Abstract
Geoelectric models, such as self-potential (SP) resistivity models, are sometimes variable, i.e., subsurface geophysical properties such as resistivity distributions and causative sources vary in time and space. How to conduct numerical modeling of such dynamic models efficiently is a difficult problem. Conventional numerical algorithms simply repeat and accumulate the static single simulation at different moments so that the total calculation time is proportional to the number of single calculations required by the dynamic process. However, only a small part of the properties in dynamic models changes over time and space, and the numerical calculation process has some repeated elements among different single simulations. Herein, the concepts of frames and dynamic and static blocks in video technology were introduced into a conventional numerical algorithm to construct a dynamic scheme for 3-D time-series (4-D) models. Specifically, a 3-D finite–infinite element coupling method integrating irregular hexahedral finite elements and unidirectional mapping of infinite elements was proposed in conjunction with a dynamic update strategy to realize the numerical modeling of dynamic resistivity models. Two tests demonstrated the correctness and effectiveness of the algorithm, and two dynamic SP resistivity models concerning contaminant plume diffusion and solute transport processes were simulated to verify the effect of the dynamic algorithm. The results suggest that the proposed algorithm is effective for dynamic SP resistivity models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akram, M., & Izquierdo, E. (2013). Fast motion estimation for surveillance video compression. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 7, 1103–1112.
Arora, T., Linde, N., Revil, A., & Castermant, J. (2007). Non-intrusive characterization of the redox potential of landfill leachate plumes from self-potential data. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 92, 274–292.
Astley, R. J., Macaulay, G. J., & Coyette, J. P. (1994). Mapped wave envelope elements for acoustical radiation and scattering. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 170(1), 97–118.
Astley, R. J., Macaulay, G. J., Coyette, J. P., et al. (1998). Three-dimensional wave-envelope elements of variable order for acoustic radiation and scattering, Part I, Formulation in the frequency domain. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(1), 49–63.
Barros, R. S., Olabarriaga, S. D., Borst, J., et al. (2016). Dynamic CT perfusion image data compression for efficient parallel processing. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 54, 463–473.
Beer, G., & Meek, J. L. (1981). Infinite domain element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 17, 43–52.
Bettess, P. (1977). Infinite element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 11, 53–64.
Bettess, P., & Zienkiewicz, O. C. (1977). Diffraction and refraction of surface waves using finite and infinite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 13(11), 1271–1290.
Bouwmans, T., Javed, S., Sultana, M., & Jung, S. K. (2019). Deep neural network concepts for background subtraction: A systematic review and comparative evaluation. Neural Networks, 117, 8–66.
Burnett, D. S. (1994). A three-dimensional acoustic infinite element based on a prolate spheroidal multipole expansion. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(5), 2798–2816.
Christensen, T. H., Bjerg, P. L., Banwart, S. A., Jakobsen, R., Heron, G., & Albrechtsen, H.-J. (2000). Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater contaminant plumes. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45, 165–241.
Cui, Y., Liu, L., & Zhu, X. (2017). Unscented Kalman filter assimilation of time-lapse self-potential data for monitoring solute transport. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 14, 920–929.
Gao, J., Smirnov, M., Smirnova, M., & Egbert, G. (2020). 3-D DC resistivity forward modeling using the multi-resolution grid. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 177, 2803–2819.
Li, Y., & Spitzer, K. (2002). Three-dimensional DC resistivity forward modelling using finite elements in comparison with finite-difference solutions. Geophysical Journal International, 151, 924–934.
Lipton, A. J., Fujiyoshi, H., & Patil, R. (1998). Moving target classification and tracking from real-time video. In IEEE workshop on applications of computer vision (pp. 8–14).
Liu, G. R., & Quek, S. S. (2014). The finite element method. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford: Elsevier.
Marques, J. M. M. C., & Owen, D. R. J. (1984). Infinite elements in quasi-static materially nonlinear problems. Computers & Structures, 18(4), 739–751.
Matsuyama, T., Ohya, T., & Habe, H. (2000). Background subtraction for non-stationary scene. In: Proceedings of Asian conference on computer vision, Taipei (pp. 622–667).
Mendonça, C. A. (2008). Forward and inverse self-potential modeling in mineral exploration. Geophysics, 73(1), F33–F43.
