Abstract
A Coxeter group admits infinite-dimensional irreducible complex representations if and only if it is not finite or affine. In this paper, we provide a construction of some of those representations for certain Coxeter groups using some topological information of the corresponding Coxeter graphs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
Not applicable.
References
Hongsheng Hu. Reflection representations of Coxeter groups and homology of Coxeter graphs. Algebr. Represent. Theory, 27(1):961–994, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-023-10242-w, 2024.
James E. Humphreys. Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups, volume 29 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
Shin-ichi Kato. A realization of irreducible representations of affine Weyl groups. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math., 45(2):193–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/1385-7258(83)90056-2 1983.
David Kazhdan and George Lusztig. Proof of the Deligne-Langlands conjecture for Hecke algebras. Invent. Math., 87(1):153–215, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01389157 1987.
Margulis G. A. and Vinberg È. B. Some linear groups virtually having a free quotient. J. Lie Theory, 10(1):171–180, http://eudml.org/doc/120869 2000.
James R. Munkres. Topology. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, second edition, 2000.
Nanhua Xi. Representations of affine Hecke algebras and based rings of affine Weyl groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 20(1):211–217, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-06-00539-X 2007.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank professor Nanhua Xi for useful discussions. The author is also grateful to the anonymous referee who provided a proof of Theorem 1.1, and to the other referee for useful comments which improved this paper a lot.
Funding
The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author has no relevant interests to declare.
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Vasu Tewari
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: A Sketched Proof of Theorem 1.1
Appendix: A Sketched Proof of Theorem 1.1
This proof is given by an anonymous referee of a previous version of this paper. The proof uses the following fact.
Lemma 6.1
[5, Corollary 2] Suppose (W, S) is an infinite non-affine irreducible Coxeter group of finite rank. Then there exists a subgroup \(Y^\prime \subseteq W\) of finite index and a surjective homomorphism \(\varphi ^\prime : Y^\prime \twoheadrightarrow F^\prime \), where \(F^\prime \) is a non-abelian free group.
Now we can prove Theorem 1.1, and we only need to prove the “only if” part.
Suppose (W, S) is infinite and non-affine. Let \(Y^\prime \), \(\varphi ^\prime \), \(F^\prime \) be as in Lemma 6.1. Let Y be the intersection of all conjugates of \(Y^\prime \) in W. Then Y is a normal subgroup of W of finite index. Since Y is of finite index in \(Y^\prime \), the image \(\varphi ^\prime (Y)\) is a subgroup of \(F^\prime \) of finite index. Therefore, \(\varphi ^\prime (Y)\) is also a non-abelian free group (see, for example, [6, Theorem 85.1]). Let \(X_1, X_2\) be two free generators of \(\varphi ^\prime (Y)\), and let \(F = \langle X_1, X_2 \rangle \). Then F is a free group of rank two, and we have a surjection \(\varphi ^\prime (Y) \twoheadrightarrow F\). By composing this surjection with the map \(\varphi ^\prime |_Y\), we obtain a surjective homomorphism \(\varphi : Y \twoheadrightarrow F\).
Let V be an infinite-dimensional irreducible representation of F (for example, \(V := \bigoplus _{n \in \mathbb {Z}} \mathbb {C} \alpha _{n}\), and let \(X_1 \cdot \alpha _n = \alpha _{n+1}\), \(X_2 \cdot \alpha _n = 2^n \alpha _{n+1}\), as in the proof of Theorem 3.2). By pulling back this F-representation along \(\varphi \), V becomes an irreducible representation of Y.
We consider the induced representation \(V_Y^W: = \mathbb {C}[W] \otimes _{\mathbb {C}[Y]} V\) of W, and we choose \(w_1, \dots , w_n\) as coset representatives for Y in W. Then \(V_Y^W = \bigoplus _{1 \le i \le n} w_i \otimes V\) as a vector space. Since Y is a normal subgroup of W, each summand \(w_i \otimes V\) is an irreducible representation of Y. Thus, \(V_Y^W\) is a semisimple Noetherian and Artinian \(\mathbb {C}[Y]\)-module, and hence a Noetherian and Artinian \(\mathbb {C}[W]\)-module. Consequently, there exists an irreducible W-representation \(M \subseteq V_Y^W\) as a subrepresentation.
If we view M as a \(\mathbb {C}[Y]\)-module, then, by semi-simplicity of the \(\mathbb {C}[Y]\)-module \(V_Y^W\) and Schur’s lemma, M is isomorphic to a direct sum of some \(\mathbb {C}[Y]\)-modules \(w_i \otimes V\). In particular, M is infinite dimensional. Theorem 1.1 is proved.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, H. Some Infinite-Dimensional Representations of Certain Coxeter Groups. Ann. Comb. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-024-00690-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-024-00690-6
Keywords
- Infinite-dimensional irreducible representations
- Coxeter groups
- Fundamental groups of graphs
- Universal coverings of graphs