, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, L. Mattiazzi et al., Decomposition of Feynman Integrals on the Maximal Cut by Intersection Numbers, JHEP 05 (2019) 153 [arXiv:1901.11510] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinzierl, On the computation of intersection numbers for twisted cocycles, J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021) 072301 [arXiv:2002.01930] [INSPIRE].
H. Frellesvig, F. Gasparotto, S. Laporta, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, L. Mattiazzi et al., Decomposition of Feynman Integrals by Multivariate Intersection Numbers, JHEP 03 (2021) 027 [arXiv:2008.04823] [INSPIRE].
S. Caron-Huot and A. Pokraka, Duals of Feynman integrals. Part I. Differential equations, JHEP 12 (2021) 045 [arXiv:2104.06898] [INSPIRE].
P. Breiding, K. Rose and S. Timme, Certifying zeros of polynomial systems using interval arithmetic, arXiv:2011.05000.
M. Y. Kalmykov and B. A. Kniehl, Counting the number of master integrals for sunrise diagrams via the Mellin-Barnes representation, JHEP 07 (2017) 031 [arXiv:1612.06637] [INSPIRE].
J. B. Boyling, A homological approach to parametric feynman integrals, Nuovo Cim. A 53 (1968) 351.
K. Aomoto, Gauss-Manin connections of Schläfli type for hypersphere arrangements, Annales de l’Institut Fourier 53 (2003) 977.
B. Sturmfels, On the Newton polytope of the resultant, J. Algebr. Comb. 3 (1994) 207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2109.08036
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Mizera, S., Telen, S. Landau discriminants. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)200
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)200