Naudet, V., Revil, A., Rizzo, E., Bottero, J. Y., & Bégassat, P. (2004). Groundwater redox conditions and conductivity in a contaminant plume from geoelectrical investigations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 8(1), 8–22.
Ren, Z., Tang, J., Kalscheuer, T., & Maurer, H. (2017). Fast 3-D large-scale gravity and magnetic modeling using unstructured grids and an adaptive multilevel fast multipole method. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth, 122(1), 79–109.
Revil, A., & Jardani, A. (2013). The self-potential method: Theory and applications in environmental geosciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Revil, A., Mendonça, C. A., Atekwana, E. A., Kulessa, B., Hubbard, S. S., & Bohlen, K. J. (2010). Understanding biogeobatteries: Where geophysics meets microbiology. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, G00G02.
Rücker, C., Günther, T., & Spitzer, K. (2006). Three-dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography—I. Modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), 495–505.
Sanchez, V., Nasiopoulos, P., & Abugharbieh, R. (2008). Efficient 4D motion compensated lossless compression of dynamic volumetric medical image data. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (pp. 549–552).
Sezer, O. G., Harmanci, O., & Guleryuz, O. G. (2008). Sparse orthonormal transforms for image compression. In 15th IEEE international conference on image processing, San Diego, CA (pp. 149–152).
Sheffer, M. R. (2007). Forward modelling and inversion of streaming potential for the interpretation of hydraulic conditions from self-potential data. Ph.D. thesis, the University of British Columbia.
Sheikh, Y., Javed, O., & Kanade, T. (2009). Background Subtraction for Freely Moving Cameras. In 2009 IEEE 12th international conference on computer vision, Kyoto (pp. 1219–1225).
Tang, J., & Gong, J. (2010). 3D DC resistivity forward modeling by finite-infinite element coupling method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 53(3), 717–728.
Ungless, R. F. (1973). An infinite element. Master thesis, University of British Columbia.
Vetro, A., Haga, T., Sumi, K., & Sun, H. (2003). Object-based coding for long-term archive of surveillance video. In 2003 International conference on multimedia and expo. ICME ’03. Proceedings (Cat. No. 03TH8698), Baltimore, MD, USA (pp. II–417).
Wang, L., Hu, W., & Tan, T. (2002). A survey of visual analysis of human motion. Chinese Journal of Computers, 25(3), 225–237.
Wang, L., Li, Z., Li, D., & Wu, T. (2012). An improved video object segmentation algorithm based on background reconstruction. In 2012 International conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, Sanya (pp. 523–526).
Xie, J., Cui, Y., Fanidi, M., Zhang, L., Guo, Y., Luo, Y., & Liu, J. (2021a). Numerical modeling of marine self-potential from seafloor hydrothermal ore deposit. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 178, 1731–1744.
Xie, J., Cui, Y., Zhang, J., Guo, Y., Wang, J., Fanidi, M., & Liu, J. (2021b). Numerical modeling of biogeobattery system from microbial degradation of underground organic contaminant. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 208.
Xie, J., Cui, Y., Zhang, L., Ma, C., Yang, B., Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2020). 3D forward modeling of seepage self-potential using finite-infinite element coupling method. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 25(3), 381–390.
Yu, Y., & Doermann, D. (2005). Model of object-based coding for surveillance video. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2, 693–696.
Yuan, Y., Qiang, J., Tang, J., Ren, Z., & Xiao, X. (2016). 2.5D direct-current resistivity forward modeling and inversion by finite-element-infinite-element coupled method. Geophysical Prospecting, 64(3), 767–779.
Zhao, S., & Lin, H. (2014). Design and implement of dynamic block-divided interlaced scanning algorithm. Journal of Chengdu University of Information Technology, 29(6), 630–634.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., Emson, C., & Bettess, P. (1983). A novel boundary infinite element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 19, 393–404.
Zuo, Q., & Wu, J. (2008). A screen sharing scheme based on block collection and data compression. Computer Technology and Development, 18(4), 206–209.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 42174170, 41874145, 72088101).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, J., Du, X., Cui, Ya. et al. Numerical Modeling for 4-D Self-Potential Resistivity Model. Pure Appl. Geophys. 180, 205–213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03208-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03208-4